Seasonal variation in long-day stimulation of prolactin secretion in ewes

Role of changes in plasma prolactin concentrations on ram and buck sperm cryoresistance

Seasonal endocrine changes may modify sperm cryoresistance in certain small ruminant species. The present work examines the effect of prolactin (PRL) on ram and buck sperm cryoresistance. A dopamine agonist (bromocriptine [BCR] 60 mg i.m. twice per week from May 15 to June 15, that is, approaching the summer solstice) or antagonist (sulpiride [SLP] 100 mg s.c. daily from December 15 to January 15, that is, around the winter solstice) was administered under solstice-appropriate photoperiod conditions to modify PRL secretion. Control animals received the vehicle only. Compared to the corresponding controls, BCR reduced PRL secretion to basal levels in both the rams and bucks. In rams, the cryoresistance ratios for sperm curvilinear velocity (P < 0.05) and lateral head displacement (P < 0.01) were higher for the BCR-treated animals. In bucks, neither the characteristics of fresh nor frozen-thawed sperm were affected by BCR treatment. After the administration of SLP, PRL levels increased and remained high for more than 5 h in the rams though they immediately began to fall in the bucks. By 24 h, PRL had returned to basal concentrations in both species. In rams treated with SLP, the cryoresistance ratios for sperm progressive motility, straight line velocity, sperm mean path velocity, cross beat frequency, and the progression ratios linearity, straightness and oscillation, were all lower compared to the controls (P < 0.05), while the amplitude of lateral head displacement was higher (P < 0.01). In bucks, sperm cryoresistance was not affected by SLP administration. Together, these results suggest that high levels of PRL negatively affect the cryoresistance of ram sperm, while buck sperm seems unaffected.

Discontinuity in the molecular neuroendocrine response to increasing daylengths in Ile-de-France ewes: Is transient Dio2 induction a key feature of circannual timing?

In mammals, melatonin is responsible for the synchronisation of seasonal cycles to the solar year. Melatonin is secreted by the pineal gland with a profile reflecting the duration of the night and acts via the pituitary pars tuberalis (PT), which in turn modulates hypothalamic thyroid hormone status via seasonal changes in the production of locally-acting thyrotrophin. Recently, we demonstrated that, in the Soay sheep, photoperiodic induction of Tshb expression and consequent downstream hypothalamic changes occur over a narrow range of photoperiods between 12 and 14 hours in duration. In the present study, we aimed to extend our molecular characterisation of this pathway, based on transcriptomic analysis of photoperiodic changes in the pituitary and hypothalamus of ovariectomised, oestradiol-implanted Ile-de-France ewes. We demonstrate that photoperiodic treatments applied before the winter solstice elicit two distinctive modes of accelerated reproductive switch off compared to ewes held on a simulated natural photoperiod, with shut-down occurring markedly faster on photoperiods of 13 hours or more than on photoperiods of 12 hours and less. This pattern of response was reflected in gene expression profiles of photoperiodically sensitive markers, both in the PT (Tshb, Fam150b, Vmo1, Ezh2 and Suv39H2) and in tanycytes (Tmem252 and Dct). Unexpectedly, the expression of Dio2 in tanycytes did not show any noticeable increase in expression with lengthening photoperiods. Finally, the expression of Kiss1, the key activator of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone release, was proportionately decreased by lengthening photoperiods, in a pattern that correlated strongly with gonadotrophin suppression. These data show that stepwise increases in photoperiod lead to graded molecular responses at the level of the PT, a progressive suppression of Kiss1 in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus and luteinising hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone release by the pituitary, despite apparently unchanged Dio2 expression in tanycytes. We hypothesise that this apparent discontinuity in the seasonal neuroendocrine response illustrates the transient nature of the thyroid hormone-mediated response to long days in the control of circannual timing.

