The Cutaneous Assessment Tool: development and reliability in juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

[Advances in the diagnostics and treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis]

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is by far the most frequent inflammatory myopathy in childhood and adolescence. It is clinically characterized by inflammatory changes of the skin and muscles but as a multisystemic disease can also affect the skeletal system, the gastrointestinal tract, lungs and heart. Intrinsic (multigenetic risk) and extrinsic factors (triggers) are involved in the pathogenesis resulting in endothelial damage, involvement of fascies, activation of the interferon system and autoimmune reactions including formation of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA). In contrast to dermatomyositis in adults, in children and adolescents there are no associations with malignant diseases. The variable expression, the rarity of the disease and the risk of long-term damage and complications necessitate pediatric rheumatological experience in the diagnostics and treatment. Recently, new approaches in drug treatment have substantially improved the outcome and prognosis but a multidisciplinary treatment (including physicians, physiotherapists, psychologists, social workers) is mandatory, especially in the first phases of the disease. Particularly important is a professionally correct treatment of the functional sequelae, which are a particular focus of this article.

Currently recommended skin scores correlate highly in the assessment of patients with Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare, chronic, and life-threatening childhood autoimmune disease. Currently, there are recommended, reliable and validated measurement tools for assessment of skin disease activity in JDM including the Disease Activity Score (skinDAS), Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), and the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI). The Physician's global assessment skin visual analog scale (Skin VAS) is also widely used for skin activity in JDM. For the purpose of comparative international studies, we wanted to compare these tools to the Physician's skin VAS (as a standard) to identify which performs better.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the correlations of these scoring tools, and separately assess the responsiveness each tool demonstrates following patient treatment, in order to see if one tool may be preferred. This was determined by assessing how well these tools correlate with each other, and the Physician's skin VAS over time, as well as the responsiveness of each tool after patient treatment.

METHODS

Skin scores were recorded at a baseline (first visit after June 1^st, 2018) and all follow-up office visits at the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Clinic. Following baseline visits, patients were followed up as clinically indicated. A subset of newly diagnosed patients (inception cohort) was identified. Correlations were assessed at the baseline visit and over time for the whole cohort. The correlations over time were derived using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs). Standardized response means with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to test score responsiveness for the nested inception cohort.

RESULTS

The skinDAS, CAT and CDASI all correlated highly with each other and with the Physician's skin VAS. The three scoring tools accurately reflected Physician's skin VAS scores over time. In addition, all tools showed moderate to high responsiveness following treatment.

CONCLUSION

All studied skin score tools performed well in our study and appear to be useful. Since no tool far outperforms the others, arbitrary consensus will be needed to select a single standard measurement tool for the purposes of efficiency and global comparability.

Outcome Measures in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease

Reliable and responsive outcome measures that accurately detect changes in disease state, activity, and damage are crucial to conducting observational and interventional trials that can directly transform care for children with rheumatic disease. A combination of consensus-based and direct measurement approaches has led to the development of several validated, composite outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, juvenile dermatomyositis, childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus, and pediatric vasculitis. This review outlines clinician-reported, disease-specific outcome measures developed for these conditions.

Nailfold Capillaroscopy With USB Digital Microscopy in Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study of 245 Patients and Healthy Controls

