Resected pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with or without 5-fluorouracil: treatment results and patterns of failure

Results and patterns of failure in patients treated with adjuvant combined chemoradiation therapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant chemoradiation is used commonly in the United States for the treatment of resected pancreatic cancer, there is no consensus on the benefit of this therapy, because the results from randomized trials are conflicting. The authors of this report reviewed their experience in a consecutive, unselected series of patients who received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation therapy (RT) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant therapy from 1998 to 2005 were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. Ninety-three percent of patients were treated with external beam RT to > or =50.4 grays, and 91% of patients received concurrent 5-FU by continuous infusion. Forty-five percent of patients went on to receive adjuvant gemcitabine.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 31 months (range, 21-62 months) among the 20 patients who remained alive. Less than half of patients had positive (33%) or close (<1 mm; 15%) resection margins, 81% of tumors were classified as T3, and 66% of patients had involved lymph nodes. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 22 months. Negative lymph node status (P = .016) was a significant prognostic factor for improved OS, whereas treatment with gemcitabine trended toward improved OS (P = .080). The median disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients was 10 months: Treatment with gemcitabine (P = .044) and the receipt of any chemotherapy (P = .047) were significant predictors of DFS. Seventy-five patients (87%) had disease recurrence, and the majority recurred with peritoneal metastases (55%) or liver metastases (53%). Patients who had negative lymph nodes trended toward a lower rate of distant failure (P = .060).

CONCLUSIONS

The median survival of the current cohort was greater than that of the chemoradiation arms of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trials and European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 trials and was comparable to the survival observed on the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group chemoradiation arm. Lymph node status and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy were significant predictors of OS and DFS, respectively. Future survival improvements should be directed at reducing peritoneal and liver metastases. Further randomized trials will be required to define the role of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Current state of adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic carcinoma cannot generally be cured by surgery alone. This review summarizes the development of adjuvant therapy over the past two decades. Four randomized controlled trials compare long-term survival of different treatments. The small GITSG-study supports combined chemoradiation, but the EORTC-study found no significant effect. A Norwegian study of adjuvant chemotherapy found an increased median survival, but no effect beyond two years. The large ESPAC-1 study shows a benefit for 5-FU based chemotherapy, while chemoradiation had a negative effect. Thus, evidence favours adjuvant therapy, but 5-FU may not be the ultimate drug. Support for gemcitabine is given by preliminary data from a German randomized trial, and further American and European studies are upcoming. However, postoperative therapy is problematic, as 20-30% of resected patients never undergo treatment because of slow recovery or other reasons. Preoperative therapy has some theoretical advantages, and moreover, patients with rapidly progressive disease may be spared surgery. Randomized controlled trials are lacking, but published results compare well with postoperative, adjuvant therapy. The value of locally targeted therapy is difficult to assess. Reasonable results have been obtained with regional chemotherapy, whereas intraoperative radiotherapy does not seem to increase survival despite reducing reducing local recurrences.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Pancreatic cancer: from pathogenesis to cure

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. The disease has a high mortality rate and the 5-year survival rate is estimated to be 4%. Currently, surgical resection is only possible in 20% of patients; even then, the overall 5-year survival rate is only 25%. As such, surgical therapy alone is not sufficient for pancreatic carcinoma, and prospective investigation of additional modalities is crucial. Numerous negative trials have shown that chemotherapy alone is the standard of care after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. However, results remain poor and progress with new drugs is needed in this setting. For locally advanced disease, the situation is more complicated; the ideal chemoradiation schedule has not been clearly defined, and improvements could come in the near future from the use of new radiotherapy tools and targeted therapies. For advanced disease, chemotherapy alone has given very disappointing results. A multidisciplinary approach combining biological assessment of targets with clinical trials to evaluate new targeted drugs should be considered.

The case for routine use of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis for most patients. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, providing the only realistic hope of long-term survival. Even with optimal surgical management, 5-year survival averages 15% to 20% for resectable disease. Progress is being made, however. Currently, the benefits of postoperative therapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear clear, and recommendations for such therapy appear to us to be well justified. Additional benefit to patients awaits the development of new agents, molecular targeted drugs, and novel approaches such as immunotherapy.

Radiation therapy and combined modality treatment of gastrointestinal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Ionizing radiation (IR) is a potent agent in enhancing tumor control of locally advanced cancer and has been shown to improve disease-free and overall survival in several entities. However, the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors remains controversial because of the marked radiation sensitivity of neighboring organs frequently compromising application of high doses of ionizing radiation.