Molecular characterization of the long-day response in the Soay sheep, a seasonal mammal

In mammals, seasonal timekeeping depends on the generation of a nocturnal melatonin signal that reflects nightlength/daylength. To understand the mechanisms by which the melatonin signal is decoded, we studied the photoperiodic control of prolactin secretion in Soay sheep, which is mediated via melatonin responsive cells in the pars tuberalis of the pituitary. We demonstrate that the phases of peak expression of the clock genes Cryptochrome1 (Cry1), Period1 (Per1), and RevErbalpha respond acutely to altered melatonin secretion after a switch from short to long days. Cry1 is activated by melatonin onset, forming the dusk component of the molecular decoder, while Per1 expression at dawn reflects the offset of melatonin secretion. The Cry1-Per1 interval immediately adjusts to the melatonin signal on the first long day, and this is followed within 24 hr by an increase in prolactin secretion. The timing of peak RevErbalpha expression also responds to a switch to long days due to altered melatonin secretion but does not immediately reset to an entrained long-day state. These data suggest that effects of melatonin on clock gene expression are pivotal events in the neuroendocrine response and that pars tuberalis cells can act as molecular calendars, carrying a form of "photoperiodic memory."

Seasonal variation in endogenous serum melatonin profiles in goats: a difference between spring and fall?

The pineal hormone melatonin serves as a signal of day length in the regulation of annual rhythms of physiological functions and behavior. The duration of high melatonin levels in body fluids is proportional to the duration of the dark period of the day. Due to the direct suppression of melatonin by light, the overt melatonin rhythm may differ from the endogenous rhythm driven by the hypothalamic circadian clock. The aim of this study was to find out possible differences between the overt and endogenous melatonin rhythms in goats during the course of a year. Seven Finnish landrace goats (nonlactating females) were kept under artificial lighting that approximately simulated the annual changes of day length at 60 degrees N. Blood samples for melatonin measurements by radioimmunoassay were collected at 2-h intervals during six seasons: winter (light:dark 6:18 h), early spring (10:14), late spring (14:10), summer (18:6), early fall (14:10), and late fall (10:14). Melatonin profiles were determined for 2 consecutive days, first in light-dark (LD) conditions and then in continuous darkness (DD). In LD conditions, the profiles matched the dark period with one exception: In winter, the mean peak duration was significantly shorter than the scotoperiod. In DD conditions, two types of endogenous melatonin patterns were found: a "winter pattern" (peak duration 13-15 h) in winter, early spring, early fall, and late fall, and a "summer pattern" (duration about 11 h) in late spring and summer. Thus, in equal habitual LD conditions in late spring and early fall (LD 14:10), the endogenous melatonin rhythms were not quite similar: The pattern in late spring resembled that in summer, and the pattern in early fall that in winter. These results suggest that, in addition to the light-adjusted overt melatonin rhythm, the endogenous rhythm of melatonin secretion varies during the course of a year.

Melatonin modulation of prolactin and gonadotrophin secretion. Systems ancient and modern

Recent studies in sheep indicate that the pineal melatonin signal which transduces effects of photoperiod acts at separate sites in the pituitary gland and brain to regulate seasonality in prolactin (PRL) and gonadotrophin secretion. The pituitary gland is the proposed site for control of PRL based on the observation that hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected (HPD) rams continue to show normal patterns of PRL secretion in response to changes in photoperiod or treatment with melatonin. Lactotrophs do not express melatonin receptors, thus this pituitary effect is assumed to be mediated by cells in the pars tuberalis via "tuberalin". The mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) is the putative target for gonadotrophin control since: i) gonadotrophin secretion is dependent on pulsatile GnRH secretion from the MBH, ii) local administration of melatonin in the MBH, but not in other areas of the brain and pituitary gland, readily reactivates GnRH-induced LH and FSH secretion in photo-inhibited rams; and iii) treatment of HPD rams with a chronic pulsatile infusion of GnRH stimulates gonadotrophin secretion irrespective of photoperiod. Complementary studies conducted by others in the Syrian hamster, have shown that lesions in the MBH block the action of melatonin on gonadotrophin but not on prolactin secretion; this supports the "dual-site hypothesis". Since all photoperiodic mammals are essentially similar in hyper-secreting PRL under long days, the pituitary control mechanism for PRL is regarded as conserved (ancient) with the pleiotrophic actions of PRL inducing a summer physiology (e.g. growth of summer pelage). In contrast, the variation between species in the timing of the gonadal cycle indicates that evolution has independently modified the melatonin-sensitive neural circuits in the MBH to permit the species-specific timing of the mating season.

