1
|
Hänze J, Mengen LM, Mernberger M, Tiwari DK, Plagge T, Nist A, Subtil FSB, Theiss U, Eberle F, Roth K, Lauth M, Hofmann R, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Stiewe T, Hegele A. Transcriptomic response of prostate cancer cells to carbon ion and photon irradiation with focus on androgen receptor and TP53 signaling. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:85. [PMID: 38956684 PMCID: PMC11218163 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is essential in the treatment of prostate cancer. An alternative to conventional photon radiotherapy is the application of carbon ions, which provide a superior intratumoral dose distribution and less induced damage to adjacent healthy tissue. A common characteristic of prostate cancer cells is their dependence on androgens which is exploited therapeutically by androgen deprivation therapy in the advanced prostate cancer stage. Here, we aimed to analyze the transcriptomic response of prostate cancer cells to irradiation by photons in comparison to carbon ions, focusing on DNA damage, DNA repair and androgen receptor signaling. METHODS Prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP (functional TP53 and androgen receptor signaling) and DU145 (dysfunctional TP53 and androgen receptor signaling) were irradiated by photons or carbon ions and the subsequent DNA damage was assessed by immuno-cytofluorescence. Furthermore, the cells were treated with an androgen-receptor agonist. The effects of irradiation and androgen treatment on the gene regulation and the transcriptome were investigated by RT-qPCR and RNA sequencing, followed by bioinformatic analysis. RESULTS Following photon or carbon ion irradiation, both LNCaP and DU145 cells showed a dose-dependent amount of visible DNA damage that decreased over time, indicating occurring DNA repair. In terms of gene regulation, mRNAs involved in the TP53-dependent DNA damage response were significantly upregulated by photons and carbon ions in LNCaP but not in DU145 cells, which generally showed low levels of gene regulation after irradiation. Both LNCaP and DU145 cells responded to photons and carbon ions by downregulation of genes involved in DNA repair and cell cycle, partially resembling the transcriptome response to the applied androgen receptor agonist. Neither photons nor carbon ions significantly affected canonical androgen receptor-dependent gene regulation. Furthermore, certain genes that were specifically regulated by either photon or carbon ion irradiation were identified. CONCLUSION Photon and carbon ion irradiation showed a significant congruence in terms of induced signaling pathways and transcriptomic responses. These responses were strongly impacted by the TP53 status. Nevertheless, irradiation mode-dependent distinct gene regulations with undefined implication for radiotherapy outcome were revealed. Androgen receptor signaling and irradiations shared regulation of certain genes with respect to DNA-repair and cell-cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Hänze
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Lilly M Mengen
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marco Mernberger
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genomics Core Facility, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Dinesh Kumar Tiwari
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Plagge
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Nist
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genomics Core Facility, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Florentine S B Subtil
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Theiss
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Eberle
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Roth
- Core Facility Cellular Imaging, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Lauth
- Center for Tumor and Immune Biology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Hofmann
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Stiewe
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genomics Core Facility, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Axel Hegele
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Urological Center Mittelhessen, DRK Hospital Biedenkopf, Biedenkopf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clinical Progress in Proton Radiotherapy: Biological Unknowns. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040604. [PMID: 33546432 PMCID: PMC7913745 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton radiation therapy is a more recent type of radiotherapy that uses proton beams instead of classical photon or X-rays beams. The clinical benefit of proton therapy is that it allows to treat tumors more precisely. As a result, proton radiotherapy induces less toxicity to healthy tissue near the tumor site. Despite the experience in the clinical use of protons, the response of cells to proton radiation, the radiobiology, is less understood. In this review, we describe the current knowledge about proton radiobiology. Abstract Clinical use of proton radiation has massively increased over the past years. The main reason for this is the beneficial depth-dose distribution of protons that allows to reduce toxicity to normal tissues surrounding the tumor. Despite the experience in the clinical use of protons, the radiobiology after proton irradiation compared to photon irradiation remains to be completely elucidated. Proton radiation may lead to differential damages and activation of biological processes. Here, we will review the current knowledge of proton radiobiology in terms of induction of reactive oxygen species, hypoxia, DNA damage response, as well as cell death after proton irradiation and radioresistance.