BENCHMARKING OF A NEW AUTOMATIC CT RADIATION DOSE CALCULATOR

Evaluation of organ and effective doses using anthropomorphic phantom: A comparison between experimental measurement and a commercial dose calculator

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to experimentally measure organ doses for computed tomography (CT) procedures using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) on a RANDO anthropomorphic phantom and verify the measured doses using CT-Expo software.

METHODS

The phantom was irradiated using clinical CT scan protocols routinely used for specific procedures in the radiology department. Fifty TLD chips were used in this study. The scanning parameters (kVp, mA, s) used to scan the phantom were used as input parameters for CT-Expo dose estimations.

RESULTS

The TLD measured organ doses varied between 3.97 mGy for the esophagus and 56.22 mGy for the brain. High doses were recorded in the brain (37.80-56.22 mGy) and the eye lens (29.94-36.16 mGy). Comparing the organ dose measurements between TLD and CT-Expo, the maximum organ dose difference was obtained for the eye lens. A comparison between the two methods for the other organs were all less than 32 %. The effective doses from the TLD measurements for the head, chest, and abdominopelvic CT examinations were 2.78, 6.67, and 17 mSv, respectively and CT-Expo were 2.20, 10.30, and 16.70 mSv, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The experimental and computational results are comparable, and the reliability of the TLD measurements and CT-Expo dose calculator has been proven.

IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDY

A reason for the difference in dose measurements between the two methods has been attributed to the dissimilarity in the organ position in the Rando anthropomorphic phantom and the standard mathematical phantom used by CT-Expo. The experimental and computational results have been found to be comparable.

[Organ and Effective Doses Using Automation Organ Dose Estimation Software for Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-dose Computed Tomography]

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the organ doses and the effective doses using three types of automated organ dose estimation software for low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer and to evaluate the correlations between each dose and size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs).

METHODS

Seventy-two adults who underwent low-dose CT screening for lung cancer were included, and the organ doses and the effective doses were calculated using each of automated organ dose estimation software. We evaluated differences between software for the organ doses and the effective doses and the correlations between each dose and SSDEs.

RESULTS

Differences in organ doses and effective doses were observed among the software. The organ doses showed a strong correlation (r=0.833-0.995) with SSDEs for organs within the scan range. The effective doses showed a strong correlation (r=0.830-0.970) with SSDEs, although there were significant differences among the software.

CONCLUSION

Although the organ doses and the effective doses differed between software, it may be possible to estimate them from SSDEs by using linear regression equations.