Identifying unmet needs in SSc-ILD by semi-qualitative in-depth interviews

Healthcare utilization in general practice and hospitals preceding a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis: a nationwide registry study

OBJECTIVES

Irreversible tissue damage is frequently present at the time of diagnosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc), which calls for earlier diagnosis. This study estimated healthcare utilization three years before the diagnosis of SSc.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from Danish national registries. Incident patients diagnosed with SSc between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2018 were matched by age and gender with 10 references without SSc. The date of diagnosis was the index date. We estimated quarterly rates and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of healthcare utilization in the three years preceding the diagnosis for patients with SSc and their references.

RESULTS

A total of 1650 SSc patients (1255 women and 395 men) and 16 500 non-SSc references were included. The mean age was 58 years (interquartile range 48-68). Three years before diagnosis, patients with SSc had more contacts with general practice (IRRwomen = 1.43 [95% CI: 1.33; 1.53], IRRmen = 1.47 [95% CI: 1.26; 1.71]) and hospitals (IRRwomen = 1.86 [95% CI: 1.62; 2.14], IRRmen = 2.70 [95% CI: 2.04; 3.58]) compared with their references. In the last three months before diagnosis, patients with SSc had significantly more contacts with general practice (IRRwomen = 2.30 [95% CI: 2.16; 2.44], IRRmen = 2.98 [95% CI: 2.64; 3.35]) and hospitals (IRRwomen = 5.62 [95% CI: 5.08; 6.20], IRRmen = 9.53 [95% CI: 7.81; 11.63]).

CONCLUSION

The higher use of healthcare services in general practice and hospitals in the three years before diagnosis suggests an opportunity to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment of SSc.

Patient perspectives on educational needs in scleroderma-interstitial lung disease

Background

Systemic sclerosis is a chronic and rare connective tissue disease with multiorgan effects, including interstitial lung disease (ILD). Navigating systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease presents a challenge for patients due to the gaps in patient education, which can impact patient health and quality of life. This study utilized the nominal group technique to identify priority knowledge gaps among patients with systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease and inform future educational interventions and research.

Methods

We conducted four structured group sessions using the nominal group technique. Patients with systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease were presented with two questions that aimed to identify knowledge gaps. Following participant ranking, investigators performed a thematic analysis of the patients' responses to categorize the generated knowledge gaps.

Results

Twenty-one patients were interviewed and ranked the top three themes for the first question (What questions about your scleroderma-lung disease that you have keep you awake at night?), based on total points, as: (1) Understanding progression, its impacts on the body, and managing health changes (39.7%); (2) anticipating future symptoms and implementing strategies for management and coping (19.8%); and (3) employing and understanding non-pharmacological interventions and self-management strategies (17.5%). The top three themes for the second question (What information do you want about your scleroderma-lung disease that you cannot find?) ranked by total points were: (1) understanding progression, its impacts on the body, and managing health changes (41.3%); (2) navigating health system barriers (16.7%); and (3) research efforts toward treating scleroderma (10.3%).

Conclusions

Our study underscores the importance of understanding the educational needs of patients with systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease. Patient responses emphasize the need to comprehensively address concerns about disease management, coping with impacts on social life, and navigating the healthcare system. By addressing these multifaceted concerns, we can design and implement patient-centered education to empower patients through increased support.

Approach to interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis-A survey to pulmonologists and rheumatologists in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding screening, rescreening, diagnosis, and follow-up practices in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) in Colombia.

METHODS

A structured survey focused on clinical practices in patients with SSc-ILD was conducted. Members of the Asociación Colombiana de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax (Asoneumocito) and the Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología (Asoreuma) were invited to participate from March 2023 to May 2023.

RESULTS

We surveyed 51 pulmonologists and 44 rheumatologists. Overall, 51.6% reported having access to multidisciplinary team discussion in ILD. Among the 95 participants, 78.9% would routinely perform a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest once a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis was established. This practice is more frequent among rheumatologists (84.1%) than among pulmonologists (74.5%). Approximately half of the participants would rescreen patients annually with computed tomography scan (56.8%) if baseline images were negative. Spirometry (81.1%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (80.0%), and 6-min walk test (55.8%) were the most frequently performed tests upon diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. During follow-up, participants would consider repeating pulmonary function tests mostly every 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening of SSc-ILD is high among pulmonologists and rheumatologists. Decision-making on diagnosis and follow-up is similar between specialties, but there are variations in their frequency and indications. Further research is needed to evaluate how to adapt recommendations for assessing SSc-ILD in different settings.

