Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell cancer of the lung. Report of a clinical trial and review of the literature

Serum levels of KL-6 are useful biomarkers for severe radiation pneumonitis

The antigen KL-6, a mucin-like high-molecular-weight glycoprotein, is expressed on type-2 pneumocytes and bronchiolar epithelial cells. Serum levels of KL-6 have been shown to correlate well with the activities of several different kinds of interstitial pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of monitoring serum KL-6 levels in patients who had received thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). In particular, the usefulness of such a protocol for the early diagnosis of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) and the evaluation of its progress and severity was examined. Serum KL-6 levels were retrospectively monitored in 16 patients with lung cancer who had received TRT with or without chemotherapy. Eight of these patients had developed severe RP and eight had developed localized (within the irradiated field) RP. Serum KL-6 levels were measured using a modified sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In patients who developed severe RP, serum KL-6 levels showed a consistent tendency to increase after the clinical diagnosis of RP. In four patients, serum KL-6 levels even began to rise before a clinical diagnosis of severe RP had been made. In the patients with localized RP, on the other hand, the serum levels did not show any tendency to increase during or after TRT. Moreover, patients whose serum KL-6 levels rose more than 1.5 times higher than their pre-treatment serum KL-6 level, had a large chance of developing severe RP that was unresponsive to steroid hormones and resulted in death. Serum KL-6 levels, therefore, should be useful indicators for the early diagnosis of severe RP and for estimating its progress and severity in patients treated with TRT.

The evolution of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols for nonsmall cell lung cancer

Over the past 2 decades, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has played a significant role in clarifying the role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RTOG lung cancer research has evolved over this time period through a systematic succession of investigations. For unresectable NSCLC, the dependence of local tumor control and survival on total dose of standard fractionation RT, as well as pretreatment performance characteristics, was demonstrated in initial RTOG trials. Subsequently, further radiation dose intensification was tested using altered fractionation RT to total doses up to 32% higher than standard RT to 60 Gy, given as either hyperfractionation or accelerated fractionation, while attempting to retain acceptable normal tissue toxicity. These higher doses required rethinking of established RT techniques and limitations, as well as careful surveillance of acute and late toxicity. A survival advantage was shown for hyperfractionation to 69.6 Gy, in favorable performance patients, compared to 60 Gy. Further testing of high dose standard RT will use three-dimensional, conformal techniques to minimize toxicity. RTOG further extended the theme of treatment intensification for unresectable NSCLC by evaluating combined chemotherapy (CT) and RT. Improved local control and survival was shown for induction CT followed by standard RT to 60 Gy, compared to standard RT (60 Gy) and altered fractionation RT (69.6 Gy). The intent of current studies is to optimize dose and scheduling of combined CT and standard RT, as well as combined CT and altered fractionation RT. Noncytotoxic RT adjuvants, such as hypoxic cell sensitizers, nonspecific immune stimulants, and biologic response modifiers have also been studied. Resectable NSCLC has also been an RTOG focus, with studies of preoperative and postoperative RT, CT, and CT/RT, including the prognostic value of serum and tissue factors. RTOG studies have yielded incremental improvements in treatment outcome for NSCLC, better understanding of the disease dynamics, and a strong foundation for future investigations.

Concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of hyperfractionated radiation therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy have shown improved survival in patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiosensitization may improve local tumor control when chemotherapy is given concurrently with hyperfractionated radiation therapy, but also may increase toxicity. A Phase I/II trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15, was designed to evaluate whether this strategy could improve survival with acceptable toxicity and be part of a Phase III trial of chemoradiation sequencing.

METHODS

Vinblastine (5 mg/M2 weekly x 5 weeks) and cisplatin (75 mg/M2 days 1, 29, and 50) were given during twice-daily irradiation (1.2 Gy, 6 hours apart) to 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions in 6 weeks. Eligible patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II (unresected) or IIIA-B NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status 70 or greater; there were no weight loss restrictions.

RESULTS

Of 42 eligible patients, 76% had greater than 5% weight loss, 45% had T4 primary tumors, and 62% were Stage IIIB. All protocol treatment was completed in 53%. Acute toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 19 of 42 (45%) having Grade 4 toxicity or higher, three (7%) with septic death. Ten of 42 (24%) had Grade 3 or higher esophagitis. There were two (4.7%) patients with Grade 3 or higher (1 lung and 1 esophagus) and two (4.7%) with Grade 4 or higher (1 lung and 1 hematologic) late toxicities. Median survival time was 12.2 months, with an overall 1-year survival of 54%, an estimated 2 year survival of 28% and a 1-year progression free survival of 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer, who were not selected on the basis of weight loss, concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy had more intense acute toxicity than hyperfractionation alone, but late toxicity was acceptable. One and 2-year survival rates were 54 and 28%, respectively.

Concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review

Stage III or locally advanced non-metastatic, non-small cell lung cancers comprise about 40% of all NSCLC. A proportion of patients with Stage III NSCLC can be treated by induction RT/CT followed by surgery, but the majority, in particular all Stage IIIB, are not candidates for this approach. For these patients, RT alone is generally considered as the standard treatment. RT has a modest, but definitive curative potential, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survivals of about 40%, 20% and 5%, respectively, and median survival of 9-12 months. Combination CT-RT, depending on its type and rationale, is aimed at improving survival via a decrease of local or distant failure rates or both. Combined modality (CM) can be subdivided into 3 categories: sequential, concomitant and alternated regimes. Concomitant and alternated CT-RT have some common characteristics and rationale, the overall time playing a central role. This paper reviews studies of inoperable NSCLC treated with these CM, excluding sequential CT-RT trials, which would require a separate discussion. Numerous Phase I-II studies have been recently published on concomitant or alternated schemes and 33 of them are presented in this paper. Although it is hazardous to readily compare their results with those of RT-alone studies, several trials using platin-based combination chemotherapy, concurrently or alternated with RT, have shown impressive response rates and encouraging survivals, at a price of significant toxicity. Seven randomized trials comparing RT alone versus concomitant CT-RT are now available: the 3 non-cisplatin trials have failed to show any improvement in survival with CM, whereas among the 4 cisplatin trials, only one demonstrated a benefit with low-dose cisplatin added to RT. Implications for future clinical research will be discussed.

