Herpesvirus Infections Potentiated by Biologics

Herpesviruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) maintain lifelong latency in the host after primary infection and can reactivate periodically either as asymptomatic viral shedding or as clinical disease. Immunosuppression, including biologic therapy, may increase frequency and severity of herpesvirus reactivation and infection. Licensed biologics are reviewed regarding their risks of potentiating HSV, VZV, and CMV reactivation and infection. Approaches to prophylaxis against HSV, VZV, and CMV infection or reactivation are discussed.

Successful treatment with famciclovir for varicella zoster virus infection resistant to acyclovir

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivates more frequently in immunocompromised patients than immunocompetent subjects and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Acyclovir is frequently used for treatment against VZV reactivation. However, long-term use of acyclovir can result in the emergence of VZV strain resistant to acyclovir. Here, we report a 67-year-old man with adult T-cell leukemia who suffered from herpes zoster with acyclovir-resistant VZV after long-term prophylaxis. The isolated viruses from his skin lesions were a mixture of acyclovir-resistant and acyclovir-susceptible strains. Sequence analysis showed the presence of thymidine kinase (TK) mutations in the resistant clones. Interestingly, oral administration of famciclovir, a prodrug form of penciclovir, resulted in resolution of his herpes zoster, although most acyclovir-resistant strains of VZV were reported to be resistant to penciclovir. This implied that a certain amount of susceptible VZV with wild-type viral TK gene was present in vivo, and that famciclovir could be phosphorylated intracellularly by the intact viral kinases. As famciclovir is more potent and longer-acting than acyclovir, the susceptible strains might have suppressed the generation and proliferation of the resistant in vivo. Even when VZV is developing resistance to acyclovir, famciclovir might be effective at least in the early resistant phase.

Factors associated with severe skin infections in patients treated with biologic therapies for inflammatory rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of severe infections is increased under biologic therapies and the skin is the second localization.

OBJECTIVE

To appraise the factors associated with severe skin infections (SSI) in patients under biologic therapies for inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD).

METHODS

We performed a case-control (ratio 1:3) study nested in a prospective cohort of patients with IRD. SSI was defined as requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectious therapy. We defined two imbedded periods: period A was the time window between the first biologic therapy and the SSI; period B was the last 3 or 12 months (for tumor necrosis factor blockers or rituximab, respectively) before the SSI.

RESULTS

Among 4,361 patients with IRD, 29 had a SSI under biologic therapy. In multivariate analyses, SSI were significantly associated with smoking, baseline C-reactive protein and gammaglobulinemia, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before biologic therapy, cumulative dose of steroids, concomitant steroids during period A, number of different biologic therapies during period A, treatment with infliximab during period A, period B or as first biologic therapy and treatment at high dose during period B.

CONCLUSION

In patients under biologic therapies for IRD, the risk of SSI is associated with several factors including tobacco, treatment with infliximab or high dose range.