In patients with acute mono-oligoarthritis, a targeted ultrasound scanning protocol shows great accuracy for the diagnosis of gout and CPPD

[First classification criteria for diseases caused by calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD)-Translation, explanation and assessment]

AIM

For diseases caused by calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD), validated classification criteria were previously lacking. In this article the recently developed and validated classification criteria are translated, explained, and assessed.

METHODS

In recent years a multinational research group developed classification criteria for CPPD disease with the support by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), following an established method. The developed criteria were finally validated in an independent cohort. The translation and annotation of the new first classification criteria were carried out in an iterative procedure in consensus with the authors.

RESULTS

The presence of a crowned dens syndrome or calcium pyrophosphate crystals in the synovial fluid in patients with pain, swelling or sensitivity of the joints (entry criterion) is sufficient for the classification as CPPD disease, where the symptoms cannot be completely explained by another rheumatic disease (exclusion criterion). If these symptoms are not present, a count of more than 56 points based on weighted criteria comprised of clinical features and the results of laboratory and imaging investigations can be included for classification as a CPPD disease. These criteria had a sensitivity of 92.2% and a specificity of 87.9% in the derivation cohorts (190 CPPD cases and 148 mimics), whereas the sensitivity was 99.2% and the specificity 92.5% in the validation cohorts (251 CPPD cases and 162 mimics).

CONCLUSION

The ACR/EULAR classification criteria 2023 of a CPPD disease will facilitate clinical research in this field. The use in the clinical routine will show how practical the criteria are.

Subsequent bilateral acute carpal tunnel syndrome due to tophaceous infiltration: A case report

BACKGROUND

Acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS) is commonly caused by repetitive strain, trauma, or inflammatory conditions. However, ACTS due to tophaceous gout is a clinical event that remains poorly understood and underreported. This rare manifestation necessitates prompt diagnosis and intervention to prevent irreversible complications.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old man who had poorly controlled hyperuricemia presented with ACTS secondary to tophaceous gout. Because of rapid symptom progression symptoms and severe median nerve compression within 3 mo, the patient underwent emergency decompression surgery for both wrists at different time points. Postoperatively, he exhibited complete recovery of sensory and motor functions, with no recurrence at long-term follow-up. Favorable outcomes were achieved through immediate decompression surgery, anti-inflammatory medications, postoperative active and passive range-of-motion exercises, and intermittent wrist splinting. Prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention, when necessary, are crucial for preventing long-term complications and obtaining favorable outcomes in patients with ACTS. An optimal gout management strategy involving pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle modifications may help minimize ACTS recurrence and improve clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Prompt surgical intervention and optimal gout management are crucial for preventing irreversible nerve damage and ACTS recurrence.

Test characteristics of Raman spectroscopy integrated with polarized light microscopy for the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis

OBJECTIVES

We studied the performance of Raman spectroscopy integrated with polarized light microscopy (iRPolM) as a next-generation technique for synovial fluid analysis in gout.

METHODS

This is a prospective study, including consecutive synovial fluid samples drawn from any peripheral swollen joint. Diagnostic accuracy was compared to the 2015 ACR/EULAR Gout classification criteria as a reference test and to polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis by a rheumatologist. Synovial fluid was analysed with iRPolM after unblinding the PLM results.

RESULTS

Two hundred unselected consecutive patient samples were included in this study. Validation against clinical criteria: 67 patients were classified as gout according to 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Compared to the 2015 ACR/EULAR gout classification criteria, iRPolM had a sensitivity of 77.6% (95% CI: 65.8-86.9), specificity of 97.7% (95% CI: 93.5-99.5), positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.5% (95% CI: 84.9-98.2), negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.7% (95% CI: 84.7-93.1), an accuracy of 91.0% (95% CI: 86.2-94.6), a positive likelihood ratio of 34.4 (95% CI: 11.16-106.10) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.36). Validation against PLM: 55 samples were positive for MSU according to PLM. The interrater agreement between PLM and iRPolM was near perfect (к=0.90). The sensitivity of iRPolM to identify MSU in PLM-positive samples was 91.2% (95% CI: 80.7-97.1), the specificity was 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0-99.5), the PPV was 94.6% (95% CI: 85.0-98.2), NPV was 96.0% (95% CI: 91.2-98.2) and the accuracy was 95.6% (95% CI: 91.4-98.2). The positive likelihood ratio was 37.4 (95% CI: 12.20-114.71), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.04-0.21).

CONCLUSION

iRPolM is a promising next-generation diagnostic tool for rheumatology by diagnosing gout with high specificity, increased objectivity, and a sensitivity comparable to PLM.