Background: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) is a valuable tool to detect microcirculation abnormalities in connective tissue diseases (CTDs). However, whether the universal serial bus (USB) digital microscopy used as onychoscopy is as effective as the videocapillaroscopy in determining the diagnostic and prognostic values of CTDs remains to be determined. Objective: This study aims to investigate NFC features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis (DM), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and compare with normal controls as well as examine which feature could differentiate among CTDs. Furthermore, we aim to explore different capillaroscopic abnormalities and their association with disease activity. Methods: Nailfold images were taken from patients and healthy controls using a USB digital microscopy. Patterns on the capillary morphology, diameter, architecture, and density were recorded and compared. We further determined the NFC findings in SLE, DM, and SSc and corresponded to their respective disease activity scoring system. Results: A total of 245 participants, consisting of 54 SLE, 32 DM, and 51 SSc patients, as well as 108 controls, were enrolled. All capillaroscopic features, except for tortuous capillaries, were significantly more common in CTDs than healthy control (all p < 0.05). A multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that bushy capillaries had significantly higher odds for both SLE and DM than SSc (OR: 4.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.71-9.81, p = 0.002 and OR: 7.82, 95% CI, 2.86-21.38, p < 0.001, respectively). Elongated capillaries demonstrated significant odds for SLE compared with SSc (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.005-11.20, p = 0.049), while prominent subpapillary plexus showed greater odds for SLE compared with both DM and SSc (OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.07-7.02, p = 0.03 and OR: 5.78, 95% CI: 2.29-14.58, p < 0.001, respectively). The presence of hemorrhage, enlarged capillaries, and the low-density index had significantly higher odds in favor of SSc than SLE. Bushy capillaries were the only pattern with a strong association for DM over SSc. The presence of enlarged capillaries indicated higher SLE severity, but no specific finding was related to DM or SSc skin scores. Conclusions: Nailfold capillaroscopic examination using a digital microscope is a valuable method for the diagnosis of SLE, DM, and SSc. Several morphologic patterns can help differentiate among CTDs; however, the prognostic significance of this method requires further investigations.

Siglec-1 expression on monocytes is associated with the interferon signature in juvenile dermatomyositis and can predict treatment response

Objective

JDM is a rare chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease with a predominant role for type I IFN responses. We aimed to determine the potential of Siglec-1 expression on monocytes as a novel IFN-inducible biomarker for disease activity monitoring and prediction of treatment response in patients with JDM.

Methods

Siglec-1 was measured by flow cytometry on circulating monocytes of 21 newly diagnosed JDM patients before start of treatment and, for 10 of these, also during follow-up. The expression levels of five type I IFN-stimulated genes, MX1, IFI44, IFI44L, LY6E and IFIT3, were measured by RT-qPCR to determine the IFN signature and calculate an IFN score. IFN-inducible plasma proteins CXCL10 and galectin-9 were measured by multiplex immunoassay.

Results

Siglec-1 and IFN score were increased in JDM patients compared with controls and correlated with clinical disease activity. Stratification of patients by Siglec-1 expression at diagnosis identified those with high Siglec-1 expression as having a higher risk of requiring treatment intensification within the first 3 months after diagnosis (55% vs 0% of patients, P = 0.01). Siglec-1 expression strongly correlated with plasma levels of previously validated biomarkers CXCL10 (r_s = 0.81, P < 0.0001) and galectin-9 (r_s = 0.83, P < 0.0001), and was superior to the IFN score in predicting treatment response (area under the curve 0.87 vs 0.53, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Siglec-1 on monocytes is a novel IFN-inducible biomarker in JDM that correlates with clinical disease activity and identifies patients at risk for a suboptimal treatment response. Further studies are required to validate these findings and their clinical potential.

Outcome Scores in Pediatric Rheumatology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Providing a summary of the latest research on outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, childhood -onset systemic lupus erythematosus, and juvenile dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

A rational management of patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases requires the regular assessment of the level of disease activity and damage, as well as the evaluation of therapeutic response through validated and standardized outcome measures. Ideally, such tools should be simple, feasible, and easily applicable in routine care. Recently, there has been a great deal of effort to refine existing tools and devise novel outcome measures, aiming to address the various aspects of disease impact and to improve the reliability of research studies and clinical trials. The newest outcome tools in pediatric rheumatology have markedly enlarged the spectrum of health domains assessable in a standardized way, thus increasing the reliability of evaluation of clinical response and fostering future clinical trials.

