British Society for Rheumatology guideline on diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis: executive summary

Cranial involvement in giant cell arteritis

Since its first clinical description in 1890, extensive research has advanced our understanding of giant cell arteritis, leading to improvements in both diagnosis and management for affected patients. Imaging studies have shown that the disease frequently extends beyond the typical cranial arteries, also affecting large vessels such as the aorta and its proximal branches. Meanwhile, advances in comprehending the underlying pathophysiology of giant cell arteritis have given rise to numerous potential therapeutic agents, which aim to minimise the need for glucocorticoid treatment and prevent flares. Classification criteria for giant cell arteritis, as well as recommendations for management, imaging, and treat-to-target have been developed or updated in the last 5 years, and current research encompasses a broad spectrum covering basic, translational, and clinical research. In this Series paper, we aim to discuss the current understanding of giant cell arteritis with cranial manifestations, describe the clinical approach to this condition, and explore future directions in research and patient care.

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging modalities in primary large vessel vasculitis (LVV).

METHODS

A systematic literature review update was performed to retrieve new evidence on ultrasound, MRI, CT and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction in LVV. The task force consisted of 24 physicians, health professionals and patients from 14 countries. The recommendations were updated based on evidence and expert opinion, iterating until voting indicated consensus. The level of agreement was determined by anonymous votes.

RESULTS

Three overarching principles and eight recommendations were agreed. Compared to the 2018 version, ultrasound is now recommended as first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected giant cell arteritis, and axillary arteries should be included in the standard examination. As an alternative to ultrasound, cranial and extracranial arteries can be examined by FDG-PET or MRI. For Takayasu arteritis, MRI is the preferred imaging modality; FDG-PET, CT or ultrasound are alternatives. Although imaging is not routinely recommended for follow-up, ultrasound, FDG-PET or MRI may be used for assessing vessel abnormalities in LVV patients with suspected relapse, particularly when laboratory markers of inflammation are unreliable. MR-angiography, CT-angiography or ultrasound may be used for long-term monitoring of structural damage, particularly at sites of preceding vascular inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance for the role of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with LVV.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Cardiovascular Imaging Referral Guideline

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Cardiovascular Expert Panel is made up of physicians from the disciplines of radiology, cardiology, and emergency medicine, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 30 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 48 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 125 recommendation statements across the 30 scenarios (27 unique scenarios as 2 scenarios point to the CAR Thoracic Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline and the acute pericarditis subscenario is included under 2 main scenarios). This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for acute chest pain syndromes, chronic chest pain, cardiovascular screening and risk stratification, pericardial syndromes, intracardiac/pericardial mass, suspected valvular disease cardiomyopathy, aorta, venous thrombosis, and peripheral vascular disease.

Giant Cell Arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common primary vasculitis and is associated with potential bilateral blindness. Neither clinical nor laboratory evidence is simple and unequivocal for this disease, which usually requires rapid and reliable diagnosis and therapy. The ophthalmologist should consider GCA with the following ocular symptoms: visual loss or visual field defects, transient visual disturbances (amaurosis fugax), diplopia, eye pain, or new onset head or jaw claudication. An immediate ophthalmological examination with slit lamp, ophthalmoscopy, and visual field, as well as color duplex ultrasound of the temporal artery should be performed. If there is sufficient clinical suspicion of GCA, corticosteroid therapy should be initiated immediately, with prompt referral to a rheumatologist/internist and, if necessary, temporal artery biopsy should be arranged. Numerous developments in modern imaging with colour duplex ultrasonography, MRI, and PET-CT have the potential to compete with the classical, well-established biopsy of a temporal artery. Early determination of ESR and CRP may support RZA diagnosis. Therapeutically, steroid-sparing immunosuppression with IL-6 blockade or methotrexate can be considered. These developments have led to a revision of both the classification criteria and the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of the American College of Rheumatologists and the European League against Rheumatism, which are summarised here for ophthalmology.

Treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope

The last British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guideline on PMR was published in 2009. The guideline needs to be updated to provide a summary of the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of adults with PMR. This guideline is aimed at healthcare professionals in the UK who directly care for people with PMR, including general practitioners, rheumatologists, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, psychologists and other health professionals. It will also be relevant to people living with PMR and organisations that support them in the public and third sector, including charities and informal patient support groups. This guideline will be developed using the methods and processes outlined in the BSR Guidelines Protocol. Here we provide a brief summary of the scope of the guideline update in development.

Mycophenolate mofetil in giant cell arteritis

Introduction

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic granulomatous vasculitis affecting the large arteries. Abnormal lymphocyte function has been noted as a pathogenic factor in GCA. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase and is therefore a highly lymphocyte-specific immunosuppressive therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of MMF for inducing remission in GCA.

Methods

Seven patients (5 female, 2 male) with GCA under therapy with MMF and who were treated at the outpatient clinic for rare inflammatory systemic diseases at Hannover Medical School between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively included in the study. All patients underwent duplex sonography, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. The primary endpoints were the number of recurrences, CRP levels at 3-6 and 6-12 months, and the period of remission.

Results

All patients in this case series showed inflammatory activity of the arterial vessels in at least one of the imaging modalities: duplex sonography (n = 5), 18F-FDG PET (n = 5), MRI (n = 6), and/or biopsy (n = 5). CRP levels of all patients decreased at the measurement time points 3-6 months, and 6-9 months after initiation of therapy with MMF compared with CRP levels before MMF therapy. All patients with GCA in this case series achieved disease remission.

Discussion

The results of the present case series indicate that MMF is an effective therapy in controlling disease activity in GCA, which should be investigated in future randomized controlled trials.