The 2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease

OBJECTIVE

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is prevalent and has diverse presentations, but there are no validated classification criteria for this symptomatic arthritis. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR have developed the first-ever validated classification criteria for symptomatic CPPD disease.

METHODS

Supported by the ACR and EULAR, a multinational group of investigators followed established methodology to develop these disease classification criteria. The group generated lists of candidate items and refined their definitions, collected de-identified patient profiles, evaluated strengths of associations between candidate items and CPPD disease, developed a classification criteria framework, and used multi-criterion decision analysis to define criteria weights and a classification threshold score. The criteria were validated in an independent cohort.

RESULTS

Among patients with joint pain, swelling, or tenderness (entry criterion) whose symptoms are not fully explained by an alternative disease (exclusion criterion), the presence of crowned dens syndrome or calcium pyrophosphate crystals in synovial fluid are sufficient to classify a patient as having CPPD disease. In the absence of these findings, a score >56 points using weighted criteria, comprising clinical features, associated metabolic disorders, and results of laboratory and imaging investigations, can be used to classify as CPPD disease. These criteria had a sensitivity of 92.2% and specificity of 87.9% in the derivation cohort (190 CPPD cases, 148 mimickers), whereas sensitivity was 99.2% and specificity was 92.5% in the validation cohort (251 CPPD cases, 162 mimickers).

CONCLUSION

The 2023 ACR/EULAR CPPD disease classification criteria have excellent performance characteristics and will facilitate research in this field.

The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease

OBJECTIVE

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is prevalent and has diverse presentations, but there are no validated classification criteria for this symptomatic arthritis. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR have developed the first-ever validated classification criteria for symptomatic CPPD disease.

METHODS

Supported by the ACR and EULAR, a multinational group of investigators followed established methodology to develop these disease classification criteria. The group generated lists of candidate items and refined their definitions, collected de-identified patient profiles, evaluated strengths of associations between candidate items and CPPD disease, developed a classification criteria framework, and used multi-criterion decision analysis to define criteria weights and a classification threshold score. The criteria were validated in an independent cohort.

RESULTS

Among patients with joint pain, swelling, or tenderness (entry criterion) whose symptoms are not fully explained by an alternative disease (exclusion criterion), the presence of crowned dens syndrome or calcium pyrophosphate crystals in synovial fluid are sufficient to classify a patient as having CPPD disease. In the absence of these findings, a score>56 points using weighted criteria, comprising clinical features, associated metabolic disorders, and results of laboratory and imaging investigations, can be used to classify as CPPD disease. These criteria had a sensitivity of 92.2% and specificity of 87.9% in the derivation cohort (190 CPPD cases, 148 mimickers), whereas sensitivity was 99.2% and specificity was 92.5% in the validation cohort (251 CPPD cases, 162 mimickers).

CONCLUSION

The 2023 ACR/EULAR CPPD disease classification criteria have excellent performance characteristics and will facilitate research in this field.

Evaluating the safety and short-term equivalence of colchicine versus prednisone in older patients with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis (COLCHICORT): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis causes intense joint pain mainly affecting older people. Because guidance and evidence remain scarce, management of this disease relies on expert opinion. We therefore aimed to compare the safety and short-term equivalence of low-dose colchicine with oral prednisone in older patients with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis.

METHODS

We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised, trial (COLCHICORT) at six hospitals in Paris and northern France. We enrolled patients who were admitted to hospital who were 65 years or older and who presented with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis with a symptom duration of less than 36 h. Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis was made by the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystals on synovial fluid analysis or typical clinical presentation (onset of joint pain and swelling). Key exclusion criteria included absence of calcium pyrophosphate crystals on synovial fluid analysis or a history of gout. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1), using a centralised electronic treatment group allocation module, to receive either colchicine 1·5 mg on day 1 and 1 mg on day 2 (ie, the colchicine group) or oral prednisone 30 mg on days 1 and 2 (ie, the prednisone group). The primary outcome was change in joint pain (measured by visual analogue scale [VAS] from 0 mm to 100 mm) at 24 h. Equivalence was determined whether the 95% CI of the between-group difference at 24 h was within the -13 mm to +13 mm margin in the per-protocol analysis. Adverse events were recorded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). This trial is completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03128905.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 5, 2018, and May 7, 2022, 111 patients who were admitted to hospital were randomly assigned (57 [51%] to the colchicine group and 54 [49%] to the prednisone group). 95 (86%) of 111 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis (49 [52%] in the colchicine group and 46 [48%] in the prednisone group). The median age was 88·0 years (IQR 82·0-91·0) and 69 (73%) of 95 participants were women and 26 (27%) were men. Acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis affected mainly the knee in 46 (48%) of 95 participants, the wrist in 19 (20%), and the ankle in 12 (13%). Pain VAS at baseline was 68 mm (SD 17). At 24 h, change in pain VAS was -36 mm (SD 32) in the colchicine group and -38 mm (SD 23) in the prednisone group. The between-group difference in change in pain VAS at 24 h was -1 mm (95% CI -12 to 10), showing equivalence between the two drugs. In the colchicine group, 12 (22%) of 55 patients had diarrhoea, one (2%) had hypertension, and none had hyperglycaemia. In the prednisone group, three (6%) of 54 had diarrhoea, six (11%) had hypertension, and three (6%) had hyperglycaemia. No deaths occurred in the colchicine group; two deaths occurred in the prednisone group, which were deemed unrelated to prednisone (one due to infectious valvular endocarditis leading to heart failure, and one due to a stroke).