METHODS

The Medline and the Cochrane Library from 1980 until 2005 were searched using subject heading (MeSH) terms including "esophageal neoplasm", "gastric neoplasm", "pancreatic neoplasm" and "rectal neoplasm", in combination with the subheadings "radiotherapy", "chemotherapy". The term, "randomized controlled trial", was used to identify randomized trials. The proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology from 1999 to 2004 and the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology from 1999 until 2005 were searched. Ongoing trials were identified through the Physician Data Query database (www.cancer.gov/search/clinical_trials).

RESULTS

RT in combination with surgery enhances tumor control of locally advanced cancer disease and has been shown to improve disease-free and overall survival in rectal cancer. In esophageal adenocarcinoma, survival was prolonged with pre-operative chemo-radiation in a meta-analysis. In gastric cancer, post-operative chemo-radiation can be considered after limited lymphadenectomy. Evidence for improving survival remains to be shown for pancreatic cancer and hepatobiliary carcinoma. In colon cancer, post-operative chemotherapy has proven to prolong survival. The impact of RT seems to be most prominent in the pre-operative setting in patients treated with curative intent.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative RT or pre-operative chemo-radiation may be considered in individual cases, but should not be used routinely for gastro-intestinal carcinoma, except for rectal carcinoma. In many studies, pre-operative radiotherapy/chemo-radiation yielded promising results and merits validation in large controlled trials.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy of pancreatic cancer: what is the appropriate target volume of radiation therapy?

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

To evaluate the influence of radiation therapy target volume on the treatment outcome of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer after curative resection.

METHODS

Between February 1987 and July 2001, 70 patients treated with curative resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed. There were 49 males and 21 females, with a median age of 57 years. Whipple's operation was performed in 44 patients, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in 14, distal pancreatectomy in 9, and subtotal pancreatectomy in 3. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was given up to 40 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction with a two-week planned rest. Intravenous 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2/day) was given on days 1 to 3 of each split course of radiotherapy. Until 1991, whole pancreas or preoperative tumor volume and retroperitoneal lymph nodes were irradiated (extended field, n=14). Thereafter, the target volume included the retroperitoneal lymph nodes and the involved pancreatic resection margin (limited field, n=56). The median follow-up period of all the patients was 16 months (range, 2-99).

RESULTS

The overall 2- and 5-year survival rate of all patients was 29.7% and 14.0%, respectively. According to the radiotherapy target volume, the median survival time was 14 months in the extended field group and 16 months in the limited field group (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

From the viewpoint of the target volume of radiotherapy, a limited field did not worsen the treatment outcome, although the survival rate was poor in both groups.

Emerging drugs in pancreatic cancer

Improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge. For the few patients with localised stages of the disease, intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies remain non-validated and the survival benefit conferred by 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy over radical surgery alone is still a matter of debate. Gemcitabine has recently emerged as the standard single agent in advanced stages of the disease and pharmacokinetic refinements such as the use of a fixed-dose infusion rate may further improve still rather modest result figures. At present, most efforts deal with the development of more effective doublet or triplet therapies, combining gemcitabine with either conventional cytotoxic drugs--the most promising being oxaliplatin--or more innovative, targeted therapeutic agents. Among these agents, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have already undergone Phase III trials, alone or in combination with gemcitabine, with rather disappointing results. However, preclinical and Phase I and II studies of cyclooxygenase-2 or lipoxygenase inhibitors, various immunotherapeutic approaches and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against growth factors or their receptors are encouraging and may provide some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Final results of a prospective trial of a PEFG (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, 5-Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine) regimen followed by radiotherapy after curative surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is controversial.

METHODS

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of postoperative combination chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in patients aged 18-70 years with a histological diagnosis of PA, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or =70. Cisplatin and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, and 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day as protracted infusion (PEFG regimen) were delivered every 28 days for 4 cycles. Assuming a minimum one-year disease-free survival (DFS) of interest of 65% and a maximum of low interest of 45% (alpha 0.05; beta 0.10), the target enrollment was 51 patients, and the strategy would be considered to deserve further analysis if more than 29 patients were DF at one-year from surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients, KPS >80: 29, median tumor size 3.5 cm, stage II/III/IVA: 2/34/13, grade 3-4: 22, positive resection margins: 26, node positive: 46, received 179 cycles of chemotherapy. Main grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of neutropenia (51%), thrombocytopenia (18%), and anemia (4%). One-year DFS was 67 +/- 7%. Two-year overall survival was 53 +/- 7%.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative management of PA with this multimodality strategy was well tolerated and yielded a promising outcome.

Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer

The length and quality of life of patients with localized pancreatic cancer will be maximized by accurate preoperative assessment of resectability, a standardized technique of tumor resection, and the routine use of protocol-based adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Continued efforts to enroll patients with localized and advanced pancreatic cancer into well-designed clinical trials should remain a high priority for oncologists across all disciplines. At present, preoperative therapy remains investigational but has a sound clinical basis and remains a reasonable alternative to up front surgery. Future clinical trials for resectable pancreatic cancer will lead to progress only if the principles of multidisciplinary cancer care and quality assurance are incorporated into their design and conduct.