Patient and caregiver shared experiences of pulmonary fibrosis (PF): A systematic literature review

Pulmonary Fibrosis (PF) describes a group of lung diseases characterised by progressive scarring (fibrosis). Symptoms worsen over time and include breathlessness, tiredness, and cough, giving rise to psychological distress. Significant morbidity accompanies PF, so ensuring patients' care needs are well defined and provided for, represents an important treatment strategy. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, illness experience and needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis and their informal caregivers. Eight databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane database of Systematic reviews (CDSR), Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and CINAHL) were used to identify studies exploring the supportive needs of adults with PF and/or their caregivers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. 53 studies were included, the majority using qualitative methodology (79 %, 42/53), 6 as part of mixed methodological studies. Supportive care needs were mapped to eight domains using an a priori framework analysis. Findings highlight a lack of psychological support throughout the course of the illness, misconceptions about and barriers to, the provision of palliative care despite its potential positive impacts. Patients and caregivers express a desire for greater disease specific education and information provision throughout the illness. Trials of complex interventions are needed to address the unique set of challenges for patients and carers living with PF.

Development of a Patient Journey Map for Improving Patient Experience and Quality of Atopic Dermatitis Care

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects both children and adults. AD increases the risk of developing comorbidities like asthma, allergic rhinitis and food allergies. AD patients face difficulties, including itching, lack of effective treatments, lack of funding and discomfort in seeking a diagnosis or treatment. This study aims to identify the main barriers and opportunities to improve the experience of patients with AD and provide high-quality care.

METHODS

Patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals were recruited from the Dermatology Department at Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Interviews with patients, caregivers and professionals were performed. Participants used storyboards to depict their preferred scenarios for improving healthcare interactions and create a Patient Journey Map.

RESULTS

A total of 15 participants were included in the study. Early symptoms of AD were commonly described as undefined stages. As symptoms worsened, patients and caregivers expressed uncertainty and frustration. Patients became concerned about AD after their first serious flare and started experiencing intense itching, eczema, wounds, shedding or asthma. Topical corticosteroids were used to manage flares, but their effectiveness diminished over time, causing further frustration. Because of the ineffectiveness of their initial treatments, dermatologists observed that patients tended to downplay symptoms and how they affected their quality of life. The specialized treatment of severe AD significantly changed patients' emotional states. Despite AD's chronic nature, patients strived to enjoy remission periods and cope with flares. Psychological and emotional support was crucial for patients and caregivers, a need addressed by the Patients' School initiative at HUPHM hospital.

CONCLUSION

The severity of AD has a profound impact on patients' lives. Patient and caregiver emotional and social needs can be met by adequate communication, access to effective treatments and comprehensive psychological support.

Variation in information needs of patients with interstitial lung disease and their family caregivers according to long-term oxygen therapy: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The information needs of patients and their families regarding interstitial lung disease (ILD) have yet to be studied in detail, and few reports have examined the differences in information needs according to patient status. This study aimed to determine whether there are differences in information needs between outpatients with ILD and their family caregivers and whether these differences depend on long-term oxygen therapy use.

METHODS

Patients with fibrotic ILDs and their families who visited Kyoto University Hospital between February 2020 and March 2022 were recruited for this descriptive study. Fibrotic ILDs included idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) than IPF, connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia. Data were obtained from electronic patient records and questionnaires. Descriptive data analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients and their family caregivers were analyzed. Twenty-seven (41.5%) patients had IIPs (IPF 9 and other IIPs 18), 34 (52.3%) had CTD-ILD, and 4 (6.2%) had fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia. The most common relationship between the patient and their family was a spouse (67.7%), with 80% living together. The primary information needs among patients and their family caregivers were common up to the third rank but differed from the rest. Patients were interested in "when and where to contact health care providers" and "end-of-life care and advanced directives," while family caregivers were interested in "diet and nutrition" and "care and support at home." Patients with long-term oxygen therapy had higher needs for "end-of-life care and advanced directives" and "how to manage breathlessness, cough, and fatigue," while the needs for "drugs for ILD" and "acute exacerbation of ILD" were relatively low. Family caregivers were interested in "diet and nutrition" in the long-term oxygen therapy group and "acute exacerbation of ILD" in the no long-term oxygen therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that the information needs of patients and their family caregivers were not the same and that the aspect of information needs differed by long-term oxygen therapy status. Healthcare providers should consider the position of the recipient of information, the appropriate time based on the patient's condition, and the necessary information.

