Three-monthly ibandronate bolus injection offers favourable tolerability and sustained efficacy advantage over two years in established corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

Risk for osteoporosis and fracture with glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoid use is ubiquitous and is associated with multiple adverse reactions. Among them, osteoporosis and bone fractures are of our concern. In this review, we present current evidence on the effect of glucocorticoids on bone mineral density and the risk of fractures, the mechanisms underlying those effects, and the recommendations for monitoring and treating patients who take them. The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and total hip is lower, and the risk of fractures is higher in glucocorticoid users than non-users. These effects have a rapid onset, are dose-dependent, and improve soon after discontinuation of glucocorticoids. They also appear to occur even with non-systemic routes of administration and with low doses. Glucocorticoids reduce bone mineral density by increasing osteoclast activity and decreasing osteoblast and osteocyte activity. Calcium metabolism and parathyroid hormone activity are less important than was initially thought. Treatment decisions are on risk stratification using clinical, radiographic, and prediction tools. Our armamentarium for the treatment and prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis includes calcium and vitamin D, bisphosphonates, recombinant parathyroid hormone, monoclonal antibodies against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, and hormone treatments.

Adjuvant drug-assisted bone healing: Part III - Further strategies for local and systemic modulation

In this third in a series of reviews on adjuvant drug-assisted bone healing, further approaches aiming at influencing the healing process are discussed. Local and systemic modulation of bone metabolism is pursued with use of a number of drugs with completely different indications, which are characterized by a pleiotropic spectrum of action. These include drugs used to treat lipid disorders (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors), hypertension (ACE inhibitors), osteoporosis (bisphosphonates), cancer (proteasome inhibitors) and others. Potential applications to enhance bone healing are discussed.

Fracture pain-Traveling unknown pathways

An increase of fracture incidence is expected for the next decades, mostly due to the undeniable increase of osteoporotic fractures, associated with the rapid population ageing. The rise in sports-related fractures affecting the young and active population also contributes to this increased fracture incidence, and further amplifies the economical burden of fractures. Fracture often results in severe pain, which is a primary symptom to be treated, not only to guarantee individual's wellbeing, but also because an efficient management of fracture pain is mandatory to ensure proper bone healing. Here, we review the available data on bone innervation and its response to fracture, and discuss putative mechanisms of fracture pain signaling. In addition, the common therapeutic approaches to treat fracture pain are discussed. Although there is still much to learn, research in fracture pain has allowed an initial insight into the mechanisms involved. During the inflammatory response to fracture, several mediators are released and will putatively activate and sensitize primary sensory neurons, in parallel, intense nerve sprouting that occurs in the fracture callus area is also suggested to be involved in pain signaling. The establishment of hyperalgesia and allodynia after fracture indicates the development of peripheral and central sensitization, still, the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. A major concern during the treatment of fracture pain needs to be the preservation of proper bone healing. However, the most common therapeutic agents, NSAIDS and opiates, can cause significant side effects that include fracture repair impairment. The understanding of the mechanisms of fracture pain signaling will allow the development of mechanisms-based therapies to effectively and safely manage fracture pain.

Predictors of Ibandronate Efficacy for the Management of Osteoporosis: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Background

Aim of the present study was to identify the predictors of ibandronate efficacy in subjects with osteoporosis or decreased bone mineral density (BMD).

Method

Several electronic databases were searched by using specific keywords for the acquisition of research articles reporting the efficacy of ibandronate in subjects with osteoporosis or decreased BMD. Metaregression analyses were carried out by using changes in the BMD of lumbar spine and total hip following ibandronate treatment as dependent (outcome) variables against several independent (explanatory) variables.

Results

Data were extracted from 34 studies (11,090 ibandronate treated subjects) which fulfilled eligibility criteria. A history of previous fracture/s was reported by 46% of these subjects. In overall population, longer treatment duration from 1 to 5 years, increasing age, history of previous fractures, lower baseline T score, and higher baseline levels of C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) predicted higher ibandronate efficacy in improving BMD of the lumbar spine as well as of the total hip. Lower baseline levels of vitamin D and higher baseline levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) predicted higher efficacy of ibandronate for lumbar spine only. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or decreased BMD, in addition to above-mentioned predictors, better efficacy of ibandronate was also associated with increasing time since menopause for both lumbar spine and total hip and lower body weight for lumbar spine only.

Conclusion

Longer treatment duration from 1 to 5 years, increasing age, lower baseline T scores, and higher serum CTX levels are identified as the predictors of better efficacy of ibandronate in the study subjects with osteoporosis or decreased BMD.

