Antiemetic efficacy of two different single intravenous doses of dolasetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy

A review of dolasetron as management of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients

Objective. To systematically review the literature about the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, dosing, and adverse effects of dolasetron, and to define its role in the management of chemotherapy-and radiation-induced nausea and vomiting.

Data Synthesis. A MedLine search was conducted using 5-HT3-receptor antagonists, antiemetics, chemotherapy toxicity, dolasetron, emesis, nausea, and vomiting as search terms. Reference lists and bibliographies of pertinent articles were also identified and reviewed. Both preclinical and clinical literature were reviewed and analyzed.

Data Synthesis. Dolasetron is a serotonin type 3 (5-HT3)-receptor antagonist with potent antiemetic effects in the management of nausea and vomiting. Following administration, dolasetron is rapidly converted to hydrodolasetron, which is believed to be responsible for the drug's antiemetic activity. Results of multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this agent in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis, including that induced by cisplatin. As a single agent, dolasetron produces a complete response rate (RR) in 44% to 57% of patients treated with cisplatin (≥70 mg/m2) and in 59% to 80% of patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy. When combined with dexamethasone, the RRs are increased. Dolasetron is well tolerated, with headache (24%) and diarrhea (12%) the most commonly reported adverse effects. The efficacy and safety of dolasetron are comparable to those observed with other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists. According to four recently published clinical practice guidelines for use of antiemetics, dolasetron is an appropriate first-line option for the prevention of nausea and vomiting due to moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Further clinical trials will determine the optimal dose and the role of this highly effective antiemetic agent for other purposes, such as treatment of delayed emesis and emesis resulting from radiation therapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation.

Clinical practice guidelines on antiemetics in oncology

The tolerability of chemotherapy has been significantly improved by the advent of effective drugs and protocols for the amelioration of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Variables such as the timing of nausea and vomiting (acute, delayed or anticipatory) and the emetogenicity of the chemotherapy must be taken into account in developing guidelines for antiemetic prophylaxis and treatment. Although there are a number of 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonists available, the clinical differences between them are small. The use of drugs with a different mechanism of action, such as the recently introduced neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant, may be a useful adjunct to 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists or steroid prophylaxis. The addition of aprepitant to standard antiemetic regimens increases the proportion of complete responses to antiemetic therapy. For the use of highly emetogenic chemotherapy in oncology a combination of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone and aprepitant is recommended in the acute phase, and dexamethasone plus aprepitant during the subsequent days (many patients do not have their symptoms controlled by 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and steroid alone). In either case, lorazepam can be added as required. For moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, a regimen of 5-hydroxytryptamine, dexamethasone and aprepitant is recommended in the acute phase, followed by aprepitant alone in the delayed phase. Alternatively, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone can be used in the acute phase, followed by dexamethasone for prophylaxis in the delayed phase. For chemotherapy with a low emetogenicity, either dexamethasone, metoclopramide, prochlorperazine or triethyperazine alone is recommended. No prophylaxis is generally required during the delayed phase and indeed may not be necessary during the acute phase either.

5-HT3 receptor antagonists for prevention of late acute-onset emesis

OBJECTIVE

To review the currently available literature on the efficacy of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in the prevention of late acute-onset chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (12-24 h after cytotoxic treatment).

DATA SOURCES

Primary articles were identified by PubMed search (performed in March 2004) and through secondary sources. Search terms included granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron, dolasetron, acute, chemotherapy, nausea, and vomiting (a further search was performed for palonosetron in March 2004).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All studies that performed regular assessments (every 2-6 h) of antiemetic control over the first 24 hours with 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Current guidelines recommend the use of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists for the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting but do not differentiate between the available agents. However, there is variability in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents, and this has implications for dosing regimen, safety, efficacy, and potential drug-drug interactions. Cytotoxic agents vary in the time profile of their emetic effect; this must be considered when choosing an appropriate 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist. The optimal agent should be simple to administer and provide safe and effective antiemetic protection over the whole 24-hour period.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences between the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists have important consequences for their dosing and efficacy in the control of late acute-onset chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Tropisetron and dexamethasone administered twice daily for the prevention of acute emesis in patients treated with continuous infusion of Cisplatin-Doxorubicin and high-dose Ifosfamide over 48, 24, and 120 hours