Conclusions from the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer adjuvant trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat. It is a tumor that tends to present late, and surgical resection is only possible in a minority of patients. After successful surgery, the prognosis is still relatively poor. Attempts at more radical pancreatic resections and extended lymphadenectomy, although feasible without excessive morbidity and mortality, have failed to produce any convincing improvement in survival. During the last few years, therefore, efforts have been directed toward the development of adjuvant therapies in an attempt to improve outcome. This article describes the main trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy with follow-on chemotherapy and presents the results of the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) 1 trial and the status of the ESPAC 2 and 3 trials.

Use of Percutaneous Drainage to Treat Hepatic Abscess after Radiofrequency Ablation of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is well described in the treatment of primary hepatic malignancies and colorectal carcinoma hepatic metastases. A known complication of RFA is the development of hepatic abscess. The management of hepatic abscesses subsequent to RFA for metastatic disease is not well described. A 49-year-old female with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. Following 6 months’ treatment, a new liver metastasis was identified. It remained stable for 6 months during additional chemotherapy and thereafter was treated with RFA. Three weeks after RFA, the patient presented with malaise and leukocytosis, and a CT scan demonstrated a large hepatic abscess at the site of the RFA. She remained febrile despite needle aspiration and intravenous antibiotics. A percutaneous drain was placed and the symptoms resolved. Contrast injection of the drain 4 weeks later demonstrated resolution of the abscess cavity but communication with the biliary tree. The drain was removed and the tract embolized with Gel-foam to prevent complications of biliary-cutaneous fistula. She remains well without evidence of abscess or disease recurrence. Thus, RFA can be used in treatment of limited isolated hepatic metastases from previously treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the incidence of hepatic abscess is increased due to bilioenteric anastomosis; extended antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered.

The role of oxaliplatin in the management of upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies

Following the successful introduction of oxaliplatin into the management of advanced colorectal cancer, its clinical utility is currently being investigated in a variety of other malignancies, including cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. In advanced pancreatic cancer, oxaliplatin has been found to be clinically effective in phase II trials in which it was combined with either 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine, the current standard chemotherapy for this disease. In a phase II trial involving 67 patients, the combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU in a high dose infusional regimen (n = 31) achieved an objective response rate of 9.7%, stable disease for at least three cycles in 48.4% of patients, tumour growth control in 58% of patients, a median time to progression of 4.9 months and median overall survival reaching 9.2 months. In combination with gemcitabine in a phase II trial involving 64 patients with metastatic (n = 34) or locally advanced (n = 30) pancreatic cancer, there was an objective response rate of 30.6%, treatment benefit in 39.7%, a median progression-free survival of 5.3 months and again a median overall survival of 9.2 months. Response rates and survival times did not differ between locally advanced and metastatic disease. On the basis of these encouraging results, phase III studies of oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer are now in progress in Europe and the United States. In metastatic gastric cancer, a phase II study investigated the combined use of oxaliplatin and 5-FU using the FOLFOX6 regimen in 53 patients, of whom 49 were evaluable for efficacy. The objective response rate was 44.9% and the median duration of response was 7.9 months. Large phase III trials of oxaliplatin-based treatment for advanced gastric cancer are now in progress. Oxaliplatin is also being investigated in oesophageal cancer and several other gastrointestinal tumours. In summary, oxaliplatin is emerging as an effective and highly promising chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: historical and current perspectives

The results from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear to be improving with increased resection rates and reduced postoperative mortality reported by specialist pancreatic cancer teams. Developments with medical oncological treatments have been difficult, however, due to the fundamentally aggressive biological nature of pancreatic cancer and its resistance to chemotherapy coupled with a relative dearth of randomised controlled trials. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-1 trial recruited nearly 600 patients and is the largest trial in pancreatic cancer. The results demonstrated that the current best adjuvant treatment is chemotherapy using bolus 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid. The median survival of patients randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy was 15.5 months and is comparable with many other studies, but the median survival in the chemotherapy arm was 19.7 months and is as good or superior to multimodality treatments including intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies. The use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid may be supplanted by gemcitabine but requires confirmation by ongoing clinical trials, notably ESPAC-3, which plans to recruit 990 patients from Europe, Canada and Australasia. Major trials such as ESPAC-1 and ESPAC-3 have set new standards for the development of adjuvant treatment and it is now clear that such treatment in this field has the potential to significantly improve both patient survival and quality of life after curative resection.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.