An early phase II study of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer

Patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters for drug testing in cancer therapy

Several patient-derived tumor models emerged recently as robust preclinical drug-testing platforms. However, their potential to guide clinical therapy remained unclear. Here, we report a model called patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTCs). PTCs result from the self-assembly and proliferation of primary epithelial, fibroblast, and immune cells, which structurally and functionally recapitulate original tumors. PTCs enabled us to accomplish personalized drug testing within 2 weeks after obtaining the tumor samples. The defined culture conditions and drug concentrations in the PTC model facilitate its clinical application in precision oncology. PTC tests of 59 patients with gastric, colorectal, or breast cancers revealed an overall accuracy of 93% in predicting their clinical outcomes. We implemented PTC to guide chemotherapy selection for a patient with mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma who experienced recurrence with metastases after conventional therapy. After three cycles of a nonconventional therapy identified by the PTC, the patient showed a positive response. These findings need to be validated in larger clinical trials, but they suggest that the PTC model could be prospectively implemented in clinical decision-making for therapy selection.

Phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel followed by bevacizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion

Objectives Vascular endothelial growth factor plays an important role in the pathogenesis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). We previously showed the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) plus carboplatin (CBDCA)/paclitaxel (PTX) in the treatment of non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) with MPE. However, the toxicities were a little severe, and the efficacy was not satisfied sufficiently. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study for NSCLC with MPE to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bev plus CBDCA/nab-PTX, which is a new combination therapy. Methods Chemotherapy-naive non-squamous (SQ) NSCLC patients with MPE participated in the study. A single aspiration (not allowing chest tube drainage) was allowed before chemotherapy. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of Bev (15 mg/kg, day1) plus CBDCA (AUC 6, day1)/nab-PTX (100 mg/m², day1, 8) every 3 weeks followed by Bev (15 mg/kg, day1) plus nab-PTX (100 mg/m², day1, 8) every 3 weeks without disease progression or unacceptable severe toxicities. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results The study enrollment was ceased because of suspension of the registration period (as scheduled) after 12 of 20 planned patients were treated successfully between March 2014 and February 2018. The ORR was 58.3 % (95 % CI, 27.7-84.8 %), and the disease control rate was 100 % (95 % CI, 73.5-100 %). Eight patients received maintenance therapy. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 14.4 and 26.9 months, respectively. Most patients experienced hematological toxicities, including ≥ grade 3 neutropenia and anemia; none experienced severe bleeding events and grade 5 toxicities. Conclusion The combination of Bev plus CBDCA/nab-PTX, a novel combination, might have efficacy with acceptable toxicities in chemotherapy-naïve non-SQ NSCLC patients with MPE.Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (No. UMIN000013329) registered on 4th March 2014.

A Therapeutic Strategy for Chemotherapy-Resistant Gastric Cancer via Destabilization of Both β-Catenin and RAS

Treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients with current standard chemotherapeutic agents frequently results in resistance, leading to poor overall survival. However, there has been no success in developing strategies to overcome it. We showed the expression levels of both β-catenin and RAS were significantly increased and correlated in tissues of 756 gastric cancer (GC) patients and tissues of primary- and acquired-resistance patient-derived xenograft tumors treated with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin modulated with leucovorin (FOLFOX). On the basis of our previous studies, where small molecules to suppress colorectal cancer (CRC) via degrading both β-catenin and RAS were developed, we tested the effectiveness of KYA1797K, a representative compound functioning by binding axin, in the growth of GC cells. The efficacy test of the drugs using gastric tumor organoids of Apc^1638N mice showed that the CD44 and ALDH1A3 cancer stem cell markers were induced by FOLFOX, but not by KYA1797K. KYA1797K also efficiently suppressed tumors generated by re-engrafting the FOLFOX-resistant patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors, which also showed resistance to paclitaxel. Overall, the small-molecule approach degrading both β-catenin and RAS has potential as a therapeutic strategy for treating GC patients resistant to current standard chemotherapies.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease: experience from Singapore and Japan

Among advanced gastric cancer cases, peritoneal dissemination is a life-threatening mode of metastasis, and any strategy to control peritoneal metastasis will significantly improve treatment outcomes. Since intraperitoneal administration of anticancer drugs can induce an extremely high concentration of drugs in the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal chemotherapy would appear to be a reasonable and promising strategy to control the peritoneal dissemination. However, it has been reported in the past that intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C or cisplatin resulted in no significant clinical effects against peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. In contrast, intraperitoneal paclitaxel is expected to remain inside the peritoneal cavity due to its large molecular weight and fat solubility, leading to a high concentration of the drug in the peritoneal cavity. In fact, promising results in several phase II clinical trials using intraperitoneal paclitaxel have been reported, including a median survival time of 16.2-24.6 months and a 1-year overall survival rate of 69-78 %. Thereafter, a phase III randomized control study (PHOENIX-GC trial) with intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic S-1 and intravenous paclitaxel in comparison to systemic S-1 plus cisplatin was conducted in Japan. Moreover, a phase II clinical trial of combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel with systemic capecitabine plus oxaliplatin is currently ongoing in Singapore. In this review, based on clinical experience from Singapore and Japan, the clinical significance of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease is discussed.

Silencing A7-nAChR levels increases the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to ixabepilone treatment

Gastric cancer is an important health issue worldwide. Currently, improving the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy drugs is an important goal of cancer research. Alpha-7 nicotine acetylcholine receptor (A7-nAChR) is the key molecule that mediates gastric cancer progression, metastasis, and therapy responses; however, the role of A7-nAChR in the therapeutic efficacy of ixabepilone remains unclear. A7-nAChR expression was silenced by small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology. The cytotoxicity of ixabepilone was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and ixabepilone-induced apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry and annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) apoptotic assay. The expression patterns of anti-apoptotic proteins (AKT, phospho-AKT, Mcl-1, and Bcl-2) and pro-apoptotic proteins (Bad and Bax) were determined by western blot. Our study found that A7-nAChR knockdown (A7-nAChR-KD) AGS cells were more sensitive to ixabepilone administration than scrambled control AGS cells. We found that A7-nAChR knockdown enhanced ixabepilone-induced cell death as evidenced by the increased number of annexin V-positive (apoptotic) cells. After scrambled control and A7-nAChR-KD cells were treated with ixabepilone, we found that pAKT and AKT levels were significantly reduced in both groups of cells. The levels of Bcl-2 and the anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 isoform increased dramatically after ixabepilone treatment in scrambled control cells but not in A7-nAChR-KD cells. Bad and Bax levels did not change between the treatment group and vehicle group in both A7-nAChR-KD and scrambled control cells, whereas cleaved PARP levels dramatically increased in ixabepilone-treated A7-nAChR-KD cells. Our results demonstrated that knockdown of A7-nAChR enhanced the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to ixabepilone administration. Thus, the A7-nAChR expression level in patients with gastric cancer may be a good indicator of ixabepilone sensitivity.