Clinical characteristics and management of clinically amyopathic juvenile dermatomyositis across four academic centers

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Clinically amyopathic juvenile dermatomyositis (CAJDM) is an uncommon but important subset of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis, characterized by pathognomonic cutaneous findings without clinically evident muscle weakness. With limited data available and lack of standardized management guidelines for CAJDM, we sought to describe common features, including early indicators that may be associated with progression of muscle disease, and review the course and treatment of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with CAJDM was conducted at four North American academic centers between the years 2000 and 2015.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included, of whom 21 (72%) were female. After a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 1.8-5.8 years), 5 of the 29 (17%) patients with CAJDM evolved into classic juvenile dermatomyositis. Median time to develop weakness was 12 months (IQR 8-19 months) after diagnosis. The skin disease of CAJDM patients who did not develop weakness was often found to be recalcitrant with 58% of them requiring multiple systemic therapies to control their cutaneous disease.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the need for long-term monitoring for the development of myositis in CAJDM and for prospective studies on treatment of recalcitrant skin disease.

The validity and utility of the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) as a clinical outcome instrument in dermatomyositis: A comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Validated outcome measures are paramount in the assessment of disease progression and evaluation of new therapeutics in clinical trials. Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease that is frequently refractory to current therapies and warrants the development of new treatments. The Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed in 2008 in response to a need for a reliable, validated measure of skin disease activity and damage for use in clinical trials and longitudinal monitoring of disease progression.

METHODS

The literature was searched for all studies validating and utilizing the CDASI between 2008 and October 2018 using searches in PubMed. Studies pertaining to validation of the CDASI, correlation with quality of life, use in the evaluation of current therapies and ongoing trials, as well as relationships to biomarkers were included in this review.

RESULTS

The CDASI was found to have intra- and inter-rater reliability, validity, reproducibility, sensitivity to clinical changes, and ease of use. It has been shown to correlate with quality of life as measured by the Skindex-29 outcome measure. The CDASI activity score has additionally been shown to correlate significantly with IFN-β, a key cytokine in DM pathogenesis.

CONCLUSION

The CDASI is a validated measure of dermatomyositis disease and has been shown to be an effective outcome instrument in clinical trials.

Galectin-9 and CXCL10 as Biomarkers for Disease Activity in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study and Multicohort Validation

Objective

Objective evaluation of disease activity is challenging in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) due to a lack of reliable biomarkers, but it is crucial to avoid both under‐ and overtreatment of patients. Recently, we identified 2 proteins, galectin‐9 and CXCL10, whose levels are highly correlated with the extent of juvenile DM disease activity. This study was undertaken to validate galectin‐9 and CXCL10 as biomarkers for disease activity in juvenile DM, and to assess their disease specificity and potency in predicting the occurrence of flares.

Methods

Levels of galectin‐9 and CXCL10 were measured by multiplex immunoassay in serum samples from 125 unique patients with juvenile DM in 3 international cross‐sectional cohorts and a local longitudinal cohort. The disease specificity of both proteins was examined in 50 adult patients with DM or nonspecific myositis (NSM) and 61 patients with other systemic autoimmune diseases.

Results

Both cross‐sectionally and longitudinally, galectin‐9 and CXCL10 outperformed the currently used laboratory marker, creatine kinase (CK), in distinguishing between juvenile DM patients with active disease and those in remission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.86–0.90 for galectin‐9 and CXCL10; AUC 0.66–0.68 for CK). The sensitivity and specificity for active disease in juvenile DM was 0.84 and 0.92, respectively, for galectin‐9 and 0.87 and 1.00, respectively, for CXCL10. In 10 patients with juvenile DM who experienced a flare and were prospectively followed up, continuously elevated or rising biomarker levels suggested an imminent flare up to several months before the onset of symptoms, even in the absence of elevated CK levels. Galectin‐9 and CXCL10 distinguished between active disease and remission in adult patients with DM or NSM (P = 0.0126 for galectin‐9 and P < 0.0001 for CXCL10) and were suited for measurement in minimally invasive dried blood spots (healthy controls versus juvenile DM, P = 0.0040 for galectin‐9 and P < 0.0001 for CXCL10).

Conclusion

In this study, galectin‐9 and CXCL10 were validated as sensitive and reliable biomarkers for disease activity in juvenile DM. Implementation of these biomarkers into clinical practice as tools to monitor disease activity and guide treatment might facilitate personalized treatment strategies.

