Assessing Agricultural Toxicity in Brazil: Advances and Opportunities in the 21st Century

Assessing pesticides in the atmosphere: A global study on pollution, human health effects, monitoring network and regulatory performance

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, but their impact on the environment and human health is a major concern. While much attention has been given to their presence in soil, water, and food, there have been few studies on airborne pesticide pollution on a global scale. This study aimed to assess the extent of atmospheric pesticide pollution in countries worldwide and identify regional differences using a scoring approach. In addition to analyzing the health risks associated with pesticide pollution, we also examined agricultural practices and current air quality standards for pesticides in these countries. The pollution scores varied significantly among the countries, particularly in Europe. Asian and Oceanic countries generally had higher scores compared to those in the Americas, suggesting a relatively higher level of air pollution caused by pesticides in these regions. It is worth noting that the current pollution levels, as assessed theoretically, pose minimal health risks to humans. However, studies in the literature have shown that excessive exposure to pesticides present in the atmosphere has been associated with various health problems, such as cancer, neuropsychiatric disorders, and other chronic diseases. Interestingly, European countries had the highest overall pesticide application intensities, but this did not necessarily correspond to higher atmospheric pesticide pollution scores. Only a few countries have established air quality standards specifically for pesticides. Furthermore, pollution scores across states in the USA were investigated and the global sampling sites were mapped. The findings revealed that the scores varied widely in the USA and the current sampling sites were limited or unevenly distributed in some countries, particularly the Nordic countries. These findings can help global relevant environmental agencies to set up comprehensive monitoring networks. Overall, the present research highlights the need to create a pesticide monitoring system and increase efforts to enhance pesticide regulation, ensure consistency in standards, and promote international cooperation.

Brazil’s Regulatory Context for Using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) on the Registration of Products

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) are any non-animal-based approaches that can provide information in the context of chemical hazard and safety assessment. The goal is to develop information with equivalent or better scientific quality and relevance than that provided by traditional animal models. Starting with ethical issues, these approaches are gaining regulatory relevance in different global agencies. Since 2008, with the enactment of the Arouca Law—the first Brazilian legislation dedicated to laboratory animals, NAMs are gathering pace in Brazil’s regulations. Specific regulations from different sectors include the acceptance of these new methods. However, some regulation is controversial about what is needed to address specific toxicological endpoints. The resulting regulatory uncertainty induces companies to keep on adopting the traditional methods, slowing NAM’s development in the country. This work brings a perspective on the regulatory acceptance of NAMs in Brazilian Legislation for the registration of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, food/supplements, and agrochemical products. This text discusses the main issues of NAM adoption for each specific regulation. Therefore, legal acceptance of NAMs results in Brazil is still a process in progress. A collective effort including regulators, industry, contract research organizations (CROs), and the academic environment is needed to build regulatory confidence in the use of NAMs.