INTERPRETATION

Colchicine and prednisone exhibit equivalent short-term efficacy for the treatment of acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis, with different safety profiles in the older population.

FUNDING

French Inter-regional Hospital Program of Clinical Research.

Assessment and diagnosis of the acute hot joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Prompt diagnosis of septic arthritis (SA) in acute native hot joints is essential for avoiding unnecessary antibiotics and hospital admissions. We evaluated the utility of synovial fluid (SF) and serum tests in differentiating causes of acute hot joints.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review of diagnostic testing for acute hot joints. Articles were included if studying ≥1 serum or SF test(s) for an acute hot joint, compared with clinical assessment and SF microscopy and culture. English-language articles only were included, without date restriction. The following were recorded for each test, threshold and diagnosis: sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values and likelihood ratios. For directly comparable tests (i.e. identical fluid, test and threshold), bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the curves.

RESULTS

A total of 8443 articles were identified, and 49 were ultimately included. Information on 28 distinct markers in SF and serum, differentiating septic from non-septic joints, was extracted. Most had been tested at multiple diagnostic thresholds, yielding a total of 27 serum markers and 156 SF markers. Due to heterogeneity of study design, outcomes and thresholds, meta-analysis was possible for only eight SF tests, all differentiating septic from non-septic joints. Of these, leucocyte esterase had the highest pooled sensitivity [0.94 (0.70, 0.99)] with good pooled specificity [0.74 (0.67, 0.81)].

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrates many single tests, individually with diagnostic utility but suboptimal accuracy for exclusion of native joint infection. A combination of several tests with or without a stratification score is required for optimizing rapid assessment of the hot joint.

How can ultrasonography help in the management of CPPD? From diagnosis to clinical subset identification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical manifestations of calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease are quite heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic presentation to severe forms of arthritis. In recent years, imaging, particularly ultrasound (US) has gained a central role for the diagnosis of CPPD. However, many questions are still open. Aim of this review is to present how US could be a key tool in the diagnosis and assessment of CPPD and for the identification of subsets of the disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

awareness and research interest around CPPD is increasing in the recent years, as several international taskforces are working on the validation of outcome measures and classification criteria for CPPD, but many pieces of the puzzle are still missing. Recent studies demonstrated that CPPD is an underdiagnosed disease, frequently misdiagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis or polymyalgia rheumatica. US has been increasingly used in the past decade for the diagnosis of CPPD and US definitions have been validated by the OMERACT US working group in the recent years, making of US a valuable tool for diagnosis.

SUMMARY

The most challenging aspects of CPPD are the differential diagnosis with other form of arthritis of the elderly, and the classification of patients in clinical subsets. In this review, we will present the available data for the use of US in the diagnosis of CPPD and we will provide a mainly experienced-based approach to the potential role of the technique in differential diagnosis and phenotypization of patients.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition (CPPD) Disease: A Review

Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate (CPPD) crystal-related arthropathies are a common cause of acute and chronic arthritis caused by the deposition of calcium pyrophosphate crystals in joints and soft tissues, resulting in inflammation and joint damage. They present with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and often present challenges to diagnosis and management as they commonly affect older co-morbid patients. The challenges are compounded by a lack of a well-defined description of CPPD. However, an international expert-driven process is underway to develop CPPD classification criteria. Treatment is also problematic as unlike gout, there are no agents available that decrease the crystal burden. Treatment options have often been extrapolated from gout treatment pathways without having extensive trials or a solid evidence base. It is hoped the new CPPD classification guidelines will contribute to large multicentre studies, with well-defined patient cohorts, which will facilitate the production of high-quality evidence to guide the management of this condition. Here, we discuss the barriers and facilitators in diagnosing and treating CPPD-related arthropathy.