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang J, Si J, Gan L, Zhou R, Guo M, Zhang H. Harnessing the targeting potential of differential radiobiological effects of photon versus particle radiation for cancer treatment. J Cell Physiol 2020; 236:1695-1711. [PMID: 32691425 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the major modalities for malignancy treatment. High linear energy transfer (LET) charged-particle beams, like proton and carbon ions, exhibit favourable depth-dose distributions and radiobiological enhancement over conventional low-LET photon irradiation, thereby marking a new era in high precision medicine. Tumour cells have developed multicomponent signal transduction networks known as DNA damage responses (DDRs), which initiate cell-cycle checkpoints and induce double-strand break (DSB) repairs in the nucleus by nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination pathways, to manage ionising radiation (IR)-induced DNA lesions. DNA damage induction and DSB repair pathways are reportedly dependent on the quality of radiation delivered. In this review, we summarise various types of DNA lesion and DSB repair mechanisms, upon irradiation with low and high-LET radiation, respectively. We also analyse factors influencing DNA repair efficiency. Inhibition of DNA damage repair pathways and dysfunctional cell-cycle checkpoint sensitises tumour cells to IR. Radio-sensitising agents, including DNA-PK inhibitors, Rad51 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, ATM/ATR inhibitors, chk1 inhibitors, wee1 kinase inhibitors, Hsp90 inhibitors, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors have been found to enhance cell killing by IR through interference with DDRs, cell-cycle arrest, or other cellular processes. The cotreatment of these inhibitors with IR may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhua Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Si
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Gan
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Zhou
- Research Center for Ecological Impacts and Environmental Health Effects of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, Nanjing, China
| | - Menghuan Guo
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill MA. Radiation Track Structure: How the Spatial Distribution of Energy Deposition Drives Biological Response. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:75-83. [PMID: 31511190 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Ionising radiation is incredibly effective at causing biological effects. This is due to the unique way energy is deposited along highly structured tracks of ionisation and excitation events, which results in correlation with sites of DNA damage from the nanometre to the micrometre scale. Correlation of these events along the track on the nanometre scale results in clustered damage, which not only results in the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), but also more difficult to repair complex DSB, which include additional damage within a few base pairs. The track structure varies significantly with radiation quality and the increase in relative biological effectiveness observed with increasing linear energy transfer in part corresponds to an increase in the probability and complexity of clustered DNA damage produced. Likewise, correlation over larger scales, associated with packing of DNA and associated chromosomes within the cell nucleus, can also have a major impact on the biological response. The proximity of the correlated damage along the track increases the probability of miss-repair through pairwise interactions resulting in an increase in probability and complexity of DNA fragments/deletions, mutations and chromosomal rearrangements. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the biological effectiveness of ionising radiation can provide an important insight into ways of increasing the efficacy of radiotherapy, as well as the risks associated with exposure. This requires a multi-scale approach for modelling, not only considering the physics of the track structure from the millimetre scale down to the nanometre scale, but also the structural packing of the DNA within the nucleus, the resulting chemistry in the context of the highly reactive environment of the nucleus, together with the subsequent biological response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Hill
