REM sleep-dependent short-term and long-term hourglass processes in the ultradian organization and recovery of REM sleep in the rat

Sleep and circadian rhythmicity as entangled processes serving homeostasis

Sleep is considered essential for the brain and body. A predominant concept is that sleep is regulated by circadian rhythmicity and sleep homeostasis, processes that were posited to be functionally and mechanistically separate. Here we review and re-evaluate this concept and its assumptions using findings from recent human and rodent studies. Alterations in genes that are central to circadian rhythmicity affect not only sleep timing but also putative markers of sleep homeostasis such as electroencephalogram slow-wave activity (SWA). Perturbations of sleep change the rhythmicity in the expression of core clock genes in tissues outside the central clock. The dynamics of recovery from sleep loss vary across sleep variables: SWA and immediate early genes show an early response, but the recovery of non-rapid eye movement and rapid eye movement sleep follows slower time courses. Changes in the expression of many genes in response to sleep perturbations outlast the effects on SWA and time spent asleep. These findings are difficult to reconcile with the notion that circadian- and sleep-wake-driven processes are mutually independent and that the dynamics of sleep homeostasis are reflected in a single variable. Further understanding of how both sleep and circadian rhythmicity contribute to the homeostasis of essential physiological variables may benefit from the assessment of multiple sleep and molecular variables over longer time scales.

NREM-REM alternation complicates transitions from napping to non-napping behavior in a three-state model of sleep-wake regulation

The temporal structure of human sleep changes across development as it consolidates from the polyphasic sleep of infants to the single nighttime sleep episode typical in adults. Experimental studies have shown that changes in the dynamics of sleep need may mediate this developmental transition in sleep patterning, however, it is unknown how sleep architecture interacts with these changes. We employ a physiologically-based mathematical model that generates wake, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep states to investigate how NREM-REM alternation affects the transition in sleep patterns as the dynamics of the homeostatic sleep drive are varied. To study the mechanisms producing these transitions, we analyze the bifurcations of numerically-computed circle maps that represent key dynamics of the full sleep-wake network model by tracking the evolution of sleep onsets across different circadian (∼ 24 h) phases. The maps are non-monotonic and discontinuous, being composed of branches that correspond to sleep-wake cycles containing distinct numbers of REM bouts. As the rates of accumulation and decay of the homeostatic sleep drive are varied, we identify the bifurcations that disrupt a period-adding-like behavior of sleep patterns in the transition between biphasic and monophasic sleep. These bifurcations include border collision and saddle-node bifurcations that initiate new sleep patterns, period-doubling bifurcations leading to higher-order patterns of NREM-REM alternation, and intervals of bistability of sleep patterns with different NREM-REM alternations. Furthermore, patterns of NREM-REM alternation exhibit variable behaviors in different regimes of constant sleep-wake patterns. Overall, the sequence of sleep-wake behaviors, and underlying bifurcations, in the transition from biphasic to monophasic sleep in this three-state model is more complex than behavior observed in models of sleep-wake regulation that do not consider the dynamics of NREM-REM alternation. These results suggest that interactions between the dynamics of the homeostatic sleep drive and the dynamics of NREM-REM alternation may contribute to the wide interindividual variation observed when young children transition from napping to non-napping behavior.

REM Sleep: An Unknown Indicator of Sleep Quality

Standard polysomnographic analysis of sleep has not provided evidence of an objective measure of sleep quality; however, factors such as sleep duration and sleep efficiency are those more consistently associated with the subjective perception of sleep quality. Sleep reduction as currently occurs in our 24/7 society has had a profound impact on sleep quality; the habitual sleep period should fit within what is a limited nighttime window and may not be sufficient to satisfy the whole sleep process; moreover, the use of artificial light during the evening and early night hours can delay and disturb the circadian rhythms, especially affecting REM sleep. The correct phase relationship of the sleep period with the circadian pacemaker is an important factor to guarantee adequate restorative sleep duration and sleep continuity, thus providing the necessary background for a good night's sleep. Due to the fact that REM sleep is controlled by the circadian clock, it can provide a window-like mechanism that defines the termination of the sleep period when there is still the necessity to complete the sleep process (not only wake-related homeostasis) and to meet the circadian end of sleep timing. An adequate amount of REM sleep appears necessary to guarantee sleep continuity, while periodically activating the brain and preparing it for the return to consciousness.

A probabilistic model for the ultradian timing of REM sleep in mice

A salient feature of mammalian sleep is the alternation between rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep. However, how these two sleep stages influence each other and thereby regulate the timing of REM sleep episodes is still largely unresolved. Here, we developed a statistical model that specifies the relationship between REM and subsequent NREM sleep to quantify how REM sleep affects the following NREM sleep duration and its electrophysiological features in mice. We show that a lognormal mixture model well describes how the preceding REM sleep duration influences the amount of NREM sleep till the next REM sleep episode. The model supports the existence of two different types of sleep cycles: Short cycles form closely interspaced sequences of REM sleep episodes, whereas during long cycles, REM sleep is first followed by an interval of NREM sleep during which transitions to REM sleep are extremely unlikely. This refractory period is characterized by low power in the theta and sigma range of the electroencephalogram (EEG), low spindle rate and frequent microarousals, and its duration proportionally increases with the preceding REM sleep duration. Using our model, we estimated the propensity for REM sleep at the transition from NREM to REM sleep and found that entering REM sleep with higher propensity resulted in longer REM sleep episodes with reduced EEG power. Compared with the light phase, the buildup of REM sleep propensity was slower during the dark phase. Our data-driven modeling approach uncovered basic principles underlying the timing and duration of REM sleep episodes in mice and provides a flexible framework to describe the ultradian regulation of REM sleep in health and disease.

An Asymmetrical Hypothesis for the NREM-REM Sleep Alternation-What Is the NREM-REM Cycle?

Since the discovery of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (Aserinsky and Kleitman, 1953), sleep has been described as a succession of cycles of non-REM (NREM) and REM sleep episodes. The hypothesis of short-term REM sleep homeostasis, which is currently the basis of most credible theories on sleep regulation, is built upon a positive correlation between the duration of a REM sleep episode and the duration of the interval until the next REM sleep episode (inter-REM interval): the duration of REM sleep would therefore predict the duration of this interval. However, the high variability of inter-REM intervals, especially in polyphasic sleep, argues against a simple oscillator model. A new “asymmetrical” hypothesis is presented here, where REM sleep episodes only determine the duration of a proportional post-REM refractory period (PRRP), during which REM sleep is forbidden and the only remaining options are isolated NREM episodes or waking. After the PRRP, all three options are available again (NREM, REM, and Wake). I will explain why I think this hypothesis also calls into question the notion of NREM-REM sleep cycles.