Systemic lupus erythematosus, bone health, and osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This manuscript will provide a review of recent publications, examining the correlation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with changes in bone health and associated osteoporosis, highlighting prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies suggest that bone loss and fractures are associated with SLE, related not only to the disease itself, but also with low vitamin D and treatment side-effects. Understanding the mechanisms of glucocorticoids on bone and the immunologic relationship of vitamin D, as well as recognizing the role of chronic inflammation on bone, allows for better understanding of skeletal side-effects. Further awareness of the association of poor bone health has led to an increased need for prevention and treatment. New imaging and treatment are emerging, although not recommended currently.

SUMMARY

Loss of bone density culminating in osteoporosis and fracture is a frequent comorbidity in SLE patients at any age and is multifactorial in etiology. Awareness and diagnosis is crucial because of its prevalence and morbidity. Prevention is safe and effective in this high-risk population where diagnostic measures and interventions are underutilized and guidelines are lacking.

Dose-Effectiveness Relationships Determining the Efficacy of Ibandronate for Management of Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the efficacy of ibandronate by evaluating the effect sizes of different dosing regimens.Major electronic databases were searched from 1985 to February 2015. A random effects meta-analysis was performed in STATA.Data from 34 studies (13,639 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Ibandronate treatment significantly improved lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) as shown by the percent change from baseline (4.80%, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.14, 5.45]). The respective effect sizes for oral intake and intravenous (IV) infusion were 4.57% and 5.22% (P < 0.0001, CIs [3.71, 5.42] and [4.37, 6.07]), respectively. All doses led to a significant increase in BMD except 2 oral dose regimens (1 mg/d: 4.65%, P = 0.285, 95% CI [-3.87, 13.18] and 0.5 mg/d: 3.60%, P = 0.38, 95% CI [-4.43, 11.64]. Ibandronate treatment (overall as well as dose wise) also significantly improved the total hip BMD-2.30% overall, 2.13% oral, and 2.63% IV (P < 0.0001, 95% CIs [1.96, 2.64], [1.70, 2.55], and [2.07, 3.20]), respectively. Ibandronate administration significantly decreased serum markers of bone resorption to -46.53% for C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen, -24.03% for bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and -50.17% for procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P < 0.0001, 95% CIs [-53.16, -39.91], [-31.28, -16.77], and [-64.13, -36.20]), respectively. Parathyroid hormone levels remained unaffected by ibandronate treatment (3.03%, P = 0.439, 95% CI [-5.06, 11.66]).There was no significant difference in the efficacy of ibandronate between oral or IV administration. Predominant dose regimens for IV administration were 1 to 3 mg/3 mo and 150 mg/mo oral and 2.5 mg/d for oral ibandronate treatment.

Bone safety of low-dose glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases

Glucocorticoids are widely used internationally for the treatment of inflammatory disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although the benefit of glucocorticoids in RA on both disease activity and severity are well known, there remain unanswered questions about the overall bone safety of chronic low-dose glucocorticoids in RA. Debate exists about the merits of glucocorticoids for bone health on the basis of their benefits in promoting activity and reducing proinflammatory cytokines. Overall current evidence supports the view that bone loss is a disease related both to RA and to glucocorticoid use independently. Calcium and vitamin D, along with prescription antiosteoporosis therapies, particularly bisphosphonates and teriparatide, play an important role in stabilizing bone mineral density and potentially lowering spinal fracture risk at the spine. International guidelines provide pathways for appropriate prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). Despite the evidence and these guidelines, many patients do not receive adequate management to prevent GIOP.

Ibandronate: its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of tumor-induced hypercalcemia and metastatic bone disease

It is well accepted that tumor cells in the bone, especially from breast cancer, prostate cancer and multiple myeloma, can stimulate osteoclast formation and activity. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated normal and pathologic bone resorption. Besides their apoptotic and antiproliferative activity on osteoclasts, bisphosphonates can also exert similar effects on macrophages and tumor cells. Currently, it is unknown if this effect can be translated into clinical practice with regard to an effective adjuvant therapeutic regimen for high-risk patients with systemic recurrences following primary treatment of a given cancer. There are several new aspects that might extend the clinical use of ibandronate, a bisphosphate, in oncology: prevention of hypogonadal osteoporosis in men, palliative management of painful osseous metastases and adjuvant therapy of high-risk prostate cancer patients. Safety and tolerability are excellent for the oral and intravenous formulations, and ibandronate can even be safely applied in pre-existing renal insufficiency. The purpose of this review is to critically reflect the pharmacology and clinical efficacy of ibandronate in the management of tumor-induced hypercalcemia, osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease.

Review of new guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis

The chronic use of glucocorticoids results in osteoporosis. Several sets of guidelines have been published on the management of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis (GIO). These guidelines vary on their focus and highlight different aspects of the current concepts in the management of GIO. In this current article, we summarize recent guidelines for management of GIO and highlight similarities and differences as well as address some of the controversies generated by these guidelines.