Survival prolongation after treatment failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology group trials JCOG9205 and JCOG9912

BACKGROUND

Two randomized phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (JCOG9205 and JCOG9912) conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group used 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (5-FUci) as the control arm. New active agents (e.g., S-1, irinotecan, and taxanes) were introduced as second-line chemotherapy in the late 1990s after JCOG9205. This combined analysis evaluated whether patients in the 5-FUci arm of JCOG9912 exhibited better survival after adjusting for baseline factors and also investigated the cause of survival prolongation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The subjects were patients assigned to the 5-FUci arms who met the eligibility criteria of both JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival after treatment failure in the first-line chemotherapy (OS-TTF) were compared after adjusting baseline characteristics using the Cox proportional hazard model. Second-line chemotherapy details were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The combined analysis included 89 and 230 patients in JCOG9205 and JCOG9912, respectively. After adjusting baseline characteristics, TTF was similar between groups (HR 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.73-1.26). However, both OS (HR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.99) and OS-TTF (HR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.57-1.01) were longer in JCOG9912. More patients in JCOG9912 received second-line chemotherapy (83 vs. 52 %) with new drugs (77 vs. 10 %) than in JCOG9205. OS-TTF was substantially prolonged in patients who received second-line chemotherapy (HR, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.46-0.95).

CONCLUSION

OS and OS-TTF were longer in JCOG9912 than JCOG9205. Second-line chemotherapy with new drugs is a potential reason for the observed prolongation of survival.

The efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel plus S-1 compared with paclitaxel plus 5-FU for advanced gastric cancer: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still a matter of debate. The chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 has been used to treat AGC or metastatic gastric cancer.We conducted a meta-analysis to compare oral S-1 and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to determine which agent was more efficacious and less toxic in combination with PTX. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, EmBase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PTX plus S-1 and PTX plus 5-FU in patients with AGC.Three RCTs were eligible and 352 patients were analyzed. PTX plus S-1 increased the disease control rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.30, P = 0.04) and reduced the progressive disease rate (RR = 0.62, 95% CI] = 0.39-0.98, P = 0.04) compared with PTX plus 5-FU. There was a significant decrease in nausea (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.82, P = 0.001) and vomiting (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.33-0.91, P = 0.02) in patients treated with PTX plus S-1.PTX plus S-1 was associated with almost equivalent safety and a lower progressive disease rate compared with PTX plus 5-FU. PTX plus S-1 is a good alternative strategy for patients who cannot tolerate a continuous intravenous infusion.

Comparative study of the antitumor activity of Nab-paclitaxel and intraperitoneal solvent-based paclitaxel regarding peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy with paclitaxel (PTX) has been shown to be a promising treatment strategy for peritoneal metastasis. The present study focused on the comparative evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticle albumin-bound PTX (Nab-PTX) and i.p. administration of the conventional solvent-based PTX (Sb-PTX). We also investigated the difference in antitumor activity depending on the route of administration in the Nab-PTX treatment. Nab-PTX was administered i.p. or intravenously (i.v.) and Sb-PTX was administered i.p. at equitoxic and equal doses to nude mice bearing gastric cancer OCUM-2MD3 cell subcutaneous and peritoneal xenografts. Therapeutic efficacy of Sb-PTX and Nab-PTX was evaluated as inhibition of tumor growth using a peritoneal metastatic model with subcutaneous xenografts. The survival rate was also investigated using mouse peritoneal models. For assessment of subcutaneous tumors, the change in tumor volume was measured, and for assessment of peritoneal tumors, the weight of ascitic fluid and the total peritoneal tumor burden were measured for each individual mouse. At equitoxic doses, treatment with Nab-PTX resulted in a greater reduction in the size of subcutaneous tumors and the weight of ascites and peritoneal burden as compared with i.p. Sb-PTX (p<0.05). Treatment with i.p. and i.v. Nab-PTX also achieved greater survival benefit than i.p. Sb-PTX (p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the degree of tumor reduction and the survival time between both drugs at equal doses. With regard to the route of administration, the antitumor efficacy of Nab-PTX after i.v. administration was equivalent to the efficacy after i.p. administration. These results suggest that i.v. Nab-PTX may be another encouraging treatment option that can target peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer.

The use of lentinan for treating gastric cancer

Natural compounds containing fungal β-glucans have been used to improve general health for thousands of years in China and Japan. Lentinan, the backbone of β-(1, 3)-glucan with β-(1, 6) branches, is one of the active ingredients purified from Shiitake mushrooms and has been approved as a biological response modifier for the treatment of gastric cancer in Japan. Despite recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents, unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer remains an incurable disease, with survival rates being far from satisfactory. Recent clinical studies have shown that chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan prolongs the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer, as compared to chemotherapy alone. In addition, trastuzumab, an antibody against HER2/neu growth factor receptor, has been used for the treatment of gastric cancer in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Lentinan may exert a synergistic action with anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies to activate complement systems through the mechanism of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement dependent cytotoxicity. Because a better understanding of its biological activities should enable us to use lentinan more efficiently in the treatment of gastric cancer, immunological effects provided by β-glucans, a possible mode of action of lentinan, and its clinical application including future potential uses are discussed in the present review.

Randomized phase II study comparing paclitaxel with S-1 vs. S-1 as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This randomized phase II study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel with S-1 (PS) vs. S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Eighty-two (82) patients were 1:1 randomly assigned to oral S-1 (daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks' cycle) or S-1 (daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks' cycle) plus paclitaxel (on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 4 weeks' cycle). S-1 was orally administered with a fixed quantity according to body surface area (BSA), while paclitaxel was given 60 mg/m(2) i.v. daily through an implanted catheter. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall responsible rates and safety.