Evidence for a seasonal variation in the ability of exogenous melatonin to suppress prolactin secretion in the mare

In seasonally breeding species photoperiodic information is thought to be conveyed to the reproductive and prolactin axis via changes in circulating concentrations of melatonin. For some species, a constant melatonin stimulus is perceived as a short day, whereas in others no photoperiodic information is provided. In the mare, a preliminary study demonstrated that constant administration of melatonin did not modify prolactin secretion, suggesting that this treatment regimen failed to provide photoperiodic information. To further investigate this proposal and to investigate an alternative explanation, namely a seasonal variation in response to melatonin, 4 experiments were performed. In experiments 1-3, the effects of constant administration of melatonin on prolactin secretion were investigated. In each study the time of treatment initiation varied beginning before the summer solstice, (May 9; Exp. 1), at the autumnal equinox (Sept. 21; Exp. 2) or the winter solstice (Dec. 21; Exp. 3). In Experiment 4, melatonin was administered as a timed daily injection (5 PM) for 6 months, beginning at the summer solstice (June 21). Constantly elevated physiological concentrations of melatonin (expts. 1-3) and an extended nighttime elevation of melatonin (exp. 4) suppressed prolactin concentrations only during the spring and early summer months (April-August). At other times during the year prolactin concentrations were similar to untreated mares. In the presence of a continuous melatonin implant the circannual rhythm of prolactin secretion was not disturbed. The results suggest that the prolactin axis of the mare is sensitive to an inhibitory melatonin signal during a restricted period of time and that at other times is refractory to this signal.

Effect of immunization against melatonin on prolactin concentrations and the timing of reproductive transitions in ewes

The objective of this experiment was to develop a procedure for immunizing ewes against melatonin that would alter the effects of changing photoperiod on seasonal reproduction and prolactin secretion. Ewes were immunized against human serum albumin (HSA) as controls (n = 9) or a melatonin-human serum albumin conjugate (0.25 mg; n = 10) on December 14th (Day 0) and boosted 9 times. They were maintained on natural photoperiod and then transferred indoors and exposed to long days for 35 d, followed by short days for 146 d, long days for 93 d, and short days for a further 123 d. Antibody titers to melatonin (at a serum dilution of 1:1,250) were significantly higher in immunized ewes (27.3 +/- 6.6%) than controls (0.7 +/- 0.1%; P < 0.001). At the end of the experiment, antibody titers in immunized ewes (at dilution of 1:50) were higher in blood (43.7 +/- 8.2%) than in cerebrospinal fluid (10.8 +/- 3.9%; P < 0.05), and highly correlated (r2 = 0.746). Onset of the breeding season was advanced slightly after the second transfer from long to short days in immunized ewes (April 12 +/- 3 d) compared with controls (April 25 +/- 3 d; P < 0.05). Mean serum prolactin concentrations were lower (P < 0.05) in melatonin-immunized ewes compared with controls on natural photoperiod, after transfer from long to short days, during long days, and after the second transfer from long to short days. In conclusion, despite melatonin-immunization increasing antibody titers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and decreasing prolactin concentrations over much of the experiment, minimal effects on the timing of reproductive transitions in the ewes were evident. This discrepancy between the response of the prolactin and reproductive axes to melatonin immunization supports the hypothesis of a dual site of action of melatonin, with melatonin acting in the pituitary gland to mediate the effects of photoperiod on prolactin secretion and in the mediobasal hypothalamus to affect reproductive responses.