First Report of Grapevine redglobe virus (GRGV) in Grapevine in France

A Synoptic Review of Plant Disease Epidemics and Outbreaks Published in 2022

This scientometric study reviews the scientific literature and CABI distribution records published in 2022 to find evidence of major disease outbreaks and first reports of pathogens in new locations or on new hosts. This is the second time we have done this, and this study builds on our work documenting and analyzing reports from 2021. Pathogens with three or more articles identified in 2022 literature were Xylella fastidiosa, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Meloidogyne species complexes, 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus', Raffaelea lauricola, Fusarium oxysporum formae specialis, and Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Our review of CABI distribution records found 29 pathogens with confirmed first reports in 2022. Pathogens with four or more first reports were Meloidogyne species complexes, Pantoea ananatis, grapevine red globe virus, and Thekopsora minima. Analysis of the proportion of new distribution records from 2022 indicated that grapevine red globe virus, sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus, and 'Ca. Phytoplasma vitis' may have been actively spreading. As we saw last year, there was little overlap between the pathogens identified by reviewing scientific literature versus distribution records. We hypothesize that this lack of concordance is because of the unavoidable lag between first reports of the type reported in the CABI database of a pathogen in a new location and any subsequent major disease outbreaks being reported in the scientific literature, particularly because the latter depends on the journal policy on types of papers to be considered, whether the affected crop is major or minor, and whether the pathogen is of current scientific interest. Strikingly, too, there was also no overlap between species assessed to be actively spreading in this year's study and those identified last year. We hypothesize that this is because of inconsistencies in sampling coverage and effort over time and delays between the first arrival of a pathogen in a new location and its first report, particularly for certain classes of pathogens causing only minor or non-economically damaging symptoms, which may have been endemic for some time before being reported. In general, introduction of new pathogens and outbreaks of extant pathogens threaten food security and ecosystem services. Continued monitoring of these threats is essential to support phytosanitary measures intended to prevent pathogen introductions and management of threats within a country.

Multiple Infections with Viruses of the Family Tymoviridae in Czech Grapevines

This study focused on the viruses of the Tymoviridae family that infect grapevines in the Czech Republic. Complete sequences of GFkV (grapevine fleck virus) and GRGV (grapevine red globe virus) from the genus Maculavirus and GRVFV (grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus) and GSyV-1 (grapevine Syrah virus 1) from the genus Marafivirus were obtained using high-throughput sequencing of small RNAs and total RNAs. Mixed infections with these viruses were observed, as well as several variants of these viruses in the same plant. Phylogenetic analysis showed the position of the newly obtained virus isolates within the Tymoviridae family. Recombinant analysis provided evidence of single and multiple intraspecific recombinations in GRGV, GSyV-1, and GRVFV. Additionally, GAMaV, a grapevine virus from the genus Marafivirus, was reported for the first time in the Czech Republic.

First report of grapevine red globe virus (GRGV) and grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus (GRVFV) infecting grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in Portugal

Grapevine Red globe virus (GRGV) and grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus (GRVFV) are relatively recently described grape viruses that respectively belong to the genera Maculavirus and Marafivirus in the family Tymoviridae [1]. Owing to their rather recent description, still limited information on their biology, on their molecular variability and on their geographic distribution is available. Both viruses are apparently completely or largely asymptomatic in European grapevine and have likely been overlooked in a wide range of situations (Martelli, 2014). According to sequences in GenBank, GRGV has been identified in Asia (Iran, Japan, China), the Americas (USA, Brazil) and Europe (Spain, France, Slovenia, Hungary, Czech Republic and Germany). GRVFV has been reported from the same countries but also in Oceania (New Zealand, Australia) and from a range of other countries including India, Pakistan and South Korea for Asia, Canada for North America and Switzerland, Slovakia, Italy and Russia for Europe. Evidence for the presence of GRGV and GRVFV in grapevine plants from northern Portugal (variety(ies) unknown) was obtained through the bioinformatic analysis [2] of RNASeq Illumina data obtained from phloem scrapings from five grapevine samples collected in different plots in 2016 [3]. Following grapevine genome substraction, contigs assembly and Blast-based contigs annotation using CLC Genomics Workbench, two plants, #4 and #5b, yielded contigs representing near complete GRGV genomes. The plant #4 contig integrated 474 reads (0.15% of reads for an average coverage of 10.1x) while the corresponding values for the contig for plant #5b are 2185 reads (2.4% of total reads) for a coverage of 47.2x. The two GRGV contigs show 91.4% nucleotide (nt) identity and the closest GRGV full genome sequence in GenBank, MZ451067 from Canada, shares respectively 98.9% and 91.6% nt identity with them. The near complete genome contigs have been deposited in GenBank (ON603917 and ON603918). Simultaneously, two near full length genomic contigs for GRVFV were identified from plant #5b and have also been deposited in GenBank (ON603919 and ON603920). These contigs show 84.4% nt identity to each other and were respectively assembled from 4643 (5.2% of total reads) and 5326 reads (6.0% of total reads) for respective average coverages of 102.3x and 117.3x. The closest full GRVFV genome in GenBank is MZ027155 from the USA, with 84.3-85.3% nt identity. Confirmation of the presence of GRVG and GRVFV in the doubly infected plant #5b was achieved by specific RT-PCR assays. A published assay [4] was used for GRGV and primers GRVFV-Cp-F 5'AAYCCTGTCACHCTCCACTG3' and GRVFV-Cp-R 5'TTCATGGTGGTGCCDGTGAG3' (Tm 55°C) were used for GRVFV. The obtained 447nt GRGV amplicon showed a single difference with the HTS contig while the 218 nt GRVFV amplicon showed 3 mutations as compared to one of the HTS contigs. The different grapevines had initially been sampled because they showed relatively poor and stunted growth but besides GRVFV and/or GRGV the HTS analysis indicated that they were also infected by hop stunt viroid, grapevine yellow speckle viroid 1, grapevine rupestris stem pitting virus, plus respectively a novel nepovirus (plant #4) and grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 and grapevine Pinot gris virus (plant #5b) so that the results reported here do not shed novel light on the potential pathogenicity of GRGV or GRVFV. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of GRGV and GRVFV in Portugal.

