Implementation of peer recovery coach services for opioid overdose patients in emergency departments in Indiana: findings from an informal learning collaborative of stakeholders

Response to a peer telehealth intervention for emergency department patients presenting with opioid use disorder or unintentional overdose: a stratified interrupted time series analysis

BACKGROUND

People in the United States who use opioids frequently use emergency department (ED) services. Some hospitals have begun placing peer recovery support specialists (PRSS) in EDs to support and advocate for patients and provide linkages to services, in an effort to reduce future presentations for opioid-related and other health problems related to substance use. However, evidence supporting the impact of PRSS services on reducing future ED presentations is limited, and even less is known about ED-based PRSS services delivered via telehealth.

METHODS

Using records from a large Indiana-based hospital system, we conducted an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of ED patients presenting for unintentional opioid overdose or other opioid-related issues. Over a five-year period, 2,542 unique ED visits were included across 12 hospitals. The primary outcome assessed was the impact of PRSS telehealth service implementation (comparing pre- and post-periods) on 30-day all-cause ED revisits. Analyses were also stratified by appropriate demographics.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in 30-day ED revisits between pre- and post-implementation of the PRSS telehealth program. Results of sex-stratified ITS indicated a significant change for females only, with decreasing log-odds of ED revisits post-program implementation (post-implementation slope OR = 0.911, p = 0.031; slope change OR = 0.874, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no detectable difference in overall ED revisits following program implementation, outcomes of stratified analyses suggested that the program may have been more impactful for females vs. males. Future research should examine the underlying mechanism of the observed sex differences to target behavioral change more effectively for all participants of telehealth PRSS services in ED settings.

Implementation strategies to support recovery support workers serving criminal legal involved people who use drugs

INTRODUCTION

Recovery support workers (RSWs) who provide social support interventions for people who use drugs (PWUD) often face challenges that can jeopardize the well-being, efficacy and sustainability of this essential workforce. To date, little has been reported on the types of implementation strategies used to support RSWs. We describe and evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy package to support Reducing Opioid Mortality in Illinois (ROMI), a paired peer recovery coach and case manager (PRC-CM) intervention for PWUD with recent criminal-legal involvement in urban and rural settings.

METHODS

ROMI utilized a remote, hub and spoke-administered multifaceted implementation strategy package to support PRCs-CMs to deliver evidence-based services to PWUD with criminal-legal involvement. The core strategies included: (a) comprehensive training; (b) individual clinical supervision; (c) group consultation; and (d) centralized technical assistance. We evaluated the implementation strategy package using a mixed-methods design including qualitative interviews with the intervention staff to explore their experiences with each strategy component, as well as a quantitative coding of topics discussed during supervision and group consultation meetings to estimate prioritization of issues and balance of topics between strategy type.

RESULTS

Between January 2019 and January 2024, the study interviewed 8 PRC-CMs and quantitatively coded 568 sessions (79 group consultations and 489 individual supervisory) for discussion themes. The hub-and-spoke model allowed for centralized access to highly skilled supervisory staff as well as knowledge sharing across geographically remote teams. The therapeutic space to process feelings and emotional support provided during individual supervision was noted to be an essential resource by PRC-CMs. Group consultation facilitated camaraderie, mutual support and continual learning through dynamic and responsive trainings. Frustrations around resource limitations and systemic barriers facing their clients remained a dominant concern for PRCs-CMs, and was incompletely addressed by the technical assistance strategy.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the practical components and individual strengths of the implementation strategies required to support the implementers of complex interventions such as social support and navigation for PWUD with criminal-legal involvement elucidates the organizational and professional capacities that may be required for real world implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04925427.

What happens after the funding ends?: A qualitative sustainability investigation of emergency department-based peer support programs implemented as part of Indiana's opioid state targeted response initiative

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, funding disseminated through the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Opioid State Targeted Response (STR) program accelerated the expansion of peer recovery support services across several states to engage emergency department patients presenting with opioid use disorder. While there is some literature on the initial implementation of these programs, little is known about their sustainability after the STR funding's end. Identifying what happened to these programs is a key component of understanding their ultimate impact and can inform future activities to develop, fund, or sustain similar efforts.

METHODS

We collected qualitative data from six organizations that participated in Indiana's STR-funded Recovery Coaching and Peer Support Initiative (RCPSI). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to gather data related to eight domains of sustainability (i.e., environmental support, funding stability, partnerships, organizational capacity, program evaluation, program adaptation, program evaluation, communications, and strategic planning). The analysts followed a deductive-inductive analysis approach, using the eight domains as an a priori coding structure and developing higher-level inductive themes.

