1
|
Plante I, West DW, Weeks J, Risca VI. Simulation of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Protection by Histones Using the Code RITRACKS. BIOTECH 2024; 13:17. [PMID: 38921049 PMCID: PMC11201919 DOI: 10.3390/biotech13020017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: DNA damage is of great importance in the understanding of the effects of ionizing radiation. Various types of DNA damage can result from exposure to ionizing radiation, with clustered types considered the most important for radiobiological effects. (2) Methods: The code RITRACKS (Relativistic Ion Tracks), a program that simulates stochastic radiation track structures, was used to simulate DNA damage by photons and ions spanning a broad range of linear energy transfer (LET) values. To perform these simulations, the transport code was modified to include cross sections for the interactions of ions or electrons with DNA and amino acids for ionizations, dissociative electron attachment, and elastic collisions. The radiochemistry simulations were performed using a step-by-step algorithm that follows the evolution of all particles in time, including reactions between radicals and DNA structures and amino acids. Furthermore, detailed DNA damage events, such as base pair positions, DNA fragment lengths, and fragment yields, were recorded. (3) Results: We report simulation results using photons and the ions 1H+, 4He2+, 12C6+, 16O8+, and 56Fe26+ at various energies, covering LET values from 0.3 to 164 keV/µm, and performed a comparison with other codes and experimental results. The results show evidence of DNA protection from damage at its points of contacts with histone proteins. (4) Conclusions: RITRACKS can provide a framework for studying DNA damage from a variety of ionizing radiation sources with detailed representations of DNA at the atomic scale, DNA-associated proteins, and resulting DNA damage events and statistics, enabling a broader range of future comparisons with experiments such as those based on DNA sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Devany W. West
- Laboratory of Genome Architecture and Dynamics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA; (D.W.W.); (V.I.R.)
| | - Jason Weeks
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, USA;
| | - Viviana I. Risca
- Laboratory of Genome Architecture and Dynamics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA; (D.W.W.); (V.I.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forster JC, Marcu LG, Bezak E. Approaches to combat hypoxia in cancer therapy and the potential for in silico models in their evaluation. Phys Med 2019; 64:145-156. [PMID: 31515013 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The negative impact of tumour hypoxia on cancer treatment outcome has been long-known, yet there has been little success combating it. This paper investigates the potential role of in silico modelling to help test emerging hypoxia-targeting treatments in cancer therapy. METHODS A Medline search was undertaken on the current landscape of in silico models that simulate cancer therapy and evaluate their ability to test hypoxia-targeting treatments. Techniques and treatments to combat tumour hypoxia and their current challenges are also presented. RESULTS Hypoxia-targeting treatments include tumour reoxygenation, hypoxic cell radiosensitization with nitroimidazoles, hypoxia-activated prodrugs and molecular targeting. Their main challenges are toxicity and not achieving adequate delivery to hypoxic regions of the tumour. There is promising research toward combining two or more of these techniques. Different types of in silico therapy models have been developed ranging from temporal to spatial and from stochastic to deterministic models. Numerous models have compared the effectiveness of different radiotherapy fractionation schedules for controlling hypoxic tumours. Similarly, models could help identify and optimize new treatments for overcoming hypoxia that utilize novel hypoxia-targeting technology. CONCLUSION Current therapy models should attempt to incorporate more sophisticated modelling of tumour angiogenesis/vasculature and vessel perfusion in order to become more useful for testing hypoxia-targeting treatments, which typically rely upon the tumour vasculature for delivery of additional oxygen, (pro)drugs and nanoparticles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake C Forster
- SA Medical Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
| | - Loredana G Marcu
- Faculty of Science, University of Oradea, Oradea 410087, Romania; Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
| | - Eva Bezak
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia; Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sridharan DM, Asaithamby A, Blattnig SR, Costes SV, Doetsch PW, Dynan WS, Hahnfeldt P, Hlatky L, Kidane Y, Kronenberg A, Naidu MD, Peterson LE, Plante I, Ponomarev AL, Saha J, Snijders AM, Srinivasan K, Tang J, Werner E, Pluth JM. Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure. LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 2016; 9:19-47. [PMID: 27345199 PMCID: PMC5613937 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2016.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Robust predictive models are essential to manage the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Chronic exposure to cosmic rays in the context of the complex deep space environment may place astronauts at high cancer risk. To estimate this risk, it is critical to understand how radiation-induced cellular stress impacts cell fate decisions and how this in turn alters the risk of carcinogenesis. Exposure to the heavy ion component of cosmic rays triggers a multitude of cellular changes, depending on the rate of exposure, the type of damage incurred and individual susceptibility. Heterogeneity in dose, dose rate, radiation quality, energy and particle flux contribute to the complexity of risk assessment. To unravel the impact of each of these factors, it is critical to identify sensitive biomarkers that can serve as inputs for robust modeling of individual risk of cancer or other long-term health consequences of exposure. Limitations in sensitivity of biomarkers to dose and dose rate, and the complexity of longitudinal monitoring, are some of the factors that increase uncertainties in the output from risk prediction models. Here, we critically evaluate candidate early and late biomarkers of radiation exposure and discuss their usefulness in predicting cell fate decisions. Some of the biomarkers we have reviewed include complex clustered DNA damage, persistent DNA repair foci, reactive oxygen species, chromosome aberrations and inflammation. Other biomarkers discussed, often assayed for at longer points post exposure, include mutations, chromosome aberrations, reactive oxygen species and telomere length changes. We discuss the relationship of biomarkers to different potential cell fates, including proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, and loss of stemness, which can propagate genomic instability and alter tissue composition and the underlying mRNA signatures that contribute to cell fate decisions. Our goal is to highlight factors that are important in choosing biomarkers and to evaluate the potential for biomarkers to inform models of post exposure cancer risk. Because cellular stress response pathways to space radiation and environmental carcinogens share common nodes, biomarker-driven risk models may be broadly applicable for estimating risks for other carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steve R Blattnig
- Langley Research Center, Langley Research Center (LaRC), VA, United States
| | - Sylvain V Costes
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Lynn Hlatky
- CCSB-Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yared Kidane
- Wyle Science, Technology & Engineering Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amy Kronenberg
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | - Mamta D Naidu
- CCSB-Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Leif E Peterson
- Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ianik Plante
- Wyle Science, Technology & Engineering Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Artem L Ponomarev
- Wyle Science, Technology & Engineering Group, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Janapriya Saha
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | | | | | - Jonathan Tang
- Exogen Biotechnology, Inc., Berkeley, CA, United States
| | | | - Janice M Pluth
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|