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Gray Laboratories, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohseni-Salehi FS, Zare-Mirakabad F, Sadeghi M, Ghafouri-Fard S. A Stochastic Model of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair Throughout the Cell Cycle. Bull Math Biol 2020; 82:11. [PMID: 31933029 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-019-00692-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Cell cycle phase is a decisive factor in determining the repair pathway of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). Recent experimental studies revealed that 53BP1 and BRCA1 are the key mediators of the DNA damage response (DDR) with antagonizing roles in choosing the appropriate DSB repair pathway in G1, S, and G2 phases. Here, we present a stochastic model of biochemical kinetics involved in detecting and repairing DNA DSBs induced by ionizing radiation during the cell cycle progression. A three-dimensional stochastic process is defined to monitor the cell cycle phase and DSBs repair at times after irradiation. To estimate the model parameters, a Metropolis Monte Carlo method is applied to perform maximum likelihood estimation utilizing the kinetics of γ-H2AX and RAD51 foci formation in G1, S, and G2 phases. The recruitment of DSB repair proteins is verified by comparing our model predictions with the corresponding experimental data on human cells after exposure to X and γ-radiation. Furthermore, the interaction between 53BP1 and BRCA1 is simulated for G1 and S/G2 phases determining the competition between NHEJ and HR pathways in repairing induced DSBs throughout the cell cycle. In accordance with recent biological data, the numerical results demonstrate that the maximum proportion of HR occurs in S phase cells and the high level of NHEJ takes place in G1 and G2 phases. Moreover, the stochastic realizations of the total yield of simple and complex DSBs ligation are compared for G1 and S/G2 damaged cells. Finally, the proposed stochastic model is validated when DSBs induced by different particle radiation such as iron, silicon, oxygen, proton, and carbon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fazeleh S Mohseni-Salehi
- Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechinc), Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Zare-Mirakabad
- Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechinc), Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mehdi Sadeghi
- School of Biological Science, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran
- National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard
- Department of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparative Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Paired Choroidal Melanoma Samples Obtained Before and After Proton Beam Irradiation by Transscleral Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Endoresection. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11081173. [PMID: 31416209 PMCID: PMC6721816 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This study compared the cytogenetic profiles of choroidal melanoma samples retrieved before and after proton beam irradiation. Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent both fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) during tantalum clip positioning, and endoresection within three months of irradiation, were retrospectively included. Chromosome alterations were explored by array comparative genomic hybridization. Age at diagnosis was 50 ± 14 years, tumor thickness was 8.6 ± 1.7 mm and tumor diameter was 12.4 ± 2.3 mm. Six FNAB samples were non-contributive (25%), versus one endoresection sample (4%) (p = 0.049). Among 17 cases with paired contributive samples, the profiles of chromosomes 3 and 8 were identical in all cases, except one with partial chromosome 3 loss on the FNAB sample only. Three cases presented additional discordant aberrations on chromosomes other than 3 or 8q. Overall, we identified monosomy 3 in two cases, 8q gain in six cases, and both alterations in three cases. All cases presented GNAQ or GNA11 mutations assessed by a custom next-generation sequencing panel. Among the six cases with non-contributive initial FNAB, three cases presented abnormal 3 or 8q chromosomes detected on the endoresection material. These results demonstrate the higher rentability of endoresection material for cytogenetic analysis compared to FNAB, and provide clinical evidence of tumor heterogeneity in choroidal melanoma.
Collapse
|
7
|
A Mathematical Model for the Effect of Low-Dose Radiation on the G2/M Transition. Bull Math Biol 2019; 81:3998-4021. [PMID: 31392576 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-019-00645-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
We develop a mathematical model to study the immediate effect of low-dose radiation on the G2 checkpoint and the G2/M transition of the cell cycle via a radiation pathway (the ATM-Chk2 pathway) of an individual mammalian cell. The model consists of a system of nonlinear differential equations describing the dynamics of a network of regulatory proteins that play key roles in the G2/M transition, cell cycle oscillations, and the radiation pathway. We simulate the application of a single pulse of low-dose radiation at different intensities ([Formula: see text] 0-0.4 Gy) and times during the latter part of the G2-phase. We use bifurcation analysis to characterize the effect of radiation on the G2/M transition via the ATM-Chk2 pathway. We show that radiation between 0.1 and 0.3 Gy can delay the G2/M transition, and radiation higher than 0.3 Gy can fully activate the G2 checkpoint. Also, our results show that radiation can be low enough to neither delay the G2/M transition nor activate the G2 checkpoint ([Formula: see text] 0.1 Gy). Our model supports the idea that the cell response to radiation during G2-phase explains hyper-radiosensitivity and increased radioresistance (HRS/IRR) observed at low dose.
Collapse
|