Temporal artery biopsy for suspected giant cell arteritis: A mini review

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a granulomatous inflammation involving medium and large vessels that can lead to serious clinical manifestations associated with tissue ischemia. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is currently the gold standard method for the diagnosis of GCA, with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 77%. However, the false-negative rate for TAB ranges from 9% to 61%. False negatives may be related to the timing of biopsy, the length of specimen, and the existence of "skip lesions." We reviewed the relevant evidence for methods to improve the sensitivity and reduce the false-negative rate for TAB. To reduce the false-negative rate for TAB, it is recommended to perform TAB within 1 week of starting corticosteroid therapy. Although there is currently no consensus, we suggest that the temporal artery is cut to a length of 20‒30 mm and to prepare serial pathological sections. It is necessary to attach great importance to patients suspected of having GCA, and complete TAB should be performed as soon as possible while starting corticosteroid therapy promptly. We also discuss the clinical value of non-invasive vascular imaging technologies, such as DUS, CTA, MRA, and 18F-FDG-PET/CT, as auxiliary methods for GCA diagnosis that could partially replace TAB.

Giant cell arteritis: reviewing the advancing diagnostics and management

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is well known to be a critical ischaemic disease that requires immediate medical recognition to initiate treatment and where one in five people still suffer visual loss. The immunopathophysiology has continued to be characterised, and the influencing of ageing in the development of GCA is beginning to be understood. Recent national and international guidelines have supported the directed use of cranial ultrasound to reduce diagnostic delay and improve clinical outcomes. Immediate high dose glucocorticoids remain the standard emergency treatment for GCA, with a number of targeted agents that have been shown in clinical trials to have superior clinical efficacy and steroid sparing effects. The aim of this review was to present the latest advances in GCA that have the potential to influence routine clinical practice.

Fast-track pathway for early diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis: the combined role of vascular ultrasonography and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-computed tomography imaging

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medical emergency, which can lead to irreversible blindness and other ischaemic vascular events if left untreated. Prompt access to specialist assessment, diagnostics in the form of a fast-track pathway (FTP) and access to appropriate treatment are key factors in preventing morbidity associated with this disease. Recent developments in vascular imaging prompted review of our management of GCA patients. Here, we present the newly implemented FTP in GCA at the University College London Hospital, with added vascular imaging in the form of temporal artery ultrasound (TAUS) and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET-CT) with temporal artery biopsy. The initial pilot data on the FTP showed a significant negative predictive value of the combined TAUS and 18 F-FDG PET-CT, and the vast majority of cases positive on imaging were confirmed by biopsy. Through the new FTP in GCA, the diagnosis was completed within 48-72 h, compared with the conventional pathway time of up to 2-3 weeks awaiting biopsy results. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of GCA enables commencement of corticosteroid (prednisolone) treatment in the appropriate patient population while avoiding unnecessary steroid exposure and toxicity in GCA-negative patients.

Is Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Necessary for the Initial Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis?

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an ophthalmological emergency that can be difficult to diagnose and prompt treatment is vital. We investigated the sequential diagnostic value for patients with suspected GCA using three biochemical measures as they arrive to the clinician: first, platelet count, then C-reactive protein (CRP), and lastly, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). This retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with suspected GCA investigated platelet count, CRP, and ESR using diagnostic test accuracy statistics and odds ratios (ORs) in a sequential fashion. The diagnosis was established by experts at follow-up, considering clinical findings and tests including temporal artery biopsy. A total of 94 patients were included, of which 37 (40%) were diagnosed with GCA. Compared with those without GCA, patients with GCA had a higher platelet count (p < 0.001), CRP (p < 0.001), and ESR (p < 0.001). Platelet count demonstrated a low sensitivity (38%) and high specificity (88%); CRP, a high sensitivity (86%) and low specificity (56%); routine ESR, a high sensitivity (89%) and low specificity (47%); and age-adjusted ESR, a moderate sensitivity (65%) and moderate specificity (65%). Sequential analysis revealed that ESR did not provide additional value in evaluating risk of GCA. Initial biochemical evaluation can be based on platelet count and CRP, without waiting for ESR, which allows faster initial decision-making in GCA.

Vascular ultrasound in rheumatology practice

Rheumatologists are increasingly using vascular ultrasound. Several guidelines now recommend ultrasound as the first diagnostic modality in giant cell arteritis (GCA). The German curriculum for rheumatology training has recently included ultrasound for the acute diagnosis of vasculitis. Recent studies have shown that ultrasound of temporal, axillary, subclavian, and vertebral arteries has sensitivities and specificities of >90%. Vascular ultrasound detects subclinical GCA in approximately 20% of patients with "pure" polymyalgia rheumatica. GCA fast-track clinics might regularly include these patients. A new score based on the intima-media thickness of the temporal and axillary arteries allows the monitoring of structural changes with treatment. The score decreases faster for the temporal arteries than it does for the axillary arteries. Measuring the diameter of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch might become a fast and cost-effective tool for the long-term monitoring of aortic aneurysms in extracranial GCA. Vascular ultrasound also has a role for Takayasu arteritis, thrombosis, Behçet's syndrome, and Raynaud's phenomenon.

Temporal artery biopsy

Giant cell arteritis is a common vasculitis in patients over the age of 50 years old. If not promptly recognized and aggressively treated with high-dose glucocorticoids, ischemia resulting in permanent vision loss or stroke can occur. Yet, the treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids over a long period of time can be problematic in this particular patient population given their age and associated comorbidities. Temporal artery biopsies (TAB) are an important diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with suspected giant cell arteritis. Herein, we explore indications for TAB and practical points in obtaining a TAB based on available evidence. We review the surgical procedure itself and associated complications. Lastly, we examine common pathological findings and considerations of alternative diagnoses.

18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice

Diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and monitoring disease activity in patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be challenging. Early recognition of LVV and treatment adaptation is essential because vascular complications (aneurysm, dilatations, ischemic complications) or treatment related side effects can occur frequently in these patients. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT) is increasingly used to diagnose, follow, and evaluate treatment response in LVV. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current evidence on the value of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis, follow, and treatment monitoring in LVV.

