National diagnostic reference level initiative for computed tomography examinations in Kenya

Evaluating Radiation Exposures and Establishments of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Patients Undergoing Chest Computed Tomography Examinations in Ethiopia

Computed tomography is invaluable for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The common challenge is using an optimized CT technique to produce qualified images while giving patients the least amount of radiation possible. The objective of the study was to determine the national DRL values for adult patients undergoing chest computed tomography examination in Ethiopia. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in twenty three (23) different CT scan facilities on 801 patients who underwent chest computed tomography examinations in Ethiopia, in which participants were recruited by systematic random sampling. Data processing in this study was carried out with a quantitative analysis technique, namely descriptive statistics. The study variables were CTDI volume and dose length product (DLP) for the radiation doses for chest CT examinations. The age range for all adult patients was above 15 years old. Their body weights were in the range of 40-80 kg. The third quartile of the distributions of the median values of these variables was used to establish chest national diagnostic reference levels. The national DRL was compared with DRLs of other countries. Microsoft Excel form and SPSS software version 26 were used to collect and analyze survey data. A total of 801 patients were examined with an average age of 48.96 years. The patients were examined with their radiological department protocol using multislice CT (MSCT) from different manufacturers. For adult chest computed tomography examinations, the calculated dose length product and computed tomography dose index third quartile values that were used as national diagnostic reference levels were 512.9 mGy cm and 10.165 mGy, respectively.Even though the computed tomography dose index volume of the current study is less than that of all African and non-African countries selected for comparison, the proposed national DLP of the current study values were intermediate and substantially higher than those reported in similar studies from African and non-African countries, respectively. It is plausible to believe that the number of sequences, scan parameters, and automatic exposure control all contribute to better optimization and increased scanner dose efficiency for non-African countries, which is the cause of this discrepancy.

Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Common Adult Computed Tomography Procedures in Addis Ababa

Background

Computed Tomography has become the major source of population exposure in diagnostic x-rays. This concerned issue will be resolved by stetting Local Diagnostic Reference Levels.

Objectives

The main objective of this study is to assess dose indicators for the establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels.

Materials and methods

A prospective cross-sectional study design was conducted on 8 public and private hospitals performing CT examinations. A total of 725 adult patients who underwent abdominopelvic, chest, and head CT examinations were evaluated from October 2021 to March 2022. Patients' demography, exposure parameters, and dose descriptors were collected. The minimum, maximum, mean, median, and third quartile values were analyzed using SPSS software version 26. Finally, the third quartile values of collected data were compared with national and international values.

Results

The third quartile values obtained from median of volumetric computed tomography dose index (mGy) and dose length product (mGy.cm) which are considered as local DRLs for head, chest, and abdominopelvic CT examination, respectively, were 53 mGy, 14 mGy and 13 mGy; 1307 mGy.cm, 575 mGy.cm, and 932 mGy.cm.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that practices of CT imaging in both public and private hospitals in Addis Ababa were comparable to other national and international values.

Adult Computed Tomography examinations in Uganda: Towards determining the National Diagnostic Reference Levels

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), typically set at the 75th percentile of the dose distribution from surveys conducted across a broad user base using a specified dose-measurement protocol, are recommended for radiological examinations. There is a need to develop and implement DRLs as a standardisation and optimisation tool for the radiological protection of patients at Computed Tomography (CT) facilities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in seven (7) different CT scan facilities in which participants were recruited by systematic random sampling. The study variables were dose length product (DLP) and volume-weighted CTDI (CTDIvol) for the radiation doses for head, chest, abdomen and lumbar spine CT examinations. The DRLs for CTDIvol and DLP were obtained by calculating the 3rd quartiles of the radiation doses per study site by anatomical region. The national diagnostic reference levels were determined by computation of DRLs using the 75th centile of the median values.

RESULTS

A total of 574 patients were examined with an average age of 47.1 years. For CTDIvol estimates; there was a strong positive significant relationship between the CTDIvol and examination mAs (r_s = 0.9017, p-value < 0.001), and reference mAs (r_s = 0.0.7708, p-value < 0.001). For DLP estimates; there was a moderate positive significant relationships between DLP and total mAs (r_s = 0.6812, p-value < 0.001), reference mAs (r_s = 0.5493, p-value < 0.001). The DRLs were as follows; for head CT scan - the average median CTDIvol was 56.02 mGy and the DLP was 1260.3 mGy.cm; for Chest CT, the CTDI volume was 7.82 mGy and the DLP was 377.0 mGy.cm; for the abdomen CT, the CTDI volume 12.54 mGy and DLP 1418.3 mGy.cm and for the lumbar spine 19.48 mGy and the DLP was 843 mGy.cm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the need to optimize the CT scan parameters in order to lower the national DRLs. This can be achieved by extensive training of all the CT scan radiographers on optimizing the CT scan acquisition parameters. Continuous dose audits are also advised with new equipment or after every three years to ensure that values out of range are either justified or further investigated.

Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography procedures in Sri Lanka: first nationwide dose survey

The main purpose of this study was to establish for the first time national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for common computed tomography (CT) procedures in Sri Lanka. Patient morphometric data, exposure parameters and dose data such as volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were collected from 5666 patients who underwent 22 types of procedure. The extreme dose values were filtered before analysis to ensure that the data come from standard size patients. The median of the dose distribution was calculated for each institution, and the third quartile value of the median distribution was considered as the NDRL. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data from 4592 patients and 17 procedure types were considered for establishment of a NDRL, covering 41% of the country's CT machines. The proposed NDRLs based on CTDIvoland DLP were: non-contrast-enhanced (NC) head, 82.2 mGy/1556 mGy cm; contrast-enhanced (CE) head, 82.2 mGy/1546 mGy cm; chest NC, 7.4 mGy/350 mGy cm; chest CE, 8.3 mGy/464 mGy cm; abdomen NC, 10.5 mGy/721 mGy cm; abdomen arterial (A) phase, 13.4 mGy/398 mGy cm; abdomen venous (V) phase, 10.8 mGy/460 mGy cm; abdomen delay (D) phase, 12.6 mGy/487 mGy cm; sinus NC, 30.2 mGy/452 mGy cm; lumbar spine NC, 24.1 mGy/1123 mGy cm; neck NC, 27.5 mGy/670 mGy cm; high-resolution CT of chest, 10.3 mGy/341 mGy cm; kidneys ureters and bladder NC, 19.4 mGy/929 mGy cm; chest to pelvis (CAP) NC, 10.8 mGy/801 mGy cm; CAP A, 10.4 mGy/384 mGy cm; CAP V, 10.5 mGy/534 mGy cm; CAP D, 16.8 mGy/652 mGy cm. Although the proposed NDRLs are comparable with those of other countries, the observed broad dose distributions between the CT machines within Sri Lanka indicate that dose optimisation strategies for the country should be implemented for most of the CT facilities.

A Review of Diagnostic Reference Levels in Computed Tomography

Computed tomography (CT) scanning generate 3-D images of the inside structures of the body by delivering comparatively radiation dose to the patient. This requires high concern of optimization via establishing diagnostic reference level (DRL). DRL values can be estimated based on reference patient percentiles (such as 90th, 75th and 50th) dose distribution. DRL has significant uses in professional judgments by generating harmonized evidence about the radiation dose received by the patient. The primary goal of this review is to assess the practical application of DRL in CT procedures internationally. The main objective of establishing DRLs is to optimize the patient dose and without compromising the image quality in order to obtain adequate diagnostic information. That means inescapability of DRL for a country in medical diagnosis is to reduce the limitation of dose dispersion, to harmonize and expand good practice, to narrow large dispersion of doses, and to create systematic supervision for unwanted radiological doses. The review presents that international records have a wide-range of mean dose distributions due to the variation of exam protocols and technical parameters in use. Hence, this review recommends that each CT health facilities are required exercising careful dose reduction strategies by accounting adequate image quality with sufficient diagnostic information via through follow up of concerned bodies.

Computed tomography diagnostic reference levels for adult brain, chest and abdominal examinations: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Radiation dose variation within and among Computed Tomography (CT) centres is commonly reported. This work systematically reviewed published articles on adult Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for the brain, chest and abdomen to determine the causes and extent of variation. A systematic literature search and review was performed in selected databases containing leading journals in radiography, radiology and medical physics using carefully defined search terms related to CT and DRLs. The quality of the included articles was determined using the Effective Public Health Practise Project tool for quantitative studies.

KEY FINDINGS

The 54 articles reviewed include: 45 studies using human data, 8 studies using phantom data, and one study with both human and phantom data. The main comparator in between studies was the dose indices used in reporting DRLs. DRL variations of up to a factor of 2 for the same procedure were noted in phantom studies, and up to a factor of 3 in human studies. Sources of variation include the type of scanner, the age of the scanner, differences in protocols, variations in patients, as well as variations in study design. Different combinations of dose indices were reported: volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) (59%); DLP only (11%); weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) and DLP (9%); CTDIvol only (7%); CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose (ED) (6%); CTDIw only (4%); CTDIvol, DLP and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) (1%) and CTDIw, CTDIvol and DLP (1%). The use of different dose indices limited dose comparison between studies.

