Persistent thrombocytopenia predicts poor long-term survival in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a 38-year follow-up study

Thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients: Descriptive analysis of the AntiPhospholipid syndrome alliance for clinical trials and InternatiOnal networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository ("Registry")

Background/PurposeAPS ACTION Registry was created to study the natural course of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) over 10 years in persistently antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positive patients with or without systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Our primary objective was to compare the characteristics of aPL-positive patients with or without thrombocytopenia (TP) and/or autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA).MethodsThe registry inclusion criteria are positive aPL based on the Revised Sapporo APS Classification Criteria, tested at least twice within 1 year prior to enrollment. For the primary comparison of demographic, clinical, and serologic characteristics in this retrospective study, we divided patients into two groups: TP/AIHA ever and never. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of <100,000 x 109/L tested twice at least 12 weeks apart, and AIHA was defined as anemia with hemolysis and a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT). For the secondary analysis, we compared patients with TP versus AIHA, and the immunosuppressive use stratified by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification.ResultsAs of April 2022, of 1,039 patients (primary aPL/APS: 618 [59%]; SLE classification: 334 [31%]) included in the registry, 228 (22%) had baseline (historical or current) TP and/or AIHA (TP only: 176 [17%]; AIHA only: 35 [3%], and both: 17 [2%]). Thrombocytopenia and/or AIHA was significantly associated with Asian race, SLE classification, cardiac valve disease, catastrophic/microvascular APS, triple aPL (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibody) positivity, and SLE-related serologic and inflammatory markers. When 101/618 (16%) primary aPL/APS patients and 101/334 (34%) SLE patients with TP and/or AIHA were compared, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil were more commonly reported in lupus patients, however corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab use were similar between groups.ConclusionIn our large multi-center international cohort of persistently aPL-positive patients, approximately one-fifth had active or historical TP and/or AIHA at registry entry; half of these patients had additional SLE. Cardiac valve disease, catastrophic/microvascular APS, and triple aPL-positivity were aPL-related clinical and laboratory manifestations associated with TP and/or AIHA, suggesting a more severe APS clinical phenotype in aPL-patients with TP and/or AIHA.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Comprehensive Clinical Review

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in combination with recurrent thrombosis in the veins and/or arteries, obstetric morbidity, and various non-thrombotic associated complications. APS can be primary, as an isolated condition, or secondary in the context of another autoimmune disease, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. This comprehensive clinical review aims to summarize the current understanding of APS pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for this unique clinical entity. Methods: A comprehensive review of the existing literature on APS was conducted, focusing on pathophysiological mechanisms, current diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic approaches. Results: APS pathogenesis involves complex interactions between aPL, phospholipid-binding proteins, and the coagulation cascade. Apart from the cardinal features of thrombosis and APS-related obstetric morbidity, APS is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Diagnosis remains challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions, and clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in order to set the diagnosis. The recently published 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria although not definitive for clinical decision-making, these criteria offer clinicians a valuable tool to aid in determining whether further investigation for APS is warranted. Continued refinement of these criteria through ongoing feedback and updates is anticipated. Treatment strategies center on anticoagulation, but individualized approaches are necessary. Conclusions: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of APS are critical to reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Moreover, familiarization with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria is encouraged, recognizing that ongoing feedback and updates will contribute to their ongoing refinement and improvement. While VKAs remain the mainstay of treatment for most APS patients further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and deepen our understanding of APS's underlying disease mechanisms.

Platelets and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombosis and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL): lupus anticoagulant and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies. APS carries significant morbidity for a relatively young patient population from recurrent thrombosis in any vascular bed (arterial, venous, or microvascular), often despite current standard of care, which is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Platelets have established roles in thrombosis at any site, and platelet hyperreactivity is clearly demonstrated in the pathophysiology of APS. Together with excess thrombin generation, platelet activation and aggregation are the common end result of all the pathophysiological pathways leading to thrombosis in APS. However, antiplatelet therapies play little role in APS, reserved as a possible option of low dose aspirin in addition to VKA in arterial or refractory thrombosis. This review outlines the current evidence and mechanisms for excessive platelet activation in APS, how it plays a central role in APS-related thrombosis, what evidence for antiplatelets is available in clinical outcomes studies, and potential future avenues to define how to target platelet hyperreactivity better with minimal impact on haemostasis.