Lessons of the month: Giant cell arteritis with Horner's syndrome and vertebral dissection

We present a case of an 82-year-old woman presenting with left-sided Horner's syndrome and stroke. She also had a 6-week history of intermittent dizziness, reduced appetite, lethargy, muscle stiffness and weight loss. Examination revealed left temporal artery and left posterior auricular artery tenderness. Her ESR showed 62 mm/hr and imaging showed left vertebral artery dissection. Temporal artery biopsy was positive.The case highlights a rare presentation of giant cell arteritis with Horner's syndrome and left vertebral artery dissection. High clinical suspicion is required to prevent delay in diagnosis and treatment.

The Usefullness of Subclavian Artery Ultrasound Assessment in Giant Cell Arteritis Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Vascular ultrasound has been increasingly used to diagnose giant cell arteritis (GCA). The temporal and axillary arteries are commonly evaluated. However, the usefulness of including the subclavian artery remains unclear. This study investigated whether inclusion of the subclavian artery in addition to the temporal and axillary arteries in the ultrasound evaluation of GCA improves the accuracy of the examination beyond ultrasonography of the temporal and axillary arteries alone.

METHODS

We formed a fast-track clinic to use ultrasound to rapidly evaluate patients with suspected GCA. In this cohort study, patients referred for new concern for GCA received a vascular ultrasound for GCA. Subclavian intima-media thickness (IMT) cutoffs of 1.0 and 1.5 mm were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-seven patients were referred to the fast-track clinic from November 2017 to August 2021. One hundred sixty-eight patients received an ultrasound for concern for new GCA. With a subclavian IMT cutoff of 1.5 mm, inclusion of the subclavian artery did not identify any patients with GCA who were not otherwise found to have positive temporal and/or axillary artery examinations, and at this cutoff, there was 1 false-positive result. A subclavian IMT cutoff of 1.0 mm identified several subjects diagnosed with GCA who had otherwise negative ultrasounds, but most subjects with an isolated subclavian IMT greater than 1.0 mm had false-positive results, and the specificity of this cutoff was poor.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of the subclavian artery in the ultrasound assessment of GCA at 2 different cutoffs rarely contributed to the accurate diagnosis of GCA and increased the rate of false-positive results.

Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology guidelines for the treatment of giant cell arteritis

Considerable variability exists in the way that health-care providers treat patients with giant cell arteritis in Latin America, with patients commonly exposed to excessive amounts of glucocorticoids. In addition, large health disparities prevail in this region due to socioeconomic factors, which influence access to care, including biological treatments. For these reasons, the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology developed the first evidence-based giant cell arteritis treatment guidelines tailored for Latin America. A panel of vasculitis experts from Mexico, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and Argentina generated clinically meaningful questions related to the treatment of giant cell arteritis in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format. Following the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation methodology, a team of methodologists did a systematic literature search, extracted and summarised the effects of the interventions, and graded the quality of the evidence. The panel of vasculitis experts voted on each PICO question and made recommendations, which required at least 70% agreement among the voting members to be included in the guidelines. Nine recommendations and one expert opinion statement for the treatment of giant cell arteritis were developed considering the most up-to-date evidence and the socioeconomic characteristics of Latin America. These recommendations include guidance for the use of glucocorticoids, tocilizumab, methotrexate, and aspirin for patients with giant cell arteritis.

Evolution of ultrasound in giant cell arteritis

Ultrasound (US) is being increasingly used to diagnose Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). The traditional diagnostic Gold Standard has been temporal artery biopsy (TAB), but this is expensive, invasive, has a false-negative rate as high as 60% and has little impact on clinical decision-making. A non-compressible halo with a thickened intima-media complex (IMC) is the sonographic hallmark of GCA. The superficial temporal arteries (STA) and axillary arteries (AA) are the most consistently inflamed arteries sonographically and imaging protocols for evaluating suspected GCA should include at least these two arterial territories. Studies evaluating temporal artery ultrasound (TAUS) have varied considerably in size and methodology with results showing wide discrepancies in sensitivity (9–100%), specificity (66–100%), positive predictive value (36–100%) and negative predictive value (33–100%). Bilateral halos increase sensitivity as does the incorporation of pre-test probability, while prior corticosteroid use decreases sensitivity. Quantifying sonographic vasculitis using Halo Counts and Halo Scores can predict disease extent/severity, risk of specific complications and likelihood of treatment response. Regression of the Halo sign has been observed from as little as 2 days to as late as 7 months after initiation of immunosuppressive treatment and occurs at different rates in STAs than AAs. US is more sensitive than TAB and has comparable sensitivity to MRI and PET/CT. It is time-efficient, cost-effective and allows for the implementation of fast-track GCA clinics which substantially mitigate the risk of irreversible blindness. Algorithms incorporating combinations of imaging modalities can achieve a 100% sensitivity and specificity for a diagnosis of GCA. US should be a standard first line investigation in routine clinical care of patients with suspected GCA with TAB reserved only for those having had a normal US in the context of a high pre-test probability.