Innovative Research Design to Meet the Challenges of Clinical Trials for Juvenile Dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper aims to provide a summary of the recent therapeutic advances and the latest research on outcome measures for clinical trials in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the superiority of the combination of prednisone with methotrexate over other conventional therapies and the potential effectiveness of rituximab in refractory cases. A multinational project has led to develop new criteria for the definition of minimal, moderate, and major improvement in future JDM clinical trials. This effort has been paralleled by the establishment of criteria for clinically inactive disease. The validation of the first composite disease activity score for JDM is in progress. The new outcome measures will increase the reliability of assessment of clinical response in JDM clinical trials and foster future multinational RCTs aimed to investigate novel treatment strategies for refractory forms of JDM.

Evaluation of the reliability of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index and the Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method in juvenile dermatomyositis among paediatric dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists

BACKGROUND

The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method (CAT-BM) have been shown to be reliable and valid outcome measures to assess cutaneous disease in adult dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile DM (JDM), respectively.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the CDASI and CAT-BM for use by paediatric dermatologists, paediatric rheumatologists and paediatric neurologists in patients with JDM.

METHODS

Five paediatric dermatologists, five paediatric rheumatologists and five paediatric neurologists each evaluated 14 patients with JDM using the CDASI, CAT-BM, and skin Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scales. Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, construct validity and completion time were compared.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability for CDASI activity and damage scores was good to moderate for paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists, but poor for paediatric neurologists. The inter-rater reliability for CAT-BM activity scores was moderate for paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists, but poor for paediatric neurologists and poor across all specialties for damage scores. Intra-rater reliability for the CDASI and CAT-BM activity and damage scores was moderate to excellent for paediatric dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists. Strong associations were found between skin PGA activity and damage scores and CDASI or CAT-BM activity and damage scores, respectively (P < 0·002). The CDASI had a mean completion time of 5·4 min compared with that for the CAT-BM of 3·1 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the reliability of the CDASI activity and damage scores and the CAT-BM activity scores when used by paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists in assessing JDM. Significant variation existed in the paediatric neurologists' scores.

Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus clinical treatment plans for juvenile dermatomyositis with skin predominant disease

BACKGROUND

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common form of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in children. A subset of children have the rash of JDM without significant weakness, and the optimal treatments for these children are unknown. The goal of this study was to describe the development of consensus clinical treatment plans (CTPs) for children with JDM who have active skin rashes, without significant muscle involvement, referred to as skin predominant JDM in this manuscript.

METHODS

The Children's Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) is a North American consortium of pediatric rheumatology health care providers. CARRA members collaborated to determine consensus on typical treatments for JDM patients with skin findings without significant weakness, to develop CTPs for this subgroup of patients. We used a combination of Delphi surveys and nominal group consensus meetings to develop these CTPs.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on patient characteristics and outcome assessment, and CTPs were developed and finalized for patients with skin predominant JDM. Treatment option A included hydroxychloroquine alone, Treatment option B included hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate, and Treatment option C included hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Three CTPs were developed for use in children with skin predominant JDM, which reflect typical treatment approaches. These are not considered to be specific recommendations or standard of care. Using the CARRA network and prospective data collection, we will be able to apply statistical methods in the future to allow comparisons of JDM patients following these consensus treatment plans.

Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Clinical Treatment Plans for Juvenile Dermatomyositis with Persistent Skin Rash

OBJECTIVE

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children. While outcomes are generally thought to be good, persistence of skin rash is a common problem. The goal of this study was to describe the development of clinical treatment plans (CTP) for children with JDM characterized by persistent skin rash despite complete resolution of muscle involvement.

METHODS

The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, a North American consortium of pediatric rheumatologists and other healthcare providers, used a combination of Delphi surveys and nominal group consensus meetings to develop CTP that reflected consensus on typical treatments for patients with JDM with persistent skin rash.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on patient characteristics and outcome assessment. Patients should have previously received corticosteroids and methotrexate (MTX). Three consensus treatment plans were developed. Plan A added intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) if it was not already being used. Plan B added mycophenolate mofetil, while Plan C added cyclosporine. Continuation of previous treatments, including corticosteroids, MTX, and IVIG, was permitted in plans B and C.

