TO USE OR NOT USE PATIENT SHIELDING ON PREGNANT WOMEN UNDERGOING CT PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY

3D printing of realistic body phantoms: Comparison of measured and simulated organ doses on the example of a CT scan on a pregnant woman

BACKGROUND

Medical examinations or treatment of pregnant women using ionizing radiation are sometimes unavoidable. In such cases, the risk of harm to the embryo and fetus after exposure to ionizing radiation must be carefully estimated. However, no commercially available anthropomorphic body phantoms of pregnant women are available for dose measurements. A promising possibility for the production of body phantoms for patient groups that are not adequately represented by the phantoms of reference persons is 3D printing. However, this approach is still in the evaluation phase.

PURPOSE

To print the abdomen of a woman in the late stage of pregnancy and compare the dose distribution measured using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) in the printed phantom for two different computed tomography (CT) protocols with the corresponding results of Monte Carlo simulations on voxel models of the pregnant woman.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The physical phantom was produced through multi-material extrusion printing using different print materials identified in previous studies to simulate homogeneous soft tissues and the mean compositions of maternal and fetal bones. The 3D printed abdomen was combined with a conventionally produced anthropomorphic female phantom to obtain a whole-body phantom of a pregnant woman. Dose values resulting from two different CT scans acquired at tube voltages of 80 and 120 kV were measured using TLDs positioned in the physical phantom and cross-validated with the results of Monte Carlo simulations performed for two different voxel models. The first was a voxelized model of the produced phantom itself and the second a realistic digital model of a pregnant woman. Representative CT values of the materials used in the printed phantom were determined from the acquired CT images.

RESULTS

The CT values of maternal and fetal tissue structures in the phantom are comparable to CT values of real human tissues. The difference between most organ doses measured in the 3D printed phantom and simulated in the voxel models was below 20% and equivalent within the measurement uncertainties. Only the dose to the fetal head was up to 50% higher and not equivalent for the realistic model and the 80 kV-protocol. As expected, the agreement was better for the voxelized than for the realistic model. For both models a slight energy dependence was observed, with larger deviations for the 80-kV protocol especially for organs located in the pelvic region.

CONCLUSION

Individualized physical body phantoms, such as that of a pregnant woman, can be produced using 3D printing. The good agreement between measured and simulated doses to the fetus cross-validates both dosimetric methods. Therefore, this study demonstrates the suitability of 3D printing phantoms for patients not adequately represented by commercially available body phantoms of reference persons.

The out-of-plane contact shield and mA-modulation - the effect on fetal absorbed dose

The effect of patient shielding on fetal radiation dose was evaluated in computed tomography pulmonary angiography with the out-of-plane shield visible in the localizer but absent in the scan range in chest computed tomography (CT). An anthropomorphic phantom with additional prosthetic pregnancy belly was scanned with different CT scanners using clinical imaging protocols and radiophotoluminescence dosemeters (GD-352 M). The out-of-plane shield decreased the fetal absorbed radiation dose with Siemens Somatom go.Up, Canon Aquilion Prime SP and Canon Aquilion One scanners. The decrease was 3.9%-39.4% (0.01-0.09 mGy). With GE Optima the shield increased the fetal dose by 100% (0.23 mGy), with Canon Aquilion One and GE Optima scanners the abdomen dose increase was 17.5% and 36.4%, respectively (0.61 and 1.38 mGy). Applying an out-of-plane shield outside the scanned volume may increase the fetal radiation dose during CT when using tube current modulation, depending on the make and model of the CT scanner.

To shield or not to shield: shielding may have unintended effects on patient dose in CT

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the patient out-of-plane shield is to reduce the patient radiation dose. Its effect on tube current modulation was evaluated with the out-of-plane shield visible in the localizer but absent in the scan range in chest CT with different CT scanners.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with six different CT scanners from three different vendors. The chest was first scanned without any shielding, and then with the out-of-plane shield within the localizer but outside the imaged volume. All pitch values of each scanner were used. The tube current values with and without the out-of-plane shield were collected and used to evaluate the effect of overscanning and tube current modulation (TCM) on patient radiation dose.

