Lessons for the use of non-biologic anchor treatments for rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologic therapies

Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer with biological therapy in common inflammatory diseases: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most previous studies compared the risk for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in biologic-treated common inflammatory diseases with the general population. Whether the increased NMSC risk is caused by the disease itself, the biologics, or both remains unknown.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to May 2021. Studies were included if they assessed the risk of NMSC for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or psoriasis patients treated with biologics compared with patients not receiving biologics. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

The current meta-analysis included 12 studies. Compared with patients with the inflammatory disease without biologics, patients receiving biological therapy were associated with an increased risk for NMSC (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.37), especially in patients with RA (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.36) and psoriasis (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52), but not in patients with IBD (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.91). The risks for squamous cell skin cancer and basal cell skin cancer were both increased for patients receiving biologics. However, the risk of NMSC did not increase in patients treated with biologics less than 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that increased risk of NMSC was identified in RA and psoriasis treated with biologics compared with patients not receiving biologics, but not in patients with IBD. The inner cause for the increased risk of NMSC in IBD patients should be further discussed.

Prevalence and predictors of adverse events with methotrexate mono- and combination-therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to summarize rates of adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA or inflammatory arthritis starting MTX as monotherapy or in combination with other csDMARDs, and to identify reported predictors of AEs.

METHODS

Three databases were searched for studies reporting AEs in MTX-naïve patients with RA. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies were included. Prevalence rates of AEs were pooled using random effects meta-analysis, stratified by study design.

RESULTS

Forty-six articles (34 RCTs and 12 observational studies) were identified. The pooled prevalence of total AEs was 80.1% in RCTs (95% CI: 73.5, 85.9), compared with 23.1% in observational studies (95% CI: 12.3, 36.0). The pooled prevalence of serious AEs was 9.5% in RCTs (95% CI: 7.4, 11.7), and 2.1% in observational studies (95% CI: 1.0, 3.4). MTX discontinuation due to AEs was higher in observational studies (15.5%, 95% CI: 9.6, 22.3) compared with RCTs (6.7%, 95% CI: 4.7, 8.9). Gastrointestinal events were the most commonly reported AEs (pooled prevalence: 32.7%, 95% CI: 18.5, 48.7). Five studies examined predictors of AEs. RF status, BMI and HAQ score were associated with MTX discontinuation due to AEs; ACPA negativity, smoking and elevated creatinine were associated with increased risk of elevated liver enzymes.

CONCLUSION

The review provides an up-to-date overview of the prevalence of AEs associated with MTX in patients with RA. The findings should be communicated to patients to help them make informed choices prior to commencing MTX.

Use of Auto-Injector for Methotrexate Subcutaneous Self-Injections: High Satisfaction Level and Good Compliance in SELF-I Study, a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study

Introduction

The objective of the study was to compare compliance and acceptability of a new auto-injector (AI) versus syringe for administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel group study comparing AI to pre-filled syringe (PFS). Adult patients with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) receiving MTX (orally or by injection) for at least 3 months were allocated to AI or PFS for 6 months and then were allocated to AI for 6 further months. Two co-primary endpoints were defined at M6: percentage of patients with compliance at least 80%; change in functional capacity assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Secondary endpoints included quality of life (RaQoL), RA activity (DAS28), and acceptability. Local safety at injection site was assessed at each visit.

Results

Two-hundred and sixty-five patients were randomized. The main analysis was conducted on per protocol set (99 AI and 98 PFS). Compliance was 96.2% in AI and 98.9% in PFS. Good complier rates were 89.9% and 94.9%, thus a difference of − 5.0% (− 18.9%; 8.9%). HAQ remained stable in both groups. No difference was found on RaQoL, change in RA activity, and safety profile. Autonomy, acceptability, and patient satisfaction were better with AI, and patients having had the experience of both AI and PFS preferred AI (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although this study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of AI versus PFS, compliance was excellent in the two groups, and AI, which was preferred by patients, is a valuable alternative to PFS for administration of MTX.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02553018.

Funding

Nordic Pharma SAS.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-like pattern in liver biopsy of rheumatoid arthritis patients with persistent transaminitis during low-dose methotrexate treatment

OBJECTIVE

The mechanism of liver injury with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) is incompletely understood. This study was designed to evaluate the association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver injury during MTX treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Between October 2014 and May 2015, we enrolled all MTX users for RA and monitored participant serum hepatic transaminase levels for 1 year. All patients had normal transaminase levels before the first MTX prescription. Using diagnostic criteria for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), we performed histological analyses for patients presenting persistent transaminitis, defined as elevations of hepatic transaminases in four of six determinations during the follow-up period. Possible risk factors for persistent transaminitis were also examined.

RESULTS

We followed 846 RA patients with a mean cumulative MTX dose of 2.48 g and identified 51 patients presenting persistent transaminitis. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, obesity (odds ratio [OR] 3.23, p < 0.001), type 2 diabetes (OR 3.52, p = 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (OR 2.56, p = 0.004), and hyperuricemia (OR 3.52, p = 0.019), which are recognized as risk factors for NAFLD, were independently associated with a risk of persistent transaminitis. Among patients with persistent transaminitis, 42 showed fatty liver at ultrasonography. These patients had no evidence of alcoholic fatty liver, chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver diseases, or hereditary liver diseases. Biopsy specimens were obtained from 32 patients, and we found that a NASH-like pattern was the most prevalent histological abnormality. There was no significant impact of MTX dose and duration on the histological severity.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors and histological findings are similar between NAFLD/NASH and liver injury during low-dose MTX treatment for RA, which suggests a strong association between both entities. NAFLD/NASH may be an underlying condition causing persistent transaminitis in MTX-treated RA patients. The results of this study illustrate the need for monitoring liver injury in RA patients with NAFLD risk factors during MTX treatment.

A Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity Score and the Choice of Second-Line Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failure

Objective

To investigate whether the Multi‐Biomarker Disease Activity (MBDA) score predicts optimal add‐on treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were inadequate responders to MTX (MTX‐IRs).

Methods

We analyzed data from 157 MTX‐IRs (with a Disease Activity Score using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28‐ESR] >3.2) from the Swedish Pharmacotherapy (SWEFOT) trial who were randomized to receive triple therapy (MTX plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine) versus MTX plus infliximab. The MBDA score as a predictor of the subsequent DAS28‐based response to each second‐line treatment was analyzed at randomization with the Breslow‐Day test for 2 × 2 groups, using both validated categories (low [<30], moderate [30–44], and high [>44]) and dichotomized categories (lower [≤38] versus higher [>38]).

Results

Among the 157 patients, 12% had a low MBDA score, 32% moderate, and 56% high. Of those with a low MBDA score, 88% responded to subsequent triple therapy, and 18% responded to MTX plus infliximab (P = 0.006); for those with a high MBDA score, the response rates were 35% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.040). When using 38 as a cutoff for the MBDA score (29% patients with lower scores versus 71% with higher scores), the differential associations with response to triple therapy versus MTX plus infliximab were 79% versus 44% and 36% versus 58%, respectively (P = 0.001). Clinical and inflammatory markers had poorer predictive capacity for response to triple therapy or MTX plus infliximab.

Conclusion

In patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX, the MBDA score categories were differentially associated with response to subsequent therapies. Thus, patients with post‐MTX biochemical improvements (lower MBDA scores) were more likely to respond to triple therapy than to MTX plus infliximab. If confirmed, these results may help to improve treatment in RA.

Methotrexate is not associated with increased liver cirrhosis in a population-based cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic hepatitis C

A few studies have shown that methotrexate (MTX) use exacerbates liver fibrosis and even leads to liver cirrhosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, although the risk is low compared to psoriatics. We therefore conducted a population-based cohort study to investigate the impact of long-term MTX use on the risk of chronic hepatitis C (CHC)-related cirrhosis among RA patients. We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan and identified 450 incident cases of RA among CHC patients (255 MTX users and 195 MTX non-users) from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2007. After a median follow-up of more than 5 years since the diagnosis of CHC, a total of 55 (12%) patients developed liver cirrhosis. We did not find an increased risk of liver cirrhosis among CHC patients with long-term MTX use for RA. Furthermore, there was no occurrence of liver cirrhosis among the 43 MTX users with a cumulative dose ≧3 grams after 108 months of treatment. In conclusion, our data showed that long-term MTX use is not associated with an increased risk for liver cirrhosis among RA patients with CHC. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to potential bias in the cohort.

Concomitant Methotrexate Protects Against Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) on the incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) resulting from the progression of joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during longterm treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.

METHODS

A total of 155 patients with RA (310 knee joints) received TNF inhibitors at our institute between May 1, 2001, and May 31, 2008. A total of 111 symptomatic (tender and/or swollen) knee joints in 68 patients were retrospectively studied over the course of a minimum of 5 years of followup. The median (interquartile range) followup period was 8.1 (7.0-9.3) years. All data were analyzed using the knee joint as the statistical unit of analysis. TKA during treatment with TNF inhibitors was used as the outcome variable in predictive analyses. The cumulative incidence of TKA was compared by concomitant or no MTX use (MTX±).

RESULTS

There were 79 subjects (71%) who received concomitant MTX. According to Kaplan-Meier estimates, the cumulative incidence of TKA for the MTX+ group was significantly lower than that for the MTX- group (24% vs 45% at 5 yrs, respectively, p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that concomitant MTX (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.89), Larsen grade (HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.94-4.41), and older age at baseline (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) were independent predictors of TKA.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant MTX reduces the incidence of TKA by 56% in patients with RA during longterm treatment with TNF inhibitors.

Safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from recent clinical trials

Glucocorticoids are one of the most effective treatments for rheumatoid arthritis, with well-established efficacy in controlling the disease symptoms and structural progression. Fears regarding their toxicity are reflected in common recommendations for the use of the lowest possible dose for the shortest possible time. We herein review toxicity data obtained in randomized clinical trials of low-dose glucocorticoid in rheumatoid arthritis, given that observational studies cannot guarantee the avoidance of bias by indication. Seven eligible randomized controlled trials were identified. These publications do not identify any strong signal of relevant toxicity of glucocorticoid in doses of up to 10 mg of prednisone equivalent/day for up to 2 years. However, the quantity (1,100 patient years of exposure) and especially the quality of evidence are too limited to establish conclusions. A large prospective trial dedicated to the toxicity of low-dose glucocorticoid is dearly needed. Meanwhile, adherence to recommendations on standardized methodologies for the registration and report of glucocorticoid adverse events is essential to improve our knowledge and competence in the best management of these important medications.

Oral low-dose glucocorticoids should be included in any recommendation for the use of non-biologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

At present, growing scientific evidence from the medical literature and expert opinion provides strong consideration for a mandatory role of glucocorticoids (GCs) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Earlier application strategies were based on initial high doses, with subsequent tapering schedules, resulting in dose-related side effects. Recent low-dose GC schemes are more feasible in routine care, while providing evidence of clinical, functional and structural efficacy. Thus, initial low-dose GC 'bridging' treatment on a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug background should be included in any existing recommendations for RA management, as very recently advocated by the EULAR Task Force 2013 updated guidelines. Long-term low-dose therapy appears to provide acceptable safety, leading to long-standing slowing of structural damage, seen even after GC therapy withdrawal. Gaps in knowledge about the optimal method to taper and possibly discontinue GC treatment remain, and this topic should be addressed in clinical trials and observational studies. Recent efforts in GC medication have also included the introduction of a modified-release drug formulation capable of drug delivery consistent with chronobiological pathogenetic rhythms of disease, which has been quite efficacious in controlling the signs and symptoms related to pathways of circadian cytokines. Long-term data will further clarify the add-on benefits of such modified-release formulations.

Benefits and risks of low-dose glucocorticoid treatment in the patient with rheumatoid arthritis

Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) have been employed extensively for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune and systemic inflammatory disorders. Their use is supported by extensive literature and their utility is reflected in their incorporation into current treatment guidelines for RA and other conditions. Nevertheless, there is still some concern regarding the long-term use of GCs because of their potential for clinically important adverse events, particularly with an extended duration of treatment and the use of high doses. This article systematically reviews the efficacy for radiological and clinical outcomes for low-dose GCs (defined as ≤10 mg/day prednisone equivalent) in the treatment of RA. Results reviewed indicated that low-dose GCs, usually administered in combination with synthetic DMARDs, most often MTX, significantly improve structural outcomes and decrease symptom severity in patients with RA. Safety data indicate that GC-associated adverse events are dose related, but still occur in patients receiving low doses of these agents. Concerns about side effects associated with GCs have prompted the development of new strategies aimed at improving safety without compromising efficacy. These include altering the structure of existing GCs and the development of delayed-release GC formulations so that drug delivery is timed to match greatest symptom severity. Optimal use of low-dose GCs has the potential to improve long-term outcomes for patients with RA.