CONCLUSION

Three consensus CTP were developed for use in children with JDM and persistent skin rash despite complete resolution of muscle disease. These CTP reflect typical treatment approaches and are not to be considered treatment recommendations or standard of care. Using prospective data collection and statistical methods to account for nonrandom treatment assignment, it is expected that these CTP will be used to allow treatment comparisons, and ultimately determine the best treatment for these patients.

Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile dermatomyositis

Background

In 2012, a European initiative called Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) was launched to optimise and disseminate diagnostic and management regimens in Europe for children and young adults with rheumatic diseases. Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare disease within the group of paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs) and can lead to significant morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines are sparse and management is mostly based on physicians' experience. Consequently, treatment regimens differ throughout Europe.

Objectives

To provide recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of JDM.

Methods

Recommendations were developed by an evidence-informed consensus process using the European League Against Rheumatism standard operating procedures. A committee was constituted, consisting of 19 experienced paediatric rheumatologists and 2 experts in paediatric exercise physiology and physical therapy, mainly from Europe. Recommendations derived from a validated systematic literature review were evaluated by an online survey and subsequently discussed at two consensus meetings using nominal group technique. Recommendations were accepted if >80% agreement was reached.

Results

In total, 7 overarching principles, 33 recommendations on diagnosis and 19 recommendations on therapy were accepted with >80% agreement among experts. Topics covered include assessment of skin, muscle and major organ involvement and suggested treatment pathways.

Conclusions

The SHARE initiative aims to identify best practices for treatment of patients suffering from PRD. Within this remit, recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of JDM have been formulated by an evidence-informed consensus process to produce a standard of care for patients with JDM throughout Europe.

Pneumatosis Intestinalis Associated with Juvenile Dermatomyositis

We herein report a case of pneumatosis intestinalis (PI), a condition characterized by the presence of gas within the wall of the digestive tract, associated with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). A 16-year-old girl, diagnosed with JDM at the age of 10, presented with abdominal pain and distention. She developed PI based on radiological findings that also included a dilated large intestine, extraluminal gas, and secondary diaphragmatic elevation. She was observed with medical therapy including bowel rest and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. However, she ultimately developed a strangulated obstruction 5 years after presentation with PI and large intestine resection and colostomy were performed emergently.

Myositis registries and biorepositories: powerful tools to advance clinical, epidemiologic and pathogenic research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical registries and biorepositories have proven extremely useful in many studies of diseases, especially rare diseases. Given their rarity and diversity, the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or myositis syndromes, have benefited from individual researchers' collections of cohorts of patients. Major efforts are being made to establish large registries and biorepositories that will allow many additional studies to be performed that were not possible before. Here, we describe the registries developed by investigators and patient support groups that are currently available for collaborative research purposes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We have identified 46 myositis research registries, including many with biorepositories, which have been developed for a wide variety of purposes and have resulted in great advances in understanding the range of phenotypes, clinical presentations, risk factors, pathogenic mechanisms, outcome assessment, therapeutic responses, and prognoses. These are now available for collaborative use to undertake additional studies. Two myositis patient registries have been developed for research, and myositis patient support groups maintain demographic registries with large numbers of patients available to be contacted for potential research participation.

SUMMARY

Investigator-initiated myositis research registries and biorepositories have proven extremely useful in understanding many aspects of these rare and diverse autoimmune diseases. These registries and biorepositories, in addition to those developed by myositis patient support groups, deserve continued support to maintain the momentum in this field as they offer major opportunities to improve understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of these diseases in cost-effective ways.