Virome of Grapevine Germplasm from the Anapa Ampelographic Collection (Russia)

Grapevine germplasm collections are unique repositories of grape cultivars; therefore, it is necessary to minimize their infection with pathogens, including viruses, and develop various programs to maintain them in a virus-free state. In our study, we examined the virome of the largest Russian grapevine germplasm collection, the Anapa Ampelographic Collection, using high-throughput sequencing of total RNAs. As a result of bioinformatics analysis and validation of its results by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR), we identified 20 viruses and 3 viroids in 47 libraries. All samples were infected with 2 to 12 viruses and viroids, including those that cause economically significant diseases: leafroll, fleck, and rugose wood complex. For the first time in Russia, we detected Grapevine virus B (GVB), Grapevine virus F (GVF), Grapevine asteroid mosaic-associated virus (GAMaV), Grapevine Red Globe virus (GRGV), Grapevine satellite virus (GV-Sat), Grapevine virga-like virus (GVLV), Grapevine-associated jivivirus 1 (GaJV-1) and Vitis cryptic virus (VCV). A new putative representative of the genus Umbravirus with the provisional name Grapevine umbra-like virus (GULV) was also identified in Russian grape samples.

High-Throughput Sequencing and the Viromic Study of Grapevine Leaves: From the Detection of Grapevine-Infecting Viruses to the Description of a New Environmental Tymovirales Member

In the past decade, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) has had a major impact on virus diversity studies as well as on diagnosis, providing an unbiased and more comprehensive view of the virome of a wide range of organisms. Rather than the serological and molecular-based methods, with their more "reductionist" view focusing on one or a few known agents, HTS-based approaches are able to give a "holistic snapshot" of the complex phytobiome of a sample of interest. In grapevine for example, HTS is powerful enough to allow for the assembly of complete genomes of the various viral species or variants infecting a sample of known or novel virus species. In the present study, a total RNAseq-based approach was used to determine the full genome sequences of various grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) isolates and to analyze the eventual presence of other viral agents. From four RNAseq datasets, a few complete grapevine-infecting virus and viroid genomes were de-novo assembled: (a) three GFLV genomes, 11 grapevine rupestris stem-pitting associated virus (GRSPaV) and six viroids. In addition, a novel viral genome was detected in all four datasets, consisting of a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA molecule of 6033 nucleotides. This genome displays an organization similar to Tymoviridae family members in the Tymovirales order. Nonetheless, the new virus shows enough differences to be considered as a new species defining a new genus. Detection of this new agent in the original grapevines proved very erratic and was only consistent at the end of the growing season. This virus was never detected in the spring period, raising the possibility that it might not be a grapevine-infecting virus, but rather a virus infecting a grapevine-associated organism that may be transiently present on grapevine samples at some periods of the year. Indeed, the Tymoviridae family comprises isometric viruses infecting a wide range of hosts in different kingdoms (Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia). The present work highlights the fact that even though HTS technologies produce invaluable data for the description of the sanitary status of a plant, in-depth biological studies are necessary before assigning a new virus to a particular host in such metagenomic approaches.

Community-onset Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in Taiwan: clinical features of the disease and associated microbiological characteristics of isolates from pneumonia and nasopharynx

As virus diseases cannot be controlled by traditional plant protection methods, the risk of their spread have to be minimized on vegetatively propagated plants, such as grapevine. Metagenomic approaches used for virus diagnostics offer a unique opportunity to reveal the presence of all viral pathogens in the investigated plant, which is why their application can reduce the risk of using infected material for a new plantation. Here we used a special branch, deep sequencing of virus-derived small RNAs, of this high-throughput method for virus diagnostics, and determined viromes of vineyards in Hungary. With NGS of virus-derived small RNAs we could detect not only the viruses tested routinely, but also new ones, which had never been described in Hungary before. Virus presence did not correlate with the age of the plantation, moreover phylogenetic analysis of the identified virus isolates suggests that infections are mostly caused by the use of infected propagating material. Our results, validated by other molecular methods, raised further questions to be answered before this method can be introduced as a routine, reliable test for grapevine virus diagnostics.