CONCLUSION

The study noted a 2-3 fold variation in DRLs between studies for the same procedure. The causes of variation are reported and include study design, scanner technology and the use of different dose indices.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need for standardisation of CT DRLs in line with the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations to reduce dose variation and facilitate dose comparison.

Validation of a Locally Designed Computed Tomography Dose Phantom: A Comparison Study with a Standard Acrylic Phantom in South-South, Nigeria

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the mean volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) for the standard head and body phantoms and locally designed head and body phantoms respectively. Similarly, this study determined and compared the displayed mean CTDIvol and Dose Length Product (DLP) for the above phantoms from the CT monitor. In addition, the percentage deviations of both phantoms were compared with the recommended limits from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American College of Radiologists (ACR). Materials and Methods: Dose measurements were made using a standard polymethymethacrylate (PMMA) phantom for head and body as well as a locally designed phantom with four CT scanners using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs). The locally designed phantoms were made using a PMMA sheet, which was bent to give the desired cylindrical shape and was made like the standard phantoms. The constructed phantom was filled with water and the TLD chips were inserted into the center and peripheries of the phantoms to obtain the absorbed doses. Results: The CTDIvol for the standard head and body phantom for center A was 66.97 and 21.85mGy and for B was 23.39 and 6.29mGy respectively. Similarly, the CTDIvol for the constructed head and body phantom for center A was 63.91 and 19.84mGy and for B was 24.67 and 6.30mGy respectively. The uncertainty between the standard and constructed head phantoms for centers A and B was 4.6 and 5.5% respectively, while that of the standard and constructed body phantoms for centers A and B was 9.2 and 0.0% respectively. The maximum percent deviation from the console CTDIvol and DLP values with the four phantoms for centers A and B was within ±20%. The mean correction factors for the head and body were 0.998 and 1.05 respectively. Conclusion: The uncertainties obtained in this study were within the IAEA and ACR recommended value of ±20%. The constructed phantom proved useful for CT dose measurements.

An audit of radiation doses received by paediatric patients undergoing computed tomography investigations at academic hospitals in South Africa

Background

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are a crucial element of auditing radiation doses in paediatric computed tomography (CT). Currently, there are no national paediatric CT DRLs in South Africa.

Objectives

The aim of this article was to establish local paediatric DRLs for CT examinations at two academic hospitals and to compare paediatric CT radiation output levels with established DRLs in the developed and developing world.

Method

Computed Tomography Dose Index_volume (CTDI_vol) and dose length product (DLP) values were collected from CT examinations performed at two university hospitals for patients aged 0–15 years, during 01 November 2016–30 April 2017. The 75th percentile of the data distribution was calculated for each CT examination type and age group, further categorised into routine working hours and after-hours for both hospitals and statistically compared.

Results

Of the 1031 CT examinations performed, CT brain examination was the most common (755/1031; 72.23%). DLP values were increased in the after-hours categories compared to regular working hours at both hospitals. The largest increase was in the 0–1 year age group (150.56%). With the exception of CT Chest and CT abdomen in the 0–1 year age group, the CTDI_vol and DLP values compared favourably to international standards.

Conclusion

Most of the calculated DRLs are acceptable and internationally comparable. This likely indicates effective reduction techniques and protocols. Computed tomography body examination protocols for 0–1 year patients should be reviewed. Strategies should be implemented to limit higher doses in after-hours examinations.

Radiology practice in sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 outbreak: points to consider

COVID-19 is a rapidly growing pandemic that has grown from a few cases in Wuhan, China to millions of infections and hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide within a few months. Sub-Saharan Africa is not spared. Radiology has a key role to play in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 as literature from Wuhan and Italy demonstrates. We therefore share some critical knowledge and practice areas for radiological suspicion and diagnosis. In addition, emphasis on how guarding against healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) by applying "red" and "green" principle is addressed. Given that pandemics such as COVID-19 can worsen the strain on the scantily available radiological resources in this region, we share some practical points that can be applied to manage these precious resources also needed for other essential services. We have noted that radiology does not feature in many main COVID-19 guidelines, regionally and internationally. This paper therefore suggests areas of collaboration for radiology with other clinical and management teams. We note from our local experience that radiology can play a role in COVID-19 surveillance.