RESULTS

The highest increase in cumulative mA was 217%, when the pitch was 1.531. The tube current value increased already 8.9 cm before the end of the scanned anatomy and the difference between the tube current of the last slices (with and without the out-of-plane shield in the localizer) was 976%.

CONCLUSION

Applying an out-of-plane shield outside the scanned volume but visible in the localizer images may increase the patient dose considerably if the scanner's TCM function is based only on localizer images.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The use of an out-of-plane shield in CT may strongly increase the tube current modulation and thus provide the patient with a higher radiation dose.

KEY POINTS

• Applying an out-of-plane shield outside the scanned volume but visible in the localizer images may increase patient radiation dose considerably. • The effect is visible with scanners that use solely localizer-based tube current modulation. • Features like overscanning may be difficult for the user to notice when planning the scanning, and yet they may affect tube current modulation and through it to patient dose.

Pregnancy, Hip Pain, and Total Hip Replacement

➤ Young women who are 15 to 45 years of age and undergo total hip replacements are at increased risk for revision compared with women >75 years of age.➤ Among women of childbearing age with a total hip replacement, 12% to 17% will later have at least 1 pregnancy.➤ Young women who undergo total hip replacement do not have an increased risk of pregnancy complications.➤ Of the 60% of women who experienced pain with a total hip replacement during pregnancy, 21% had persisting pain, and 4% reported the pain as severe.➤ Women who have a total hip replacement and later experience pregnancy and childbirth have no increased risk of pregnancy complications or increased revision rates; there was no effect of the mode of delivery on revision rates or complications including fracture, dislocation, or loosening, according to the limited studies available.

Trauma in Pregnancy

Trauma is the leading cause of nonobstetric maternal death. Pregnant patients have a similar spectrum of traumatic injuries with a noted increase in interpersonal violence. A structured approach to trauma evaluation and management is recommended with several guidelines expanding on ATLS principles; however, evidence is limited. Optimal management requires understanding of physiologic changes in pregnancy, a team-based approach, and preparation for interventions that may including neonatal resuscitation. The principles of trauma management are the same in pregnancy with a systematic approach and initial maternal focused resuscitation..

Perioperative Anesthetic Management of the Pregnant Patient With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Intervention: A Systematic Review

Maternal congenital heart disease is increasingly prevalent, and has been associated with a significantly increased risk of maternal, obstetric, and neonatal complications. For patients with CHD who require cardiac interventions during pregnancy, there is little evidence-based guidance with regard to optimal perioperative management. The periprocedural management of pregnant patients with congenital heart disease requires extensive planning and a multidisciplinary teams-based approach. Anesthesia providers must not only be facile in the management of adult congenital heart disease, but cognizant of the normal, but significant, physiologic changes of pregnancy.

Using barium as an internal radioprotective shield for pregnant patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of our retrospective study was to assess the effect of barium sulfate contrast medium on radiation dose and diagnostic quality of CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) in an in-vivo study of pregnant patients.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included 33 pregnant patients who underwent CTPA to exclude pulmonary embolism. The patients received oral 40% w/v barium solution just prior to the acquisition of their planning radiograph. All CTPA were performed on 64-slice, single-source CT scanners with AEC with noise index = 28.62-31.64 and the allowed mA range of 100-450. However, only 5/33 patients had mA modulation (AEC 100-450 mA range), while 28/33 patients had mA maxed out at the set maximum mA of 450 over the entire scan range. We recorded CTDIvol (mGy), DLP (mGy.cm) and scan length. The same information was recorded in weight-and scanner-matched, non-pregnant patients. Statistical tests included descriptive data (median and interquartile range) and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in CTDIvol and DLP between the barium and control group patients (p > 0.1). The median mA below the diaphragm was significantly higher in each patient with barium compared to the weight and scanner-matched patient without barium. Evaluation of lung and subsegmental lower lobe pulmonary arteries was limited in 85% barium group. Due to thin prospective section thickness (1.25 mm), most patients were scanned at maximum allowed mA for AEC.