RESULTS

A total of ten individuals (roles included 4 Program Supervisors, 2 Nurse Administrators, a Psychiatric Social Worker, a Mobile Treatment Manager, a Grant Coordinator, and a Vice President of Planning) participated in six interviews. Two programs did not sustain services, primarily because they lacked a sufficient volume of eligible patients to justify services. Factors identified as supporting sustainability in the other four programs included (1) identification of alternate funding sources, (2) evolving internal support for ED-based opioid use disorder treatment, and (3) investment in internal and external relationships. Furthermore, these themes operated across multiple sustainability domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings illustrate a dynamic interplay between program context and multiple theorized sustainability domains that impacted the viability of RCPSI programs after the end of STR funding. Results indicate a need for a better understanding of the factors influencing the sustainability of programs supported by federal funding to mitigate the opioid crisis, and such findings will likely apply to a broader range of grant-supported programs.

Bridging the gap: An environmental scan of post-overdose program features and evaluation measures

BACKGROUND

Prior overdose incident is a predictor of future non-fatal and fatal overdoses. Therefore, the period immediately following a non-fatal overdose is critical for engaging with survivors; however, they often do not access or receive services immediately after experiencing an overdose. To efficiently reach this high-risk population and provide survivors with services, novel interventions including post-overdose outreach programs have been developed.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted an environmental scan of the academic and gray literature on post-overdose programs to identify key features and measures used to evaluate post-overdose programs. Using the Donabedian quality framework we then analyzed the frequency of measures by type of initiating stakeholder.

RESULTS

Of the 36 studies included for final extraction, 14 were descriptive studies, ten were evaluation studies, eight studies identified facilitators and barriers, and four were program design toolkits. Initiator entity types included emergency departments (EDs; n = 10), public health agencies (n = 5), community-based organizations (n = 4), emergency medical services (EMS) (n = 4), law enforcement agencies (n = 4), and some combination or unknown (n = 9). We identified six key features of post-overdose programs across the literature: program theory, team composition, identifying and contacting clients, service provision, public private partnerships, and referrals. We extracted 223 operationalized measures, of which we analyzed 173 and categorized them as client experience (n = 2), structural (n = 12), process (n = 69), and outcome measures (n = 90). Public health agency-initiated programs reported all the experience-related measures (n = 2) and the most outcome measures (n = 23). Programs initiated by EDs reported the most process measures (n = 20), whereas community-based agencies reported the most structural measures (n = 12). Only two of the 223 measures related to stigma.

CONCLUSION

There are six common features across all post-overdose programs and different initiating organization types had differing foci for their evaluation measures. The key features and evaluation measure clusters identified in this environmental scan can help inform future post-overdose programs assess the comprehensiveness of their evaluations, inform funding agencies on the range of existing measures (and gaps) to consider, and support evaluators in study design.

Peer support for patients with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: A narrative review

Faced with a growing opioid overdose crisis, emergency departments (EDs) are increasingly hiring peers-people with lived experiences of addiction and recovery-to work with patients in the ED who have opioid use disorders (OUDs) or who have experienced an opioid overdose. Despite a clear need for more support for patients with OUD and rapid expansion in grant funding for peer programs, there are limited data on how these programs affect clinical outcomes and how they are best implemented within the ED. In this narrative review, we synthesize the existing evidence on how to develop and implement peer programs for OUD in the ED setting. We describe the key activities peers can undertake in the ED, outline requirements of the peer role and best practices for peer supervision and hiring, detail how ED administrators have built financial and political support for peer programs, and summarize the limited evidence on clinical and care linkage outcomes of peer programs. We highlight key resources that ED clinicians and administrators can use to develop peer programs and key areas where additional research is needed.

Results From the POINT Pragmatic Randomized Trial: An Emergency Department-Based Peer Support Specialist Intervention to Increase Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Linkage and Reduce Recurrent Overdose

BACKGROUND

People with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present at the emergency department (ED), a potentially critical point for intervention and treatment linkage. Peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) interventions have expanded in US-based EDs, although evidence supporting such interventions has not been firmly established.