RESULTS

The median OS with PS versus S-1 monotherapy was 14.0 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.02), survival at 12 months was 61.0 % in the PS group and 46.3 % in the S-1 group. Median PFS was also significantly longer in the PS group (6.0 months) than in the S-1 group (4.0 months). The overall response rate was determined in 82 evaluable patients, and was significantly higher (P = 0.04) with PS (19 patients, 46.3 %) than with S-1 monotherapy (10 patients, 24.4 %). PS was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths, all were grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities, including anorexia, nausea, and diarrhea developed in less than 10 % of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel with S-1 is well tolerated and active in AGC patients. Further investigation with comparative trials is needed for confirmation.

Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Only partial cross-resistance between docetaxel and paclitaxel has been demonstrated in breast and ovarian cancers. Whether weekly paclitaxel is effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy remains unclear, and we aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in such patients.

METHODS

Patients who had received docetaxel-based regimens were assigned to the prior-docetaxel group, and those who had never received docetaxel were designated as the non-docetaxel group. Paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) was administered by intravenous infusion in all patients, and this was repeated weekly for 3 weeks out of 4.

RESULTS

Between April 2006 and June 2011, 65 patients were studied: 26 in the prior-docetaxel group and 39 patients were non-docetaxel group. The median age, gender, performance status, histological type, history of gastrectomy, and the locations and numbers of metastatic sites did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the prior-docetaxel group, the response rate (RR) was 14.2% (3/21) among patients with measurable lesions, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 79 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 47-135 days], and overall survival (OS) was 123 days (95% CI, 90-215 days) from the initiation of paclitaxel treatment. In the non-docetaxel group, the RR was 11.5% (3/26) among patients with measurable lesions, PFS was 82 days (95% CI, 52-106 days), and OS was 143 days (95% CI, 121-178 days). The efficacy of weekly paclitaxel thus appeared to be similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel was modestly active in patients with gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Phase II multi-institutional prospective randomised trial comparing S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer

Background:

A combination of S-1 and cisplatin has been shown to be effective with acceptable safety for the first-line treatment of far-advanced gastric cancer in Japan. This is the first randomised phase II trial to compare S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in this setting.

Methods:

Patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of the two regimens: S-1 (40 mg m⁻² twice daily) on days 1–14 plus paclitaxel (60 mg m⁻²) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (S-1+paclitaxel) or S-1 (40 mg m⁻² twice daily) on days 1–21 plus cisplatin (60 mg m⁻²) on day 8 of a 5-week cycle (S-1+cisplatin). The primary end point was the response rate (RR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results:

A total of 83 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses. In the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups, RRs (52.3% vs 48.7% P=0.74) and median PFS (9 vs 6 months; P=0.50) were similar. The median OS was similar in the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups (16 vs 17 months; P=0.84). The incidence of grade 3 or higher haematological toxicity was 19.0% with S-1+paclitaxel and 19.5% with S-1+cisplatin. The incidence of grade 3 or higher non-haematological toxicity was 14.2% with S-1+paclitaxel and 17.1% with S-1+cisplatin.

Conclusion:

S-1+paclitaxel was suggested to be a feasible and effective non-platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Our results should be confirmed in multicenter, phase III-controlled clinical trials.

First-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for patients with severe peritoneal disseminated gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment with an oral fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin is widely used for advanced gastric cancer, but patients with severe peritoneal metastasis often cannot tolerate such treatment, due to inadequate oral intake or massive ascites. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of systemic chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

The cases of 92 patients with advanced gastric cancer and severe peritoneal metastasis who received first-line chemotherapy at our hospital between May 2001 and February 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. Severe peritoneal metastasis was defined as massive ascites or inadequate oral intake due to peritoneal dissemination. Inadequate oral intake was defined as having required an intravenous drip infusion.

RESULTS

All 92 patients received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy; 40 of the patients had massive ascites, 34 had inadequate oral intake, and the remaining 18 had both conditions. Among the 86 patients having assessable ascites, 23 (27%) patients showed an improvement in ascites. Of the 52 patients with inadequate oral intake, 17 (33%) patients improved to the point of ingesting without intravenous drip infusion after receiving the chemotherapy. Median time to treatment failure and overall survival time were 1.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.5 months] and 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9-5.3 months), respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events were anorexia (26%), neutropenia (26%), and anemia (22%).

CONCLUSION

The treatment regimen of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis was feasible, but its efficacy was not sufficient.

Lentinan prolonged survival in patients with gastric cancer receiving S-1-based chemotherapy

AIM: To examine whether administration of lentinan, purified β-1, 3-glucan, can prolong survival in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving S-1-based chemotherapy.

METHODS: Since 2004, 78 patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer have received S-1-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Survival, side effects, and the ratio of granulocytes/lymphocytes (G/L ratio) were compared between 2 groups of patients who received chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan and chemotherapy alone.

RESULTS: Median overall survival was significantly longer in the former group than in the latter group [689 d (95% CI: 431-2339 d) vs 565 d (95% CI: 323-662 d), P = 0.0406]. In addition, the G/L ratio in patients who received lentinan was maintained around or below 2, which was significantly lower than that in patients who received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Chemo-immunotherapy with lentinan offers a significant advantage over S-1-based chemotherapy alone in terms of survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Analysis of Beta-Tubulin Gene Exon 4 Mutations in Advanced Stage III or IV Gastric Cancer

The mechanisms that cause chemoresistance of gastric cancer have yet to be elucidated. Taxanes and promising agents that were recently approved for treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Mutations of beta-tubulin, which is a target of taxianes, have been shown to confer chemoresistance against these agents. The aim of the present study is to investigate the presence of mutations of the beta-tubulin in gastric cancer tissues. Sixty-six patients with advanced stage III or IV gastric cancer patients enrolled in this study. Paired samples of gastric cancer tissue and normal mucosa were obtained by endoscopy. The guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP)-binding site in exon 4 of the beta-tubulin gene was examined by polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis, followed by sequencing of the products with abnormally shifted bands. SSCP analysis showed abnormal bands upstream of the GTP-binding site in 7 of the 66 patients, but sequence analysis found no nucleotide substitutions in these patients. Three variant bands were also detected down stream of the the GTP-binding site, but the sequences of the 3 products corresponded to those of two independent pseudogenes. Thus, none of the tumor samples showed mutation of the beta-tubulin exon 4 GTP-binding site. In conclusion, these findings suggest that mutations of the beta-tubulin gene are rare and are unlikely to be an important cause of taxane resistance to taxians.