The antiemetic effectiveness of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in combination with dexamethasone in patients receiving short-term infusion chemotherapy has been well demonstrated. Less information is available about the efficacy of the same antiemetic combination in patients treated with regimens of chemotherapy in which the drugs are delivered in continuous infusion of several hours. The purpose of this study was to report the effectiveness of a double administration of antiemetic drugs in patients treated with strong emesis-inducing drugs for several days. In this study, 19 male and 13 female patients with osteosarcoma, ages 9 to 45 years, treated with chemotherapy, received intravenous tropisetron 5 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg every 12 hours during the first two cycles of the preoperative treatment: cisplatin 120 mg/m2 over 48 hours followed by Adriamycin 75 mg/m2 delivered in 24 hours and continuous infusion of ifosfamide 15 g/m2 over 120 hours. The assessment of the antiemetic efficacy was performed three times every day: from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm, from 4:00 pm to 12:00 am, and from 12:00 am to 8:00 am. The patients were followed from the beginning of the treatment until 2 hours after its end, when they were discharged from hospital. Complete protection from emesis was obtained in 80% of the 256 days of treatment: 81% during the first cycle (cisplatin 120 mg/m2 in 48 hours followed by Adriamycin 75 mg/m2 delivered in 24 hours) and 79% during the second cycle (continuous infusion of ifosfamide 15 g/m2 in 120 hours). In both cycles, complete protection declined from the first to the last day of treatment (from 100% to 62% during the first cycle and from 100% to 63% during the second cycle). These results indicate that when chemotherapy is administered in a protracted infusion, higher doses of antiemetic agents are necessary to achieve acceptable antiemetic activity.

Comparative review of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Since their introduction, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have become the agents of choice in the prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and are generally superior to high-dose metoclopramide regimens. The availability of four different agents (ondansetron, granisetron, dolasetron, and tropisetron) within this class has prompted investigations into potential differences between the drugs, which appear to be few. More importantly, the results of recently conducted randomized comparative trials in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy have demonstrated similar efficacy. Although study designs and patient populations differed, seven large comparative trials in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy reported no significant differences in complete or complete plus major response rates among the agents. Similar results were generally reported in trials evaluating patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The safety and tolerability of these agents also appear to be similar. The most common adverse events include headache, gastrointestinal effects, lightheadedness, and sedation. All agents are available in both intravenous and oral dosage forms and may be administered as a single dose.

Guidelines for anti-emetic therapy: acute emesis

Anti-emetic therapy has become integral to the management of patients with cancer. Goals related to complete emesis control include providing treatment that reduces hospitalisation and time in the ambulatory setting, care that is convenient for the patient and therapy that enhances patients' quality of life. A panel of clinical, health economic and basic scientists with expertise in various oncology disciplines reviewed published literature to develop evidence-based consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Currently, serotonin receptor antagonists and corticosteroids are the two categories of anti-emetics that are most effective, have the fewest side-effects and are convenient to use. These agents are recommended in combination for highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens and as single agents or in combination for moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. When possible, these agents may be given orally in single doses; current evidence does not support dose escalation for either category of anti-emetics. In special situations, such as the use of high-dose chemotherapy combination regimens, the most emetogenic component of the regimen should dictate the choice of anti-emetic. Appropriate anti-emetic use described in these guidelines represents both good medical practice and a sensible economic approach to care.

A risk-benefit assessment of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in antineoplastic therapy-induced emesis

Insight into the pathophysiology of antineoplastic therapy-induced nausea and vomiting led to the development of the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists as the most potent class of antiemetic agents. Among those which have been investigated are ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron and dolasetron. A risk-benefit analysis of these drugs must not only account for the modest clinical differences in efficacy and tolerability, but also should include such issues as ease of use, route of administration, dosage considerations and patient preference. Pharmacokinetic and preclinical studies reveal distinctions among these antiemetics, but, overall, these distinctions do not translate in to clinically significant differences. In clinical trials, the most widely studied members of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are granisetron and ondansetron, which have been found to possess equivalent antiemetic efficacy. Dolasetron and tropisetron are also available, and some randomised trials have also documented their similar antiemetic activity, depending on the doses and schedules used. The equivalent efficacy of oral granisetron 2 mg versus intravenous ondansetron 32 mg has recently been demonstrated in prospective randomised clinical trials in patients receiving either highly emetogenic or moderately emetogenic antineoplastic therapy. The utilisation and efficacy of oral ondansetron and dolasetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic antineoplastic therapy has also been documented. This review offers a brief overview of the pharmacokinetic and preclinical research on the 5-HT3 antagonists, a review of the comparative clinical trials of the major members of this class and a summary risk-benefit assessment that considers clinical applicability and cost, as well as efficacy and safety.

Intravenous dolasetron mesilate in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing gynecological surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a range of doses of intravenous (i.v.) dolasetron mesilate, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial.

SETTING

Ten hospitals and/or surgical centers.