Thrombocytopenia in antiphospholipid syndrome: Is anticoagulation and/or antiaggregation always required?

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune and prothrombotic condition defined by the association of thrombotic events and/or obstetrical complications and the persistence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) over time. Among the new criteria recently included in the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS, thrombocytopenia is one of the most frequent. The occurrence of thrombocytopenia in aPL/APS patients is important to consider because it could predict APS-related clinical events with a 3-fold increased risk for thrombotic events or obstetrical morbidity or all-cause deaths. A debate on the need or not of anticoagulation and/or antiaggregation in APS patients and aPL carriers with thrombocytopenia took place on the 7th edition of the International Congress on Controversies in Rheumatology and Autoimmunity (CORA), that was organized in Turin, Italy, on March 18th, 2023, and this review summarizes the main arguments that were discussed in this session.

The mTOR pathway in the antiphospholipid syndrome

This perspective discussed the available evidence on the involvement of mTOR pathway in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), from the aspects of endothelial cells, platelets, monocytes and anti-phospholipid antibodies (PLs), which may lead to future therapeutic applications of mTOR inhibition in APS.

Thrombocytopenia in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: association with prognosis and clinical implications

OBJECTIVES

Thrombocytopenia, a frequent clinical manifestation in patients with APS, could be an independent predictor of recurrent thrombotic, obstetric and severe extracriteria events.

METHODS

This single-centre prospective study enrolled 218 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary APS between 2010 and 2021. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count less than 100 × 109/L.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 74 (33.94%) patients with thrombocytopenia and 144 patients with a continuous normal platelet count. Comparison of baseline characteristics indicated that patients with thrombocytopenia had more visceral venous thromboses [10 (13.51%) vs 5(3.47%); P = 0.009] and extracriteria manifestations [mainly haemolytic anaemia; 20 (27.03%) vs 17 (11.81%); P = 0.007]. Hypocomplementemia was more likely among patients with thrombocytopenia [19 (25.68%) vs 16 (11.11%); P = 0.01]. The presence of aCL-IgG/IgM, anti-β2-glycoprotein I and lupus anticoagulant were more frequently detected in patients with thrombocytopenia. In survival analysis, thrombotic, obstetric and severe extracriteria survival rates were significantly worse in patients with thrombocytopenia. In multivariate Cox regression, thrombocytopenia was an independent risk factor for all endpoint events, including thrombotic events [hazard ratio (HR) 2.93 (95% CI 1.31, 6.56), P = 0.009], pregnancy morbidity [HR 8.00 (95% CI 2.43, 26.37), P = 0.0006] and severe extracriteria events [HR 15.27 (95% CI 1.85, 125.98), P = 0.01].

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia could identify primary APS patients at high risk of developing thrombotic events, pregnancy morbidity and severe extracriteria events.

Targeting thromboinflammation in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease, where persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) leads to thrombotic and obstetric complications. APS is a paradigmatic thromboinflammatory disease. Thromboinflammation is a pathophysiological mechanism coupling inflammation and thrombosis, which contributes to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. APS can serve as a model to unravel mechanisms of thromboinflammation and the relationship between innate immune cells and thrombosis. Monocytes are activated by aPL into a proinflammatory and procoagulant phenotype, producing proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 6, as well as tissue factor. Important cellular signaling pathways involved are the NF-κB-pathway, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, and the NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 inflammasome. All of these may serve as future therapeutic targets. Neutrophils produce neutrophil extracellular traps in response to aPL, and this leads to thrombosis. Thrombosis in APS also stems from increased interaction of neutrophils with endothelial cells through P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1. NETosis can be targeted not only with several experimental therapeutics, such as DNase, but also through the redirection of current therapies such as defibrotide and the antiplatelet agent dipyridamole. Activation of platelets by aPL leads to a procoagulant phenotype. Platelet-leukocyte interactions are increased, possibly mediated by increased levels of soluble P-selectin and soluble CD40-ligand. Platelet-directed future treatment options involve the inhibition of several platelet receptors activated by aPL, as well as mTOR inhibition. This review discusses mechanisms underlying thromboinflammation in APS that present targetable therapeutic options, some of which may be generalizable to other thromboinflammatory diseases.

