Safety and effectiveness of abatacept in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the PRINTO/PRCSG registry

An update on the safety of biologic therapies for the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of patients with polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis are treated with biologics with great efficacy. Consequently, the importance regarding safety data in general as well as especially serious infections, incident autoimmune processes, or malignancies rises. In children, this is crucial concerning occurrences that manifest rarely and only after a prolonged latency period.

AREAS COVERED

This study aims to analyze safety under therapy with the five most commonly used biologicals for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Germany: abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, and tocilizumab, and a control cohort, who received methotrexate. For this, data from the Biologics in Pediatric Rheumatology (BiKeR) Registry were analyzed with a focus on potential adverse drug reactions like serious infections, autoimmune processes or malignancies.

EXPERT OPINION

Besides JIA category-specific differences, investigating side effects like severe infections and the development of additional autoimmune processes due to therapy is crucial. Future clinical randomized double-blinded studies are essential for direct drug comparisons, enabling optimal individualized therapy considering comorbidities and individual risks. Large patient data over a (life-)long period beyond childhood are particularly important, especially concerning the risk of malignancy after prolonged latency.

Advances in pharmacotherapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood. More therapeutic options are available for the treatment of JIA with more children achieving minimal active disease or inactive disease status.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the major novel treatment options for children with non-systemic JIA, including current evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of biologic treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

With all the advances in treatment targets, the disease trajectory of patients with JIA have changed significantly and remission is the goal of today's treatment. New treatment trials show the pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, efficacy and safety for these medications in children with JIA. Future studies will need to incorporate patient and family preferences, in addition to novel biomarkers and artificial intelligence-based diagnostic systems into head-to-head international multicenter trials to better assess the treatment algorithm for individual patients.

25 Years of Biologics for the Treatment of Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Advances in Prognosis and Ongoing Challenges

There are over 100 rheumatic diseases and approximately 300,000 children with a pediatric rheumatic disease (PRD) in the United States. The most common PRDs are juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Effective and safe medications are essential because there are generally no cures for these conditions. Etanercept was the first biologic therapy for the treatment of JIA, approved in 1999. Since then, other biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) blocking relevant immunologic pathways have been approved for the treatment of JIA, resulting in a marked improvement of disease prognosis. Conversely, there is only one bDMARD that has been approved for cSLE, but none are approved for the treatment of JDM. Lack of approved therapeutic options, with established dosing regimens and known efficacy and safety, remains a central challenge in the treatment of all PRDs, including autoinflammatory diseases, and for complications of PRDs. This review provides an overview of bDMARD and tsDMARD treatments studied for the treatment of various subtypes of JIA, summarizes information from bDMARD studies in other PRDs, with a focus on pivotal trials that led to regulatory approvals, and highlights improved outcomes in patients with JIA with the reception of these newer medications. Further, we outline barriers and challenges in the treatment of other PRDs. Last, we summarize the current regulatory landscape for bDMARD studies and medication approvals for patients with PRDs.

Drug therapy in juvenile spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes latest developments in treatment of juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA), specifically enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been addition of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) beyond tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for JSpA such as IL-17 blockers, IL-23 blockers, and janus activating kinase inhibitors with favorable safety profile. Conducting robust clinical trials for this subpopulation of JIA remains a challenge; extrapolation studies are being used to obtain approval from regulatory agencies.

SUMMARY

Newer drug therapies have expanded the scope of treatment for patients with JSpA. bDMARDs such as adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and secukinumab have demonstrated clinically significant treatment efficacy in ERA and JPsA. Based on extrapolation studies, intravenous golimumab, etanercept, abatacept, and ustekinumab have gained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for JPsA. Long-term follow-up studies continue to demonstrate acceptable safety profiles. There is need for more real-world data on drug efficacy from Registry studies and research on effective de-escalation strategies.