1
|
Greer SF, Surendran A, Grant M, Lillywhite R. The current status, challenges, and future perspectives for managing diseases of brassicas. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1209258. [PMID: 37533829 PMCID: PMC10392840 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1209258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The Brassica genus comprises the greatest diversity of agriculturally important crops. Several species from this genus are grown as vegetable and oil crops for food, animal feed and industrial purposes. In particular, B. oleracea has been extensively bred to give rise to several familiar vegetables (cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, kale and Brussels Sprouts, etc.) that are grouped under seven major cultivars. In 2020, 96.4 million tonnes of vegetable brassicas were produced globally with a 10.6% increase over the past decade. Yet, like other crops, the production of brassicas is challenged by diseases among which, black rot, clubroot, downy mildew and turnip yellows virus have been identified by growers as the most damaging to UK production. In some cases, yield losses can reach 90% depending upon the geographic location of cultivation. This review aims to provide an overview of the key diseases of brassicas and their management practices, with respect to the biology and lifecycle of the causal pathogens. In addition, the existing controls on the market as well as those that are currently in the research and development phases were critically reviewed. There is not one specific control method that is effective against all the diseases. Generally, cultural practices prevent disease rather than reduce or eliminate disease. Chemical controls are limited, have broad-spectrum activity, are damaging to the environment and are rapidly becoming ineffective due to the evolution of resistance mechanisms by the pathogens. It is therefore important to develop integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that are tailored to geographic locations. Several knowledge gaps have been identified and listed in this review along with the future recommendations to control these four major diseases of brassicas. As such, this review paper will act as a guide to sustainably tackle pre-harvest diseases in Brassica crops to reduce food loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon F. Greer
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Arthy Surendran
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Carbon, Crop and Soils Group, SRUC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Murray Grant
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Lillywhite
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Foucher J, Ruh M, Briand M, Préveaux A, Barbazange F, Boureau T, Jacques MA, Chen NWG. Improving Common Bacterial Blight Phenotyping by Using Rub Inoculation and Machine Learning: Cheaper, Better, Faster, Stronger. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2022; 112:691-699. [PMID: 34289714 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-21-0129-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Accurate assessment of plant symptoms plays a key role for measuring the impact of pathogens during plant-pathogen interaction. Common bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. phaseoli and X. citri pv. fuscans is a major threat to common bean. The pathogenicity of these bacteria is variable among strains and depends mainly on a type III secretion system and associated type III effectors such as transcription activator-like effectors. Because the impact of a single gene is often small and difficult to detect, a discriminating methodology is required to distinguish the slight phenotype changes induced during the progression of the disease. Here, we compared two different inoculation and symptom assessment methods for their ability to distinguish two tal mutants from their corresponding wild-type strains. Interestingly, rub inoculation of the first leaves combined with symptom assessment by machine learning-based imaging allowed significant distinction between wild-type and mutant strains. By contrast, dip inoculation of first-trifoliate leaves combined with chlorophyll fluorescence imaging did not differentiate the strains. Furthermore, the new method developed here led to the miniaturization of pathogenicity tests and significant time savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Foucher
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Mylène Ruh
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Martial Briand
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Anne Préveaux
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Florian Barbazange
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Tristan Boureau
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Marie-Agnès Jacques
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| | - Nicolas W G Chen
- Univ. Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ivanov AV, Safenkova IV, Zherdev AV, Dzantiev BB. The Potential Use of Isothermal Amplification Assays for In-Field Diagnostics of Plant Pathogens. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 10:plants10112424. [PMID: 34834787 PMCID: PMC8621059 DOI: 10.3390/plants10112424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Rapid, sensitive, and timely diagnostics are essential for protecting plants from pathogens. Commonly, PCR techniques are used in laboratories for highly sensitive detection of DNA/RNA from viral, viroid, bacterial, and fungal pathogens of plants. However, using PCR-based methods for in-field diagnostics is a challenge and sometimes nearly impossible. With the advent of isothermal amplification methods, which provide amplification of nucleic acids at a certain temperature and do not require thermocyclic equipment, going beyond the laboratory has become a reality for molecular diagnostics. The amplification stage ceases to be limited by time and instruments. Challenges to solve involve finding suitable approaches for rapid and user-friendly plant preparation and detection of amplicons after amplification. Here, we summarize approaches for in-field diagnostics of phytopathogens based on different types of isothermal amplification and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. In this review, we consider a combination of isothermal amplification methods with extraction and detection methods compatible with in-field phytodiagnostics. Molecular diagnostics in out-of-lab conditions are of particular importance for protecting against viral, bacterial, and fungal phytopathogens in order to quickly prevent and control the spread of disease. We believe that the development of rapid, sensitive, and equipment-free nucleic acid detection methods is the future of phytodiagnostics, and its benefits are already visible.