Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot study

Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To summarise and compare the performance of magnification mammography and digital zoom utilising a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system in the detection and diagnosis of microcalcifications.

METHODS

We ran an extended search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Engineering Village and Web of Science. Diagnostic test studies, experimental breast phantom studies and a Monte Carlo phantom study were included. A narrative approach was selected to summarise and compare findings regarding the detection of microcalcifications, while a hierarchical model with bivariate analysis was used for the meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing microcalcifications.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. Phantom studies suggested that the size of microcalcifications, magnification or zoom factor, exposure factors and detector technology determine whether digital zoom is equivalent to magnification mammography in the detection of microcalcifications. Pooled sensitivity for magnification and zoom calculated from the diagnostic test studies was 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-0.97) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.70-0.94), respectively. Pooled specificity was 0.55 (95% CI 0.51-0.58) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.50-0.62), respectively. The differences between the sensitivities and specificities were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital zoom may be equivalent to magnification mammography. Diagnostic test studies and phantom studies using newer detector technology would contribute additional knowledge on this topic.

KEY POINTS

• The performance of digital zoom is comparable to magnification for detecting microcalcifications when newer detector technology and optimised imaging procedures are utilised. • The accuracy of digital zoom appears equivalent to geometric magnification in diagnosing microcalcifications.

Discrimination of breast microcalcifications using a strain-compounding technique with ultrasound speckle factor imaging

The usefulness of breast ultrasound could be extended by improving the detection of microcalcifications by being able to detect and enhance microcalcifications while simultaneously eliminating hyperechoic spots (e.g., speckle noise and fibrocystic changes) that can be mistaken for microcalcifications (i.e., false microcalcifications). This study investigated the use of a strain-compounding technique with speckle factor (SF) imaging to analyze the degree of scatterer redistributions in breast tissues under strain conditions for identifying microcalcifications and false microcalcifications. The efficacy of the proposed method was tested by collecting raw data of ultrasound backscattered signals from 26 lesions at BI-RADS category 4 or 5 with suspicious microcalcifications. The different strain conditions were created by applying manual compression to deform the breast lesion. For each region in which microcalcifications were suspected, estimates of the SNR of the strain-compounding B-scan images and estimates of the mean SF (SFavg) in the strain-compounding SF images were calculated. Compared with microcalcifications, the severity of speckle of the false microcalcifications would be easily degraded under compressive strain conditions. The results demonstrated that the SNR estimates in the strain-compounding B-scan images for microcalcifications and false microcalcifications were 5.22 ± 1.04 (mean ± standard deviation) and 4.62 ± 1.09, respectively; the corresponding SFavg estimates in the strain-compounding SF images were 0.47 ± 0.10 and 0.22 ± 0.10 (p < 0.01). The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using the SNR estimate was 0.71, whereas that using the SFavg estimate was 0.94. These findings indicate that the strain-compounding SF imaging method is more effective at discriminating between microcalcifications and false microcalcifications.

Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

High-quality full-field digital mammography has been available now for several years and is increasingly used for both diagnostic and screening mammography. A number of different detector technologies exist, which all have their specific advantages and disadvantages. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography has been shown to be at least equivalent to film-screen mammography in a general screening population. Digital mammography is superior to screen-film mammography in younger women with dense breasts due to its ability to selectively optimize contrast in areas of dense parenchyma. This advantage is especially important in women with a genetic predisposition for breast cancer, where intensified early detection programs may have to start from 25 to 30 years of age. Tailored image processing and computer-aided diagnosis hold the potential to further improve the early detection of breast cancer. However, at present no consensus exists among radiologists on which processing is optimal for digital mammograms. Image processing may also vary significantly among vendors with so far limited interoperability. This review aims to summarize the available information regarding the impact of digital mammography on workflow and breast cancer diagnosis.

Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of pixel size on the detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A high-spatial-resolution prototype imager that yields variable pixel size (39 and 78 microm) and a clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system that yields a 100-microm pixel size were used. Radiographic images of a contrast-detail (CD) phantom were obtained to perform four-alternative forced-choice observer experiments. Polymethylmethacrylate was added to obtain phantom thicknesses of 45 and 58 mm, which are typical breast thicknesses encountered in mammography. Phantom images were acquired with both systems under nearly identical exposure conditions by using an antiscatter grid. Twelve images were acquired for each phantom thickness and pixel size (for a total of 72 images), and six observers participated in this study. Observer responses were used to compute the fraction of correctly detected disks. A signal detection model was used to fit the recorded data from which CD characteristics were obtained. Repeated-measures analyses with mixed-effects linear models were performed for each of the six observers. All statistical tests were two sided and unadjusted for multiple comparisons. A P value of .05 or less was considered to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed significantly better CD characteristics with 39- and 78-microm pixel sizes compared with 100-microm pixel size for all disk diameters and phantom thicknesses (P<.001). Increase in phantom thickness degraded CD characteristics regardless of pixel size (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the conditions of this study, reducing pixel size below 100 mum with low imaging system noise enhances the visual perception of small objects that correspond to typical microcalcifications.

Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography

The physical characteristics of charge-coupled device (CCD) mammography detector with 16-bit dynamic range and 27 microm detector element size were investigated. The detector, with an active area of 1 cm x 20 cm is suitable for slot-scanning systems. We evaluated the detector resolution by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) using a tilted edge. We also measured the noise power spectra (NPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) using tungsten spectra filtered with 3 mm Al. We carried out measurements in two modes of operation: the frame mode where the detector is stationary and the scan mode where the detector operates in a slot-scanning configuration. The specific beam qualities and exposure ranges employed were 30 kVp, HVL 1.4 mm Al, 1.24 microC kg(-1) to 12.44 microC kg(-1), and 40 kVp, HVL 2.1 mm Al and 3.26 microC kg(-1) to 16.64 microC kg(-1). The product of the normalized noise power spectrum and exposure was also computed to evaluate the quantum limited characteristic of the detector. The detector MTF was 12% at 15 lp mm(-1). The product of the noise power spectra and exposure was independent of exposure level, indicating a quantum limited detector. The DQE in the scan and frame modes near zero frequency was 40% and 60%, respectively. Our results show that the slot-scanning configuration was less efficient than the performance capabilities of the detector. This detector is comparable to other digital mammography sensors evaluated in the literature.

Theoretical analysis of high-resolution digital mammography

The performance of a high-resolution charge coupled device-based full-field digital mammography imager was analysed using a mathematical framework based on an adaptation of cascaded linear systems theory described by other investigators. This work has been conducted in order to understand the impact of various design parameters on the physical performance characteristics of the imager. Specifically, the effect of pixel size, scintillator thickness and packing density, x-ray spectra, air kerma, dark current, charge integration time, and pixel fill-factor on the frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency was studied using a charge-coupled device as a reference platform. The imaging system was modelled as a series of physical processes with gain and spatial spreading. For each stage, the signal and noise power spectra were computed and propagated through the imaging chain as inputs to subsequent stages. Good agreement between experimental and theoretical predictions was obtained for various x-ray spectral conditions that were investigated. The modulation transfer function, MTF(f) and detective quantum efficiency DQE(f) characteristics obtained in this study are encouraging and comparable to other digital mammography systems. The results of this study strongly suggest the feasibility of large area scintillator-based digital mammography imagers with pixel sizes below 100 microm.

A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology

Observer performance studies are time-consuming tasks, both for the participating observers and for the scientists collecting and analysing the data. A possible way to optimise such studies is to perform them in a completely digital environment. A software tool-ViewDEX (Viewer for Digital Evaluation of X-ray images)-has been developed in Java, enabling it to function on almost any computer. ViewDEX is designed to handle several types of studies, such as visual grading analysis (VGA), image criteria scoring (ICS) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results from each observer are saved in a log file, which can be exported for further analysis in, for example, a special software for analysing ROC results. By using ViewDEX for an ROC experiment, an evaluation rate of approximately 200 images per hour can be achieved, compared to approximately 25 images per hour using hard copy evaluation. The results are obtained within minutes of completion of the viewing. The risk of human errors in the process of data collection and analysis is also minimised. The viewer has been used in a major trial containing approximately 2700 images.