A phase II trial of iproplatin (CHIP) in previously treated advanced breast cancer

Emerging platinum(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics: A new epoch for platinum-based cancer therapy

Owing to the unique DNA damaging cytotoxicity, platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy has long been the first-line choice for clinical oncology. Unfortunately, Pt drugs are restricted by the severe dose-dependent toxicity and drug resistance. Correspondingly, Pt(IV) prodrugs are developed with the aim to improve the antitumor performance of Pt drugs. However, as "free" molecules, Pt(IV) prodrugs are still subject to unsatisfactory in vivo destiny and antitumor efficacy. Recently, Pt(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics, inheriting both the merits of Pt(IV) prodrugs and nanotherapeutics, have emerged and demonstrated the promise to address the underexploited dilemma of Pt-based cancer therapy. Herein, we summarize the latest fronts of emerging Pt(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics. First, the basic outlines of Pt(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics are overviewed. Afterwards, how versatile Pt(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics overcome the multiple biological barriers of antitumor drug delivery is introduced in detail. Moreover, advanced combination therapies based on multimodal Pt(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics are discussed with special emphasis on the synergistic mechanisms. Finally, prospects and challenges of Pt(IV) prodrug nanotherapeutics for future clinical translation are spotlighted.

The Next Generation of Platinum Drugs: Targeted Pt(II) Agents, Nanoparticle Delivery, and Pt(IV) Prodrugs

The platinum drugs, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, prevail in the treatment of cancer, but new platinum agents have been very slow to enter the clinic. Recently, however, there has been a surge of activity, based on a great deal of mechanistic information, aimed at developing nonclassical platinum complexes that operate via mechanisms of action distinct from those of the approved drugs. The use of nanodelivery devices has also grown, and many different strategies have been explored to incorporate platinum warheads into nanomedicine constructs. In this Review, we discuss these efforts to create the next generation of platinum anticancer drugs. The introduction provides the reader with a brief overview of the use, development, and mechanism of action of the approved platinum drugs to provide the context in which more recent research has flourished. We then describe approaches that explore nonclassical platinum(II) complexes with trans geometry or with a monofunctional coordination mode, polynuclear platinum(II) compounds, platinum(IV) prodrugs, dual-threat agents, and photoactivatable platinum(IV) complexes. Nanoparticles designed to deliver platinum(IV) complexes will also be discussed, including carbon nanotubes, carbon nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, upconversion nanoparticles, and polymeric micelles. Additional nanoformulations, including supramolecular self-assembled structures, proteins, peptides, metal-organic frameworks, and coordination polymers, will then be described. Finally, the significant clinical progress made by nanoparticle formulations of platinum(II) agents will be reviewed. We anticipate that such a synthesis of disparate research efforts will not only help to generate new drug development ideas and strategies, but also will reflect our optimism that the next generation of approved platinum cancer drugs is about to arrive.

Platinum-based compounds for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

The role of platinum-based compounds (PBCs) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been extensively studied. As single agents, high response rates have been observed in first-line therapy, while results in pretreated patients were discouraging. Regimens containing cisplatin/carboplatin together with taxanes showed the highest efficacy and safety as both first-line and second-line therapy. When administered with vinorelbine, the combination was also active and well tolerated in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients. Combining PBCs with etoposide or nucleoside analogues showed moderate activity, yet high toxicity in the case of etoposide. The overall results for the combination with anthracyclines were disappointing. Addition of trastuzumab to PBC combinations showed remarkable activity and good tolerability in patients with HER2/neu overexpression. The use of cisplatin or carboplatin alongside novel targeted therapeutics for patients with triple-negative MBC seems promising and is being further evaluated. The use of PBCs against MBC requires careful patient selection and combination with the right chemotherapeutic agent.

