1
|
Li W, Guo S, Miao N. Transcriptional responses of fluxapyroxad-induced dysfunctional heart in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 29:90034-90045. [PMID: 35864390 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21981-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Fluxapyroxad (FLU) is a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide used in controlling crop diseases. Potential toxicity to aquatic organisms is not known. We exposed zebrafish to 1, 2, and 4 μM FLU for 3 days. The embryonic zebrafish showed developmental cardiac defects, including heart malformation, pericardial edema, and heart rate reduction. Compared with the controls, cardiac-specific transcription factors (nkx2.5, myh7, myl7, and myh6) exhibited dysregulated expression patterns after FLU treatment. We next used transcriptome and qRT-PCR analyses to explore the molecular mechanism of FLU cardiotoxicity. The transcriptome analysis and interaction network showed that the downregulated genes were enriched in calcium signaling pathways, adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, and cardiac muscle contraction. FLU exposure repressed the cardio-related calcium signaling pathway, associated with apoptosis in the heart and other manifestations of cardiotoxicity. Thus, the findings provide valuable evidence that FLU exposure causes disruption of cardiac development in zebrafish embryos. Our findings will help to promote a better understanding of the toxicity mechanisms of FLU and act as a reference to explore the rational use and safety of FLU in agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhua Li
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular Medicine of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Fujian Molecular Medicine, Key Laboratory of Xiamen Marine and Gene Drugs, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Molecular Diagnosis of Fujian Universities, School of Biomedical Sciences, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, 361021, People's Republic of China
| | - Shanshan Guo
- Engineering Research Center of Molecular Medicine of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Fujian Molecular Medicine, Key Laboratory of Xiamen Marine and Gene Drugs, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Molecular Diagnosis of Fujian Universities, School of Biomedical Sciences, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, 361021, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Miao
- Center for Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and School of Biomedical Sciences, Huaqiao University, 668 Jimei Road, Xiamen, 361021, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Washuck N, Hanson M, Prosser R. Yield to the data: some perspective on crop productivity and pesticides. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2022; 78:1765-1771. [PMID: 34995003 DOI: 10.1002/ps.6782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The scientific consensus is that pesticide use maximizes crop yields in the face of pest and disease pressures. Often, the debate then becomes a "so what" question (e.g., a percent or two increase in yield is inconsequential, so why use pesticides at all?). We set out to help give technical and lay audiences an objective and quantitative sense of what it means for pesticides to protect crop yields from two perspectives: (i) the number of additional hectares required to produce the same amount of food without the use of pesticides; and (ii) increased calorie production and people fed. Using available seeding and yield data for Canada and United States from 2015 to 2019 for common field crops, a user-friendly interface was developed that allows for the coarse calculation of land preserved and caloric increases for specific scenarios (e.g., jurisdiction, crop, percent yield increase). We found that land preserved would range from 145 883 to 11 590 255 ha and the number of adults fed would range from 1 333 814 to 100 016 319 depending on the crop and the country. Our hope is that this simple tool will provide a fuller sense of what changes in crop yields mean, and their implications for environmental protection and food security. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Washuck
- School of Environmental Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Hanson
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ryan Prosser
- School of Environmental Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kandel YR, Hunt C, Ames K, Arneson N, Bradley CA, Byamukama E, Byrne A, Chilvers MI, Giesler LJ, Halvorson J, Hooker DC, Kleczewski NM, Malvick DK, Markell S, Potter B, Pedersen W, Smith DL, Tenuta AU, Telenko DEP, Wise KA, Mueller DS. Meta-Analysis of Soybean Yield Response to Foliar Fungicides Evaluated from 2005 to 2018 in the United States and Canada. PLANT DISEASE 2021; 105:1382-1389. [PMID: 33245257 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-07-20-1578-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Random-effect meta-analyses were performed on data from 240 field trials conducted between 2005 and 2018 across nine U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, to quantify the yield response of soybean after application of foliar fungicides at beginning pod (R3) stage. Meta-analysis showed that the overall mean yield response when fungicide was used compared with not applying a fungicide was 2.7% (110 kg/ha). Moderator variables were also investigated and included fungicide group, growing season, planting date, and base yield, which all significantly influenced the yield response. There was also evidence that precipitation from the time of planting to the R3 growth stage influenced yield when fungicide was used (P = 0.059). Fungicides containing a premix of active ingredients from multiple groups (either two or three ingredients) increased the yield by 3.0% over not applying a fungicide. The highest and lowest yield responses were observed in 2005 and 2007, respectively. Better yield response to fungicides (a 3.0% increase) occurred when soybean crops were planted not later than 21 May and when total precipitation between planting and the R3 application date was above historic averages. Temperatures during the season did not influence the yield response. Yield response to fungicide was higher (a 4.7% increase) in average yield category (no spray control yield 2,878 to 3,758 kg/ha) and then gradually decreased with increasing base yield. Partial economic analyses indicated that use of foliar fungicides is less likely to be profitable when foliar diseases are absent or at low levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuba R Kandel
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, U.S.A
| | - Cathi Hunt
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, U.S.A
| | - Keith Ames
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A
| | - Nicholas Arneson
- Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A
| | - Carl A Bradley
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, Princeton, KY 42445, U.S.A
| | - Emmanuel Byamukama
- Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, U.S.A
| | - Adam Byrne
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A
| | - Martin I Chilvers
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A
| | - Loren J Giesler
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, U.S.A
| | - Jessica Halvorson
- Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, U.S.A
| | - David C Hooker
- Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
| | - Nathan M Kleczewski
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A
| | | | - Samuel Markell
- Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, U.S.A
| | - Bruce Potter
- University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, U.S.A
| | - Wayne Pedersen
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A
| | - Damon L Smith
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A
| | - Albert U Tenuta
- Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada
| | - Darcy E P Telenko
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A
| | - Kiersten A Wise
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, Princeton, KY 42445, U.S.A
| | - Daren S Mueller
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|