Burden of Disease and Productivity Loss in the European Economic Area in Patients Affected by Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease

INTRODUCTION

Progression of fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been associated with poor prognosis, lower quality of life for patients and caregivers, and higher healthcare costs. This study estimated the burden of disease and productivity loss of progressively fibrosing ILD, focusing on progressive pulmonary fibrosis other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF PPF) and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) in the European Economic Area (EEA).

METHODS

An economic model was built to estimate the clinical burden of SSc-ILD and non-IPF PPF. The model was based on published data on disease prevalence and disease burden (in terms of comorbidities, exacerbations, and deaths) as well as on productivity loss (in terms of sick days, early retirement, permanent disability, and job loss). Aggregate income loss was obtained by multiplying productivity loss by the median daily income in each country/area of investigation. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the impact of the variability of the model assumptions.

RESULTS

In the whole EEA, a total of 86,794 and 13,221 individuals were estimated to be affected by non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. Estimated annual sick days associated with the diseases were 3,952,604 and 672,172, early retirements were 23,174 and 5341, permanently disabled patients were 41,748 and 4037, and job losses were 19,789 and 2617 for non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. Annual exacerbations were estimated to be 22,401-31,181 and 1259-1753, while deaths were 5791-6171 and 572-638 in non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. The estimated annual aggregate income loss in EEA, accounting for losses due to annual sick days, early retirements, and permanently disabled patients, was €1433 million and €220 million in non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. The productivity loss due to job losses was €194 million and €26 million in non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD, respectively. The main driver of aggregate income loss variability was the prevalence.

CONCLUSION

The impact of non-IPF PPF and SSc-ILD on society is definitely non-negligible. Actions to reduce the burden on our societies are highly needed.

The diagnostic trajectories of Danish patients with autoimmune rheumatologic disease associated interstitial lung disease: an interview-based study

Background

Autoimmune rheumatologic disease associated interstitial lung diseases (ARD-ILD) are rare conditions and the association between ARDs and respiratory symptoms often goes unrecognised by ARD patients and general practitioners (GPs). The diagnostic trajectory from the first respiratory symptoms to an ARD-ILD diagnosis is often delayed and may increase the burden of symptoms and allow further disease progression.The aim of this study was to 1) characterise the diagnostic trajectories of ARD-ILD patients and to 2) identify barriers for obtaining a timely ILD diagnosis based on the experiences and perceptions of both patients and healthcare professionals.

Method

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with Danish ARD-ILD patients, rheumatologists, pulmonologists and ILD nurses.

Results

Sixteen patients, six rheumatologists, three ILD nurses and three pulmonologists participated. Five characteristics of diagnostic trajectories were identified in the patient interviews: 1) early referral to lung specialists; 2) early delay; 3) delay or shortcut depending on specific circumstances; 4) parallel diagnostic trajectories connected late in the process; 5) early identification of lung involvement without proper interpretation. With the exception of early referral to lung specialists, all of the diagnostic trajectory characteristics identified led to delayed diagnosis. Delayed diagnostic trajectories resulted in patients experiencing increased uncertainty. Inconsistent disease terminology, insufficient knowledge and lack of awareness of ARD-ILD among central healthcare professionals and delayed referral to ILD specialists were main contributors to the diagnostic delay identified by the informants.

Conclusion

Five characteristics of the diagnostic trajectories were identified, four of which led to diagnostic delay of ARD-ILD. Improved diagnostic trajectories can shorten the diagnostic trajectory and increase early access to appropriate specialist medical care. Improved awareness and expertise in ARD-ILD across different medical specialties, especially among GPs, may contribute to more efficient and timely diagnostic trajectories and improved patient experiences.

