What do we measure with 28-joint DAS in elderly patients? An explorative analysis in the NOR-DMARD study

Association between levels of serotonin, melatonin, cortisol and the clinical condition of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic connective tissue disease of autoimmune basis. It is characterized by inflammation of joints and systemic complications. The etiopathogenesis is still unknown. Predisposing factors for the disease include genetic, immunological and environmental. Chronic disease and the stress experienced by patients disrupt the body's homeostatic state and weaken the human immune system. Reduced immunity and endocrine disruption may influence the development of autoimmune diseases and exacerbate their course. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between the blood levels of hormones such as cortisol, serotonin, melatonin and the clinical status of RA patients as determined by the DAS28 index and CRP protein. A total of 165 people participated in the study of these 84 subjects had RA and the rest were the control group. All participants completed a questionnaire and had their blood drawn to determine hormones. Patients with RA had higher plasma cortisol (324.6 ng/ml vs. 292.9 ng/ml) and serotonin concentrations (67.9 ng/ml vs. 22.1 ng/ml) and lower plasma melatonin (116.8 pg/ml vs. 330.2 pg/ml) compared to controls. Patients whose CRP concentration were above normal also had elevated plasma cortisol concentration. No significant association was observed in RA patients between plasma melatonin, serotonin and DAS28 values. However, it can be concluded that those with high disease activity had lower melatonin levels as compared to patients with low and moderate DAS28 values. Significant differences were found between RA patients not using steroids and plasma cortisol (p = 0.035). In RA patients, it was observed that as plasma cortisol concentration increased, the chance of having an elevated DAS28 score, indicating high disease activity, increased.

Challenges in the management of older patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases

The rise in the number of people aged 65 years and older living with inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis is causing considerable challenges for clinicians. As patients get older, they are at an increased risk of multiple chronic diseases, a situation termed multimorbidity. Multimorbidity inevitably drives polypharmacy, where by a patient requires treatment with multiple medications. In addition, advancing age, multimorbidity and polypharmacy all place a patient at an increased risk of developing geriatric syndromes, which are clinical conditions in older people that do not fit into disease categories and include malnutrition, sarcopenia and frailty. Geriatric syndromes further increase the risk of adverse outcomes, including the accrual of additional morbidity, nursing home admission and mortality. Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are especially prone to developing geriatric syndromes. Some predisposing risk factors for geriatric syndromes, such as joint swelling and functional limitations, are also inherent to rheumatic inflammatory disease itself. The frequent coexistence of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and geriatric syndromes in this patient group requires individually tailored interventions to preserve patient independence and overall functioning. To prepare for the changing demography, rheumatologists should gain more insight into the implications of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and geriatric syndromes for the management of older patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Time-averaged disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis associated with long-term bone mineral density changes

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with poor bone mineral density (BMD). We designed the current study owing to the lack of long-term prospective studies regarding whether a high disease activity leads to increased bone loss.

Methods:

We have continually enrolled patients with RA. According to the average disease activity score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) during follow-up, the patients were classified into remission, low disease activity, and moderate or high disease activity groups. Patients were examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up. BMD changes were compared among the groups.

Results:

We have studied 477 patients. Overall BMD was significantly reduced from baseline to the 3-year follow-up (p < 0.05). After stratifying according to the time-averaged DAS28-ESR levels and use of anti-osteoporosis treatment (AOT), the BMD values of the femur and spine significantly increased in patients in the remission group with AOT. The BMD changes of different DAS28-ESR patients were further compared using the generalized estimation equation model. For the patients on AOT, the negative change in femoral BMD values of the moderate or high activity group was significant when compared with the remission group with positive BMD changes (regression coefficient, –0.038; 95% confidence interval, –0.055 to –0.021).

Conclusion:

For RA patients, if remission is achieved, AOT can better improve BMD, especially in the femur. In addition, moderate or high disease activity will lead to significant bone loss; therefore, disease activity must be actively controlled.