METHODS

Researchers conducted a pragmatic trial of POINT (Project Planned Outreach, Intervention, Naloxone, and Treatment), an ED-initiated intervention for harm reduction and recovery coaching/treatment linkage in 2 Indiana EDs. Cluster randomization allocated patients to the POINT intervention (n = 157) versus a control condition (n = 86). Participants completed a structured interview, and all outcomes were assessed using administrative data from an extensive state health exchange and state systems. Target patients (n = 243) presented to the ED for a possible opioid-related reason. The primary outcome was overdose-related ED re-presentation. Key secondary outcomes included OUD medication treatment linkage, duration of medication in days, all-cause ED re-presentation, all-cause inpatient re-presentation, and Medicaid enrollment. All outcomes were assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-enrollment. Ad hoc analyses were performed to assess treatment motivation and readiness.

RESULTS

POINT and standard care participants did not differ significantly on any outcomes measured. Participants who presented to the ED for overdose had significantly lower scores (3.5 vs 4.2, P < .01) regarding readiness to begin treatment compared to those presenting for other opioid-related issues.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized trial investigating overdose outcomes for an ED peer recovery support specialist intervention. Though underpowered, results suggest no benefit of PRSS services over standard care. Given the scope of PRSS, future work in this area should assess more recovery- and harm reduction-oriented outcomes, as well as the potential benefits of integrating PRSS within multimodal ED-based interventions for OUD.

A combined intervention strategy to increase linkage to and retention in substance use treatment for individuals accessing hospital-based services: study protocol

Background

In 2020, New Mexico had the highest alcohol related death and the 11th highest drug overdose rate in the U.S. Towards the long-term goal of addressing this public health problem, we are implementing and evaluating an multi-level intervention designed to identify adults at risk of substance use disorder (SUD) and encourage linkage to and retention in treatment. The first level includes equipping the ED and medical inpatient units of a safety-net hospital with a method to screen individuals at risk of a SUD. The second level includes Seeking Safety (SS), a trauma-specific treatment for PTSD and SUD; and pharmacotherapy for SUD. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is used throughout both levels. Using the SPIRIT guidelines and checklist, this study protocol describes the multi-level intervention and the methodology we are using to assess feasibility and effectiveness.

Methods

We are using a Type 1 hybrid implementation design with a non-randomized approach (ISRCTN registration # ISRCTN33100750). We aim to enroll 110 adults ( ≧ 18 ) who screen positive for unhealthy use of alcohol, prescription medications (used nonmedically) and/or illicit drugs. Peer support workers are responsible for screening, using MI to increase engagement in screening and treatment and delivery of SS. Pharmacotherapy is provided by addiction clinical specialists. Treatment is provided post hospital discharge via telehealth to increase access to care. Participants are identified through (1) review of electronic health records for individuals with a chief or secondary complaint or mental health condition relating to alcohol and/or other drug use, (2) referrals from clinical staff and (3) screening in the ED and medical inpatient units. Feasibility is being measured through process data. Effectiveness will be determined by changes in two primary outcomes: (i) PTSD symptom severity; and (ii) substance use.

Discussion

Our study will expand on research related to the implementation of treatment strategies for patients presenting at EDs and admitted to medical inpatients units wherein there is a significant window of opportunity to link patients with follow-up behavioral and clinical services for alcohol and/or drug misuse. The challenges associated with implementation and strategies that have been helpful to address these challenges will further inform the field.

Characterization of peer support services for substance use disorders in 11 US emergency departments in 2020: findings from a NIDA clinical trials network site selection process

INTRODUCTION

Emergency departments (ED) are incorporating Peer Support Specialists (PSSs) to help with patient care for substance use disorders (SUDs). Despite rapid growth in this area, little is published regarding workflow, expectations of the peer role, and core components of the PSS intervention. This study describes these elements in a national sample of ED-based peer support intervention programs.

METHODS

A survey was conducted to assess PSS site characteristics as part of site selection process for a National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) evaluating PSS effectiveness, Surveys were distributed to clinical sites affiliated with the 16 CTN nodes. Surveys were completed by a representative(s) of the site and collected data on the PSS role in the ED including details regarding funding and certification, services rendered, role in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and naloxone distribution, and factors impacting implementation and maintenance of ED PSS programs. Quantitative data was summarized with descriptive statistics. Free-text fields were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 surveys were completed, collected from 9 different states. ED PSS funding was from grants (55%), hospital funds (46%), peer recovery organizations (27%) or other (18%). Funding was anticipated to continue for a mean of 16 months (range 12 to 36 months). The majority of programs provided "general recovery support (81%) Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) services (55%), and assisted with naloxone distribution to ED patients (64%). A minority assisted with ED-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) programs (27%). Most (91%) provided services to patients after they were discharged from the ED. Barriers to implementation included lack of outpatient referral sources, barriers to initiating MOUD, stigma at the clinician and system level, and lack of ongoing PSS availability due to short-term grant funding.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ED-based PSSs were funded through time-limited grants, and short-term grant funding was identified as a barrier for ED PSS programs. There was consistency among sites in the involvement of PSSs in facilitation of transitions of SUD care, coordination of follow-up after ED discharge, and PSS involvement in naloxone distribution.