Tolerance of glucocorticoids in giant cell arteritis: a study of patient-reported adverse events

OBJECTIVE

To assess patients' self-reported glucocorticoid (GC)-related adverse events (AEs) in a GCA population.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to the 100 patients most recently diagnosed with GCA in a tertiary centre. This questionnaire included open- and close-ended questions on the disease and GC effects. Eight primary AE areas were analysed: cardiovascular, metabolic, muscle, cognitive and psychologic, bone, cutaneous and hairiness, infective and visual complications. Including derivative subitems from preceding areas, a total of 18 GC-related AEs were analysed separately and according to GC duration.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were analysed and 89 (99%) reported at least one GC-related AE [median 6 (range 1-11)]. Cognitive and psychological changes, primarily insomnia (72%), affected 90% of patients. Cutaneous changes and muscle loss affected 70% of patients, with frequent impairment of physical autonomy (P = 0.007) associated with this event. Metabolic issues, especially weight gain (40%) and diabetes mellitus (20%), affected 49% of patients. Conversely, vision troubles and bone fractures were mentioned by 42% and 9% of patients, respectively, and more frequently in patients who received GCs for >18 months (P = 0.01 and P = 0.007, respectively). Cardiovascular changes and infections affected 30% and 26% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study of GC tolerance assessed using a self-evaluation provides pragmatic and updated data reminding us that GC tolerance remains more noteworthy than ever. This study suggests carefully monitoring GC-related AEs during follow-up and encourages GC-sparing strategies in some patients.

Inflammatory Diseases of the Aorta: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 2

Inflammatory aortitis is most often caused by large vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant cell arteritis, Takayasu's arteritis, immunoglobulin G4-related aortitis, and isolated aortitis. There are distinct differences in the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and natural history of LVV that are important for the cardiovascular provider to know. If possible, histopathologic specimens should be obtained to aide in accurate diagnosis and management of LVV. In most cases, corticosteroids are utilized in the acute phase, with the addition of steroid-sparing agents to achieve disease remission while sparing corticosteroid toxic effects. Endovascular and surgical procedures have been described with success but should be delayed until disease control is achieved whenever possible. Long-term management should include regular follow-up with rheumatology and surveillance imaging for sequelae of LVV.

Comparing treatment options for large vessel vasculitis

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are the major forms of large vessel vasculitis (LVV).Glucocorticoids represent the cornerstone of LVV treatment, however, relapses and recurrences frequently occur when they are tapered or stopped, determining a prolonged exposure to glucocorticoids and a subsequent increased risk of glucocorticoid-related side effects. Therefore, conventional and biologic immunosuppressive drugs have been proposed to obtain a glucocorticoid-sparing effect.

AREAS COVERED

We searched PubMed® using the keywords "giant cell arteritis/drug therapy" and "Takayasu Arteritis/drug therapy" OR "Takayasu Arteritis/surgery". This review focuses on the management of LVV, based on the current evidence while highlighting the differences in terms of therapeutic management of TAK and GCA.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, such as methotrexate or azathioprine, are recommended in association to glucocorticoids for selected GCA and all TAK patients. Two randomized placebo-controlled trials recently demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab in reducing relapses and cumulative prednisone dosage in GCA patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing disease. Observational evidence and two small randomized controlled trials support the use of TNF-alpha inhibitors and tocilizumab as glucocorticoid-sparing agents in relapsing TAK, albeit high-quality evidence regarding the management of TAK is still lacking.

[Giant cell arteritis diagnosed by a temporal artery biopsy without abnormal imaging and physical findings in an elderly patient presenting with fever]

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is considered in the differential diagnosis of fever of unknown origin in the elderly. We describe the case of an 83-year-old man with GCA diagnosed by temporal artery biopsy (TBA), who did not exhibit abnormal physical and imaging findings. The patient had fever and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), which had persisted for two months. He was examined and treated with antibiotics and antipyretic analgesics in a local clinic, but they had little effect. He was referred to us. He showed no abnormal physical findings. Image examinations, including ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and PET-CT, showed no abnormal findings. We performed TBA. The histological examination of the artery showed inflammatory cell invasion and rupture of the internal elastic membrane, indicating GCA. We initiated oral corticosteroid treatment. The patient's fever quickly disappeared and his CRP level returned to normal. TBA has been the gold standard for the diagnosis of GCA. However, TBA is an invasive procedure and the sensitivity depends on the operator's skill level. Recently, imaging examinations have frequently been used for the diagnosis of GCA. The sensitivity of imaging examinations is similar to that of TBA. However, our case did not show any abnormal imaging findings and was only diagnosed by TBA. This case suggested that TBA remains a useful examination for elderly patients with fever that persists for a long time.

Does Tocilizumab Influence Ophthalmic Outcomes in Giant Cell Arteritis?

BACKGROUND

Despite appropriate use of corticosteroids, an important minority of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) develop progressive vision loss during the initial stages of the disease or during corticosteroid tapering. Tocilizumab is the only clearly effective adjunctive treatment to corticosteroids in the management of GCA, but questions regarding its efficacy specifically in the neuro-ophthalmic population and its role in mitigating vision loss have not been broached until recently.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The authors queried Pubmed using the search terms "GCA" and "tocilizumab" in order to identify English-language publications either explicitly designed to evaluate the influence of tocilizumab on the ophthalmic manifestations of GCA or those which reported, but were not primarily focused on, ophthalmic outcomes.

RESULTS

Recent retrospective analyses of populations similar to those encountered in neuro-ophthalmic practice suggest that tocilizumab is effective in decreasing the frequency of GCA relapse, the proportion of flares involving visual manifestations of GCA, and the likelihood of permanent vision loss. Data regarding the utility of tocilizumab to curtail vision loss at the time of diagnosis are limited to case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional corticosteroid monotherapy, treatment of GCA with both corticosteroids and tocilizumab may decrease the likelihood of permanent vision loss. Further prospective, collaborative investigation between rheumatologists and neuro-ophthalmologists is required to clarify the ophthalmic and socioeconomic impact of tocilizumab on the treatment of GCA.