CONCLUSION

Use of AEC with thick barium in pregnant patients undergoing CTPA as an internal radioprotective shield produces counterproductive artifacts and tube current increments.

Comparison of organ and effective dose estimations from different Monte Carlo simulation-based software methods in infant CT and comparison with direct phantom measurements

Purpose

Computational dosimetry software is routinely used to evaluate the organ and effective doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations. Studies have shown a significant variation in dose estimates between software in adult cohorts, and few studies have evaluated software for pediatric dose estimates. This study aims to compare the primary organ and effective doses estimated by four commercially available CT dosimetry software to thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements in a 1‐year‐old phantom.

Methods

One hundred fifteen calibrated LiF (Mg, Cu, P)‐TLD 100‐H chips were embedded within an anthropomorphic phantom representing a 1‐year‐old child at positions that matched the approximate location of organs within an infant. The phantom was scanned under three protocols, each with whole‐body coverage. The mean absorbed doses from 25 radiosensitive organs and skeletal tissues were determined from the TLD readings. Effective doses for each of the protocols were subsequently calculated using ICRP 103 formalism. Dose estimates by the four Monte Carlo–based dose calculation systems were determined and compared to the directly measured doses.

Results

Most organ doses determined by computation dosimetry software aligned to phantom measurements within 20%. Additionally, comparisons between effective doses are calculated using computational and direct measurement methods aligned within 20% across the three protocols. Significant variances were found in bone surface dose estimations among dosimetry methods, likely caused by differences in bone tissue modeling.

Conclusion

All four‐dosimetry software evaluated in this study provide adequate primary organ and effective dose estimations. Users should be aware, however, of the possible estimated uncertainty associated with each of the programs.

THE EFFECT OF OUT-OF-PLANE PATIENT SHIELDING ON CT RADIATION EXPOSURE AND TUBE CURRENT MODULATIONS: A PHANTOM STUDY ACROSS THREE VENDORS

The aim of this study was to evaluate how out-of-plane patient shielding affects radiation exposure parameters and tube current modulation on different vendors' computed tomography (CT) scanners. Helical CT scans were performed using two homogenous phantoms to mimic patient attenuation. Four CT scanners from three vendors were investigated by varying the distance of the patient shield from the border of the imaging volume. Scans were performed with a shield placed before and after the localizer. Changes in volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and tube current-time products were studied. Out-of-field lead shield increased the CTDIvol and DLP values for each scanner at least for one scan setting when the shield was present in the localizer. The most notable changes were recorded with >1.3 pitch values when the shield was closest to the scanned volume (2.5 cm), and the scan direction was towards the shield. The usage of patient shields in the localizer CT scans can disturb TCM even when placed 7.5 cm away from the edge of the scan.

World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine Review Paper: Incidental Findings during Obstetrical Ultrasound

Although the prevalence of incidental findings revealed during an obstetric ultrasound examination is low, the findings may include adnexal and cervical masses, uterine or urinary congenital malformations, free fluid in the pouch of Douglas or tortuous vessels (varices). Adnexal masses are the most common finding and vary in imaging characteristics. They are mainly unilateral, cystic masses with a low risk of malignancy that are treated conservatively. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis scoring models may be helpful in differentiating benign from malignant masses. For those masses >5 cm, follow-up is recommended, and resection could be considered to avoid risk of torsion, rupture and hemorrhage, which may compromise pregnancy outcome. Uterine masses such as fibroids are commonly diagnosed early in the first trimester and should be followed up during pregnancy to evaluate any changes. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound is the first-line test for the diagnosis of such incidentalomas; however, magnetic resonance ultrasound may have a useful role in excluding malignancy potential. As a result of their low frequency and the lack of good evidence, there are no specific guidelines on the management of incidentalomas detected at obstetric scans. Their management should follow the related general guidelines for ovarian, cervical and uterine masses, with individualized management depending on the pregnancy status.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

X-RAY AND MOLECULAR IMAGING DURING PREGNANCY AND BREASTFEEDING-WHEN SHOULD WE BE WORRIED?