A novel aGAPSS-based nomogram for the prediction of ischemic stroke in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

Background

Ischemic stroke (IS) is the most common and life-threatening arterial manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). It is related to high mortality and severe permanent disability in survivors. Thus, it is essential to identify patients with APS at high risk of IS and adopt individual-level preventive measures. This study was conducted to identify risk factors for IS in patients with APS and to develop a nomogram specifically for IS prediction in these patients by combining the adjusted Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) with additional clinical and laboratory data.

Methods

A total of 478 consecutive patients with APS were enrolled retrospectively. All patients were randomly assigned to the training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic analyses were conducted to identify predictors of IS in the training cohort. Then, a nomogram was developed based on these predictors. The predictive performance of the nomogram for the training and validation cohorts was evaluated by determining areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and creating calibration plots. A decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to compare the potential net benefits of the nomogram with those of the aGAPSS.

Results

During a mean follow-up period of 2.7 years, 26.9% (129/478) of the patients were diagnosed with IS. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that five risk factors were independent clinical predictors of IS: age (P < 0.001), diabetes (P = 0.030), hyperuricemia (P < 0.001), the platelet count (P = 0.001), and the aGAPSS (P = 0.001). These predictors were incorporated into the nomogram, named the aGAPSS-IS. The nomogram showed satisfactory performance in the training [AUROC = 0.853 (95% CI, 0.802–0.896] and validation [AUROC = 0.793 (95% CI, 0.737–0.843)] cohorts. Calibration curves showed good concordance between observed and nomogram-predicted probability in the training and validation cohorts. The DCA confirmed that the aGAPSS-IS provided more net benefits than the aGAPSS in both cohorts.

Conclusion

Age, diabetes, hyperuricemia, the platelet count, and the aGAPSS were risk factors for IS in patients with APS. The aGAPSS-IS may be a good tool for IS risk stratification for patients with APS based on routinely available data.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Related Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Characteristics and Early Recognition

Background

Pulmonary thromboembolism is a common disease frequently encountered in the emergency room and has a high mortality rate. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a high-risk factor for recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE). It is critical to effectively administer anticoagulants to avoid the recurrence of thrombotic events. This study aims to identify the clinical characteristics of APS patients with PE (APS-PE) and to develop a risk score for determining the presence of APS in PE patients in the emergency situations.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 76 PE patients in this study, with 46 patients in the APS-PE group and 30 patients in the non-APS-PE group. We compared differences in demographics, laboratory parameters, and early mortality risk between the two groups. Risk factors for APS-PE were screened using logistic regression analysis. We also developed an early risk score using multivariate analysis weighted points proportional to the β- regression coefficient values and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for APS in PE patients.

Results

In the APS-PE group, we observed a higher proportion of males (43.6 vs. 20%), a higher proportion of low-risk patients (58.7 vs. 10%), lower levels of white blood cells and platelets (PLT), longer activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and a slight increase in D-dimer levels. Patients who were triple positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) were younger. The APTT gradually increased as the number of positive aPLs increased. The risk factors for APS included male (OR = 5.565, 95% CI 1.176–26.341), decreased PLT (OR = 0.029, 95% CI 0.003–0.330), slightly increased D-dimer (OR = 0.089, 95% CI 0.019–0.426), and prolonged APTT (OR = 4.870, 95% CI 1.189–19.951). The risk score was named MPDA and included male, PLT, D-dimer and APTT, which can predict APS in PE patients with the AUC at 0.888 (95% CI 0.811–0.965).

Conclusion

The risk factors for APS in PE patients are male, low PLT, prolonged APTT and slightly increased D-dimer. The MPDA is a quantitative scoring system which is highly suggestive of APS in PE patients.

Sirolimus Monotherapy for Thrombocytopenia in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Pilot Study From a Tertiary Referral Center

Background

Thrombocytopenia (TP) is considered as a warning sign of high-risk antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and sometimes a paradoxical sign of anti-thrombosis treatment. Currently, there is an extreme paucity of effective and safe drugs for long-term management of TP in primary APS patients; therefore, we explored the efficacy and safety of sirolimus monotherapy.

Methods

In this real-world study, we included 7 consecutive patients with primary APS who received sirolimus monotherapy for TP. Oral sirolimus was initiated at a dose of 1–2 mg once daily and then adjusted primarily based on clinical efficacy and tolerance, with consideration of the sirolimus trough concentration of ≤15 ng/ml.