The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials

Since its approval in 1979 cisplatin has become an important component in chemotherapy regimes for the treatment of ovarian, testicular, lung and bladder cancers, as well as lymphomas, myelomas and melanoma. Unfortunately its continued use is greatly limited by severe dose limiting side effects and intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. Over the last 30 years, 23 other platinum-based drugs have entered clinical trials with only two (carboplatin and oxaliplatin) of these gaining international marketing approval, and another three (nedaplatin, lobaplatin and heptaplatin) gaining approval in individual nations. During this time there have been more failures than successes with the development of 14 drugs being halted during clinical trials. Currently there are four drugs in the various phases of clinical trial (satraplatin, picoplatin, Lipoplatin and ProLindac). No new small molecule platinum drug has entered clinical trials since 1999 which is representative of a shift in focus away from drug design and towards drug delivery in the last decade. In this perspective article we update the status of platinum anticancer drugs currently approved for use, those undergoing clinical trials and those discontinued during clinical trials, and discuss the results in the context of where we believe the field will develop over the next decade.

Platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Interest in platinum compounds for the treatment of breast cancer has been reawakened because of preclinical studies indicating synergy of platinum salts with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in human breast cancer cell lines that overexpress HER2/neu. Cisplatin, carboplatin, and iproplatin are not very active as single agents in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The activity of oxaliplatin has not been adequately tested in refractory MBC. On the other hand, cisplatin is very active as first-line chemotherapy, with response rates (RR) of 50%; carboplatin appears to be moderately active in patients without prior chemotherapy (RR around 30%). The clinical effectiveness of the other platinum compounds (iproplatin, oxaliplatin, and others) has not yet been fully tested as first-line chemotherapy. Platinum compounds have been extensively tested in combination with other antitumoral agents. Cisplatin combinations have been employed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. These combinations are very active, although the precise contribution of cisplatin to the overall activity is not known. Combinations with cisplatin have been investigated, essentially, as salvage therapy for patients with previously treated MBC. The combinations of cisplatin with older pharmacological agents (5-fluorouracil, etoposide) have moderate activity, while the combinations of cisplatin with the newer agents (vinorelbine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine) appear to be more active. The combinations of carboplatin with the classical agents (5-fluorouracil, etoposide) are poorly active in previously treated MBC; however, the combination of carboplatin with the taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel) is more active. Of greatest interest is the synergy between the platinum derivatives and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab demonstrated in vitro in breast cancer cell lines overexpressing HER2/neu. Currently, several combinations of platinum compounds (either cisplatin or carboplatin) with docetaxel and trastuzumab are under clinical testing in patients with MBC who overexpress HER2/neu. The preliminary results are very promising, and these combinations will soon be tested in the adjuvant setting. Cisplatin, carboplatin, and perhaps, oxaliplatin appear to have some antitumor activity in MBC and can be combined safely with other agents that are active in this disease. However, the precise role that platinum compounds play in the treatment of breast cancer remains to be defined.

Randomized phase II trial of iproplatin and carboplatin in advanced breast cancer. The EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group and the EORTC Data Center

BACKGROUND

The observed activity of cisplatin in breast cancer and its unattractive toxicity profile in palliative treatment warranted further study of platinum analogues in this disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, 61 of whom had been previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to therapy with either iproplatin (n = 32) or carboplatin (n = 30). Both platinum analogues were administered intravenously, iproplatin at a dose of 240 mg/m2 every 4 weeks and carboplatin at a dose of 450 mg/m2 every 5 weeks.

RESULTS

Only two patients responded to iproplatin (7%) for durations of 21 and 61 weeks, and one patient responded to carboplatin (3%) for a duration of 64 weeks. All responses were complete. At the given dose schedules carboplatin was more myelosuppressive than iproplatin. Non-hematologic toxicities included nausea and vomiting (93% vs. 90%), diarrhea (20% vs. 10%) and hemorrhage (16% vs. 10%) for iproplatin and carboplatin, respectively. Two patients developed alopecia with carboplatin. No renal toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Both iproplatin and carboplatin have limited activity in previously treated women with advanced breast cancer when given in conventional dosages.