Ocular Complications of Giant Cell Arteritis: An Acute Therapeutic Emergency

The risk of blindness, due to acute ischemic ocular events, is the most feared complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA) since the middle of the 20th century. A decrease of its rate has occurred after the advent of corticoid therapy for this vasculitis, but it seems to have stabilized since then. Early diagnosis and treatment of GCA is key to reducing its ocular morbidity. However, it is not uncommon for ophthalmological manifestations to inaugurate the disease, and the biological inflammatory reaction may be mild, making its diagnosis more challenging. In recent years, vascular imaging has opened up new possibilities for the rapid diagnosis of GCA, and ultrasound has taken a central place in fast-track diagnostic processes. Corticosteroid therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment and must begin immediately in patients with visual symptoms and suspicion of GCA. In that situation, the administration route of corticotherapy, intravenous or oral, is less important than its speed of delivery, any hour of delay worsening the prognosis.

Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent primary large-vessel vasculitis in individuals older than 50. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are considered the cornerstone of treatment. GC therapy is usually tapered over months according to clinical symptoms and inflammatory marker levels. Considering the high rate of GC-related adverse events in these older individuals, immunosuppressive treatments and biologic agents have been proposed as add-on therapies. Methotrexate was considered an alternative option, but its clinical impact was limited. Other immunosuppressants failed to demonstrate a significant favourable benefit/risk ratio. The approval of tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitor brought significant improvement. Indeed, tocilizumab had a noticeable effect on cumulative GCs’ dose and relapse prevention. After the improvement in pathophysiological knowledge, other targeted therapies have been proposed, with anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-17, anti-IL-1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, Janus kinase inhibitors or anti-granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor therapies. These therapies are currently under evaluation. Interestingly, mavrilimumab, ustekinumab and, to a lesser extent, abatacept have shown promising results in phase 2 randomised controlled trials. Despite this recent progress, the value, specific condition and optimal application of each treatment remain undecided. In this review, we discuss the scientific rationale for each treatment and the therapeutic strategy.

Giant cell arteritis with spontaneous remission

The case of a 75-year-old woman diagnosed with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), treated with low doses of prednisone, and with clinical and analytical remission is reported. Two years later, she presented with a clinical picture of giant cell arteritis (GCA), including headache, diplopia, jaw pain, feeling of swelling in both temples, and elevation of acute phase reactants. Symptoms spontaneously subsided 2 weeks later, while analytical parameters improved without any treatment. A high-resolution colour Doppler ultrasound showed thickening of the intima-media complex with 'halo' sign in the right temporal artery. A biopsy of the right temporal artery was performed, although it was not successful, as no artery could be found, and the procedure became more complicated with an eyebrow ptosis due to a lesion in the frontal branch of the facial nerve. GCA diagnosis was based on the clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings. The patient was treated with prednisone and methotrexate, without clinical or analytical relapse. Comments are presented on the described cases of GCA with spontaneous remission, and the most appropriate treatments in these cases are discussed. Other peculiarities of the case, such as the progression to GCA more than 2 years after the onset of PMR, and the complications from the temporal artery biopsy are also mentioned.

Validation of a multimodal algorithm for diagnosing giant cell arteritis with imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify which combination of imaging modalities should be used to obtain the best diagnostic performance for the non-invasive diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB-approved prospective single-center study enrolled participants presenting with a suspected diagnosis of GCA from December 2014 to October 2017. Participants underwent high-resolution 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), temporal and extra-cranial arteries ultrasound and retinal angiography (RA), prior to temporal artery biopsy (TAB). Diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality alone, then a combination of several imaging modalities, was evaluated. Several algorithms were constructed to test optimal combinations using McNemar test.

RESULTS

Forty-five participants (24 women, 21 men) with mean age of 75.4 ± 16 (SD) years (range: 59-94 years) were enrolled; of these 43/45 (96%) had ophthalmological symptoms. Diagnosis of GCA was confirmed in 25/45 (56%) patients. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI, ultrasound and RA alone were 100% (25/25; 95% CI: 86-100) and 86% (19/22; 95% CI: 65-97), 88% (22/25; 95% CI: 69-97) and 84% (16/19; 95% CI: 60-97), 94% (15/16; 95% CI: 70-100) and 74% (14/19; 95% CI: 49-91), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values ranged from 95 to 100% (95% CI: 77-100), 67 to 100% (95% CI: 38-100), 81 to 100% (95% CI: 61-100) and 91 to 100% (95% CI: 59-100) when combining several imaging tests, respectively. The diagnostic algorithm with the overall best diagnostic performance was the one starting with MRI, followed either by ultrasound or RA, yielding 100% sensitivity (22/22; 95% CI: 85-100%) 100% (15/15; 95% CI: 78-100) and 100% accuracy (37/37; 95% CI: 91-100).

CONCLUSION

The use of MRI as the first imaging examination followed by either ultrasound or RA reaches high degrees of performance for the diagnosis of GCA and is recommended in daily practice.

Vascular Ultrasound for Giant Cell Arteritis: Establishing a Protocol Using Vascular Sonographers in a Fast-Track Clinic in the United States

Objective

We developed a fast‐track clinic (FTC) to expedite the evaluation of patients suspected of having giant cell arteritis (GCA) using vascular ultrasound. Though FTCs have demonstrated efficacy in Europe, no protocolized clinic in the United States has been developed. This study introduces a new FTC model unique to the United States, using vascular sonographers, and describes the protocols used to develop reliable findings. We evaluate clinical outcomes using vascular ultrasound and temporal artery biopsy (TAB).

Methods

A retrospective review included all subjects referred to the University of Washington FTC aged 50 years old or older who received both ultrasound and TAB between November 2017 and November 2019. Ultrasound was performed by a vascular sonographer trained in GCA detection. Ultrasound results were read by a vascular surgeon and reviewed by four rheumatologists certified in musculoskeletal ultrasound who had completed a course in vascular ultrasound use in GCA and large‐vessel vasculitis.

Results

A total of 43 subjects underwent both vascular ultrasound and TAB. Six subjects had both positive ultrasound and TAB results. There were also seven positive ultrasound results in patients with negative TAB results, most due to detection of large‐vessel GCA (LV‐GCA). All 29 subjects with negative ultrasound results had negative TAB results.