Implementation Challenges and Recommendations for Employing Peer Support Workers in Emergency Departments to Support Patients Presenting after an Opioid-Related Overdose

The placement of a peer support workers (PSWs) in emergency departments (ED) is a promising practice for supporting persons with opioid use disorder who are presenting with an overdose or related medical condition. However, this practice is underutilized. The objective of this study was to identify the challenges of employing PSWs in the ED and provide a checklist to increase the likelihood of their successful integration and retention in this environment. Qualitative methods were used to collect data from nineteen key stakeholders who worked in hospital settings. Using a social-ecological model, themes were identified at the system, hospital, and individual levels. To support integration of PSWs and buy in for the ED team, our findings indicate a need for a planning phase that includes collaboration between leadership, ED staff, and PSWs. Specifically, planning should address four areas: (1) hiring a PSW that is a good fit for the fast-paced ED setting, (2) education of ED staff on the value and role of PSWs, (3) establishing workflow protocols, and (4) providing PSWs with training and appropriate supervision.

Identifying unique barriers to implementing rural emergency department-based peer services for opioid use disorder through qualitative comparison with urban sites

BACKGROUND

In an effort to address the current opioid epidemic, a number of hospitals across the United States have implemented emergency department-based interventions for engaging patients presenting with opioid use disorder. The current study seeks to address gaps in knowledge regarding implementation of a sub-type of such interventions, emergency department-based peer support services, in rural areas by comparing implementation of rural and urban programs that participated in Indiana's Recovery Coach and Peer Support Initiative (RCPSI).

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative semi-structured implementation interviews collected as part of an evaluation of 10 programs (4 rural and 6 urban) participating in the RCPSI. We conducted interviews with representatives from each program at 3 time points over the course of the first year of implementation. Our deductive coding process was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and an external context taxonomy.

RESULTS

We identified key differences for rural programs corresponding to each of the 5 primary constructs in the coding scheme. (1) Intervention characteristics: rural sites questioned intervention fit with their context, required more adaptations, and encountered unexpected costs. (2) External context: rural sites were not appropriately staffed to meet patient needs, encountered logistical and legal barriers regarding patient privacy, and had limited patient transportation options. (3) Inner setting: rural sites lacked strong mechanisms for internal communication and difficulties integrating with pre-existing culture and climate. (4) Characteristics of individuals: some rural providers resisted working with peers due to pre-existing attitudes and beliefs. (5) Implementation process: rural sites spent more time identifying external partners and abandoned more components of their initial implementation plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate how rural programs faced greater challenges implementing emergency department-based peer services over time. These challenges required flexible adaptations to originally intended plans. Rural programs likely require flexibility to adapt interventions that were developed in urban settings to ensure success considering local contextual constraints that were identified by our analysis.

Client perspectives on the accessibility and quality of substance use treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

People who use drugs have been particularly vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic because of their unique social, harm reduction, and treatment needs. These unique needs and challenges have significant influence on the severity of their substance use, mental health symptomatology, willingness to engage in treatment, and adherence to treatment options. This has included immense challenges related to the dissemination of COVID-19 messaging and the need for harm reduction and treatment service entities to adopt new formats to continue operation.

METHODS

In-depth interview data were collected people who use drugs (N=24) residing in Oklahoma from November 2020 through February 2021 to assess perspectives on (1) their access to harm reduction, substance use prevention, and treatment programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) the perceived quality of such services and programs during this time, and (3) the perceived availability of tailored COVID-19 information.

RESULTS

Several factors emerged related to accessing and quality of substance use services during COVID-19, including poor accessibility (e.g., internet access), diminished quality (i.e., lack of social support), and lack of tailored COVID-19 prevention and treatment messaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Upticks in COVID-19 cases and deaths are expected to continue as new SARS-CoV-2 variants are introduced. The present findings highlight the need for tailored COVID-19 messaging (e.g., minimizing the sharing of substance use supplies that can spread COVID-19, mask wearing, COVID-19 vaccination), which is responsive to unique needs of substance using populations. Similarly, as prevention and treatment programs are delivered online, efforts are necessary to ensure equitable access and enhanced quality of services.