Evaluation of performance and carcass traits for a five-cohort All Heifer, No Cow beef production system demonstration herd

Applications and world-wide use of sexed semen in cattle

Successful sorting of sperm based on presence of the X- or Y-chromosome was first reported in the early 1980's with the first live births reported in rabbits in 1988. Subsequent development of technological efficiencies resulted in commercialization of sex-sorted semen to cattle producers in 2003-2005. At product launch, low throughput dictated that reasonable prices to the producer could only be accomplished with extremely low sperm number dosages (2 × 10⁶). Furthermore, conception rates were 70%-75% of those achieved by conventional unsorted product. Refinements in sorting equipment have enhanced the number of sperm that can be sorted from a semen sample and (or) aliquot of time, which translates into reduced production costs, while modifications to other aspects of sperm processing and freezing have facilitated maintenance of a conception potential more similar to that of conventional semen. More recently, strategic use of sex-sorted semen coupled with genomic technologies to identify superior females to satisfy replacement female needs has, by default, led to identification of a population of dairy cows from which replacements are not desired, leading to a tremendous increase in use of beef semen in dairy herds. Though exact numbers are unavailable, estimates indicate sex-sorted semen is rapidly approaching 30% of the total AI market share in North America. Though the primary application of sex-sorted semen is to accelerate genetic progress while enhancing biosecurity through in-house production of replacement animals, numerous other potential applications are evolving or are under consideration.

Evaluation of biological and economic efficiency of the All Heifer, No Cow beef production system using a system dynamics model based on 6 yr of demonstration herd data

Alternative management strategies with no cows and all heifers may improve biological and economic efficiency of beef production. The All Heifer, No Cow (AHNC) beef production system involves insemination of nulliparous heifers with female sex-selected semen (FSS) to produce primarily female calves that are early weaned at 3 mo of age. Dams are finished on a high concentrate diet and harvested before 30 mo of age. The objectives of this research were to: 1) build a dynamic model of an AHNC beef production system to quantify system biological and economic efficiency; 2) compare effects of utilizing FSS vs. conventional semen on biological and economic efficiency; 3) evaluate what-if scenarios to determine the effects on biological and economic efficiency of changing variables ±5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% from initial observed values; and 4) evaluate the effects on biological and economic efficiency of changing variables ±10% from initial observed values. A model was built over a 21-yr horizon using Stella Architect. Biological parameter values in the model were based on the 6 yr of data collected from the management of an AHNC demonstration herd. In the model animal, total digestible nutrients (TDN) intake, hot carcass weight (HCW), and age at harvest were randomized. Feed, animal, and carcass prices included in the model were based on 10 yr of historical U.S. price data. Key response variables were biological and economic efficiency (mean ± SD). Biological efficiency was defined as the ratio of output (kilograms of HCW produced) to input (lifetime kilograms of feed TDN consumed), and economic efficiency was measured using a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and unit variable cost (UVC). Over 40 simulation runs, the predicted mean biological efficiency was 0.0714 ± 0.0008. Economic efficiency was 0.95 ± 0.02 and US $445.41 ± 0.06 for BCR and UVC, respectively. Biological and economic efficiency was improved in the conventional semen scenario; biological efficiency was 0.0738 ± 0.0008, and BCR and UVC were 0.99 ± 0.04 and US $407.24 ± 0.006, respectively. Under this parameterization and market conditions, the AHNC beef production system failed to achieve profitability under any scenario that was evaluated. However, this review did not account for the potential increased genetic benefit from a decreased generation interval and the reduction in feed energy in comparison to a conventional cow/calf system.