MALE OSTEOPOROSIS

Population aging is a reality that is being faced worldwide, and Brazil is no different. Osteoporosis was considered to be a postmenopausal women's disease for many years. Men have many development and hormonal factors that differentiate their skeletal maturation, which affects the incidence of osteoporosis and fractures. An up-to-date review of the specific literature within the Medline system is presented.

Prevention and treatment of systemic glucocorticoid side effects

BACKGROUND

Systemic glucocorticoids are used in dermatologic practice for various diseases including connective tissue disorders, bullous diseases, and many other dermatologic conditions. Patients with these diseases are at times treated with long-term courses of glucocorticoids, which place them at increased risk for glucocorticoid-induced side effects. Therefore, dermatologists must be knowledgeable of risks related to glucocorticoid use and be familiar with guidelines to manage them.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update of recent advances in the prevention and treatment of major glucocorticoid-induced side effects.

METHODS

Review of the literature.

RESULTS

Data regarding the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced side effects are presented.

CONCLUSION

This review should help dermatologists optimally manage and prevent glucocorticoid-induced side effects.

Treatment of osteoporosis after liver transplantation with ibandronate

Osteoporosis is a major side-effect after liver transplantation (LTX). Therefore, the objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of ibandronate to reduce fractures after LTX. Seventy-four patients after LTX were included in the study and measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine and proximal femur using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed prior to and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. The study group (IBA) consisted of 34 patients who received calcium (1 g/day), vitamin D3 (800-1000 IE/day) and ibandronate 2 mg every 3 months intravenously for 1 year. The control group consisted of 40 patients (CON) who received calcium and vitamin D3 at the same dosages. Prevalence of new fractures was predefined as primary endpoint. Changes of BMD and biochemical markers of bone metabolism were also investigated. In all patients, we found a reduction of BMD in the first few months after LTX. In the lumbar spine and the proximal femur the maximum reduction occurred 3 and 6 months post-LTX. One and 2 years after transplantation, the group receiving ibandronate demonstrated a better recovery from loss of BMD and a significantly lower prevalence of fractures (IBA 2 vs. CON 10 P < 0.04, chi(2)). Ibandronate with calcium and vitamin D3 reduces the BMD-loss after LTX and decreases the rate of bone fractures significantly.

New and emerging treatments for osteoporosis

A variety of new treatments for osteoporosis have become available within the last several years, and a number of emerging treatments remain in late clinical stage development. New and emerging treatments include more potent members, or more convenient formulations, of existing classes of therapy, but a number of the emerging treatments are first-generation compounds addressing specific therapeutic targets based on recent advances in understanding of basic bone biology. These new and emerging treatments include agents with anticatabolic effects, compounds with anabolic effects, and one agent possibly containing both anticatabolic and anabolic effects. The increasing variety of new and emerging treatments increases the possibility that effective therapy will be targeted to the specific needs of the individual patient.

Comparison of the analgesic effects of bisphosphonates: etidronate, alendronate and risedronate by electroalgometry utilizing the fall of skin impedance

Analgesic effects of etidronate, alendronate and risedronate were compared in patients with osteoporosis and/or osteoarthritis by measuring the fall of skin impedance along with conventional subjective pain-estimation by visual rating scale (VRS). One hundred ninety-nine postmenopausal women consulting the Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis Clinic of Katsuragi Hospital complaining of back and/or knee pain were randomly divided into four groups; Group A (49 subjects) given 5 mg/day alendronate, Group E (50 subjects) 200 mg/day etidronate, Group R (50 subjects) 2.5 mg/day risedronate and Group P no bisphosphonate. None of the four groups showed significant deviation from others as to age and parameters of bone metabolism. Proportions of subjects with osteoporosis was 18-40%. Those with osteoarthritis of the spine and knee, higher than Grade II according to the Nathan and Lawrence-Kellgren scale, respectively, was 45 and 61%, respectively, without a significant difference among the four groups. Significant positive correlation was found between the fall of skin impedance and pain expressed in VRS. Attenuation of exercise-induced fall of skin impedance and also subjective pain expressed in VRS was greatest in Group E with a highly significant difference from Groups A (P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001), R (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0014) and P (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001). Neither A nor R showed significant difference from P as to the fall of skin impedance. Among the three bisphosphonates tested, etidronate appeared to be outstanding in analgesic effects.

Calcaneus BMD short-term precision in young and elderly subjects using the DXL Calscan

In this study, the short-term reproducibility and agreement between individual units of dual X-ray and laser (DXL) Calscan (version 2), a new bone densitometry device based on dual X-ray absorptiometry and Laser technique, were evaluated. The variations in bone mineral density (BMD) and T-score between the right and the left foot were also studied retrospectively in 334 individuals. The short-term CV%, based on 19 healthy individuals scanned twice on 4 different units, was 2.1%, and the average CV% per scanner ranged from 1.1% to 1.8%. The short-term CV% in 33 elderly individuals (aged 83+/-6 yr) was 3.9% and in a subgroup with a calcaneal T-score of -2.5 or below (n=16) 5.1%. There was no statistical difference between the average BMD of the right and left foot, and (r2) between the right and left side was 0.84. The observed short- and long-term reproducibilities, as well as the acceptable variation between individual machines, show that this version of Demetech DXL Calscan is suitable for measuring BMD.