Diagnostic Reference Level of Radiation Dose and Image Quality among Paediatric CT Examinations in A Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia

Pediatrics are more vulnerable to radiation and are prone to dose compared to adults, requiring more attention to computed tomography (CT) optimization. Hence, diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have been implemented as part of optimization process in order to monitor CT dose and diagnostic quality. The noise index has recently been endorsed to be included as a part of CT optimization in the DRLs report. In this study, we have therefore set local DRLs for pediatric CT examination with a noise index as an indicator of image quality. One thousand one hundred and ninety-two (1192) paediatric patients undergoing CT brain, CT thorax and CT chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) examinations were analyzed retrospectively and categorized into four age groups; group 1 (0-1 year), group 2 (1-5 years), group 3 (5-10 years) and group 4 (10-15 years). For each group, data such as the volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and the effective dose (E) were calculated and DRLs for each age group set at 50th percentile were determined. Both CT dose and image noise values between age groups have differed significantly with p-value < 0.05. The highest CTDIvol and DLP values in all age groups with the lowest noise index value reported in the 10-15 age group were found in CT brain examination. In conclusion, there was a significant variation in doses and noise intensity among children of different ages, and the need to change specific parameters to fit the clinical requirement.

Diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT in Jordan

This study aimed to investigate the current status of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in paediatric CT across Jordan. The dose data for four main CT examinations (brain, chest, abdominopelvic, and chest, abdomen and pelvis (CAP)) in hospitals and imaging centres (n = 4) were measured. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) values were compared within the different hospitals and age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-10 years and 11-18 years). DRLs in Jordan were compared to international DRLs. The paediatric population consisted of 1818 children; 61.4% of them were male. There were significant variations between the DRLs for each CT scanner with an up to four-fold difference in dose between hospitals. There were apparent significant differences between Jordan and other countries with the DLPs in Jordan being relatively high. However, for CTDIvol, the values in Jordan were close to those of other countries. This study confirmed variations in the CTDIvol and DLP values of paediatric CT scans in Jordan. These variations were attributed to the different protocols and equipment used. There is a need to optimise paediatric CT examinations doses in Jordan.

Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations: results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey

PURPOSE

To explore doses from common adult computed tomography (CT) examinations and propose national diagnostic reference levels (nDRLs) for Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the Nnamdi Azikiwe University and University Teaching Hospital Institutional Review Boards (IRB: NAUTH/CS/66/Vol8/84) and involved dose surveys of adult CT examinations across the six geographical regions of Nigeria and Abuja from January 2016 to August 2017. Dose data of adult head, chest and abdomen/pelvis CT examinations were extracted from patient folders. The median, 75th and 25th percentile CT dose index volume (CTDI_vol) and dose-length-product (DLP) were computed for each of these procedures. Effective doses (E) for these examinations were estimated using the k conversion factor as described in the ICRP publication 103 (E_DLP = _{k × DLP}).

RESULTS

The proposed 75th percentile CTDI_vol for head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis are 61 mGy, 17 mGy, and 20 mGy, respectively. The corresponding DLPs are 1310 mGy.cm, 735 mGy.cm, and 1486 mGy.cm respectively. The effective doses were 2.75 mSv (head), 10.29 mSv (chest), and 22.29 mSv (abdomen/pelvis).

CONCLUSION

Findings demonstrate wide dose variations within and across centres in Nigeria. The results also show CTDI_vol comparable to international standards, but considerably higher DLP and effective doses.

Review of the current status of radiation protection in diagnostic radiology in Africa

The aim of this paper is to review the available published studies from African countries on patient doses and medical radiation protection and identify strengths, weaknesses, and challenges. Papers on radiation doses to patients published until 2016 pertaining to studies in African countries were reviewed. Radiography, interventional radiology, computed tomography (CT), and mammography modalities were covered. In radiography, the entrance surface air kerma values were below the established diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency, European Commission, and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Patient and staff doses in interventional procedures were not on the higher side when compared with other published reports from developed countries. The dose length product values in CT in many situations were higher than established DRLs. In mammography, the variations of clinical image quality and dose to standard breast between African countries and other countries were insignificant. In conclusion, like in any continent, not all countries in Africa are active, but some have produced good results. The potential for optimization of radiation protection using simple and inexpensive techniques has been demonstrated. The lack of medical physicists is one of the important challenges.