1
|
Bharmauria V, Seo S, Crawford JD. Neural integration of egocentric and allocentric visual cues in the gaze system. J Neurophysiol 2025; 133:109-120. [PMID: 39584726 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00498.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Revised: 11/14/2024] [Accepted: 11/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024] Open
Abstract
A fundamental question in neuroscience is how the brain integrates egocentric (body-centered) and allocentric (landmark-centered) visual cues, but for many years this question was ignored in sensorimotor studies. This changed in recent behavioral experiments, but the underlying physiology of ego/allocentric integration remained largely unstudied. The specific goal of this review is to explain how prefrontal neurons integrate eye-centered and landmark-centered visual codes for optimal gaze behavior. First, we briefly review the whole brain/behavioral mechanisms for ego/allocentric integration in the human and summarize egocentric coding mechanisms in the primate gaze system. We then focus in more depth on cellular mechanisms for ego/allocentric coding in the frontal and supplementary eye fields. We first explain how prefrontal visual responses integrate eye-centered target and landmark codes to produce a transformation toward landmark-centered coordinates. Next, we describe what happens when a landmark shifts during the delay between seeing and acquiring a remembered target, initially resulting in independently coexisting ego/allocentric memory codes. We then describe how these codes are reintegrated in the motor burst for the gaze shift. Deep network simulations suggest that these properties emerge spontaneously for optimal gaze behavior. Finally, we synthesize these observations and relate them to normal brain function through a simplified conceptual model. Together, these results show that integration of visuospatial features continues well beyond visual cortex and suggest a general cellular mechanism for goal-directed visual behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Bharmauria
- The Tampa Human Neurophysiology Lab & Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
- York Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Serah Seo
- York Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Douglas Crawford
- York Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Psychology, Biology, Kinesiology & Health Sciences, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seo S, Bharmauria V, Schütz A, Yan X, Wang H, Crawford JD. Multiunit Frontal Eye Field Activity Codes the Visuomotor Transformation, But Not Gaze Prediction or Retrospective Target Memory, in a Delayed Saccade Task. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0413-23.2024. [PMID: 39054056 PMCID: PMC11373882 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0413-23.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Single-unit (SU) activity-action potentials isolated from one neuron-has traditionally been employed to relate neuronal activity to behavior. However, recent investigations have shown that multiunit (MU) activity-ensemble neural activity recorded within the vicinity of one microelectrode-may also contain accurate estimations of task-related neural population dynamics. Here, using an established model-fitting approach, we compared the spatial codes of SU response fields with corresponding MU response fields recorded from the frontal eye fields (FEFs) in head-unrestrained monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during a memory-guided saccade task. Overall, both SU and MU populations showed a simple visuomotor transformation: the visual response coded target-in-eye coordinates, transitioning progressively during the delay toward a future gaze-in-eye code in the saccade motor response. However, the SU population showed additional secondary codes, including a predictive gaze code in the visual response and retention of a target code in the motor response. Further, when SUs were separated into regular/fast spiking neurons, these cell types showed different spatial code progressions during the late delay period, only converging toward gaze coding during the final saccade motor response. Finally, reconstructing MU populations (by summing SU data within the same sites) failed to replicate either the SU or MU pattern. These results confirm the theoretical and practical potential of MU activity recordings as a biomarker for fundamental sensorimotor transformations (e.g., target-to-gaze coding in the oculomotor system), while also highlighting the importance of SU activity for coding more subtle (e.g., predictive/memory) aspects of sensorimotor behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serah Seo
- Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Vishal Bharmauria
- Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33606
| | - Adrian Schütz
- Department of Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain, and Behavior - CMBB, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 35032 Marburg, and Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Xiaogang Yan
- Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Hongying Wang
- Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - J Douglas Crawford
- Centre for Vision Research and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
- Departments of Psychology, Biology, Kinesiology & Health Sciences, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taghizadeh B, Fortmann O, Gail A. Position- and scale-invariant object-centered spatial localization in monkey frontoparietal cortex dynamically adapts to cognitive demand. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3357. [PMID: 38637493 PMCID: PMC11026390 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47554-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Egocentric encoding is a well-known property of brain areas along the dorsal pathway. Different to previous experiments, which typically only demanded egocentric spatial processing during movement preparation, we designed a task where two male rhesus monkeys memorized an on-the-object target position and then planned a reach to this position after the object re-occurred at variable location with potentially different size. We found allocentric (in addition to egocentric) encoding in the dorsal stream reach planning areas, parietal reach region and dorsal premotor cortex, which is invariant with respect to the position, and, remarkably, also the size of the object. The dynamic adjustment from predominantly allocentric encoding during visual memory to predominantly egocentric during reach planning in the same brain areas and often the same neurons, suggests that the prevailing frame of reference is less a question of brain area or processing stream, but more of the cognitive demands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahareh Taghizadeh
- Sensorimotor Group, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany
- School of Cognitive Science, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), P.O. Box 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ole Fortmann
- Sensorimotor Group, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany
- Faculty of Biology and Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Gail
- Sensorimotor Group, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
- Faculty of Biology and Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Göttingen, Germany.
- Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schütz A, Bharmauria V, Yan X, Wang H, Bremmer F, Crawford JD. Integration of landmark and saccade target signals in macaque frontal cortex visual responses. Commun Biol 2023; 6:938. [PMID: 37704829 PMCID: PMC10499799 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05291-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Visual landmarks influence spatial cognition and behavior, but their influence on visual codes for action is poorly understood. Here, we test landmark influence on the visual response to saccade targets recorded from 312 frontal and 256 supplementary eye field neurons in rhesus macaques. Visual response fields are characterized by recording neural responses to various target-landmark combinations, and then we test against several candidate spatial models. Overall, frontal/supplementary eye fields response fields preferentially code either saccade targets (40%/40%) or landmarks (30%/4.5%) in gaze fixation-centered coordinates, but most cells show multiplexed target-landmark coding within intermediate reference frames (between fixation-centered and landmark-centered). Further, these coding schemes interact: neurons with near-equal target and landmark coding show the biggest shift from fixation-centered toward landmark-centered target coding. These data show that landmark information is preserved and influences target coding in prefrontal visual responses, likely to stabilize movement goals in the presence of noisy egocentric signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Schütz
- Department of Neurophysics, Phillips Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain, and Behavior - CMBB, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany & Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Vishal Bharmauria
- York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Xiaogang Yan
- York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hongying Wang
- York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Frank Bremmer
- Department of Neurophysics, Phillips Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain, and Behavior - CMBB, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany & Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - J Douglas Crawford
- York Centre for Vision Research and Vision: Science to Applications Program, York University, Toronto, Canada.
- Departments of Psychology, Biology, Kinesiology & Health Sciences, York University, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|