Safety considerations with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of osteoporosis. Although evidence supports a good safety profile for these agents, numerous tolerability issues have been associated with their use. This review provides an overview of the safety issues associated with the nitrogen-containing class of bisphosphonates and discusses the potential effect of these issues on adherence. The review specifically considers upper gastrointestinal (UGI) adverse events (AEs), renal toxicity, influenza-like illness, osteonecrosis of the jaw and evidence on how to treat or prevent these events. In clinical trials, UGI AEs, including severe events such as oesophageal ulcer, oesophagitis and erosive oesophagitis, have been reported at similar frequencies in placebo- and active-treatment arms. However, postmarketing studies have highlighted UGI AEs as a concern. These studies show that a significant portion of patients are less compliant with administration instructions outside strict clinical trial supervision, and when oral bisphosphonates are not administered as directed, patients are more likely to experience UGI AEs. Some clinical trials with oral bisphosphonates have suggested that a decrease in the frequency of administration may lead to improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability. In the authors' experience, the issue of UGI tolerability can be minimised by explaining to the patient and/or caregiver the importance of following administration instructions. Intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates have been recently approved for use in osteoporosis, offering an alternative regimen for patients with osteoporosis. Earlier generation IV bisphosphonates (e.g. etidronate) have been associated with acute renal failure. Alternatively, late-generation IV bisphosphonates (i.e. ibandronate) have shown a better safety profile in relation to renal toxicity. Influenza-like illness, often referred to as an acute-phase reaction, covers symptoms such as fatigue, fever, chills, myalgia and arthralgia. These symptoms are transitory and self-limiting and usually do not recur after subsequent drug administration. Symptoms of influenza-like illness have been associated with both IV and oral bisphosphonates. Osteonecrosis of the jaw has also been associated with IV bisphosphonate treatment, particularly in patients treated with high doses. A small number of patients with cancer and osteoporosis using oral bisphosphonates have also reported this AE. As osteonecrosis of the jaw is difficult to treat and is often associated with dental procedures and poor oral hygiene, preventive measures seem to be the best management option for patients taking bisphosphonates.Overall, the safety and tolerability profile of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates is good, and long-term treatment does not appear to carry a risk of serious AEs. By encouraging adherence to administration instructions physicians can minimise certain complications, such as UGI intolerability. By being aware of other potential safety issues, such as renal impairment, influenza-like illness and osteonecrosis of the jaw, physicians can detect these AEs early in the course of treatment.

A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials

There are many types of pain assessments available to researchers conducting clinical trials, ranging from simple, single-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questions through extensive, multidimensional inventories. The primary question addressed in this survey of top-tier medical journals was: Which pain assessments are most commonly used in trials? Articles addressing chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical trials were identified in 7 major medical journals for the year 2003. A total of 50 studies (1476 total original research articles reviewed) met selection criteria, and from these we identified 28 types of pain assessments. Selected studies were classified according to the dimensions of pain assessed, the type of scale and descriptors/anchors used, and the reporting period specified. The most frequently used assessments were the single-item VAS and the Numeric Rating Scale; multidimensional inventories were used infrequently. There was considerable variability in the instructions patients received about the period to consider when evaluating their pain, and many studies provided only cursory information about their assessments in the methods. Overall, it appears that clinical trials use simple measures of pain and that there is no widely accepted standard for clinical pain assessment that would facilitate comparison of outcomes across trials.

PERSPECTIVE

This review highlights the heterogeneity of pain outcome measures used and the abundance of single-item measures in clinical trials. Although there are many pain outcome measures available to clinical researchers, more consistency in the field should be encouraged so that results between studies can be compared.

Optimal timing of a single dose of zoledronic acid to increase strength in rat fracture repair

We hypothesized that ZA treatment would bolster fracture repair. In a rat model for closed fracture healing, a single dose of ZA at 0, 1, or 2 wk after fracture significantly increased BMC and strength of the healed fracture. Delaying the dose (1 or 2 wk after fracture) displayed superior results compared with dosing at the time of fracture.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are known to increase bone strength and thus the resistance to fracture by decreasing osteoclastic bone resorption. These properties may enable bisphosphonates to also increase the strength of fracture repair. Zoledronic acid (ZA) is a potent bisphosphonate with a high affinity for bone mineral, allowing bolus intravenous dosing in a range of indications. In this study, we examined the application of bolus dose ZA in endochondral fracture repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Carbon-14 labeled ZA was used in a closed rat fracture model. Rats were divided into five treatment groups (n = 25 per group): saline control, local ZA (0.01 mg/kg), and three systemic bolus ZA groups (0.1 mg/kg) with different administration times: at fracture, 1 wk after fracture, and 2 wk after fracture. Rats were killed 6 wk postoperatively. Postmortem analyses included radiography, QCT, microCT, biomechanical testing, scintillation counting, autoradiography, and histology.