Conclusion

This is the first study in the United States to demonstrate a reliable FTC protocol using vascular sonographers. This protocol demonstrated good agreement between ultrasound and TAB and allowed for the detection of additional cases of LV‐GCA by vascular ultrasound. Vascular ultrasound improved the rate of GCA diagnosis primarily by detecting additional cases of LV‐GCA.

Contextualizing temporal arterial magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Imaging modalities have become common in evaluating patients for a possible diagnosis of GCA. This study seeks to contextualize how temporal arterial magnetic resonance angiography (TA-MRA) can be used in facilitating the diagnosis of GCA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who had been previously referred to a rheumatologist for evaluation of possible GCA in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Data including clinical features, inflammatory markers, imaging, and biopsy results were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression model to predict the diagnosis of GCA. Using these models, the utility of TA-MRA in series with or in parallel to clinical evaluation was demonstrated across the cohort as well as in subgroups defined by biopsy and imaging status.

RESULTS

In total 268 patients had complete data. Those diagnosed with biopsy- and/or imaging-positive GCA were more likely to demonstrate classic features including jaw claudication and vision loss. Clinical multivariable modelling allowed for fair discriminability [receiver operating characteristic (ROC) 0.759, 95% CI: 0.703, 0.815] for diagnosing GCA; there was excellent discriminability in facilitating the diagnosis of biopsy-positive GCA (ROC 0.949, 0.898-1.000). When used in those with a pre-test probability of 50% or higher, TA-MRA had a positive predictive value of 93.0%; in those with a pre-test probability of 25% or less TA-MRA had a negative predictive value of 89.5%.

CONCLUSION

In those with high disease probability, TA-MRA can effectively rule in disease (and replace temporal artery biopsy). In those with low to medium probability, TA-MRA can help rule out the disease, but this continues to be a challenging diagnostic population.

Current advances in giant cell arteritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to present the latest advances in giant cell arteritis (GCA) care, and recent national and international rheumatology societies guidance which influences clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cranial ultrasound reduces diagnostic delay and improves clinical outcomes. Immediate high dose glucocorticoids remain the standard treatment for GCA. Controlled trial evidence using Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, shows good clinical efficacy with steroid-sparing effects.

SUMMARY

Improved patient outcomes require formalizing pathways to diagnosis and closer liaison with rheumatology for long-term management with second-line therapies.

Diagnosing Giant Cell Arteritis: A Comprehensive Practical Guide for the Practicing Rheumatologist

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common large vessel vasculitis in the elderly population. In recent years, advanced imaging has changed the way GCA can be diagnosed in many locations. The GCA fast-track clinic (FTC) approach combined with ultrasound (US) examination allows prompt treatment and diagnosis with high certainty. FTCs have been shown to improve prognosis while being cost effective. However, all diagnostic modalities are highly operator dependent, and in many locations expertise in advanced imaging may not be available. In this paper, we review the current evidence on GCA diagnostics and propose a simple algorithm for diagnosing GCA for use by rheumatologists not working in specialist centres.

Risk factors for symptomatic vascular events in giant cell arteritis: a study of 254 patients with large-vessel imaging at diagnosis

Aims

To identify factors associated with vascular events in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of GCA patients diagnosed over a 20-year-period, who all underwent vascular imaging evaluation at diagnosis. Symptomatic vascular events were defined as the occurrence of any aortic event (aortic dissection or symptomatic aortic aneurysm), stroke, myocardial infarction, limb or mesenteric ischemia and de novo lower limbs arteritis stage 3 or 4. Patients with symptomatic vascular event (VE+) and without were compared, and risk factors were identified in a multivariable analysis.

Results

Thirty-nine (15.4%) of the 254 included patients experienced at least one symptomatic vascular event during follow-up, with a median time of 21.5 months. Arterial hypertension, diabetes, lower limbs arteritis or vascular complication at diagnosis were more frequent in VE+ patients (p < 0.05), as an abnormal computed tomography (CT)-scan at diagnosis (p = 0.04), aortitis (p = 0.01), particularly of the descending thoracic aorta (p = 0.03) and atheroma (p = 0.03). Deaths were more frequent in the VE+ group (37.1 versus 10.3%, p = 0.0003). In multivariable analysis, aortic surgery [hazard ratio (HR): 10.46 (1.41-77.80), p = 0.02], stroke [HR: 22.32 (3.69-135.05), p < 0.001], upper limb ischemia [HR: 20.27 (2.05-200.12), p = 0.01], lower limb ischemia [HR: 76.57 (2.89-2027.69), p = 0.009], aortic atheroma [HR: 3.06 (1.06-8.82), p = 0.04] and aortitis of the descending thoracic aorta on CT-scan at diagnosis [HR: 4.64 (1.56-13.75), p = 0.006] were independent predictive factors of a vascular event.

Conclusion

In this study on GCA cases with large vessels imaging at diagnosis, aortic surgery, stroke, upper or lower limb ischemia, aortic atheroma and aortitis of the descending thoracic aorta on CT-scan, at GCA diagnosis, were independent predictive factors of a vascular event.

Plain language summary

Risk factors for symptomatic vascular events in giant cell arteritisThis study was performed to identify the risk factors for developing symptomatic vascular event during giant cell arteritis (GCA) because these are poorly known.We performed a retrospective study of GCA patients diagnosed over a 20-year-period, who all underwent vascular imaging evaluation at diagnosis.Patients with symptomatic vascular event (VE+) and without (VE-) were compared, and risk factors were identified in a multivariable analysis.Thirty-nine patients experienced at least one symptomatic vascular event during follow-up, with a median time of 21.5 months.Arterial hypertension, diabetes, lower limbs arteritis or vascular complication at diagnosis were significantly more frequent in VE+ patients, as an abnormal CT-scan at diagnosis, aortitis, particularly of the descending thoracic aorta and atheroma. Deaths were more frequent in the VE+ group.Among 254 GCA patients, 39 experienced at least one vascular event during follow-up.Aortic surgery, stroke, upper and lower limb ischemia were vascular event risk factors.Aortic atheroma and descending thoracic aorta aortitis on CT-scan were vascular event risk factors.This study on GCA cases with large vessels imaging at diagnosis, showed that aortic surgery, stroke, upper or lower limb ischemia, aortic atheroma and aortitis of the descending thoracic aorta on CT-scan, at GCA diagnosis, were independent predictive factors of a vascular event.