Reporting and conducting patient journey mapping research in healthcare: A scoping review

AIM

To identify how patient journey mapping is being undertaken and reported.

DESIGN

A scoping review of the literature was undertaken using JBI guidance.

DATA SOURCES

Databases were searched in July 2021 (16th-21st), including Ovid's Medline, Embase, Emcare and PsycINFO; Scopus; Web of Science Core Collection, the Directory of Open Access Journals; Informit and; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

REVIEW METHODS

Eligible articles included peer-reviewed literature documenting journey mapping methodologies and studies conducted in healthcare services. Reviewers used Covidence to screen titles and abstracts of located sources, and to screen full-text articles. A table was used to extract data and synthesize results.

RESULTS

Eighty-one articles were included. An acceleration of patient journey mapping research was observed, with 76.5% (n = 62) of articles published since 2015. Diverse mapping approaches were identified. Reporting of studies was inconsistent and largely non-adherent with relevant, established reporting guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Patient journey mapping is a relatively novel approach for understanding patient experiences and is increasingly being adopted. There is variation in process details reported. Considerations for improving reporting standards are provided.

IMPACT

Patient journey mapping is a rapidly growing approach for better understanding how people enter, experience and exit health services. This type of methodology has significant potential to inform new, patient centred models of care and facilitate clinicians, patients and health professionals to better understand gaps and strategies in health services. The synthesised results of this review alert researchers to options available for journey mapping research and provide preliminary guidance for elevating reporting quality.

Understanding the challenges, unmet needs, and expectations of mucopolysaccharidoses I, II and VI patients and their caregivers in France: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of inherited lysosomal storage diseases caused by defective enzyme activity involved in the catalysis of glycosaminoglycans. Published data on adult patients with MPS remains scarce. Therefore, the present qualitative survey study was aimed at understanding knowledge of the disease, unmet needs, expectations, care, and overall medical management of adult/adolescent patients with MPS I, II and VI and their caregivers in France.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients (MPS I, n_p = 11; MPS II, n_p = 9; MPS VI, n_p = 5) were included and about 36 in-depth interviews (caregivers alone, n_c = 8; patients-caregiver pair, n_c+p = 22; patients alone, n_p = 6) were conducted. Except one (aged 17 years), all patients were adults (median age: 29 years [17-50]) and diagnosed at median age of 4 years [0.4-30], with mainly mothers as caregivers (n_c = 16/19). Patients were classified into three groups: Group A, Patients not able to answer the survey question because of a severe cognitive impairment (n_p = 8); Group B, Patients able to answer the survey question with low or no cognitive impairment and high motor disability (n_p = 10); and Group C, Patients able to answer the survey question with low or no cognitive impairment and low motor disability (n_p = 7). All groups were assessed for impact of disease on their daily lives based on a scale of 0-10. Caregivers in Group A were found to be most negatively affected by the disease, except for professional activity, which was most significantly impacted in Group B (4.7 vs. 5.4). The use of orthopaedic/medical equipments, was more prevalent in Groups A and B, versus Group C. Pain management was one of the global unmet need expressed by all groups. Group A caregivers expected better support from childcare facilities, disability clinics, and smooth transition from paediatric care to adult medicine. Similarly, Group B caregivers expected better specialised schools, whereas Group C caregivers expected better psychological support and greater flexibility in weekly infusion schedules for their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey concluded that more attention must be paid to the psychosocial status of patients and caregivers. The preference for reference centre for follow-up and treatment, hospitalizations and surgeries were evident. The most significant needs expressed by the patients and caregivers include better understanding of the disease, pain management, monitoring of complications, flexibility in enzyme replacement therapy, home infusions especially for attenuated patients, and improved transitional support from paediatric to adult medicine.

Patient preferences for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a discrete choice experiment

OBJECTIVES

Treatments for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) differ in attributes, i.e. mode of administration, adverse events (AEs) and efficacy. As physicians and patients may perceive treatments differently, shared decision-making can be essential for optimal treatment provision. We therefore aimed to quantify patient preferences for different treatment attributes.