RESULTS

Single-dose systemic ZA administration significantly increased callus volume, callus BMC, and mechanical strength. Perioperative treatment increased mechanical strength by 30% compared with controls (p < 0.05). Administering the systemic dose at 1 or 2 wk after fracture further increased mechanical strength compared with controls by 44% and 50%, respectively (p < 0.05). No significant differences in mechanical parameters were seen with local injection at the dose studied. Autoradiographic analysis indicated that ZA binds significantly to bone that is present at the time of administration. ZA quantification indicated that delayed administration significantly increased the uptake efficiency in the callus. Histological and microCT analysis showed that ZA treated calluses had a distinctive internal structure consisting of an intricate network of retained trabecular bone.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of a single systemic dose of ZA plays an important role in the modulation of callus properties in this rat fracture model; delaying the single dose produces a larger and stronger callus.

Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoids continue to be used for many inflammatory diseases, and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) remains the most common secondary form of metabolic bone disease. Recent meta-analyses suggest that both active and native vitamin D can help maintain lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), particularly in patients receiving lower-dose glucocorticoid therapy. Recent randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown that oral bisphosphonates are superior to vitamin D in maintaining BMD and should be continued for as long as a person receives glucocorticoid treatment. Similar to the oral bisphosphonates, intravenous ibandronate has been shown to preserve BMD and also to significantly reduce vertebral fracture risk. Increasing evidence supports a role for parathyroid hormone to prevent or treat GIOP as well. Despite effective therapies, many at-risk patients fail to receive treatment for GIOP, and even among those who initiate treatment, half discontinue within 1 to 2 years. New approaches to evidence implementation are being tested to improve the quality of osteoporosis care and decrease fracture risk among long-term glucocorticoid users.

Ibandronate, an experimental intravenous bisphosphonate for osteoporosis, bone metastases, and hypercalcemia of malignancy

Ibandronate is an experimental intravenous bisphosphonate under study for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis and skeletal complications of bone metastases, as well as hypercalcemia of malignancy. To review the data on this drug, PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for pertinent studies in English; data from January 1986-October 2005 were reviewed. In preclinical studies, ibandronate was an extremely potent bisphosphonate compared with its predecessors and was active in all animal models of human postmenopausal and corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis. Similar to other bisphosphonates, ibandronate exhibits antitumor activity and prevents or reduces bone metastases. Forty to fifty percent of the dose is bound to bone; renal clearance of unchanged drug accounts for 70% of total body clearance. Early clinical trials demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate in the prevention or treatment of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis when administered once every 3 months. Intravenous ibandronate also reduces skeletal complications of bone metastases, including pain, although the cumulative dose used is much higher than that used in osteoporosis, as the drug is administered every 3-4 weeks. Single doses of intravenous ibandronate are probably also effective in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. The major tolerability issue with intravenous bisphosphonates is renal safety, thus the drugs generally require infusion (e.g., 0.25 hr for zoledronic acid, 2-24 hrs for pamidronate). However, intravenous ibandronate can be administered by bolus injection over a few minutes without an elevated risk of nephrotoxicity. The experimental intravenous dosage is 2 mg every 3 months for treatment or prevention of osteoporosis, and 2-6 mg every 3-4 weeks or in a single dose for treatment of bone metastases or hypercalcemia of malignancy, respectively. Ibandronate can be used in the presence of severe renal impairment with proper dosage adjustment. The drug will be an interesting addition to the available drugs for osteoporosis, bone metastases, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Studies of intravenous ibandronate as an adjunctive treatment for cancers that tend to metastasize to bone are under way. Whether intravenous ibandronate will be a therapeutic advance is best answered by randomized, controlled trials. These are ongoing and should provide data with which to make better-informed choices concerning intravenous bisphosphonates.

Ibandronate Intravenous

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive five to six well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent to you in print and CD ROM forms and are available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of your facility. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The FI.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The September 2006 monograph topics are dasatinib, darunavir, ranibizumab injection, oxymorphone HCl extended-release tablets/oxymorphone HCl tablets, and 17a-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. The DUE is on oxymorphone

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most frequent cause of secondary osteoporosis. Glucocorticoids cause a rapid bone loss in the first few months of use, but the most important effect of the drug is suppression of bone formation. The administration of oral glucocorticoid is associated with an increased risk of fractures at the spine and hip. The risk is related to the dose, but even small doses can increase the risk. Patients on glucocorticoid therapy lose more trabecular than cortical bone and the fractures are more frequent at the spine than at the hip. Calcium, vitamin D and activated forms of vitamin D can prevent bone loss and antiresorptive agents are effective for prevention and treatment of bone loss and to decrease fracture risk. Despite the known effects of glucocorticoids on bone, only a few patients are advised to take preventive measures and treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

