IDAC-ALPHA: AN ALPHA DOSIMETRY SOFTWARE FOR NORMAL ORGANS AND TISSUES

Modeling the effect of daughter migration on dosimetry estimates for unlabeled actinium-225

BACKGROUND

Actinium-225 (225 Ac) is an alpha emitting radionuclide which has demonstrated promising results in Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT). A concern with 225 Ac is that the decay energy can break the bond to the targeting vehicle, resulting in the release of free alpha-emitting daughter radionuclides in the body.

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to develop a compartment model to describe the movement of unlabeled 225 Ac in a human where the daughter isotopes of 225 Ac have unique biokinetics.

METHOD

The ICRP Occupational Intake of Radionuclides reports were used to construct a compartment model for the 225 Ac decay chain where the daughter isotopes of 225 Ac are assigned their own unique transfer coefficients (TCs) between compartments. Computer simulations were performed for unlabeled 225 Ac uniformly placed in the plasma and only the dose from alpha particles was considered. Absorbed doses to normal organs were determined for the liver, kidneys, bone, soft tissue, active marrow, and blood. Simulations were performed for the case when: (1) the daughters have unique biokinetics and (2) the daughters decay at the site of 225 Ac.

RESULTS

When the daughters have unique biokinetics, the organs that receive the highest absorbed dose are the liver (male: 1466.6 mGy/MBq, female: 1885.7 mGy/MBq), bone (male: 293.6 mGy/MBq, female: 403.6 mGy/MBq) and kidneys (male: 260.8 mGy/MBq, female: 294.0 mGy/MBq). These doses were compared to the case when the daughters of 225 Ac decay at the site of 225 Ac. There was a 13.5% increase in kidney dose, a 0.8% decrease in liver dose, and <0.1% decrease in bone dose calculations when the daughters have unique biokinetics compared to assuming the daughters decay at the site of 225 Ac.

CONCLUSIONS

The kidneys received a large dose estimate (260-295 mGy/MBq) as well as a considerable change in dose of +13.5% when the daughters have unique biokinetics compared to assuming the daughters decay at the site of 225 Ac. Therefore, to accurately determine the kidney dose from unlabeled 225 Ac in a human, the biokinetics of the daughter isotopes should be considered.

The contest between internal and external-beam dosimetry: The Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the tortoise

Radionuclide therapy, also called molecular radiotherapy (MRT), has come of age, with several novel radiopharmaceuticals being approved for clinical use or under development in the last decade. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a well-established treatment modality, with about half of all oncologic patients expected to receive at least one external radiation treatment over their disease course. The efficacy and the toxicity of both types of treatment rely on the interaction of radiation with biological tissues. Dosimetry played a fundamental role in the scientific and technological evolution of EBRT, and absorbed doses to the target and to the organs at risk are calculated on a routine basis. In contrast, in MRT the usefulness of internal dosimetry has long been questioned, and a structured path to include absorbed dose calculation is missing. However, following a similar route of development as EBRT, MRT treatments could probably be optimized in a significant proportion of patients, likely based on dosimetry and radiobiology. In the present paper we describe the differences and the similarities between internal and external-beam dosimetry in the context of radiation treatments, and we retrace the main stages of their development over the last decades.

Dosimetry in targeted alpha therapy. A systematic review: current findings and what is needed

Objective. A systematic review of dosimetry in Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT) has been performed, identifying the common issues. Approach. The systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, and the literature was searched using the Scopus and PubMed databases. Main results. From the systematic review, three key points should be considered when performing dosimetry in TAT. (1) Biodistribution/Biokinetics: the accuracy of the biodistribution data is a limit to accurate dosimetry in TAT. The biodistribution of alpha-emitting radionuclides throughout the body is difficult to image directly, with surrogate radionuclide imaging, blood/faecal sampling, and animal studies able to provide information. (2) Daughter radionuclides: the decay energy of the alpha-emissions is sufficient to break the bond to the targeting vector, resulting in a release of free daughter radionuclides in the body. Accounting for daughter radionuclide migration is essential. (3) Small-scale dosimetry and microdosimetry: due to the short path length and heterogeneous distribution of alpha-emitters at the target site, small-scale/microdosimetry are important to account for the non-uniform dose distribution in a target region, organ or cell and for assessing the biological effect of alpha-particle radiation. Significance. TAT is a form of cancer treatment capable of delivering a highly localised dose to the tumour environment while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. Dosimetry is an important part of treatment planning and follow up. Being able to accurately predict the radiation dose to the target region and healthy organs could guide the optimal prescribed activity. Detailed dosimetry models accounting for the three points mentioned above will help give confidence in and guide the clinical application of alpha-emitting radionuclides in targeted cancer therapy.

The role of dosimetry and biological effects in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with 223Ra: first in human study

BACKGROUND

223Ra is currently used for treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC) bone metastases with fixed standard activity. Individualized treatments, based on adsorbed dose (AD) in target and non-target tissue, are absolutely needed to optimize efficacy while reducing toxicity of α-emitter targeted therapy. This is a pilot first in human clinical trial aimed to correlate dosimetry, clinical response and biological side effects to personalize 223Ra treatment.

METHODS

Out of 20 mCRPC patients who underwent standard 223Ra treatment and dosimetry, in a subset of 5 patients the AD to target and non-target tissues was correlated with clinical effects and radiation-induced chromosome damages. Before each 223Ra administrations, haematological parameters, PSA and ALP values were evaluated. Additional blood samples were obtained baseline (T0), at 7 days (T7), 30 days (T30) and 180 days (T180) to evaluate chromosome damage. After administration WB planar 223Ra images were obtained at 2-4 and 18-24 h. Treatment response and toxicity were monitored with clinical evaluation, bone scan, 18F-choline-PET/CT, PSA value and ALP while haematological parameters were evaluated weekly after 223Ra injection and 2 months after last cycle.

RESULTS

1. a correlation between AD to target and clinical response was evidenced with threshold of 20 Gy as a cut-off to obtain tumor control; 2. the AD to red marrow was lower than 2 Gy in all the patients with no apparently correlation between dosimetry and clinical toxicity. 3. a high dose dependent increase of the number of dicentrics and micronuclei during the course of 223Ra therapy was observed and a linear correlation has been found between blood AD (BAD) and number of dicentrics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides some interesting preliminary evidence to be further investigated: dosimetry may be useful to identify a more appropriate 223Ra administered activity predicting AD to target tissue; a dose dependent complex chromosome damage occurs during 223Ra administration and this injury is more evident in heavily pre-treated patients; dosimetry could be used for radioprotection purpose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The pilot study has been approved from the Ethics Committee of Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (N:RS1083/18-2111).