Intraperitoneal infusion of paclitaxel with S-1 for peritoneal metastasis of advanced gastric cancer: phase I study

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal administration of taxanes revealed excellent anti-tumor effect for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer in some experimental models. The aim of this study is to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose (RD) of intraperitoneally infused paclitaxel (PTX) with S-1 as a phase I study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with advanced gastric cancer in addition to confirmed peritoneal metastasis using laparoscopy were enrolled in this study. The regimen consists of oral administration of S-1 (Dose 80 mg: BSA<1.25 m(2), 100 mg: 1.25<BSA<1.5 m(2), 120 mg: BSA>1.5 m(2)) for 14 days and intraperitoneal infusion of PTX (Dose escalation: level I: 40, II: 60, III: 80, level IV: 90, V: 100 mg/m(2)) at day 1 and 14. PTX concentrations in serum and ascites were determined at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours after the infusion, which was repeated twice every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The number of patients were as follows: Level I: 3, Level II: 6, Level III: 3, Level IV: 3, Level V: 3. Grade 3 leukocytopenia was confirmed in 1 (Level II) and 2 (Level V). MTD is 90 mg/m(2), RD is 80 mg/m(2) and DLT is Grade 3 leukocytopenia. The average serum PTX concentrations remained in optimal range except for all 3 of level V patients. In all cohorts, the PTX concentrations in the ascites were approximately 1000 folds higher than those in serum for 48 hours after the infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

MTD and RD were PTX 90 mg/m(2), 80 mg/m(2), respectively. These findings were supported by pharmocokinetics of PTX.

Assessing clinical benefit response in the treatment of gastric malignant ascites with non-measurable lesions: a multicenter phase II trial of paclitaxel for malignant ascites secondary to advanced/recurrent gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel has shown promise against advanced gastric cancer and associated malignant ascites with non-measurable lesions. In order to evaluate the therapeutic effect of paclitaxel against malignant gastric ascites, a prospective phase II clinical trial was designed according to our previously proposed criteria represented by the clinical benefit response in gastric cancer (CBR-GC) criteria and the five-point method (5PM).

METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric cancer with malignant ascites were treated with 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusions of 80 mg/m² of paclitaxel weekly over a 3-week cycle on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by 1 week of rest. Therapeutic responses were measured according to the CBR-GC criteria and the 5PM.

RESULTS

The CBR-GC criteria showed improved ascites volume and functional status in 39.1% of patients. A positive CBR-GC response in abdominal girth was seen in 31.3% of patients, and this was significantly correlated with the 5PM-estimated change in ascites volume (p < 0.001). The median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range 1-12). The most common non-hematological toxicity was anorexia, in 22.2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Weekly i.v. paclitaxel is a safe and effective chemotherapeutic regimen based on validated CBR-CG criteria.

Multicenter phase II trial of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin triplet combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of S-1, paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent, measurable gastric cancer received intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² plus cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and S-1 35 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1-14 based on a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in the current study, among whom 38 were assessable for efficacy and all assessable for toxicity. Two complete response and 24 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 59.1%. At a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the median time to progression and median overall survival was 9.4 (95% CI 6.8-12.1) months and 11.2 (95% CI 7.6-14.8) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 45 events (20.9%) and febrile neutropenia was observed in five events (2.3%). The common non-hematologic toxicity was nausea (grade 1/2, 27.2%) and diarrhea (grade 1/2, 9.0%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1, paclitaxel and cisplatin was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Weekly paclitaxel for heavily treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, and cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Although triweekly administration of paclitaxel is approved for gastric cancer in Japan, currently, the drug is often delivered with a weekly schedule because of the equivalent efficacy and lesser toxicity of this dosing schedule as compared with the triweekly administration schedule. Weekly administration of paclitaxel as second-line or first-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer has been reported to yield a response rate of about 20%. Because there has been no report of the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in the third-line setting, this retrospective study investigated the efficacy and toxicities of weekly paclitaxel used in the third-line setting for the treatment of gastric cancer refractory to all three key drugs, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and cisplatin, used in clinical practice.

METHODS

In 85 patients with advanced or recurrent histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma who had failed to respond to prior chemotherapy regimens containing fluorouracil, irinotecan, and cisplatin, paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was administered weekly, three times, for 3 weeks out of 4.

RESULTS

The median number of courses was 3 (range, 1-38). The overall response rate was 23.2% (19/82) in the patients with measurable lesions, and ascites disappeared in 15 of 48 patients (31.3%). Progression-free survival was 105 days and the median survival time was 201 days from the initiation of paclitaxel administration. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 25 (29%), 25 (29%), 37 (44%), and 3 (4%) patients. Other, nonhematological, toxicities were nausea, vomiting, anorexia, sensory neuropathy, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel administration shows activity against advanced gastric cancer also in the third-line setting.

Surgical management for a malignant bowel obstruction with recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common clinical complication in patients with recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma, which has a poor prognosis and a limited life expectancy. This study considered the effectiveness of surgical management for MBO.

METHODS

This study reviewed the clinical course of 70 patients who underwent surgery for MBO and compared the outcomes in three groups: patients with (A) peritonitis carcinomatosis without manifest ascites, (B) peritonitis carcinomatosis with ascites, (C) local recurrence without peritonitis carcinomatosis.

RESULTS

The 1-year survival rate and median survival time (MST) in the patients in group A were 33.3% and 228 days, which was statistically longer than those (6.7% and 46 days) in the patients in group B (P = 0.026). The rate of the patients with possible oral intake of solid meals for 6 months and median oral intake periods were 45.4% and 161 days in patients in group A and 28.0% and 93 days in patients in group C. In contrast, 66.7% in group B could not take solid meals for more than 1 month, and five patients could not take solid meals at all.