Alternated approach with local irradiation and combination chemotherapy including cisplatin or carboplatin plus epirubicin and etoposide in intermediate stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is disappointing; their median survival time does not exceed 8-12 months. Recently, some authors reported an increased response rate and sometimes a prolonged survival for patients with intrathoracic disease treated with local irradiation combined with cytotoxic drugs.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive patients with Stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled in a randomized Phase II trial of alternated treatment composed of four courses of combination chemotherapy and three cycles of local irradiation. Chemotherapy consisted of a randomly selected platinum compound (cisplatin [60 mg/m2] or carboplatin [300 mg/m2]) intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1, epirubicin (50 mg/m2) i.v. on Day 1, and etoposide (100 mg/m2) i.v. on Days 1-3. A course of radiotherapy consisted of 5 consecutive fractions (3 Gy per fraction, 1 fraction per day) for a total dosage of 15 Gy per course. Each course of chemotherapy was alternated every 2 weeks with a course of irradiation so that the entire treatment was performed in 13 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 53 were evaluable for response: 7 showed a complete clinical remission, and 25 reached a partial response, giving an overall response rate of 60% (95% confidence interval, 46%-74%). The tumors of four patients who showed a complete or partial response subsequently were surgically resected, and the complete disappearance of any residual tumor cells was documented histologically in two of them. No difference in response was observed between cisplatin- (16 of 26 [62%]) and carboplatin-treated patients (16 of 27 [59%]), and no correlation was found between response and either stage or histology. Patients enrolled in the carboplatin arm experienced less severe leukopenia and vomiting than did those in the cisplatin arm. Median freedom from progression and overall survival time were 28 and 39 weeks, respectively. Patients who responded had a significantly longer median duration of survival (49 weeks) as compared to non-responders (15 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

The alternated chemoradiotherapy treatment obtained a high response rate with substantial toxicity. This approach did not seem to improve the prognosis of patients significantly. In this setting, the administration of carboplatin instead of cisplatin appeared to be tolerated better by the patients.

Combined-modality therapies for non-small cell lung cancer

Regionally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for nearly 40% of all presentations of NSCLC. In the past, such patients received radiotherapy alone, but the median and long-term survival durations were disappointingly poor. Past attempts at combining chemotherapy and radiation were also disappointing, and were troubled by low doses of radiation or orthovoltage equipment or both. Recently, cisplatin-containing regimens have shown some efficacy in stage IV disease. The response rate for these combinations in stage III disease is nearly double that in stage IV disease. The greater response in stage III has led to a series of trials of sequenced chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment of regionally advanced (unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB) NSCLC. Several randomized trials have now shown a statistically significant advantage for the combined modality over radiation alone regarding time to treatment failure, median survival duration, and percent of long-term survivors. Other trials have focused on the concurrent use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Several pilot studies have suggested that concurrent cisplatin plus chest irradiation can produce apparently beneficial results with respect to local control and are the subject of ongoing clinical trials. At the University of Maryland Cancer Center, we have combined weekly carboplatin 100 mg/m2 with concurrent chest irradiation. The preliminary results are very encouraging. The toxicity of this treatment program is very manageable, and preliminary data suggest excellent local control and survival. Other pilot studies have suggested that combination chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy is also technically feasible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy

Between August 1985 and September 1989, 62 patients with medically inoperable or surgically unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer were treated with both external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate bronchial brachytherapy. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy (5000-6000 cGy in 5-6 1/2 weeks) and weekly high dose rate bronchial brachytherapy (three to five fractions, 500 cGy at 1 cm from the source) delivered either concurrently or sequentially. Median survival for all patients was 13 months (m). Stage I and Stage IIIA-B patients had median survivals of 20 m and 10 m, respectively. Patients without nodal disease (No) had a significantly longer median survival compared to patients with regional node metastases (N1-3), 17 m versus 9 m. A total of 54 patients were evaluable for local tumor control analysis. Local tumor control was achieved in six of eight patients who had a normal pre-treatment radiograph. Patients with measurable tumor on the pre-treatment radiograph and negative regional nodes had local tumor control in eight of twenty-two (36%) cases. In patients with regional lymphadenopathy, loco-regional tumor control was achieved in four of eight cases. Additionally, there were sixteen patients with non-measurable tumor due to associated effusion, atelectasis and/or infiltrate. Four of these (25%) were considered to have local tumor control. Of 60 evaluable patients, there were nine occurrences of fatal hemorrhage, one of whom was disease-free (NED) at autopsy. The remaining eight patients had either clinical or pathological evidence of recurrent or persistent tumor. Patients who had follow up bronchoscopies were found to have varying degrees of concentric narrowing in the treated areas. One such patient had total lung collapse with no evidence of tumor. While this form of treatment may yield high local control rates in earlier stages, this study suggests the potential risk of fatal complication. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate the use of this modality in the treatment of lung cancer.