The DXL Calscan heel densitometer: evaluation and diagnostic thresholds

The DXL Calscan (Demetech AB) is a new dual energy X-ray absorptiometry device for determining heel bone mineral density (BMD). The system is based on the standard technique of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), using a fan beam configuration, but introduces an additional laser measurement of heel thickness intended to improve accuracy. We have examined the utility, in vitro and in vivo performance of the DXL Calscan and established triage thresholds based on the UK's National Osteoporosis Society guidelines on peripheral densitometry. The Calscan proved convenient, easy to use and was stable over time and within a range of operating temperatures. Short-term in vitro precision as %CV, with phantom repositioning, was 0.75% and long term precision 0.73%. Precision in vivo, determined from duplicate right heel scans of 67 subjects, was 1.19%. Effective radiation dose to the patient was <0.1 microSv per scan. 140 white females (70 osteoporotic and 70 non-osteoporotic), aged 55-70 years underwent scans of both heels. Subjects were defined as osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic on the basis of axial DXA (spine L2-L4 and total hip). Triage thresholds for reassurance-referral or referral-treatment were 0.391 g cm(-2) and 0.306 g cm(-2) for non-dominant and 0.395 g cm(-2), 0.294 g cm(-2) for dominant heel, respectively. The non-dominant heel proved slightly superior to the dominant for triage purposes. Of the seven non-osteoporotic subjects misclassified as osteoporotic by Calscan of either heel, six had severe axial osteopenia. If operated by trained personnel and used in appropriate populations exhibiting risk factors, the Calscan is well suited for use in the management of post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Acute Renal Effects of Intravenous Bisphosphonates in the Rat

Bisphosphonates are potent osteoclast inhibitors that have been associated with renal toxicity following rapid intravenous administration of high doses, which was hypothesised to be due to precipitation of bisphosphonate aggregates or complexes in the kidney. Five studies were conducted in rats investigating the characteristics of bisphosphonate-related acute renal effects. These studies included single intravenous injections of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (1) ibandronate (1-20 mg/kg), or (2) zoledronate (1-10 mg/kg); (3) a single nephrotoxic dose of the non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, clodronate (2 x 200 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection); (4) a single low dose of ibandronate (1 mg/kg); (5) a single high dose of zoledronate (10 mg/kg). Clinical biochemistry and kidney histopathology were performed 1 and/or 4 days after bisphosphonate dosing. The proximal convoluted tubules were the primary target for renal injury. Tubular degeneration and single cell necrosis of the these tubules were observed with all three bisphosphonates on the fourth, but not the first day after dosing. Differences between the bisphosphonates in the type and/or localisation of the lesions were apparent. Granular deposits in the lumen of distal tubules were apparent with the highest dose of zoledronate (10 mg/kg). However, intraluminal debris was proteinaceous with no evidence of any precipitation of bisphosphonate, or formation of aggregates or complexes in the kidney. Generally, biochemical parameters of renal safety and urinary enzymes did not differ significantly from controls. In summary, bisphosphonate-related renal changes did not appear to be due to the precipitation, aggregation or complexation of bisphosphonate, and biochemical parameters of renal safety did not reliably detect this renal injury.

Biological properties and mechanism of action of ibandronate: application to the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates, with their proven efficacy and safety, are the most commonly prescribed treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, optimal efficacy is often not achieved due to poor patient adherence to medication. Poor adherence leads to an increased risk of fracture, which itself results in morbidity, elevated healthcare costs and potentially, mortality. Although weekly rather than daily dosing of bisphosphonates has improved adherence, there remains a significant problem, and dosing less frequently than weekly has been suggested as a possible means for further improving adherence. Ibandronate is a new bisphosphonate that has a specific structure and set of characteristics that enable less frequent dosing than currently available bisphosphonates. This review provides details of the general structural features of all bisphosphonates and how these are understood to contribute to their functions in osteoporosis treatment. From this, the unique structure of ibandronate is described, along with how this translates into the high antiresorptive potency, favorable bone-binding, persistence in bone, and good tolerability that permits less frequent dosing. Finally, the clinical evidence for ibandronate is briefly presented, demonstrating the viability of less frequent dosing, with its potential benefits for patient convenience and adherence to therapy.