CONCLUSION

Palliative operations for the patients with manifest ascites of MBO are risky and rarely effectively improve oral intake, but this is not considered to be a contraindication for surgical management. Informed consent is therefore important in the surgical management of MBO.

Disposition kinetics of taxanes after intraperitoneal administration in rats and influence of surfactant vehicles

Rats were intraperitoneally administered 40 mg kg−1 of paclitaxel or docetaxel dissolved in various drug solutions. The drug solutions were prepared using 20 mL of saline, adding 4.2% Cremophor EL (crEL) for paclitaxel (TXL), and 1.5% Polysorbate-80 (PS-80) (TXT), 7.5% PS-80 (TXT+PS-80) or 4.2% crEL (TXT+crEL) for docetaxel. The apparent first-order absorption rate constant from the peritoneal cavity (ka) of TXL was about one-twentieth of that of TXT. The ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve of drug in plasma over that in ascites for TXL was about one-third of that of TXT. The values of the above ratio and the ka of TXT+PS-80 and TXT+crEL were similar to those of TXL. After intraperitoneal administration, the values of the blood-to-plasma concentration ratio in the four groups were similar and independent of time. In the in-vitro study, PS-80 and crEL caused similar, concentration-dependent decreases of drug permeation into red blood cells after a 15-min incubation of rat blood with 10 μg mL−1 of TXL. We demonstrated that the disposition kinetics of taxanes after intraperitoneal administration to rats was strongly influenced, in a concentration-dependent manner, by the surfactant vehicle used, crEL or PS-80.

The unusual presentation of gastric adenocarcinoma as a testicular mass: a favorable response to docetaxel and Cisplatin plus oral tegafur/uracil and leucovorin

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world. The routes of metastasis include direct extension, lymphatics, and peritoneal or hematogenous spread. Testicular metastasis is rare. We present here a 23-year-old gastric cancer patient who first presented with right-side testis swelling and pain. Diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma was made after right-side orchiectomy. Gastric adenocarcinoma with ascites and peritoneal seeding was found after esophagogastroscopy and abdominal computed tomography. The patient received chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 8, plus oral tegafur/uracil 300 mg/m(2)/day and leucovorin 90 mg/day on day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle, and he had a partial response to the chemotherapy. Metastatic tumors, especially gastric adenocarcinoma, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with testicular mass and they may respond well to chemotherapy.

Safety and Feasibility of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel followed by Fluoropyrimidine Analogs and Radiation as Adjuvant Therapy for Gastric Cancer

Background

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemo-radiotherapy is currently considered a standard of care for the treatment of gastric cancer. The impact of 5FU-based adjuvant therapy on the rate of distant recurrence has been modest. In order to improve the systemic effects of adjuvant therapy, we have been treating patients with resected gastric cancer with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by fluoropyrimidine analogue and radiation.

Methods

We report on the outcomes of 21 consecutive gastric cancer patients treated off protocol with adjuvant carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/ml × min) and paclitaxel (175–200 mg/m²) every 3 weeks, followed by concurrent pyrimidine analogs (either capecitabine 1,600–2,000 mg/m²/day in 17 patients, or 5FU 200 mg/m²/day in 4 patients) and radiation (45–50.4 Gy). Patients received a total of 4–6 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Results

The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Sixteen patients had stage 3 disease and 7 of them had positive surgical margins (6 with R1 and 1 with R2 resection), 3 patients were stage 2, and 2 patients were stage 1 (all had R0 resection). All patients had D1/D2 (4 had D2 and 17 had D1) lymph node dissection. The incidence of grade 3 or higher overall, hematologic, or gastrointestinal toxicity in the patients receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel was 57, 48 and 10%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed. After adjuvant treatment 15 patients developed recurrent disease, 10 of whom had distant metastases. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 12.3 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.0 months. Patients with R0 resection had significantly longer OS than did those with positive surgical margins (log-rank p = 0.0060). Median OS for the R0 resection group was 28.8 months.

Conclusions

Carboplatin and paclitaxel added to radiation plus fluoropyrimidine analogs is a well-tolerated regimen in the adjuvant setting. The activity of this regimen in this relatively high-risk group of gastric cancer patients is of interest for future development.

A long-time survivor of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer successfully treated by fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy: a case study

A 67-year-old male with advanced gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis as well as a tumor embolus in the portal vein was treated by S-1/cisplatin therapy. The serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were elevated to 836 ng/ml at the first visit. After one course of chemotherapy, the patient showed stable disease; the serum level of alpha-fetoprotein also decreased to 626 ng/ml after a transient increase, and therefore reduction surgery was performed. A total gastrectomy with a distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and regional lymph node dissection was performed. The resected specimen was diagnosed to be alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. There were no metastatic foci in the resected lymph nodes, presumably due to the preoperative chemotherapy. S-1/cisplatin therapy was continued after the operation to treat the remaining tumor embolus in the portal vein. After one course of this therapy, the tumor embolus disappeared. However, a lymph node measuring 1.5 cm in diameter appeared in the hepatoduodenal ligament. Therefore, the chemotherapy was changed to paclitaxel monotherapy. After 2 courses of paclitaxel monotherapy, the lymph node swelled, and thus 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine was added to the paclitaxel regimen. After 5 courses of this regimen, the lymph node swelling disappeared without any other new lesions and a total of 21 courses were performed. The patient remained stable for over 8 years without recurrence. The expression of chemoresistance-related proteins was retrospectively analyzed by immunohistochemistry to evaluate the chemoresistance. The ortate phosphoribosyltransferase expression was strongly positive, and the good outcome in this case may have been associated with this result.