Health outcomes of pediatric rheumatic diseases

Measurement of health outcomes in pediatric rheumatic diseases is a critical component of clinical practice and research studies. Measures should include the biological, physical, and psychosocial dimensions of health. Health outcome measures are developed systematically, often using consensus methods. Prior to implementation into practice, health outcome measures must undergo evaluation of measurement properties such as reliability, validity, and responsiveness. There are several health outcome measures available for juvenile idiopathic arthritis, juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus, and juvenile dermatomyositis, many of which are composite measures of disease activity. In addition, tools exist for measuring physical functioning and health-related quality of life. There is increasing focus on the incorporation of patient-reported or parent-reported outcomes when measuring the health state of patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases. Further work is required to determine the optimal health outcome measures and approach for eliciting the patient's perception of their health state in pediatric rheumatology.

Disease activity measures in paediatric rheumatic diseases

Disease activity refers to potentially reversible aspects of a disease. Measurement of disease activity in paediatric rheumatic diseases is a critical component of patient care and clinical research. Disease activity measures are developed systematically, often involving consensus methods. To be useful, a disease activity measure must be feasible, valid, and interpretable. There are several challenges in quantifying disease activity in paediatric rheumatology; namely, the conditions are multidimensional, the level of activity must be valuated in the context of treatment being received, there is no gold standard for disease activity, and it is often difficult to incorporate the patient's perspective of their disease activity. To date, core sets of response variables are defined for juvenile idiopathic arthritis, juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus, and juvenile dermatomyositis, as well as definitions for improvement in response to therapy. Several specific absolute disease activity measures also exist for each condition. Further work is required to determine the optimal disease activity measures in paediatric rheumatology.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: current trends in pathogenesis, clinical features, and up-to-date treatment recommendations

Recently, there have been important advances in the understanding of the pathophysiologic features, assessment, and management of patients with a newly diagnosed idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Myositis-specific autoantibodies have been identified to define patient subgroups and offer prognostic implications. Similarly, proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 and type 1 interferon-dependent genes, may serve as potential biomarkers of disease activity in adult and juvenile patients with dermatomyositis (DM). Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging has become an important modality for the assessment of muscle inflammation in adult IIM and juvenile DM. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies also are being recognized as a subset of IIM triggered by medications such as statins. However, confusion exists regarding effective management strategies for patients with IIM because of the lack of large-scale, randomized, controlled studies. This review focuses primarily on our current management and treatment algorithms for IIM including the care of pediatric patients with juvenile DM. For this review, we conducted a search of PubMed and MEDLINE for articles published from January 1, 1970, to December 1, 2011, using the following search terms: idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, dermatomyositis, polymyositis, juvenile dermatomyositis, sporadic inclusion body myositis, inclusion body myositis, inflammatory myositis, myositis, myopathies, pathogenesis, therapy, and treatment. Studies published in English were selected for inclusion in our review as well as additional articles identified from bibliographies.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in childhood: current concepts

The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a group of rare, chronic, multisystem, autoimmune diseases associated with muscle weakness. This article reviews practical issues of relevance to pediatricians, including clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, investigation, therapy, and prognosis. The importance of early recognition and specialist involvement is emphasized.

Evaluation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the CDASI and the CAT-BM

To properly evaluate therapies for cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM), it is essential to administer an outcome instrument that is reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical change, particularly when measuring disease activity. The purpose of this study was to compare two skin severity DM outcome measures, the Cutaneous Disease and Activity Severity Index (CDASI) and the Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method (CAT-BM), with the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) as the "gold standard". Ten dermatologists evaluated 14 patients with DM using the CDASI, CAT-BM, and PGA scales. Inter- and intra-rater reliability, validity, responsiveness, and completion time were compared for each outcome instrument. Responsiveness was assessed from a different study population, where one physician evaluated 35 patients with 110 visits. The CDASI was found to have a higher inter- and intra-rater reliability. Regarding construct validity, both the CDASI and the CAT-BM were significant predictors of the PGA scales. The CDASI had the best responsiveness among the three outcome instruments examined. The CDASI had a statistically longer completion time than the CAT-BM by about 1.5 minutes. The small patient population may limit the external validity of the findings observed. The CDASI is a better clinical tool to assess skin severity in DM.

