1
|
Maheshwari S, Arias M, Ubersax C, Tucker A, Bal S, Ravi G, Godby K, Costa LJ, Williams GR, Shrestha S, Bhatia S, Giri S. Understanding health outcome preferences of older adults diagnosed with multiple myeloma. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101781. [PMID: 38714092 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health outcome preferences of older adults with cancer vary based on burden/intensity of treatment and its impact on health outcomes such as survival, quality of life, and functional and cognitive well-being. We studied the association between age and health outcome preferences of adults with multiple myeloma (MM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a single center prospective cohort study, we identified adults ≥50y with MM who underwent geriatric assessment (GA) within 30 days of initiating a new line of therapy. We assessed health outcome preferences using a nine-item health outcome preference scale where patients were asked to prioritize varying treatment outcomes in a Likert scale. We compared the response patterns for each item by age group (50-69y vs ≥70y) using Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared test. For items significant in bi-variable analysis, we built proportional odds models to study the association between age and health outcome preferences adjusting for sex, race, frailty, and high risk cytogenetics. RESULTS We included 119 patients with a median age of 65y. Of these, 58% were male, 56% were non-Hispanic White, and 28% were frail. Older adults (≥70y) versus younger adults (50-69y) were more likely to prioritize health outcomes such as quality of life (53% vs. 34%), functional independence (74% vs. 33%), maintaining cognitive ability (79% vs. 54%), and living free from pain (50% vs 18%) over longer survival (all p values <0.05). In multivariable models, each one interquartile range (IQR) increase in age was associated with increased odds of prioritization of functional independence [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.44-4.53)], maintaining cognitive ability [aOR 1.75, 95% CI (1.01-3.02)], and willingness to take milder/ fewer treatments [aOR 2.40, 95% CI (1.36-4.26)] over longer survival. Similarly, each IQR increase in age was associated with decreased odds of prioritization of survival over quality of life [aOR 0.45, 95% CI (0.26-0.78)] and survival over being free from pain [aOR 0.39, 95% CI (0.22-0.69)]. DISCUSSION Three out of four older adults (age ≥ 70y) with MM rated other outcomes, particularly functional and cognitive well-being, above survival. Determining the most significant treatment outcomes for older adults with MM can aid in establishing treatment goals and enhance shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Maheshwari
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Miguel Arias
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Clare Ubersax
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Abigail Tucker
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Susan Bal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gayathri Ravi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kelly Godby
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Luciano J Costa
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sadeep Shrestha
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Smith Giri
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Savchenko A, Tariman JD, Kohon A, Simonovich SD, Dahan T, Bishop-Royse J. Multiple Myeloma: Validation of the Values and Preferences Elicitation Questionnaire- Cure and Survival Preference Scale (VPEQ-CSPS). CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:e96-e103. [PMID: 38185586 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the emergence of many novel therapies, the treatment decisions for multiple myeloma (MM) are increasingly guided by concerns of quality of life, achievement of cancer-free remission, living a longer overall survival, and a relentless search for a cure; however, the impact of various decision-making factors on patients' actual therapy choices and the patients' desire for cure and survival is mainly unknown. The lack of a valid and reliable measure for uncovering patients' preferences for cure and survival makes it more challenging to put this factor into the actual treatment decision equation. PURPOSE This study examined the psychometric properties of the Values and Preferences Elicitation Questionnaire-Cure and Survival Preference Scale (VPEQ-CSPS) instrument. METHODS The VPEQ-CSPS instrument was deployed using an anonymous Qualtrics online survey to patients diagnosed with MM within the network of International Myeloma Foundation online patient support groups across the United States. One hundred seventy-four (N = 174) valid responses were obtained and used to examine the validity and reliability of the VPEQ-CSPS. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.72 indicating excellent sample adequacy. A statistically significant Bartlett's test of sphericity (P < .001) indicated significant correlations among the variables of the dataset to conduct the EFA. The internal consistency coefficients indicated adequate reliability of the instrument with Cronbach's alpha value at 0.80. The EFA and parallel analysis revealed the 5-item VPEQ-CSPS as a valid and reliable unidimensional scale that can be used by oncology clinicians to elicit their patient's preferences for cure and survival. This new instrument has the potential to contribute to the achievement of shared decision-making for myeloma treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Dahan
- Rutgers University-Camden, School of Nursing, Camden, NJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rana S, Maharjan S, Sookdeo SD, Schmidt P. Pain Management in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Literature Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e55975. [PMID: 38601412 PMCID: PMC11006436 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Managing pain in cancer patients with multiple myeloma (MM) poses a considerable challenge. This review thoroughly investigates current pain management strategies, difficulties, and future directions in the field. The review divides pain treatment strategies into pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological therapies. Looking ahead, promising areas for future study and development are mentioned, such as incorporating precision medicine into pain management and investigating innovative therapeutics. Despite existing limitations, advances in pain management provide great opportunities to improve the quality of life and overall results for MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shubh Rana
- Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA
| | - Suprina Maharjan
- Internal Medicine, Xavier University School of Medicine, Oranjestad, ABW
| | | | | |
Collapse
|