The efficacy and safety of reduced-dose docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of advanced stage gastric adenocarcinoma

Patients with advanced gastric carcinoma have still had bad prognosis despite advances in the modern treatment era. Docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is effective, but highly toxic regimen for advanced cases. In this study, we modified the standard doses of DCF (mDCF) to evaluate the effectiveness and side effects. From July 2005 to July 2008, 37 advanced gastric cancer patients treated with at least one course of mDCF protocol as first-line treatment were included. The mDCF protocol included 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel and cisplatin for 1 day and 600 mg/m(2)/day, 5-flourouracil infusion for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks. No patients used prophylactic granulocte -colony stimulating factor. Of the patients, 28 were male and nine were female; the median age was 53 (23-65) years. Of them, 83.8% received at least four courses of chemotherapy and 64.9% completed the preplanned six courses of treatment. Eleven (29.7%) of those patients who received mDCF in the first-line treatment used the FOLFIRI (5-FU, folinic acit, irinotekan) regimen for the second-line treatment. Response rates were evaluated according to RECIST criteria in 30 out of 37 patients. The median follow-up time was 7.1 months. The longest follow-up time was 19.9 months. Two patients (5.4%) had complete response, nine (21.6%) had partial response, and 14 (37.9%) had stabilized disease; overall, the disease was controlled in 25 patients (64.9%) whereas five patients (13.5%) had progression. Median time to progression was 6.7 months and overall survival was 10 months. The assessment of patients for grade 3-4 toxicity revealed that while 5.4% had anemia and 8.1% had neutropenia, 5.4% nausea and 5.4% diarrhea. Neutropenic fever developed in two patients, requiring hospitalization. G-CSF was used in three patients. Two patients with neutropenic fever and two with severe anemia (total number 4; 10.8%) received delayed chemotherapy. Dose reduction was required in four patients (10.8%), one due to neutropenia, one due to nephrotoxicity, and two due to nausea. No patient died due to chemotherapy toxicity. This retrospective study suggested that mDCF might have comparable efficacy with classical DFC, with better toxicity profile. However, its small size and retrospective nature should be considered when interpreting the results.

Phase II study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of weekly i.v. and i.p. paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 was carried out in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination and/or cancer cells on peritoneal cytology were enrolled. PTX was administered i.v. at 50 mg/m(2) and i.p. at 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. The primary end point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, efficacy against malignant ascites and safety.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled, including 21 with primary tumors with peritoneal dissemination, 13 with peritoneal recurrence and six with positive peritoneal cytology only. The median number of courses was 7 (range 1-23). The 1-year OS rate was 78% (95% confidence interval 65% to 90%). The overall response rate was 56% in 18 patients with target lesions. Malignant ascites disappeared or decreased in 13 of 21 (62%) patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (18%) and anemia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy of i.v. and i.p. PTX with S-1 is well tolerated and active in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Gastrojejunostomy as induction treatment for S-1-based chemotherapy in patients with incurable gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The development of new generation anticancer agents, including the oral drug, S-1, may alter the clinical importance of gastrojejunostomy in the treatment of incurable gastric cancer. We reviewed a series of patients who underwent gastrojejunostomy for this reason between 2002 and 2005.

METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent gastrojejunostomy followed by S-1-based chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer with obstruction or stenosis of the gastric outlet at Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital and two affiliated hospitals. The safety of gastrojejunostomy, outcome of palliation, and survival time were analyzed retrospectively. We compared the survival times with those of patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy or exploratory laparotomy between 1987 and 2001.

RESULTS

The median operative time and blood loss were 153 min and 66 ml, respectively. There were no major complications. The median starting time for chemotherapy after gastrojejunostomy was 15.5 days. All patients were discharged after gastrojejunostomy, and the median postoperative home stay ratio was 68%. The median survival time after gastrojejunostomy was 354 days, which was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy or exploratory laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

Gastrojejunostomy for incurable gastric cancer contributes not only to improving quality of life (QOL), but to prolonging survival through the induction and maintenance of S-1-based chemotherapy.

A phase II trial of paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We wanted to assess the effectiveness and safety of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin for treating advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer were entered into this study. Paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m(2) on day 1, 5-FU 1 g/m(2)/day in a 24 hour continuous infusion from day 1 to day 4 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 were administered. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 33 patients were finally evaluable for their response. 17 (51.5%) patients had a partial response (95% CI: 26.0 approximately 77.0%). The median duration of overall survival was 13.2 months. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 15.2% and 1.1% of all the cycles, respectively. Grade 3 stomatitis and neurotoxicity were observed in 20.6% and 1.1% of all patients, respectively. Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of paclitaxel, 5-FU and cisplatin demonstrated activity and acceptable toxicity for treating metastatic gastric cancer.

A phase i study of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with weekly paclitaxel (FLTAX) as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of combination chemotherapy with leucovorin-modulated weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven metastatic or recurrent GC were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by 5-FU as a bolus i.v. infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15. A 2-h i.v. infusion of l-leucovorin was started at the same time as the paclitaxel infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patients were scheduled to receive 5-FU, l-leucovorin and paclitaxel at four dose levels (mg/m(2)/week): 500/250/60 (level 1), 500/250/80 (level 2), 600/250/80 (level 3) and 600/250/100 (level 4), respectively.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled. During the first cycle of the highest dose level (level 4), two of the six patients had DLT involving Grade 3 diarrhea and Grade 3 skin rash. Furthermore, three of the four patients who received the second consecutive cycle of treatment at dose level 4 had Grade 4 neutropenia. Dose level 3 was thus determined to be the MTD. Eleven (61%) of the 18 patients had partial responses, and the median progression-free survival time was 6.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD and the recommended dose for phase II studies of this regimen were determined to be 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/week, l-leucovorin 250 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2)/week.

Phase II trial of biweekly paclitaxel plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with biweekly paclitaxel plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed advanced or recurrent inoperable gastric cancer were enrolled in the present study. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (40 mg/m(2)) as a 2-h intravenous infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil (2,400 mg/m(2)) as a 46-h continuous infusion. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. There were 12 partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 40.0%. At a median follow-up of 10.6 months, the median time to progression and median overall survival were 3.9 and 8.8 months, respectively. The most common hematological toxicity was grade 1-2 anemia, which was seen in 83.3% of patients. No grade 4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia was noted. The most common non-hematological toxicity was anorexia, which was seen in 70% of patients, although grade 3 anorexia was noted in only 10% of cases. There was no severe treatment-related morbidity or death.

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy consisting of biweekly paclitaxel plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancers.

Phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor effects of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer in a phase I/II setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was designed as a phase I/II clinical trial. In phase I portion, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel with fixed dose of S-1. S-1 (daily dose, 80 mg/m(2)) was given orally on days 1-21 every 35-day cycle (rest on days 22-35). Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m(2), stepping up to 70 mg/m(2) in 10-mg/m(2) increment. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicity, grade 3 or higher nonhematological toxicity, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the first course of treatment. In phase II portion, the efficacy and toxicity at the RD of paclitaxel with S-1 were assessed.

RESULTS

The MTD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 60 mg/m(2), because >33.3% of patients (2/3) developed DLTs. DLT included postponement of treatment due to grade 2 neutropenia, and grade 3 stomatitis, anorexia, and nausea. Therefore, the RD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 50 mg/m(2). In the phase II portion, 22 patients were evaluated with 50 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and 80 mg/m(2) S-1 in a 35-day cycle. The response rate was 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2-75.6%). The median survival time was 283 days (95% CI, 218-508 days). The median number of treatment courses was 4 (range 1-10), indicating that this regimen could be given repeatedly.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer showed that this regimen has substantial antitumor activity and can be given safely.

Phase I/II study of a combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

A phase I/II study of a combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and objective response rate (RR) in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-14. Paclitaxel was injected intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15, starting with a dose of 50 mg/m(2). The dose was increased in a stepwise manner.

RESULTS

In phase I, level 2 (60 mg/m(2)) was considered the MTD, because 2 of 3 patients in level 2 developed DLTs (grade 3 neutropenia and anemia, and grade 4 diarrhea and stomatitis). Therefore, the RD was determined to be level 1 (50 mg/m(2)). In phase II, efficacy and safety were assessed in 18 patients treated with the RD. The RR was 64.7% and the median survival time was 13.5 months. The most severe toxicities were grade 3 leukopenia (5.5%) and grade 3 neutropenia (5.5%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that S-1 combined with 50 mg/m(2) paclitaxel is effective and safe in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

The effect of p53 gene expression on the inhibition of cell proliferation by paclitaxel

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated the relationship between p53 status and paclitaxel (PTX)-induced inhibition of the growth of human stomach cancer cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We made use of two human stomach cancer cell lines, MKN45 and MKN28. Growth inhibition in response to PTX was evaluated by MTT method. We used flow cytometry to monitor the cell cycle and western blot analysis to evaluate the expression of signaling molecules.

RESULTS

PTX inhibited the proliferation of both stomach cancer cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. However, PTX cytotoxicity was stronger in MKN28 cells. Flow cytometric analysis showed that 1 muM PTX enhanced the percentage of MKN 45 cells in the sub-G1 phase of the cell cycle, whereas it increased the percentage of MKN 28 cells arrested at G2/M phase. 1 muM PTX was found to increase cyclin B1 production in MKN28 cells, but not in MKN 45 cells. In contrast, PTX-treatment led to an increase in the cleaved form of caspase-3 in MKN45, but not MKN28 cells. An inhibitor of p53, pifithrin-alpha, antagonized the expression of the cleaved form of caspase-3 in MKN45 cells.

CONCLUSION

Both p53 status and cyclin-B1 expression might be useful for predicting the therapeutic response of stomach cancer to PTX.

Multicenter phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma. A total of 65 patients were treated with the following regimen, administered every 28 days; 5-FU 600 mg/m2 by 24-hour continuous infusion from days 1 through 5, and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by 3-hour intravenous infusion on days 8, 14, and 21. A total of 272 cycles were conducted with a median of 4 (2-13) cycles per case. Out of 57 patients with measurable disease by RECIST criteria, there were 2 complete responses (3.5%), 20 partial responses (35.1%) and 25 cases with stable disease (43.9%). The overall response rate was 38.6% (95%CI: 26.0-51.2%). The median survival time and 1-year survival rates were 329 days and 47.4%, respectively. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were well tolerated.

Phase II study of low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin as a second-line therapy after 5-fluorouracil/platinum chemotherapy in gastric cancer

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer that had failed 5-fluorouracil/platinum-based chemotherapy. Thirty-two patients with documented progression on or within 6 months after discontinuing 5-fluorouracil/platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. As a second-line treatment, paclitaxel (145 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 every 3 weeks. Among 32 patients enrolled, 8 (25%) responded partially to paclitaxel/cisplatin, 8 (25%) had stable disease, and 14 (44%) had progressive disease. Two patients (6%) were not evaluable. The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival for all patients were 2.9 months and 9.1 months, respectively. The most common hematologic toxicity was anemia (47%). Grade 3 neutropenia developed in three patients (9%), but no other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were emesis (31%) and peripheral neuropathy (38%). Three cases (9%) of grade 3/4 emesis and 2 cases (6%) of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy developed. In conclusion, low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy showed moderate activity with favorable toxicity profiles. However, relatively short TTP of this regimen warrants the development of more effective paclitaxel-based regimens other than combination with cisplatin in these patients as second-line therapies.

Doxifluridine combined with weekly paclitaxel for second-line treatment in patients with gastric cancer resistant to TS-1

BACKGROUND

Many patients with gastric cancer respond to TS-1, but some fail to respond or have recurrence. Second-line therapy is needed.

METHODS

We performed a pilot study in patients with advanced gastric cancer who did not respond to TS-1 or who had disease recurrence. The patients received oral doxifluridine (600 mg/day) on days 1 to 21 and an intravenous infusion of paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2)) on days 7, 14, and 21 of a 28-day cycle. The treatment was repeated until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Response rate, duration of response, median survival time (MST), effects on pleural effusion, ascites, and other signs, and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 52 patients. The response rate was 28%. The duration of response was 103 days. The MST after the start of second-line treatment was 175 days (95% confidence interval, 135 to 224 days). Pleural effusion or ascites resolved or decreased in 73% of the patients. Hair loss occurred in 32 patients (62%), and leukopenia developed in 28 (54%, grade 3 in 1 patient and grade 2 or lower in the others). The MST after the start of treatment with TS-1 was about 16 months.

CONCLUSION

A combination of doxifluridine and weekly paclitaxel is expected to be an effective second-line treatment for gastric cancer not responding to TS-1, especially in patients with malignant ascites or pleural effusion. However, it remains unclear whether paclitaxel plus doxifluridine results in a better response and survival benefit than paclitaxel alone in this subgroup of patients. Further studies are therefore necessary.