Update on the assessment of children with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

The availability of validated measurement tools to assess children with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies is critical to clinical care and to ongoing research into new therapeutic modalities and approaches. Recent work has led to the development of tools for assessment of muscle strength and physical function, skin disease, global disease activity and damage, extramuscular disease, and quality of life. Ongoing work is attempting to integrate these assessments into core sets and definitions of improvement and flare. Future work will refine these assessments and definitions and--where there are multiple choices--determine which tools constitute an optimal assessment.

Protocols for the initial treatment of moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis: results of a Children's Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Conference

OBJECTIVE

To use juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) survey data and expert opinion to develop a small number of consensus treatment protocols, which reflect current initial treatment of moderately severe juvenile DM.

METHODS

A consensus meeting was held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on December 1-2, 2007. Nominal group technique was used to achieve consensus on treatment protocols, which represented typical management of moderately severe juvenile DM. Consensus was also reached as to which patients these protocols would be applicable (inclusion and exclusion criteria), which initial investigations should be done prior to initiating one of these protocols, which data should be collected to evaluate these protocols, and the concomitant interventions required or recommended.

RESULTS

Three protocols that described the first 2 months of treatment were developed. All protocols included corticosteroids and methotrexate. One protocol also included intravenous gamma globulin. Consensus was achieved for all issues that were addressed by conference participants, although there were some areas of controversy.

CONCLUSION

Despite considerable variation in clinical practice, it is possible to achieve consensus on the initial treatment of juvenile DM. Once these protocols are extended beyond 2 months, these protocols will be available for clinical use. By using methods that account for differences between patients (confounding by indication), the comparative effectiveness of the protocols will be evaluated. In the future, the goal will be to identify the optimal treatment of moderately severe juvenile DM.

Juvenile dermatomyositis: advances in pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare, presumably autoimmune illness that causes proximal muscle weakness and a variety of typical cutaneous features. The study of this illness has been hampered by its rarity but, in recent years, important developments have increased our understanding of JDM. Genetic factors are likely important in the pathogenesis of JDM. These include several Human Leukocyte Antigen alleles, in particular those associated with the 8.1 ancestral haplotype and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene 308 polymorphism. Microchimerism, activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and upregulation of type-1 interferon inducible genes also appear to play an important role in the pathogenesis of JDM. The study of JDM has also been limited by a lack of validated assessment tools. Recent work has validated the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire as measures of muscle strength and function, and the Cutaneous Assessment Tool as a measure of skin disease activity and damage. Development of core sets of tools that should be used in all JDM studies has also been an important step. The use of magnetic resonance imaging and novel laboratory assessments (such as type-1 interferon inducible gene products, peripheral blood B cell and natural killer cell numbers, and myositis-associated and myositis-specific autoantibodies) are also playing an increasing role in the diagnosis and assessment of JDM. Current treatment is with corticosteroids, frequently in combination with other medications such as methotrexate or intravenous gammaglobulin. Newer therapies, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and rituximab are currently being evaluated; it is not clear what role these medications will have in the future.

Juvenile dermatomyositis: new developments in pathogenesis, assessment and treatment

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare, potentially life-threatening systemic autoimmune disease primarily affecting muscle and skin. Recent advances in the recognition, standardised assessment and treatment of JDM have been greatly facilitated by large collaborative research networks. Through these networks, a number of immunogenetic risk factors have now been defined, as well as a number of potential pathways identified in the aetio-pathogenesis of JDM. Myositis-associated and myositis-specific autoantibodies are helping to sub-phenotype JDM, defined by clinical features, outcomes and immunogenetic risk factors. Partially validated tools to assess disease activity and damage have assisted in standardising outcomes. Aggressive treatment approaches, including multiple initial therapies, as well as new drugs and biological therapies for refractory disease, offer promise of improved outcomes and less corticosteroid-related toxicity.