METHODS

Seven SSc-ILD attributes were identified from mixed-methods research and clinician input: mode of administration, shortness of breath, skin tightness, cough, tiredness, risk of gastrointestinal AEs (GI-AEs) and risk of serious and non-serious infections. Patients with SSc-ILD completed an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) in which they were asked to repeatedly choose between two alternatives characterized by varying severity levels of the included attributes. The data were analysed using a multinomial logit model; relative attribute importance and maximum acceptable risk measures were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 231 patients with SSc-ILD completed the DCE. Patients preferred twice-daily oral treatments and 6-12 monthly infusions. Patients' choices were mostly influenced by the risk of GI-AEs or infections. Improvement was more important in respiratory symptoms than in skin tightness. Concerning trade-offs, patients accepted different levels of increase in GI-AE risk: +21% if it reduced the infusions' frequency; +15% if changing to an oral treatment; up to +37% if it improved breathlessness; and up to +36% if it reduced the risk of infections.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to quantitatively elicit patients' preferences for treatment attributes in SSc-ILD. Patients showed willingness to make trade-offs, providing a firm basis for shared decision-making in clinical practice.

Multidisciplinary teams in the clinical care of fibrotic interstitial lung disease: current perspectives

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, involving the integrated collaboration of healthcare professionals, are increasingly used in clinical practice to inform the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Over time, the assessment of patients with ILD has transitioned from discussions among clinicians, radiologists and pathologists to the inclusion of a broader range of clinical data and specialist expertise. Studies have shown that a multidisciplinary approach can have many benefits for the clinical care of patients with ILD by improving the diagnostic confidence for different ILDs and guiding treatment decisions. The utility of MDT discussions for diagnosis, monitoring disease progression and management decisions, will need to be considered based on how it is best positioned in the diagnostic and therapeutic process, as well as the practicality and challenges of its use. There are also uncertainties and heterogeneity concerning the optimal practices of MDT meetings in ILD care. In this review, we describe recent developments refining the approach to MDTs in clinical practice, including who should be involved in the MDTs, when it is most needed, their use in patient management, challenges in their implementation, and ongoing controversies in the field that need further research.

Epidemiology of interstitial lung diseases and their progressive-fibrosing behaviour in six European countries

The PERSEIDS study aimed to estimate incidence/prevalence of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD), other non-IPF F-ILDs and their progressive-fibrosing (PF) forms in six European countries, as current data are scarce. This retrospective, two-phase study used aggregate data (2014-2018). In Phase 1, incident/prevalent cases of ILDs above were identified from clinical databases through an algorithm based on codes/keywords, and incidence/prevalence was estimated. For non-IPF F-ILDs, the relative percentage of subtypes was also determined. In Phase 2, a subset of non-IPF F-ILD cases was manually reviewed to determine the percentage of PF behaviour and usual interstitial pneumonia-like (UIP-like) pattern. A weighted mean percentage of progression was calculated for each country and used to extrapolate incidence/prevalence of progressive-fibrosing ILDs (PF-ILDs). In 2018, incidence/105 person-years ranged between 9.4 and 83.6 (ILDs), 7.7 and 76.2 (F-ILDs), 0.4 and 10.3 (IPF), 6.6 and 71.7 (non-IPF F-ILDs), and 0.3 and 1.5 (SSc-ILD); and prevalence/105 persons ranged between 33.6 and 247.4 (ILDs), 26.7 and 236.8 (F-ILDs), 2.8 and 31.0 (IPF), 22.3 and 205.8 (non-IPF F-ILDs), and 1.4 and 10.1 (SSc-ILD). Among non-IPF F-ILDs, sarcoidosis was the most frequent subtype. PF behaviour and UIP-like pattern were present in a third of non-IPF F-ILD cases each and hypersensitivity pneumonitis showed the highest percentage of progressive behaviour. Incidence of PF-ILDs ranged between 2.1 and 14.5/105 person-years, and prevalence between 6.9 and 78.0/105 persons. To our knowledge, PERSEIDS is the first study assessing incidence, prevalence and rate of progression of ILDs across several European countries. Still below the threshold for orphan diseases, the estimates obtained were higher and more variable than reported in previous studies, but differences in study design/population must be considered.