Bisfosfonatos intravenosos

Bisphosphonates possess a fundamental role in the treatment of bone metabolic diseases. Yet their main limitations are poor oral absorption and gastrointestinal side effects, mainly esophageal irritation. Indeed, oral administration is unpleasant for many patients, and it is difficult in bed-confined subjects. Therefore, intravenous administration of these agents can be very useful in several clinical scenarios, especially to improve the compliance. Recently, it has been showed that intravenous bisphosphonates are very useful to control hypercalcemia of malignancy, and to prevent bone complications related to metastases. Their use has also been analyzed in the prevention of bone disease after organ transplantation. Thus, their application to control Paget's disease of bone is well-known, and probably they could have an important role as antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal and steroidal osteoporosis. We present here a state of the art of the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for the aforementioned disorders.

The influence of corticosteroids on quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in the 1st year after renal transplantation

Steroid-related bone loss is a recognized complication after renal transplantation. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of bone measures bone structure besides bone mass. We investigated the influence of corticosteroid therapy on QUS parameters in the 1st year after renal transplantation. A total of 119 renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive either a steroid-free regimen or a regimen with prednisone during 4 months. In 96 patients (steroid-free n=49, steroids n=47), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters of the lumbar spine and the right hip, and QUS parameters of the right calcaneus were measured at baseline, 3, and 12 months after transplantation. Despite a significant difference in steroid use between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in DXA and QUS parameters at any time point. BMD of the lumbar spine decreased at 3 months and recovered hereafter to the baseline value. BMD of the femoral trochanter decreased at 3 months and remained stable hereafter. The QUS parameter broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) was significantly lower at 12 months after transplantation compared with baseline (steroid-free -4.1+/-1.5%, steroids -2.6+/-1.5%). In contrast to the DXA parameters, BUA continued to decrease (P<0.05) between 3 and 12 months after transplantation in both groups. It is concluded, that the usage of a moderate dose of steroids during 4 months after renal transplantation had no important influence on QUS parameters of the calcaneus. While BMD remained stable or improved between 3 and 12 months after transplantation, the decrease in BUA seems to reflect a continuing change in bone structure in this population with preexistent renal osteodystrophy.

Ibandronate: a clinical pharmacological and pharmacokinetic update

Ibandronate is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. It has a strong affinity for bone mineral and potently inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Ibandronate is effective for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy, metastatic bone disease, postmenopausal osteoporosis, corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, and Paget's disease. Oral ibandronate is rapidly absorbed (t(max) < 1 hour), with a low bioavailability (0.63%) that is further reduced (by up to 90%) in the presence of food. Ibandronate has a wide therapeutic index and is not metabolized and, therefore, has a low potential for drug interactions. Given its metabolic stability, ibandronate is eliminated from the blood by partitioning into bone (40%-50%) and through renal clearance (CL(R) approximately 60 mL/min). The CL(R) of ibandronate is linearly related to creatinine clearance. The sequestration of ibandronate in bone (V(D) > 90 L) results in a multiphasic elimination (t((1/2)) range approximately 10-60 hours), characterized by the slow release of ibandronate from the bone compartment. The potency of ibandronate and its sequestration into bone allow ibandronate to be developed as oral and intravenous injection formulations that can be administered with convenient extended between-dose intervals.

Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with active vitamin D3 analogues: a review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including organ transplantation studies

The aim of this review with meta-analysis was to determine if there is a rationale to use activated forms of vitamin D3 to treat or prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and to compare the effect of active vitamin D3 metabolites with that of other anti-osteoporosis therapies. We performed a systemic search using MEDLINE/PubMed (1966-2003). Animal studies and clinical trials involving humans with data on therapy to treat or prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with active vitamin D3 analogues were included. Animal studies and basic research studies with active vitamin D3 were reviewed (qualitative review). Meta-analysis (quantitative review) on clinical trials (including organ transplantation studies) was performed with percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density or bone mineral content as the primary outcome measure; the secondary outcome measure was incidence of vertebral fractures. Fifty-four articles were found. Animal and basic research studies showed that active vitamin D3 analogues can inhibit bone loss during treatment with glucocorticoids. Concerning the effect on bone mineral density, the pooled effect size of active vitamin D3 analogues compared with no treatment, placebo, plain vitamin D3 and/or calcium was 0.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18, 0.52). Compared with bisphosphonates, the pooled effect size was -1.03 (95% CI -1.71, -0.36). The pooled estimate of the relative risk for vertebral fractures of active vitamin D3 analogues compared with no treatment, placebo, plain vitamin D3 and/or calcium was 0.56 (95% CI 0.34, 0.92) and compared with bisphosphonates it was 1.20 (95% CI 0.32, 4.55). Active vitamin D3 analogues not only preserve bone during glucocorticoid therapy more effectively than no treatment, placebo, plain vitamin D3 and/or calcium, but are also more effective in decreasing the risk of vertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates, however, are more effective in preserving bone and decreasing the risk of vertebral fractures than active vitamin D3 analogues.