PATIENTS

281 women undergoing gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received one of four single, i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate (12.5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg) or placebo administered following cessation of anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were monitored for 24 hours following study drug administration. The antiemetic efficacy of each dolasetron mesilate dose was evaluated by recording the number and timing of emetic episodes, and the effects on nausea were assessed by use of visual analog scales (VAS). Safety was assessed by adverse event reports, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements, and monitoring vital signs. Complete responses (patients with no emetic episodes and no escape antiemetic medication requirements in 24 hours) were achieved by 54% in the 12.5-mg, 67% in the 25-mg, and 59% in both the 50-mg and 100-mg dolasetron mesilate dose groups, and by 43% in the placebo group. Nausea VAS assessments demonstrated that dolasetron-treated patients were significantly (p = 0.048) more likely to report no nausea (VAS score < 5 mm) than those in the placebo group. Adverse events reported generally were mild in intensity, and there were no clinically significant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs, or ECG parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Dolasetron was effective and well tolerated for the prevention of PONV in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery with general anesthesia.

Intravenous dolasetron mesilate ameliorates postoperative nausea and vomiting

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolasetron mesilate with placebo for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

METHODS

In a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study 337 adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia received one of four single, doses of dolasetron mesilate iv (12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg) or placebo. Study medication was administered postoperatively when the patient reported nausea lasting 10 min or when one emetic episode occurred within two hours of the patient's arrival in the recovery room. Efficacy was assessed by the investigators over the 24-hr study period by recording the number and timing of emetic episodes, the severity of nausea, the timing of administration of escape antiemetic medications, and patients' and investigators' satisfaction with antiemetic therapy.

RESULTS

The study sample was predominately women, and the surgical procedures were primarily gynaecological. All dolasetron mesilate doses produced higher complete response rates than placebo (P < 0.05). Only approximately one-third of dolasetron patients required escape antiemetic medication compared with more than 50% of patients in the placebo group. Both patient and physician satisfaction with dolasetron treatment was high. The most common adverse event was mild or moderate headache for both placebo-treated patients and dolasetron-treated patients. Clinical laboratory results were unremarkable.

CONCLUSION

Single doses of dolasetron mesilate iv, given after the first episode of PONV, were both effective and safe in this adult patient population.

A double-blind, multicentre comparison of intravenous dolasetron mesilate and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy

The potent serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonists are new highly selective agents for the prevention and control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting that have been shown to be comparable to or more effective than traditional metoclopramide regimens. This study was designed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron and metoclopramide in chemotherapy-naive and non-naive cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of single i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate salt (1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (7 mg/kg) in 226 patients for the prevention of acute emesis and nausea associated with the administration of high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 24 h. Complete responses were achieved by 57%, 48%, and 35% of patients given dolasetron mesilate 1.8 mg/kg (P = 0.0009 vs metoclopramide), dolasetron mesilate 1.2 mg/kg (P = 0.0058 vs metoclopramide), and metoclopramide, respectively. Overall, dolasetron was significantly more effective than metoclopramide for time to first emetic episode, nausea, patient satisfaction, and investigator global assessment of efficacy. Males, chemotherapy-naive patients, and alcoholics had higher response rates. Dolasetron was well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate headache most commonly reported. Twelve percent of patients receiving metoclopramide reported extrapyramidal symptoms compared with 0% of patients receiving dolasetron. In conclusion, dolasetron mesilate was effective for the prevention of CINV with high-dose cisplatin. Single i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate were more effective than 7 mg/kg metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In addition, 1.8 mg/kg dolasetron mesilate consistently produced the highest response rates and appears to be the most effective dose for further clinical development.

Therapeutic equivalence of single oral doses of dolasetron mesilate and multiple doses of ondansetron for the prevention of emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. European Dolasetron Comparative Study Group

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to compare the anti-emetic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of dolasetron mesilate with that of the approved oral, multiple-dose regimen of ondansetron in 399 cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Single oral doses of 25, 50, 100 or 200 mg of dolasetron mesilate were administered 1 h prior to the initiation of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Multiple doses of ondansetron (8 mg x 3 or 8 mg x 4) capsules, or matching placebo for patients randomised to dolasetron, were given 1.5 h before and 6.5, 14.5 and 22.5 h after the start of chemotherapy (total dose = 32 mg). Efficacy was evaluated for 24 h after the initiation of chemotherapy. The most frequently used moderately emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents included cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and carboplatin (28.4, 23.1 and 20.6% of patients, respectively). A statistically significant (P < 0.001) linear dose-response relationship was observed over the entire dolasetron dosage range for all efficacy parameters. Complete response rates were 45.0, 49.4, 60.5 and 76.3% for 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg dolasetron mesilate, respectively, and 72.3% of ondansetron patients. A single oral 200 mg dolasetron mesilate dose was therapeutically equivalent to ondansetron for all efficacy parameters and patient satisfaction was high. Overall, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between any of the dolasetron mesilate doses, or between dolasetron and ondansetron. Headache was most frequently reported (approximately 15% for each drug). No clinically important changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory parameters were observed with either drug. In conclusion, a single oral 200 mg dolasetron mesilate dose was therapeutically equivalent to multiple-dose ondansetron in the prevention of emesis and nausea following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.