DAE (daunorubicin, Ara-C, and etoposide) and intermediate dose Ara-C for remission induction and consolidation treatment of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Timed-sequential chemotherapy as induction and/or consolidation regimen for younger adults with acute myelogenous leukemia

Increasing the intensity of induction chemotherapy has generated considerable recent interest in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Achieving complete remission is a sine qua non condition for prolonged disease-free survival and may affect long-term outcome. In this setting, administering a repeat course of induction shortly after completion of the first course, known as timed-sequential chemotherapy (TSC), has been tested and may lead to an improved long-term outcome. Whether these results are due to the biologic recruitment of cell cycle-specific agents is unknown. However, this strategy to intensify induction may lead to more profound myelosuppression and to potential toxicities. Here we review the results of timed-sequential chemotherapy, used as induction regimen in de novo, relapsed or refractory AML or used as post-remission therapy, and compare them with those from other types of regimens.

Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens for patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens have been widely used in China for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. However, their efficacy has not been tested in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in a large population. We assessed the efficacy and safety of homoharringtonine-based induction treatment for management of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study was done in 17 institutions in China between September, 2007, and July, 2011. Untreated patients aged 14-59 years with acute myeloid leukaemia were randomly assigned (by a computer-generated allocation schedule without stratification) to receive one of three induction regimens in a 1:1:1 ratio: homoharringtonine 2 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, and aclarubicin 20 mg/day on days 1-7 (HAA); homoharringtonine 2 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7, and daunorubicin 40 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-3 (HAD); or daunorubicin 40-45 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-3 and cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-7 (DA). Patients in complete remission were offered two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m(2) every 12 h on days 1-3). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission after two cycles of induction treatment and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, number ChiCTR-TRC-06000054.

FINDINGS

We enrolled 620 patients, of whom 609 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 150 of 206 patients (73%) in the HAA group achieved complete remission versus 125 of 205 (61%) in the DA group (p=0.0108); 3-year event-free survival was 35.4% (95% CI 28.6-42.2) versus 23.1% (95% CI 17.4-29.3; p=0.0023). 133 of 198 patients (67%) in the HAD group had complete remission (vs DA, p=0·20) and 3-year event-free survival was 32.7% (95% CI 26.1-39.5; vs DA, p=0.08). Adverse events were much the same in all groups, except that more patients in the HAA (12 of 206 [5.8%]) and HAD (13 of 198 [6.6%]) groups died within 30 days than in the DA group (two of 205 [1%]; p=0.0067 vs HAA; p=0.0030 vs HAD).

INTERPRETATION

A regimen of homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin is a treatment option for young, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.

FUNDING

Chinese National High Tech Programme, Key Special Research Foundation of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, National Nature Science Foundation of China, National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project.

Homoharringtonine in combination with cytarabine and aclarubicin resulted in high complete remission rate after the first induction therapy in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of HAA regimen (homoharritonine 4 mg/m2/day, days 1-3; cytarabine 150 mg/m2/day, days 1-7; aclarubicin 12 mg/m2/day, days 1-7) as an induction therapy in the treatment of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 48 patients with newly diagnosed AML, aged 35 (14-57) years, were entered into this clinical study. The median follow-up was 26 months. Eighty-three percent of patients achieved complete remission (CR), and the first single course of induction HAA regimen resulted in CR rate of 79%. The CR rate of 100, 82 and 33% were achieved in patients with favorable, intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetics, respectively. For all patients who achieved CR, the median time from the initiation of the induction therapy to the evaluation of the remission status was 32 days. For all patients, the estimated 3 years overall survival (OS) rate was 53%, whereas for patients with M5, the estimated OS rate at 3 years was 75%. The toxicities associated with HAA regimen were acceptable, and the most common toxicity was infection. This study suggested that HAA regimen might be a well-tolerable, effective induction regimen in young adult patients with AML.

Timed-sequential chemotherapy with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for newly diagnosed de novo acute myelogenous leukemia

EMA, consisting of etoposide, mitoxantrone, and cytarabine, is a timed-sequential chemotherapy (TSC) regimen and an efficacious option for induction treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) have been shown to recruit leukemic blasts into cell cycle. We postulated the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to EMA (EMA-G) might enhance treatment efficacy. EMA-G consisted of mitoxantrone on days 1-3, cytarabine on days 1-3 and 8-10, etoposide on days 8-10, and G-CSF from day 4 until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/microl. In total, 28 patients were enrolled. All patients had newly diagnosed de novo AML. The median age was 42 years. Of the 27 patients with cytogenetic analysis, six had favorable karyotype, 18 intermediate karyotype, and three unfavorable karyotype. The median follow-up was 37.5 months. The median time for both ANC recovery and last platelet transfusion was 26 days. The toxicities associated with this regimen were no more than those expected with the standard chemotherapy. In all, 24 (86%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), three (11%) patients had no response, and one patient died within 24 h of induction therapy before response could be evaluated. Of the 24 patients who achieved CR, 22 received high-dose cytosine arabinoside and two received allogeneic bone marrow transplant as initial postremission therapy. For the whole cohort, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 67%. The median relapse-free survival was 30.5 months. We conclude that EMA-G regimen is a safe regimen and administration of G-CSF during and after induction treatment is not associated with prolongation of marrow aplasia or acceleration of leukemia relapse. It is efficacious for induction therapy for newly diagnosed de novo AML. A high CR rate can be achieved with only one course of this chemotherapy.