Some of the ethically most sensitive issues in radiation protection arise at imaging of pregnant-and potentially pregnant-patients and of newborn. This article reviews the current literature and recommendations on imaging during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Risks related to alternative non-ionizing radiation methods are also considered. With few exceptions, exposure of the fetus through radiography, computed tomography (CT) and nuclear medicine imaging can be limited to safe levels, although studies such as abdominal-pelvic CT cannot avoid significant exposure to fetuses. Eight to 10 weeks post-conception, the fetus has a thyroid which starts to concentrate iodide having crossed the placenta barrier resulting in unacceptably high doses to the fetal thyroid after administration of 131I- and even 123I-iodide and other radiopharmaceuticals with a high content of free radioiodine. Many radiopharmaceuticals are excreted through breast milk. Breastfeeding interruption recommendations should be followed to keep the effective dose to the infant below 1 mSv.

Neurocritical Care of the Pregnant Patient

Purpose of review

To summarize recent changes in management and emerging therapies for pregnant neurocritical care patients.

Recent findings

Diagnostic and treatment options for managing neurologic emergencies in pregnant patients have expanded with both greater understanding of the effects of imaging modalities and medications on pregnancy and application of standard treatments for non-pregnant patients to pregnant populations. Specifically, this includes cerebrovascular diseases (pregnancy-associated ischemic stroke, pregnancy-associated intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis), post-maternal cardiac arrest care, seizures and status epilepticus, myasthenia gravis, and fetal somatic support in maternal death by neurologic criteria.

Summary

With the exception of direct abdominal computed tomography (CT), most imaging studies are reasonably safe in pregnancy. When emergent imaging is needed to prevent maternal morbidity or mortality, any CT sequence with or without contrast is appropriate to pursue. Though new safety data on antiplatelets, antihypertensives, thrombolytics, and antiepileptic drugs have increased options for disease management in pregnancy, unfractionated and low-molecular weight heparin remain the safest options for anticoagulation. Early studies on hypothermia, ketamine, and immunomodulating therapies in pregnancy are promising. In myasthenia gravis, new data on adjunct devices may allow more patients to undergo safe vaginal delivery, avoiding cesarean section and the associated risk of crisis. When difficult decisions regarding preterm delivery arise, recent outcome studies can help inform discussion. Lastly, when the feared complication of maternal death by neurologic criteria occurs, fetal somatic support may help to save at least one life.

Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiology/Canadian Association of Radiologists Best Practice Guidance for Investigation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism, Part 1: Acquisition and Safety Considerations

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a well-recognized cause of circulatory system compromise and even demise which can frequently present a diagnostic challenge for the physician. The diagnostic challenge is primarily due to the frequency of indeterminate presentations as well as several other conditions which can have a similar clinical presentation. This often obliges the physician to establish a firm diagnosis due to the potentially serious outcomes related to this disease. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has increasingly cemented its role as the primary investigation tool in this clinical context and is widely accepted as the standard of care due to several desired attributes which include great accuracy, accessibility, rapid turn-around time and the ability to suggest an alternate diagnosis when APE is not the culprit. In Part 1 of this guidance document, a series of up-to-date recommendations are provided to the reader pertaining to CTPA protocol optimization (including scan range, radiation and intravenous contrast dose), safety measures including the departure from breast and gonadal shielding, population-specific scenarios (pregnancy and early post-partum) and consideration of alternate diagnostic techniques when clinically deemed appropriate.