Results

Of included patients, the median age was 58 years with a median disease course of 1.5 years and 4 patients were treatment-naïve. All patients completed 6 months of sirolimus therapy with a median follow-up of 6 months (range: 6–15). All patients received sirolimus monotherapy for TP during the entire follow-up, without any additional agents. Overall, the platelet count exhibited a substantially increasing trend after sirolimus administration during the first 6 months (p < 0.001) and stability later. Specifically, the median platelet count was significantly increased from 59 × 10⁹/l before sirolimus to 90 × 10⁹/l at month 1 (p = 0.028), 131 × 10⁹/l at 3 months (p = 0.028), and 178 × 10⁹/l at 6 months (p = 0.018). Overall and complete responses were respectively achieved in 6 (85.7%) and 5 (71.4%) patients at month 6. Importantly, overall response was achieved in all 4 treatment-naïve patients. Additionally, there were different extents of decline in the titers of antiphospholipid antibodies after sirolimus treatment. Regarding safety, only one patient experienced an elevated cholesterol level with recovery after atorvastatin treatment.

Conclusion

Sirolimus monotherapy confers good efficacy and tolerance for TP in primary APS patients and therefore may be considered as a first-line therapy.

Predictors Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in a Cohort of Women with Systematic Lupus Erythematosus from Romania-An Observational Study (Stage 2)

Background: Pregnancy in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is accompanied by adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). We aimed to investigate the association between clinical, sonographic, and laboratory parameters and APOs (preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, and maternal mortality). Methods: This observational retrospective study included all pregnancies in women with SLE who attended two tertiary maternity hospitals from Romania between January 2013 and December 2020. Clinical, sonographic, and laboratory variables were examined. Bivariate associations of APO status and each predictor variable were evaluated, and significant predictors were further included in a classification model based on discriminant analysis. Results: Predictors of APOs included BMI > 25 kg/m2, personal history of lupus nephritis or chronic hypertension, proteinuria, low C3, SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2k score ≥ 4 and physician’s global-assessment (PGA) score ≥ 1 throughout pregnancy, increased mean uterine arteries pulsatility index in the first and second trimesters, cerebroplacental ratio < 1 in the second and third trimesters, and small fetal abdominal circumference in the third trimester. Glucocorticoids, methyldopa, and aspirin use appeared to be protective against APOs. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the most important predictors for APOs in pregnant patients with SLE, which could constitute a basis for further research.

Recent Advances in Anticoagulant Treatment of Immune Thrombosis: A Focus on Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome

For more than 10 years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly prescribed for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic events. However, their use in immunothrombotic disorders, namely heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is still under investigation. The prothrombotic state resulting from the autoimmune mechanism, multicellular activation, and platelet count decrease, constitutes similarities between HIT and APS. Moreover, they both share the complexity of the biological diagnosis. Current treatment of HIT firstly relies on parenteral non-heparin therapies, but DOACs have been included in American and French guidelines for a few years, providing the advantage of limiting the need for treatment monitoring. In APS, vitamin K antagonists are conversely the main treatment (+/− anti-platelet agents), and the use of DOACs is either subject to precautionary recommendations or is not recommended in severe APS. While some randomized controlled trials have been conducted regarding the use of DOACs in APS, only retrospective studies have examined HIT. In addition, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is now a part of immunothrombotic disorders, and guidelines have been created concerning an anticoagulant strategy in this case. This literature review aims to summarize available data on HIT, APS, and VITT treatments and define the use of DOACs in therapeutic strategies.

Cardiac and vascular features of arterial and venous primary antiphospholipid syndrome. The multicenter ATHERO-APS study

BACKGROUND

Patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) may suffer from venous and/or arterial thrombosis, but studies addressing eventual clinical and laboratory features that may discriminate between arterial thromboembolism (ATE) from venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been poorly addressed.

METHODS

Cross sectional comparison of baseline characteristics of 100 patients enrolled in the multi center ATHERO-APS cohort study; patients with previous ATE and VTE were compared with regards to clinical and biochemical variables as well as to echocardiographic features and ankle-brachial index (ABI) measured at enrolment.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 51 years, 72 were women. 60 patients suffered VTE and 40 ATE. Compared to VTE, ATE patients displayed a higher prevalence of hypertension (43.3% vs. 65%, p = 0.034) and diabetes (3.3% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.015). Mean concentration of inflammation and complement activation markers were similar between the two groups as well as autoantibodies titres; mean D-dimer concentration was greater in VTE patients (184 ng/ml vs. 347 ng/ml; p = 0.024) whereas mean platelet count was greater in ATE patients (263 × 10⁹/L vs 216 × 10⁹/L, p = 0.044). By multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, hypertension and diabetes, ABI ≤ 0.9 (OR: 3.4; p = 0.041) and left atrial enlargement (OR: 3.5; p = 0.035) were associated with a history of ATE. ATE patients had a higher prevalence of ABI <0.9 (32.5% vs 10% p = 0.005) than VTE patients. At logistic regression analysis, IgG aCL >120 GPL U/ml was associated with an ABI ≤0.9 (OR: 5; p = 0.023) after adjustment for age and sex.