Systemic vasculitides and the role of multitechnique imaging in the diagnosis

Vasculitis, a systemic disease characterised by inflammation of the blood vessels, remains challenging to diagnose and manage. Vessel size has been the basis for classifying systemic vasculitides. Imaging plays a vital role in diagnosing this challenging disease. This review article aims (a) to summarise up-to-date literature in this field, as well as include classification updates and (b) to review available imaging techniques, recent advances, and emphasis on imaging findings to diagnose large vessel vasculitides.

Corticosteroid Usage in Giant Cell Arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a condition that can cause irreversible visual loss if untreated. While corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment to prevent visual loss, the type, dose, route, and duration of corticosteroid treatment of GCA remain controversial. Our study surveyed neuro-ophthalmologists to determine commonly prescribed dosages of corticosteroids for the treatment of GCA with or without visual loss. For patients with acute visual loss, 52% would use intravenous (IV), 46% would use IV or oral and 2% would use oral corticosteroids. Seventy-three per cent would use 500 to 1000 mg IV methylprednisolone in this group. For patients with GCA without acute visual loss, 67% would use the oral route, 30% would use IV or oral, and 3% indicated they would use IV route of treatment. Seventy-five per cent would use 1.0 to 1.5 mg/kg oral prednisone in this group. Our results suggest a majority but not a complete consensus for route and dose of corticosteroid treatment in GCA and confirm conventional recommendations for high dose IV corticosteroids for GCA with visual loss and lower dose oral regimens for GCA without visual loss.

Ultrasound for diagnosis and follow-up of chronic axillary vasculitis in patients with long-standing giant cell arteritis

Aims:

To assess intima-media thickness (IMT) changes measured by ultrasound in axillary arteries of giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients over time and to calculate an ultrasound cut-off value for the diagnosis of chronic axillary artery involvement in patients with longstanding GCA.

Methods:

Ultrasound of both axillary arteries was performed in 109 GCA patients at time of diagnosis and at several follow-up visits and in 40 healthy controls (HCs). IMT determined at the prospective follow-up visit was compared between GCA patients with (axGCA) and without (non-axGCA) vasculitis of axillary arteries at baseline, as well as with HCs. Changes in IMT were depicted. Receiver operating characteristics were performed for cut-off calculations. Inter-/intra-rater agreement was evaluated using stored images and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results:

Seventy-three patients were in the axGCA and 36 in the non-axGCA group. Pathological IMT of axillary arteries (axGCA) declined in the first 18 months of treatment by −0.5 mm, (range −2.77 to 0.50), independent of age and gender. Median IMT, after median disease duration of 48 months (16–137), was 0.90 mm (0.46–2.20) in axGCA and 0.60 mm (0.42–1.0) in the non-axGCA group pooled with HCs. An IMT of 0.87 mm was highly specific (specificity 96%, sensitivity 61%) for diagnosis of chronic axGCA. Intra-rater and inter-reader agreement of ultrasound images were good [ICC 0.96–1.0 (three readers) and 0.87, respectively].

Conclusion:

Pathological IMT of the axillary artery declined under treatment. An IMT of 0.87 mm is highly specific for diagnosis of chronic vasculitis of axillary arteries in long-standing GCA patients.

Characterization of visual manifestations and identification of risk factors for permanent vision loss in patients with giant cell arteritis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Permanent vision loss (PVL) is a feared complication and a leading cause of morbidity in giant cell arteritis (GCA). The objective of this study is to describe visual manifestations and identify risk factors of ocular involvement in GCA.

METHODS

A retrospective database from a single vasculitis referral center was used. Descriptive statistics comparing patients with and without ocular involvement were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred patients with GCA were included. Visual symptoms were present in 53% of patients at diagnosis and included blurred vision (30%), diplopia (16%), amaurosis fugax (14%), and blindness (19%). Out of 19 patients with blindness, 16 did not recover and had PVL. Patients with PVL were older (79.2 ± 6.7 vs 74.2 ± 7.6 years; p = 0.008) and more likely to have coronary artery disease (31% vs 10%; p = 0.018). However, they were less likely to have other cranial symptoms (81% vs 96%; p = 0.019), mainly headaches (64% vs 92%; p = 0.003). Risk factors associated with an abnormal ophthalmologic examination were the same as for PVL, but patients were also more likely to have diabetes (29% vs 7%; p = 0.040) and less likely to have constitutional symptoms (53% vs 80%; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Patients with GCA and ocular involvement were more likely to have baseline diabetes and atherosclerosis. A predisposing vascular vulnerability might therefore increase the risk of ocular involvement. Key points • Most patients with GCA and complete vision loss at presentation will not recover and evolve to have permanent vision loss. • A GCA patient with visual manifestations at presentation has more baseline vascular risk factors (diabetes, atherosclerosis) than patients without ocular involvement. • Patients with GCA and visual manifestations have fewer constitutional symptoms and lower inflammatory markers than patients without ocular involvement.

Patient Reported Outcomes in Large Vessel Vasculitides

Purpose of Review

The goal of this paper is to review current and future uses of patient-reported outcomes in large vessel vasculitis. The large vessel vasculitides comprise Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu arteritis; both are types of systemic vasculitis which affect the larger blood vessels. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture the impact of these diseases on health-related quality of life.

Recent Findings

Generic PROs such as the SF-36 are currently used to compare HRQOL of people with GCA and TAK within clinical trials and observational studies and to make comparisons with the general population and HRQoL in other diseases. The development of a disease-specific PRO for GCA is currently underway. Beyond clinical trials, there is much interest in the use of PROs within routine clinical care, particularly E-PROs for remote use.

Summary

Further work will be needed to complete the development of disease-specific PROs for people with large vessel vasculitis and to establish feasibility, acceptability, and utility of E-PROs.

Diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis: Major review

Giant cell arteritis is a medical emergency because of the high risk of irreversible blindness and cerebrovascular accidents. While elevated inflammatory markers, temporal artery biopsy and modern imaging modalities are useful diagnostic aids, thorough history taking and clinical acumen still remain key elements in establishing a timely diagnosis. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of treatment but are associated with high relapse rates and side effects. Targeted biologic agents may open up new treatment approaches in the future.

The Main Challenges in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Where Do We Stand?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated multi-systemic disease characterized by a wide variability of clinical manifestations and a course frequently subject to unpredictable flares. Despite significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology and optimization of medical care, patients with SLE still have significant mortality and carry a risk of progressive organ damage accrual and reduced health-related quality of life. New tools allow earlier classification of SLE, whereas tailored early intervention and treatment strategies targeted to clinical remission or low disease activity could offer the opportunity to reduce damage, thus improving long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the early diagnosis of SLE is still an unmet need for many patients. Further disentangling the SLE susceptibility and complex pathogenesis will allow to identify more accurate biomarkers and implement new ways to measure disease activity. This could represent a major step forward to find new trials modalities for developing new drugs, optimizing the use of currently available therapeutics and minimizing glucocorticoids. Preventing and treating comorbidities in SLE, improving the management of hard-to-treat manifestations including management of SLE during pregnancy are among the remaining major unmet needs. This review provides insights and a research agenda for the main challenges in SLE.

[How long should treatment with tocilizumab be carried out for giant cell arteritis and how should it be ended (discontinue/taper off)?]

The revised S2 guidelines for treatment of giant cell arteritis have recently been published. Glucocorticosteroids remain the standard first line treatment. For severe or relapsing courses of the disease, the IL‑6 antagonist tocilizumab, a potent antibody, is now available as a therapeutic option; however, how long this treatment should be continued after having achieved a stable remission remains a matter of discussion. For patients with a complicated course and a high risk of relapse, a continuous treatment would be the safest way; however, with a milder course of disease for approximately half of the patients, treatment without relapse can be discontinued again.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: a single centre NHS experience using imaging (ultrasound and PET-CT) as a diagnostic and monitoring tool

Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor blocker, is approved for relapsing, refractory giant cell arteritis (GCA). We report real-life clinical experience with TCZ in GCA including assessment of responses on imaging (ultrasound (US) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET-CT)) during the first year of treatment. We included 22 consecutive patients with GCA treated with TCZ where EULAR core data set on disease activity, quality of life (QoL) and treatment-related complications were collected. Pre-TCZ US and ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT findings were available for 21 and 4 patients, respectively, where we determined the effect on US halo thickness, temporal and axillary artery Southend Halo Score and Total Vascular Score on ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT. The 22 patients with GCA (10 cranial, 10 large vessel, 2 both) had a median disease duration of 58.5 (range, 1-370) weeks prior to initiation of TCZ. Half had used prior conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARDs). TCZ was initiated for refractory (50%), ischaemic (36%) or relapsing (14%) disease. Median follow-up was 43 (12-52) weeks. TCZ was discontinued due to serious adverse events (SAEs) in two patients. On treatment with TCZ, 4 discontinued prednisolone, 11 required doses ≤2.5 mg, 2 required daily dose of 2.5-5 mg and 5 needed prednisolones ≥5 mg daily. QoL improved by 50%. Total US halo thickness decreased in 38 arterial segments, median temporal artery Halo Score decreased from 11 to 0, axillary artery Halo Score remained stable. Median Total Vascular Score on FDG-PET/CT reduced from 11.5 to 6.5. In our experience, TCZ showed an excellent response with acceptable safety in GCA, with improvement on US and FDG-PET/CT imaging.

Non-Canonical WNT5A Signaling Through RYK Contributes to Aggressive Phenotype of the Rheumatoid Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes

We hypothesized that WNT5A could contribute to the enhanced migration and invasiveness of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA FLS), which is one of the incompletely understood aspects of the RA FLS aggressive phenotype. This hypothesis is based on the previous evidence of a WNT5A role in both, RA and cell migration. Migration and invasion of RA FLS were assessed after incubation with recombinant Wnt5a (rWnt5a) or silencing of the endogenous WNT5A expression. The expression of WNT5A, WNT receptors, cytokines, chemokines, and metalloproteinases was quantified with RT-PCR. The WNT pathway was explored with gene silencing, antibody and pharmacological inhibition followed by migration assays and phosphoprotein western blots. Here, we reported that rWnt5a promoted migration and invasion of RA FLS, whereas knockdown of the endogenous WNT5A reduced them. These effects were specific to the RA FLS since they were not observed in FLS from osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Also, rWnt5a induced the expression of IL6, IL8, CCL2, CXCL5, MMP1, MMP3, MMP9, and MMP13 from baseline or potentiating the TNF induction, WNT5A signaling required the RYK receptor and was mediated through the WNT/Ca²⁺ and the ROCK pathway. These pathways involved the RYK and ROCK dependent activation of the p38, ERK, AKT, and GSK3β kinases, but not the activation of JNK. Together these findings indicate that WNT5A contributes to the enhanced migration and invasiveness of RA FLS through RYK and the specific activation of ROCK and downstream kinases.