A phase II open-label study of DHA-paclitaxel (Taxoprexin) by 2-h intravenous infusion in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or oesophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Combination chemotherapy regimens can improve survival in patients with advanced gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel is a novel conjugate formed by the covalent linkage of the fatty acid DHA to paclitaxel and may result in increased tumour exposure to paclitaxel without increased toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single arm, phase II study of DHA-paclitaxel, eligible patients with previously untreated, inoperable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or stomach were treated with DHA-paclitaxel (1,100 mg/m(2)) administered by 2-h intravenous infusion every 21 days.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were recruited of whom 53 were evaluable for toxicity, and 48 for response. There were five confirmed partial responses (9.4%) by the RECIST criteria. The median duration of response was 87 days (range 49-97 days), the median time to progression was 84 days (95% CI 78-124 days), and median overall survival was 262 days (95% CI 205-357 days). Grade >or=3 neutropaenia occurred in 93% of patients, and febrile neutropaenia in 17% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DHA-paclitaxel has modest activity in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer and with haematological toxicity that is comparable to paclitaxel and docetaxel.

A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin as salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic activity and safety of paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancers that are unresponsive to primary chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients unresponsive to first line chemotherapy were entered into this trial. The treatment regimen consisted of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2) by 3-hour infusion on day 1, and cisplatin, 60 mg/m(2) by 1 hour infusion on day 1, with the treatment repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

37 patients were entered in this study, with 32 fully evaluable for response. 4 (13%), 13 (40%) and 15 (47%) patients achieved a partial response, stable disease and progressed, respectively. The median time to progression was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.0 approximately 6.0 months), and the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI: 5.5 approximately 19.7 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 54%. Of a total of 135 cycles of chemotherapy, grades 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and anemia (3%). Grade >or=2 neuropathy was observed in 6 patients (17%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is an effective and tolerable salvage treatment modality for advanced gastric cancer.

Retrospective evaluation of sequential outpatient chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Due to the recent development of several promising chemotherapeutic agents, such as S-1, irinotecan (CPT-11) and paclitaxel, response rates for advanced gastric cancer to chemotherapy have improved. Thus far, however, the efficacy and survival benefits of sequential chemotherapy using these agents have not been evaluated. An additional benefit of outpatient sequential chemotherapy, that is, without hospitalization, would be its contribution to the maintenance of patients' social activities. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate sequential outpatient chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic/recurrent gastric cancer treated with sequential outpatient chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The sequential treatment consisted of S1-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy, low-dose CPT-11/CDDP as second-line therapy and weekly paclitaxel administration as third-line therapy.

RESULTS

A series of 32 patients was enrolled in this study. During the sequential chemotherapy, all patients were treated at the outpatient ward of Kyoto University Hospital without hospitalization. The overall response rate was 37.5% and the median survival time was 523 days (95% confidence interval: 323-723 days). The progression-free survival for the three therapies was 135 days for S-1, 148 days for low-dose CPT-11/CDDP and 57 days for paclitaxel. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 1 patient (3.1%), and there were no treatment-related deaths. Univariate analysis showed that factors with significant impact on survival were pathological type (intestinal vs. diffuse), clinical response (responder vs. non-responder) and prior chemotherapy. Factors with p values <0.1, including pathological type, clinical response, prior chemotherapy and age (>75 vs. < or =75 years), were evaluated by multivariate analysis, which disclosed that clinical response and patient age were significantly related to patient prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In terms of survival and maintenance of social activities of patients, outpatient sequential chemotherapy appears to be both feasible and effective for advanced gastric cancer. Although prospective analysis of sequential chemotherapy is difficult because of its complex treatment protocol, clinical trials to assess the survival benefits of second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer are clearly warranted.

TS-1 as first-line therapy for gastric linitis plastica: historical control study

Gastric linitis plastica (LP) is usually found as an advanced gastric cancer and has a poor prognosis. No sufficiently effective chemotherapy has been reported. In recent years, TS-1 has yielded a high response rate for advanced gastric cancers and favorable treatment results have also been suggested for gastric LP. We retrospectively compared and discussed anti-tumor effects and survival time for 62 consecutive patients with unresectable gastric LP who underwent chemotherapy at Kitasato University East Hospital between November 1995 and December 2002. They were divided into two groups: 19 patients given chemotherapy including TS-1 as first-line therapy (TS-1 group), and 43 patients given chemotherapy mainly with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, methotrexate and mitomycin C (non-TS-1 group). The overall response was 57.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.7-80.1%] in the TS-1 group, which was significantly greater than the 27.9% (95% CI 14.5-41.3%) of the non-TS-1 group (P < 0.01). The median survival time was 402 days (95% CI 251-553 days) in the TS-1 group, which was also significantly longer than the non-TS-1 group (213 days, 95% CI 165-261 days, P < 0.01). Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher were observed in 21.1 and 5.2%, respectively, in the TS-1 group, which were lower than the values of 37.2 and 20.9% in the non-TS-1 group. We conclude that greater anti-tumor effects and longer survival time can be expected from chemotherapy including TS-1 for gastric LP compared with conventional chemotherapy.

Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with paclitaxel in patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer

Both paclitaxel and S-1 are effective against gastric cancer, but the optimal regimen for combined chemotherapy with these drugs remains unclear. This phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and objective response rate of paclitaxel in combination with S-1. S-1 was administered orally at a fixed dose of 80 mg m-2 day-1 from days 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle. Paclitaxel was given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15, starting with a dose of 40 mg m-2 day-1. The dose was increased in a stepwise manner to 70 mg m-2. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks unless disease progression was confirmed. In the phase I portion, 17 patients were enrolled. The MTD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 70 mg m-2 because 40% of the patients given this dose level (two of five) had DLT. The RD was determined to be 60 mg m-2. In the phase II portion, 24 patients, including five with assessable disease who received the RD in the phase I portion, were evaluated. The median number of treatment courses was six (range: 1-17). The incidence of the worst-grade toxicity in patients given the RD was 28 and 8%, respectively. All toxic effects were manageable. The response rate was 54.1%, and the median survival time was 15.5 months. Our phase I/II trial showed that S-1 combined with paclitaxel is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer.