Multisystem proteinopathy: Where myopathy and motor neuron disease converge

Multisystem proteinopathy (MSP) is a pleiotropic group of inherited disorders that cause neurodegeneration, myopathy, and bone disease, and share common pathophysiology. Originally referred to as inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFD), attributed to mutations in the gene encoding valosin-containing protein (VCP), it has more recently been discovered that there are several other genes responsible for similar clinical and pathological phenotypes with muscle, brain, nerve, and bone involvement, in various combinations. These include heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1 and A1 (hnRNPA2B1, hnRNPA1), sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1), matrin 3 (MATR3), T-cell restricted intracellular antigen 1 (TIA1), and optineurin (OPTN), all of which share disruption of RNA stress granule function and autophagic degradation. This review will discuss each of the genes implicated in MSP, exploring the molecular pathogenesis, clinical features, current standards of care, and future directions for this diverse yet mechanistically linked spectrum of disorders.

Promising and Upcoming Treatments in Myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight new and emerging treatment targets in myositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The landscape of novel therapeutics in myositis has vastly changed in the past 5 years. This is largely due to a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of myositis and validation of more robust outcome measures that standardize the ability to assess treatment response. Clinical trials in dermatomyositis are leading the way with ongoing multicenter, international phase 3 clinical trials. Proof-of-concept studies targeting the JAK/STAT pathway have also showed early promise in treating refractory dermatomyositis in adults and children. This review highlights that the future armamentarium of therapeutic drugs will likely be larger and more selective in treating different subgroups of myositis.

Long-term safety and tolerability of bimagrumab (BYM338) in sporadic inclusion body myositis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term safety and tolerability and to monitor benefits of extended use of bimagrumab in individuals with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) who completed a single-dose core study.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label extension study, 10 adults received bimagrumab 10 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks up to 2 years (104 weeks). Safety (primary endpoint) was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs). Clinical benefits were assessed by changes from baseline in thigh muscle volume (TMV), lean body mass (LBM), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), handgrip, and quadriceps strength.

RESULTS

Participants had a mean age of 70.1 (SD 10.4) years. All participants (n = 10) discontinued the treatment due to early termination of the study (n = 7) or AEs (n = 3; myocardial infarction, esophageal carcinoma, and dementia, none of which were treatment related). The most common AEs were muscle spasms and falls (both 9 of 10, 90%), followed by diarrhea (6 of 10, 60%) and acne and skin eruption (both 5 of 10, 50%). At weeks 8 and 16, mean TMV increased from baseline by 4.1% (SD 4.3%) and 4.5% (SD 6.3%). Mean LBM increased from baseline and was sustained at 6.9% (SD 3.9%) at week 76. Means of 6MWD showed a progressive decline from baseline to week 76, during which there was a modest numerical increase in handgrip strength and no significant changes in quadriceps strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment up to 2 years with bimagrumab had a good safety profile and was well tolerated in individuals with sIBM. An increase in muscle mass was noted on a group level; however, there was no evidence of clinical improvement.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02250443.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with sIBM, long-term bimagrumab treatment was safe and well tolerated and did not lead to functional improvement.

Proteomic Profiling Unravels a Key Role of Specific Macrophage Subtypes in Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis

Unbiased proteomic profiling was performed toward the identification of biological parameters relevant in sIBM, thus giving hints about the pathophysiological processes and the existence of new reliable markers. For that purpose, skeletal muscle biopsies from 13 sIBM and 7 non-diseased control patients were analyzed with various methods, including liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (four patients). Subsequent data analysis identified key molecules further studied in a larger cohort by qPCR, immunostaining, and immunofluorescence in situ. Proteomic signature of muscle biopsies derived from sIBM patients revealed the chaperone and cell surface marker CD74, the macrophage scavenger molecule CD163 and the transcription activator STAT1 to be among the highly and relevantly expressed proteins suggesting a significant contribution of immune cells among the myofibers expressing these markers. Moreover, in silico studies showed that 39% of upregulated proteins were involved in type I or mixed type I and type II interferon immunity. Indeed, further studies via immunohistochemistry clearly confirmed the prominent involvement of the key type I interferon signature-related molecules, ISG15 as well as IRF8 with MHC class II⁺ myofibers. Siglec1 colocalized with CD163⁺ macrophages and MHC class II molecules also co-localized with CD74 on macrophages. STAT1 co-localized with Siglec1⁺ macrophages in active myofibre myophagocytosis while STAT6 colocalized with endomysial macrophages. These combined results show involvement of CD74, CD163, and STAT1 as key molecules of macrophage activation being crucially involved in mixed and specific type I interferon, and interferon gamma associated-pathways in sIBM. On a more general note, these results also highlight the type of immune-interaction between macrophages and myofibers in the etiopathology of sIBM.

Autoimmune Myopathies: Updates on Evaluation and Treatment

The major forms of autoimmune myopathies include dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), myositis associated with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). While each of these conditions has unique clinical and histopathological features, they all share an immune-mediated component. These conditions can occur in isolation or can be associated with systemic malignancies or connective tissue disorders (overlap syndromes). As more has been learned about these conditions, it has become clear that traditional classification schemes do not adequately group patients according to shared clinical features and prognosis. Newer classifications are now utilizing myositis-specific autoantibodies which correlate with clinical and histopathological phenotypes and risk of malignancy, and help in offering prognostic information with regard to treatment response. Based on observational data and expert opinion, corticosteroids are considered first-line therapy for DM, PM, ASS, and IMNM, although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is increasingly being used as initial therapy in IMNM related to statin use. Second-line agents are often required, but further prospective investigation is required regarding the optimal choice and timing of these agents.

Inclusion Body Myositis: Update on Pathogenesis and Treatment

Inclusion body myositis is the most common acquired myopathy after the age of 50. It is characterized by progressive asymmetric weakness predominantly affecting the quadriceps and/or finger flexors. Loss of ambulation and dysphagia are major complications of the disease. Inclusion body myositis can be associated with cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A antibodies. Muscle biopsy usually shows inflammatory cells surrounding and invading non-necrotic muscle fibers, rimmed vacuoles, congophilic inclusions, and protein aggregates. Disease pathogenesis remains poorly understood and consists of an interplay between inflammatory and degenerative pathways. Antigen-driven, clonally restricted, cytotoxic T cells represent a main feature of the inflammatory component, whereas abnormal protein homeostasis with protein misfolding, aggregation, and dysfunctional protein disposal is the hallmark of the degenerative component. Inclusion body myositis remains refractory to treatment. Better understanding of the disease pathogenesis led to the identification of novel therapeutic targets, addressing both the inflammatory and degenerative pathways.