An update on selected connective tissue diseases in adolescents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent advances in our current understanding of several autoimmune disorders that affect adolescents. Systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, and juvenile localized scleroderma stand out among the connective tissue diseases for their multiorgan involvement, significant potential morbidity, and the challenges of chronic treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

A better understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases and new insights into the relationship between the immune dysregulation and clinical features has allowed for the development of novel therapies that are more efficacious and targeted than traditional therapies.

SUMMARY

This article provides an update of the recent literature, highlighting advances that the general pediatrician should know in the care of adolescents with these diseases.

Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

Reliable and validated measures of skin disease severity are needed for cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM). Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) skin indices have been developed as outcome instruments.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to demonstrate reliability and validity of the CDASI, and to compare the CDASI with other potential tools for use in measuring disease severity in cutaneous dermatomyositis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CDASI has four activity and two damage measures, with scores from 0 to 148. DSSI assesses activity based on body surface area and severity on a scale of 0-72. CAT uses 21 activity and damage items, for a range of 0-175 for activity and 0-33 for damage. Ten dermatologists used the instruments to score the same 12-16 patients in one session. Global validation measures were administered to physicians and patients.

RESULTS

Global validation measures correlated with the three outcome instruments (P < 0.0001). CAT displayed lower inter- and intrarater reliability relative to the CDASI. All scales correlate better with physician than patient global skin measures.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the CDASI may be a useful outcome measure for studies of cutaneous DM. Further testing to compare responsiveness of all three measures is necessary.

Alternative scoring of the Cutaneous Assessment Tool in juvenile dermatomyositis: results using abbreviated formats

OBJECTIVE

The Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) is a comprehensive, semiquantitative tool for the assessment of skin disease in juvenile dermatomyositis (DM). The goal of this study was to determine whether alternative scoring methods would shorten the CAT without compromising its measurement characteristics.

METHODS

A total of 113 children with juvenile DM were assessed at baseline; 94 were assessed again 7-9 months later. Interrater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness were obtained using the original scoring method and 2 alternative methods: the maximum and binary scoring methods.

RESULTS

Spearman's correlations of the maximum and binary methods with the original were both 0.98 (P < 0.0001) for the CAT activity score, and 0.96 and 0.98, respectively (P < 0.0001), for the CAT damage score. Values obtained for interrater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness were similar for all 3 scoring methods. Although there was a trend toward the maximum method having higher interrater reliability and the binary method having higher responsiveness, the confidence intervals were overlapping and no statistically significant differences were observed. Correlation coefficients for the 3 scoring methods with other measures of myositis disease activity and damage were very similar.

CONCLUSION

The maximum and binary methods of scoring the CAT have measurement characteristics similar to the original method. Adoption of one of these abbreviated scoring methods should increase its acceptability to clinicians and researchers.

Preliminary validation and clinical meaning of the Cutaneous Assessment Tool in juvenile dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

To provide preliminary validation of the Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), a new tool to assess cutaneous manifestations of juvenile dermatomyositis (DM), and to explore the clinical meaning of CAT scores.

METHODS

Children with juvenile DM (n = 113) were assessed at baseline and 7-9 months later (n = 94). Internal consistency, redundancy, construct validity, and responsiveness of the CAT were examined. CAT scores corresponding to ordinal global assessments were determined.

RESULTS

Item-total correlations ranged from 0.27-0.67 for activity lesions present in > or =10% of patients; item-domain and domain-total correlations ranged from 0.25-0.99. Cronbach's alpha was 0.79 for the CAT activity score and 0.74 for the CAT damage score. As predicted, the CAT activity score correlated strongly with both global disease activity and skin disease activity and moderately with the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale, whereas the CAT damage score correlated moderately with the physician global disease and skin disease damage scores. Median CAT activity scores of 1, 7, 13, 18, and 31 corresponded to absent, mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe skin disease activity, respectively. Median CAT damage scores of 0, 1, 2, and 5 correlated with the same descriptions of damage (severe and extremely severe combined).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary validation of the CAT demonstrated good internal consistency, nonredundancy, good construct validity, and appropriate responsiveness. The CAT is a comprehensive, semiquantitative assessment tool for skin disease in juvenile DM.