Outcomes in patients with systemic sclerosis undergoing early versus delayed intervention with potential disease-modifying therapies

Systemic Sclerosis Sine Scleroderma: A Time of Reappraisal

OBJECTIVE

Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma (ssSSc), formally described in 1962, is a subset of SSc that, unlike limited cutaneous (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) forms, lacks skin fibrosis. According to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, SSc can be diagnosed in the absence of skin thickening, even if this is expected to develop later in disease course. Driven by a fatal case of ssSSc with cardiac involvement, we analyzed published data on ssSSc prevalence and severity.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis of SSc cohorts with data on ssSSc were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies involving a total of 25,455 patients with SSc, published between 1976 and 2023, were identified. Although different definitions were used, the mean prevalence of ssSSc was almost 10% (range 0-23%), with the largest study reporting a cross-sectional prevalence of 13%. In 5 studies with a follow-up period of up to 9 years, reclassification of ssSSc into lcSSc or dcSSc ranged 0-28%. Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, and cardiac diastolic dysfunction were present in 46% (range 9.3-59.1%), 15% (range 5.9-24.6%), 5% (range 1.6-24.6%), and 26.5% (range 1.8-40.7), respectively, of patients with ssSSc. Survival across studies was comparable to lcSSc and better than dcSSc.

CONCLUSION

Published data on ssSSc vary widely on prevalence, clinical expression, and prognosis, partly due to underdiagnosis and misclassification. Although classification criteria should not affect appropriate management of patients, updated ssSSc subclassification criteria that takes into account time from disease onset should be considered.

Natural history of indolent-anti-synthetase syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Anti-synthetase syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease (ASS-ILD) may occur without myositis. Although a recent Japanese guide proposed a watch-and-wait approach for chronic ASS-ILD without obvious progression, the natural history of this subgroup and the appropriateness of the watch-and-wait approach remain unclear. We aimed to describe the natural history of ASS-ILD, that is sufficiently indolent to be a candidate for the watch-and-wait approach.

METHODS

Among consecutive patients with ASS-ILD, we retrospectively identified those without myositis, acute/subacute onset, and significant lung function impairment, which qualified them as indolent-ASS-ILD cases, and described their natural course. Additionally, we evaluated the risk factors for fibrosis progression on computed tomography (CT) using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among 80 patients with ASS-ILD, we identified 33 with indolent-ASS-ILD, all of whom were initially followed up with a watch-and-wait approach. Among 30 patients with sufficient follow-up data, 27 (90%) showed a stable course without treatment over 24 months. Subsequently, four patients experienced ≥10% relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline without treatment during a median follow-up duration of 81 months. Seven patients showed fibrosis progression with >10% increase in the total lung area on CT. Higher levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) were associated with fibrosis progression on CT.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with indolent-ASS-ILD did not experience ≥10% relative FVC decline over five years without treatment. However, fibrosis progression on CT, which seemed to precede significant FVC decline, occurred more frequently, especially in patients with higher KL-6 and SP-D levels.

Heterogeneity of determining disease severity, clinical course and outcomes in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic literature review

Objective The course of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is highly variable and different from continuously progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Most proposed definitions of progressive pulmonary fibrosis or SSc-ILD severity are based on the research data from patients with IPF and are not validated for patients with SSc-ILD. Our study aimed to gather the current evidence for severity, progression and outcomes of SSc-ILD.Methods A systematic literature review to search for definitions of severity, progression and outcomes recorded for SSc-ILD was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023.Results A total of 9054 papers were reviewed and 342 were finally included. The most frequent tools used for the definition of SSc-ILD progression and severity were combined changes of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC), isolated FVC or DLCO changes, high-resolution CT (HRCT) extension and composite algorithms including pulmonary function test, clinical signs and HRCT data. Mortality was the most frequently reported long-term event, both from all causes or ILD related.Conclusions The studies presenting definitions of SSc-ILD 'progression', 'severity' and 'outcome' show a large heterogeneity. These results emphasise the need for developing a standardised, consensus definition of severe SSc-ILD, to link a disease specific definition of progression as a surrogate outcome for clinical trials and clinical practice.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022379254.Cite Now.

State-of-the-art evidence in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with multi-organ involvement, fibrosis and vasculopathy. Treatment in SSc, including early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and the use of organ-specific therapies, has improved, as evident from randomized clinical trials. Treatments for early dcSSc include immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and tocilizumab. Patients with rapidly progressive early dcSSc might be eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which can improve survival. Morbidity from interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension is improving with the use of proven therapies. Mycophenolate mofetil has surpassed cyclophosphamide as the initial treatment for SSc-interstitial lung disease. Nintedanib and possibly perfinidone can be considered in SSc pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is frequently treated with initial combination therapy (for example, with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists) and, if necessary, the addition of a prostacyclin analogue. Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers are treated with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (especially nifedipine), then phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intravenous iloprost. Bosentan can reduce the development of new digital ulcers. Trial data for other manifestations are mostly lacking. Research is needed to develop targeted and highly effective treatments, best practices for organ-specific screening and early intervention, and sensitive outcome measurements.

Step forward in early recognition of systemic sclerosis: data from the Leiden CCISS cohort

BACKGROUND

Since 2009, Dutch patients with a confirmed diagnosis/suspicion of systemic sclerosis (SSc) can be referred to the Leiden Combined Care in Systemic Sclerosis (CCISS) cohort. This study evaluated whether early recognition of SSc has improved over time and whether disease characteristics and survival has changed over time.

METHODS

643 SSc patients fulfilling American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2013 SSc criteria were included and categorised into three groups based on cohort-entry year: (1) 2010-2013 (n=229 (36%)), (2) 2014-2017 (n=207 (32%)) and (3) 2018-2021 (n=207 (32%)). Variables including disease duration, interstitial lung disease (ILD), digital ulcers (DU), diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), antitopoisomerase (ATA) and anticentromere (ACA) antibodies, and survival from disease onset were compared between cohort-entry groups, including analyses stratified for sex and autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Over time, duration between onset of disease symptoms and cohort entry decreased in males and females, but was always longer in females than in males.The proportion of patients presenting with DU decreased, especially in ACA+SSc patients. Almost no ACA+ patients presented with ILD, while in ATA+ patients this proportion was 25% in 2010-2013 and decreased to 19% in 2018-2021. A reduction in patients presenting with clinically meaningful ILD and dcSSc was observed.Overall 8-year survival for males was 59% (95% CI 40% to 73%) and for females 89% (95% CI 82% to 93%). Eight-year survival showed a trend for improvement over time, and was always worse in males.

CONCLUSION

We observed a decrease in disease duration in Leiden CCISS cohort at cohort entry, possibly indicating more timely diagnosis of SSc. This could provide opportunities for early interventions. While symptom duration at presentation is longer in females, mortality is consistently higher in males, underlining the urge for sex-specific treatment and follow-up.