CONCLUSION

Clinical, laboratory and cardiovascular variables distinguish arterial from venous APS patients, amongst which the ABI and left atrial enlargement. Implications for these two distinct clinical phenotypes of APS patients need further investigation.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Risk factors and management

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) may cause chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Current knowledge regarding prevalence and risk factors for CTEPH among APS patients is limited. We sought to determine clinical features and biomarkers that could identify APS subjects suffering from CTEPH, and describe the prevalence, course and treatment outcomes of patients with APS-CTEPH.

METHODS

504 APS patients were treated in our center during 2008 to 2019. We studied clinical and laboratory features of 69 APS patients, comparing 19 patients diagnosed with CTEPH (APS-CTEPH) and treated accordingly, with 50 consecutive age and gender matched patients with no evidence of pulmonary hypertension (APS-No-CTEPH).

RESULTS

CTEPH prevalence was 3.8% in our APS cohort and was linked with the following parameters: primary APS (p < 0.05); prior pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001); recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (p < 0.001); lower platelet counts (p < 0.001); triple anti-phospholipid antibodies positivity (p < 0.001), higher titers of anti-cardiolipin IgG (p < 0.001), anti-B2GPI IgG (p < 0.001), and high Russell viper venom time ratio (RVVT-ratio) (p < 0.05). Additionally, history of catastrophic APS was more prevalent in APS-CTEPH vs APS-No-CTEPH (p < 0.05). Of APS-CTEPH patients, 15/19 underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA): In 12/15 the procedure was elective and resulted in good perioperative and long-term outcomes, while only 1 of 3 patients that underwent urgent PEA survived.

CONCLUSIONS

CTEPH is relatively common in APS. Primary APS, prior PE, recurrent VTE, thrombocytopenia and specific anti-phospholipid antibodies predict CTEPH in APS. Active assessment for CTEPH in APS patients should be considered, as PEA was found to be effective and relatively safe, especially if electively performed.

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the International Guidelines

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) requires long-term anticoagulation to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used in APS patients, but contradictory guidelines recommendations on their use do exist. We performed a systematic review of literature including studies investigating the role of DOACs in APS patients. At this aim, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 14 studies which investigated the use of DOACs in patients with APS, of which 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs, 7 case series and 3 cohort studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective). Among DOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used (n = 531), followed by dabigatran (n = 90) and apixaban (n = 46). Regarding guidelines indications, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend against the use of DOACs in all APS patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), British Society for Haematology (BSH), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance provided more detailed indications stating that warfarin should be the first-choice treatment but DOACs may be considered in patients (1) already on a stable anticoagulation with a DOAC, (2) with low-quality anticoagulation by warfarin, (3) unwilling/unable to undergo INR monitoring, (4) with contraindications or serious adverse events under warfarin. Patients with arterial APS or triple positivity should be treated with warfarin while venous APS with single or double positivity may be candidate to DOACs, but high-quality studies are needed.

Biochemical and clinical predictors in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus: comprehensive update

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune diseases as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) could cause many maternal complications. The most common maternal complications of autoimmune diseases are lupus flare, hypertension, nephritis, preeclampsia (PE), eclampsia, and poor pregnancy outcomes which including preterm delivery and pregnancy loss. Only the lupus anticoagulant in the greatest prospective multicenter study has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes of the APS.

PURPOSE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive update for predictors in pregnant women with APS/SLE.

METHODS

These data have been collected from clinical and pathological studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In recent years the SLE and APS demonstrated to have different and valuable clinical and biomarker predictors for the pregnancy outcome. Treatment of pregnant women with APS is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and aspirin; however, around 75% of this management is considered successful.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes recent research that focuses on biochemical and clinical predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) of pregnant women with SLE and APS. Furthermore, we have collected more evidence that confirms the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) preventing APOs.