1
|
Mayer S, Bossin L, Christensen JB, Pedrazzi L, Yukihara EG. Personal dosimetry at the Paul Scherrer Institute. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 199:1790-1792. [PMID: 37819303 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) is the largest research institute for natural and engineering sciences in Switzerland. PSI develops, builds and operates complex large research facilities. Every year, >2400 scientists from Switzerland and around the world come to PSI to use the facilities and to carry out experiments. Many areas at PSI are radiation protection areas. Depending on the radiation protection area, the work carried out and the time the users spend in these areas, they have to carry a personal dosemeter. PSI runs an individual monitoring service in compliance with the Swiss legislation on radiological protection and approved by the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate. The service provides about 35 000 dosemeters per year for the internal and external customers consisting of whole-body dosemeters for photons and neutrons as well as extremity dosemeters. This paper gives an overview on the employed personal dosimetry techniques by the individual monitoring service of PSI, the number of distributed dosemeters for internal and external customers and statistics about the measured doses at PSI over 30 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Mayer
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Lily Bossin
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Lisa Pedrazzi
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo G Yukihara
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stabilini A, Akselrod M, Fomenko V, Harrison J, Yukihara E. Principal Component Analysis applied to neutron dosimetry based on PADC detectors and FNTDs. RADIAT MEAS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
3
|
Yukihara EG, Akselrod MS, Fomenko V, Harrison J, Million M, Assenmacher F, Stabilini A, Meier K. COMPARISON BETWEEN PADC AND FNTD NEUTRON DETECTOR SYSTEMS IN BLIND TESTS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2018; 180:225-229. [PMID: 29036622 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare a neutron dosimetry system based on polyallyl diglycol carbonate (PADC) detectors with a new system based on Al2O3:C,Mg fluorescence nuclear track detectors (FNTD). The irradiations, performed as part of an intercomparison organized by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany, were on a PMMA phantom with 252Cf or 241Am-Be source, usually with the phantom surface perpendicular to the radiation beam (0° angle), and with Hp(10) values between 0.3 and 7 mSv. One 252Cf irradiation was performed at 30° angle, and one with an additional 1 mSv gamma irradiation. The results showed an agreement between the two techniques with an average and maximum difference between PADCs and FNTDs of 1.5 and 22%, respectively, if one compares only cases of doses >1 mSv. For one of the irradiation conditions with dose of 0.9 mSv, use of the incorrect calibration factor for the FNTD (252Cf instead of 241Am-Be) led to reported values ~×2 larger than the given doses, due to low statistics in the determination of the ratio between 6Li-doped glass and polyethylene neutron converters. Although the FNTD track analysis algorithm may need further development, the results presented here demonstrate the feasibility of the FNTD technology and indicate areas requiring improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E G Yukihara
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Physics Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
| | - M S Akselrod
- Landauer Inc., Crystal Growth Division, 7231/2 Eastgate St., Stillwater, OK, USA
| | - V Fomenko
- Landauer Inc., Crystal Growth Division, 7231/2 Eastgate St., Stillwater, OK, USA
| | - J Harrison
- Landauer Inc., Crystal Growth Division, 7231/2 Eastgate St., Stillwater, OK, USA
| | - M Million
- Landauer Europe, 9 rue Paul Dautier CS, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
| | - F Assenmacher
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - A Stabilini
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Energia, via la Masa 34, Milan, Italy
| | - K Meier
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assenmacher F, Boschung M, Hohmann E, Mayer S. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PADC MATERIALS AND ETCHING CONDITIONS FOR FAST NEUTRON DOSIMETRY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2016; 170:162-167. [PMID: 26443546 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Etched-track polyallyl diglycol carbonate (PADC) dosemeters have been in use at the Paul Scherrer Institute since 1998 in neutron dosimetry for individual monitoring. In the last years, the availability of PADC materials from different manufacturers has grown, and different etching conditions were proposed, with the intention to improve the quality and overall performance of PADC in individual neutron monitoring. The goal of the present study was to compare the performance of different PADC materials and to investigate the influence of different etching conditions on sensitivity to fast neutrons and lower detection limit. The comparison covers six different PADC materials and eight different etching conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Assenmacher
- Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - M Boschung
- Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - E Hohmann
- Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - S Mayer
- Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mayer S, Boschung M, Butterweck G, Assenmacher F, Hohmann E. STABILITY OF THE NEUTRON DOSE DETERMINATION ALGORITHM FOR PERSONAL NEUTRON DOSEMETERS AT DIFFERENT RADON GAS EXPOSURES. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2016; 170:154-157. [PMID: 26396265 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Since 2008 the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) has been using a microscope-based automatic scanning system for assessing personal neutron doses with a dosemeter based on PADC. This scanning system, known as TASLImage, includes a comprehensive characterisation of tracks. The distributions of several specific track characteristics such as size, shape and optical density are compared with a reference set to discriminate tracks of alpha particles and non-track background. Due to the dosemeter design at PSI, it is anticipated that radon should not significantly contribute to the creation of additional tracks in the PADC detector. The present study tests the stability of the neutron dose determination algorithm of the personal neutron dosemeter system in operation at PSI at different radon gas exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Mayer
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Markus Boschung
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Gernot Butterweck
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Frank Assenmacher
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Eike Hohmann
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Division for Radiation Safety and Security, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|