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mansotra R, Vakhlu J. Comprehensive account of present techniques for in-field plant disease diagnosis. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:5309-5320. [PMID: 34410444 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02529-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The early detection of plant pathogens is an appropriate preventive strategy for the management of crop yield and quality. For this reason, effective diagnostic techniques and tools, which are simple, specific, rapid and economic, are needed to be developed. Although several such technologies have been developed still most of them suffer one or the other limitation. Major limitations of the widely used diagnostic methods are requirement of trained staff and laboratory setup. Development of point-of-care diagnostic devices (handy portable devices) that require no specialized staff and can directly be used in fields is need of the hour. The aim of this review is to compile the information on current promising techniques that are in use for plant-pathogen diagnosis. Additionally, it focuses on the latest in-field pathogen diagnostic techniques with associated advantages and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritika Mansotra
- Metagenomic Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, University of Jammu, Jammu, India
| | - Jyoti Vakhlu
- Metagenomic Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, University of Jammu, Jammu, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Catara V, Cubero J, Pothier JF, Bosis E, Bragard C, Đermić E, Holeva MC, Jacques MA, Petter F, Pruvost O, Robène I, Studholme DJ, Tavares F, Vicente JG, Koebnik R, Costa J. Trends in Molecular Diagnosis and Diversity Studies for Phytosanitary Regulated Xanthomonas. Microorganisms 2021; 9:862. [PMID: 33923763 PMCID: PMC8073235 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9040862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacteria in the genus Xanthomonas infect a wide range of crops and wild plants, with most species responsible for plant diseases that have a global economic and environmental impact on the seed, plant, and food trade. Infections by Xanthomonas spp. cause a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, making their identification difficult. The coexistence of phylogenetically close strains, but drastically different in their phenotype, poses an added challenge to diagnosis. Data on future climate change scenarios predict an increase in the severity of epidemics and a geographical expansion of pathogens, increasing pressure on plant health services. In this context, the effectiveness of integrated disease management strategies strongly depends on the availability of rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic methods. The accumulation of genomic information in recent years has facilitated the identification of new DNA markers, a cornerstone for the development of more sensitive and specific methods. Nevertheless, the challenges that the taxonomic complexity of this genus represents in terms of diagnosis together with the fact that within the same bacterial species, groups of strains may interact with distinct host species demonstrate that there is still a long way to go. In this review, we describe and discuss the current molecular-based methods for the diagnosis and detection of regulated Xanthomonas, taxonomic and diversity studies in Xanthomonas and genomic approaches for molecular diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittoria Catara
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Jaime Cubero
- National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA), 28002 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Joël F. Pothier
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Research Group, Institute for Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), 8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland;
| | - Eran Bosis
- Department of Biotechnology Engineering, ORT Braude College of Engineering, Karmiel 2161002, Israel;
| | - Claude Bragard
- UCLouvain, Earth & Life Institute, Applied Microbiology, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium;
| | - Edyta Đermić
- Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Maria C. Holeva
- Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Scientific Directorate of Phytopathology, Laboratory of Bacteriology, GR-14561 Kifissia, Greece;
| | - Marie-Agnès Jacques
- IRHS, INRA, AGROCAMPUS-Ouest, Univ Angers, SFR 4207 QUASAV, 49071 Beaucouzé, France;
| | - Francoise Petter
- European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO/OEPP), 75011 Paris, France;
| | - Olivier Pruvost
- CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France; (O.P.); (I.R.)
| | - Isabelle Robène
- CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France; (O.P.); (I.R.)
| | | | - Fernando Tavares
- CIBIO—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO-Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; or
- FCUP-Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Ralf Koebnik
- Plant Health Institute of Montpellier (PHIM), Univ Montpellier, Cirad, INRAe, Institut Agro, IRD, 34398 Montpellier, France;
| | - Joana Costa
- Centre for Functional Ecology-Science for People & the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 300-456 Coimbra, Portugal
- Laboratory for Phytopathology, Instituto Pedro Nunes, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|