Insufficiently dosed intravenous ibandronate injections are associated with suboptimal antifracture efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Less frequent bisphosphonate dosing in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis has the potential to promote therapy adherence through improved convenience. Ibandronate is a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, proven to significantly increase vertebral and nonvertebral bone mineral density (BMD) when administered as a convenient intravenous injection. A recent double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III study explored the antifracture efficacy and safety of 1 and 0.5 mg iv ibandronate injections, given once every 3 months, in 2862 women (55-76 years) with postmenopausal osteoporosis [one to four prevalent vertebral fractures and lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD T score of less than -2.0 and greater than -5.0 in >or=1 vertebra]. All participants received daily vitamin D (400 IU) and calcium (500 mg) supplementation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new morphometric vertebral fractures after 3 years. However, although a consistent trend toward a reduction in the incidence of new morphometric vertebral fracture was observed in the active treatment arms compared with placebo (9.2% vs. 8.7% vs. 10.7% in the 1 mg, 0.5 mg and placebo groups, respectively), as well as in the incidence of nonvertebral and hip fractures, the magnitude of fracture reduction was suboptimal and was insufficient to achieve statistical significance. At the studied doses, intravenous ibandronate injections also produced dose-dependent, but comparatively small, increases in lumbar spine BMD (4.0% and 2.9%, respectively) and decreases in biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation, relative to placebo. Optimal fracture efficacy likely requires more substantial increases in BMD and more pronounced suppression of bone turnover. In light of the clear dose-response relationship observed in this and other studies, this is likely to be achieved with higher intravenous doses of ibandronate. The results of a recent phase II/III study (Intermittent Regimen Intravenous Ibandronate Study: the IRIS study) provide support for this hypothesis.

Intermittent intravenous ibandronate injections reduce vertebral fracture risk in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: results from a long-term comparative study

Despite its well-known benefits, chronic corticosteroid therapy causes osteoporotic fractures in approximately 30-50% of patients treated. To prevent the occurrence of these fractures, treatment with oral bisphosphonates is recommended. However, current oral bisphosphonates, which are given either daily or weekly, are associated with stringent, inconvenient dosing guidelines. Less frequent dosing may provide greater acceptability. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ibandronate, a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, when given by intravenous (i.v.) injection every 3 months in men and women with established corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIO; lumbar spine [L2-L4] bone mineral density [BMD] T-score < or =-2.5). A total of 115 participants were assigned to receive daily calcium supplements (500 mg) plus either ibandronate (2 mg) injections every 3 months or daily oral alfacalcidol (1 microg), for 3 years. Intermittent i.v. ibandronate injections produced significantly greater increases in mean BMD at the lumbar spine (13.3% versus 2.6%, respectively; p<0.001), and femoral neck (5.2% versus 1.9%, respectively; p<0.001) versus daily oral alfacalcidol, after 3 years, relative to baseline. This study was not statistically powered to show a difference between the groups with respect to fracture incidence. Nevertheless, after 36 months, the frequency of patients with new vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the patients receiving ibandronate relative to those taking alfacalcidol (8.6% versus 22.8%, respectively; p=0.043). This is the first time that significant vertebral fracture reduction has been demonstrated with an i.v. bisphosphonate in CIO. Patients treated with i.v. ibandronate injections also experienced less back pain (p<0.001) and less height loss (p=0.001) than those receiving oral alfacalcidol. Both regimens were well tolerated. In conclusion, intermittent i.v. ibandronate injections are efficacious, well-tolerated, and convenient, and promise to offer physicians an important therapeutic advance in the management of osteoporosis.

Intravenous ibandronate injections given every three months: a new treatment option to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy, safety, and dose response of three doses of ibandronate, given intermittently by intravenous (IV) injection every three months, in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

629 postmenopausal women, categorised according to time since menopause and baseline lumbar spine (L1-4) bone mineral density (BMD), were enrolled into a multicentre, double blind, placebo controlled trial. They were randomly allocated to receive IV ibandronate 0.5 mg, 1 mg or 2 mg, or placebo every three months. All women received daily calcium supplementation.

RESULTS

One year's treatment with intermittent IV ibandronate injections produced a dose dependent gain in mean (SD) lumbar spine BMD from baseline of 2.5 (2.5)%, 1.8 (2.6)%, and 1.0 (2.8)% in the groups receiving 2 mg, 1 mg, and 0.5 mg ibandronate, respectively, compared with a loss of BMD of 0.4 (2.4)% in the women in the placebo group; p=0.0001 for each ibandronate dose v placebo. Highest BMD gains occurred in women with osteopenia receiving 2 mg ibandronate. Similarly, at the hip, all three doses of ibandronate produced significantly better gains in BMD than placebo (p<0.05), with the greatest gains in the women with osteopenia receiving the 2 mg dose. Ibandronate concomitantly and dose dependently suppressed markers of bone turnover in comparison with placebo, and injections were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

IV ibandronate injections, given every three months, may be an effective alternative to oral bisphosphonates and hormonal therapy in the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.