METHODOLOGY AT CIEMAT WHOLE BODY COUNTER FOR IN VIVO MONITORING OF RADIOIODINE IN THE THYROID OF EXPOSED POPULATION IN CASE OF NUCLEAR EMERGENCY

Monte Carlo calculation of whole body counter efficiency factors for different computational phantoms

Individual monitoring can provide an estimate of the radioactivity present in the body of the exposed individuals. Periodic monitoring of occupationally exposed individuals is of great importance in case of accidental incorporation. Computational phantoms and Monte Carlo codes are often used to complement the calibration method of counting systems in internal dosimetry. Here, counting efficiency (CE) factors for a WBC system were calculated using MC simulations. The WBC system with a NaI(Tl) detector and the BOMAB phantom was modeled using three MC codes. After validation, the models were used to obtain CE values for a wide range of energies, and a CE curve was generated for the WBC system. To estimate the effects of anatomical differences on the measurement process, two anthropomorphic voxel phantoms were modeled using the VMC code. For the detector position with the highest CE value, the differences when comparing BOMAB results with the MaMP and Yale results were (-1 ± 6)% and (-1 ± 3)%, respectively. The results confirm that the use of the BOMAB phantom is a good approach for the calibration of the whole-body counter system. Measurements should be made at detector position with the highest CE values, and it is recommended to use the mean Monte Carlo CE values calculated in this work.

UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN THE RESPONSE TEST OF A THYROID MONITOR

A test device consisting of an I-131 source, a phantom on a 3D moving table, and a NaI(Tl) scintillation detector on a fixed flat table was developed to carry out response tests of a thyroid monitor. A measurement uncertainty due to variation of configuration of the source and the detector, as well as other factors, was estimated. The estimated relative standard uncertainty of measurement at a source-detector distance of 100 mm, which was deduced to be the optimum, was 1.9%. This is sufficiently small for calibrating a thyroid monitor used for radiation protection.