Capecitabine for 5-fluorouracil-resistant brain metastases from breast cancer

Systematic review of the management of brain metastases from hormone receptor positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with breast cancer. Local central nervous system (CNS) directed therapies are usually the first line treatment for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), but those must be followed by systemic therapies to achieve long-term benefit. Systemic therapy for hormone receptor (HR⁺) breast cancer has evolved in the last 10 years, but their role when brain metastases occur is uncertain.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on management of HR⁺ BCBM by searching Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane databases. The PRISMA guidelines were used for systematic review.

RESULTS

Out of 807 articles identified, 98 fulfilled the inclusion criteria in their relevance to the management of HR⁺ BCBM.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to brain metastases from other neoplasms, local CNS directed therapies are the first line treatment for HR⁺ BCBM. Although the quality of evidence is low, after local therapies, our review supports the combination of targeted and endocrine therapies for both CNS and systemic management. Upon exhaustion of targeted/endocrine therapies, case series and retrospective reports suggest that certain chemotherapy agents are active against HR⁺ BCBM. Early phase clinical trials for HR⁺ BCBM are ongoing, but there is a need for prospective randomized trials to guide management and improve patients' outcome.

Systemic treatments for breast cancer brain metastasis

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in females and BC brain metastasis (BCBM) is considered as the second most frequent brain metastasis. Although the advanced treatment has significantly prolonged the survival in BC patients, the prognosis of BCBM is still poor. The management of BCBM remains challenging. Systemic treatments are important to maintain control of central nervous system disease and improve patients' survival. BCBM medical treatment is a rapidly advancing area of research. With the emergence of new targeted drugs, more options are provided for the treatment of BM. This review features currently available BCBM treatment strategies and outlines novel drugs and ongoing clinical trials that may be available in the future. These treatment strategies are discovered to be more efficacious and potent, and present a paradigm shift in the management of BCBMs.

Systemic Therapy Approaches for Breast Cancer Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Brain metastasis arising from breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Various systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies which are effective against breast cancer often fail to provide benefits against brain metastasis. This is mainly due to limited penetration of the therapies across the blood-brain barrier, and divergent evolution of brain metastasis compared to the primary tumor. Thus, brain metastasis is typically treated upfront with local therapies, such as surgery and radiation, followed by systemic therapies. Systemic therapies with CNS permeability are favored in patients with brain metastasis. This paper reviews various systemic therapy options for breast cancer brain metastasis.

Intracranial Response Rate in Patients with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases after Systemic Therapy

Simple Summary

For many years, patients with breast cancer and brain metastases were excluded from participation in clinical trials. It was believed that anticancer drugs could not cross the blood–brain barrier. However, recent evidence strongly suggests that some drugs can act against brain metastases, with the greatest intracranial response rate reported in the case of capecitabine, neratinib plus capecitabine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine. In this article, we discuss the achievements in systemic therapy of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. We stress on the newest clinical trial results which indicate tremendous progress in HER2-positive breast cancer. On the other hand, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer or hormone-receptor-positive brain metastases, much fewer compounds were discovered. Based on the presented results, patients with active brain metastases should be routinely included in clinical trials with novel agents.

Abstract

Brain metastases are detected in 5% of patients with breast cancer at diagnosis. The rate of brain metastases is higher in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients (TNBC). In patients with metastatic breast cancer, the risk of brain metastases is much higher, with up to 50% of the patients having two aggressive biological breast cancer subtypes. The prognosis for such patients is poor. Until recently, little was known about the response to systemic therapy in brain metastases. The number of trials dedicated to breast cancer with brain metastases was scarce. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic including very significant results of clinical trials which have been presented very recently. We focus on the intracranial response rate of modern drugs, including new antibody–drug conjugates, HER2- targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies. We highlight the most effective and promising drugs. On the other hand, we also suggest that further efforts are needed to improve the prognosis, especially patients with TNBC and brain metastases. The information contained in this article can help oncologists make treatment-related decisions.

Central Nervous System Metastases from Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospective

It is estimated that approximately one-third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) will develop brain metastases. The prognosis for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis has improved in the recent past, especially for hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER) positive subtypes. However, the overall survival rate for patients with triple-negative subtype remains poor. The development of newer treatment options, including antibody-drug conjugates such as Sacituzumab govitecan, is particularly encouraging. This article reviews the clinical outcomes, challenges, and current approach to the treatment of brain metastasis in TNBC. We have also briefly discussed newer treatment options and ongoing clinical trials. The development of brain metastasis significantly decreases the quality of life of patients with TNBC, and newer treatment strategies and therapeutics are the need of the hour for this disease subgroup.

Evaluation of Thymidine Phosphorylase Inhibitors in Glioblastoma and Their Capacity for Temozolomide Potentiation

A number of studies have shown high levels of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) expression in glioblastoma (GBM), with trace or undetectable TP levels in normal developed brain tissue. TP catalyzes the reversible phosphorolysis of thymidine to thymine and 2-deoxyribose-1-phosphate, maintaining nucleoside homeostasis for efficient DNA replication and cell division. The TP-mediated catabolism of thymidine is responsible for multiple protumor processes and can support angiogenesis, glycation of proteins, and alternative metabolism. In this study, we examined the effect of TP inhibition in GBM using the known nanomolar TP inhibitors 5-chloro-6-[1-(2'-iminopyrrolidin-1'-yl)methyl]uracil (TPI) and the analogous 6-[(2'-aminoimidazol-1'-yl)methyl]uracils. Although these TP inhibitors did not demonstrate any appreciable cytotoxicity in GBM cell lines as single agents, they did enhance the cytotoxicity of temozolomide (TMZ). This pontetiated action of TMZ by TP inhibition may be due to limiting the availability of thymine for DNA repair and replication. These studies support that TP inhibitors could be used as chemosensitizing agents in GBM to improve the efficacy of TMZ.

Analysis Survival of Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases Treated with Different Fraction Whole Brain Radiotherapy Concomitant with Capecitabine

Introduction: Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide. The main therapeutic modality for breast cancer with brain metastases is radiation. Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) is a treatment that provides moderate doses of radiotherapy to all brain tissue. Capecitabine was found to be effective for the treatment of breast cancer with metastases and its metabolites can cross the BBB in animal models.   Objective: This study aims to determine the response and survival of breast cancer patient with brain metastases treated with different fractionation WBRT combined with capecitabine administration.   Materials and methods: This is a prospective, randomized-blind cohort analytic study. Subjects were randomized into two groups by giving different fraction of WBRT (Group I WBRT 10x3Gy and Group II WBRT 20x2Gy) concomitant with capecitabine 850-1000mg/m2. OS was calculated from brain metastases diagnosis. Median follow-up was 5.6 months.   Results: A total of 22 breast cancer patients with brain metastases participated in this study. Group I obtained results of 5 (45.5%) out of 11 are responding to therapy and median OS was 4.4 months. Whereas in group II found 11 (100%) out of 11 patients responded to therapy and median OS was 9.4 months. The results of statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences of response between the two groups with p value= 0.012. The differences of survival of each group also statistically significant with p value=0.004   Conclusions: WBRT with 20x2Gy concomitant with Capecitabine gives a better response rate and OS.

Effects of systemic therapy and local therapy on outcomes of 873 breast cancer patients with metastatic breast cancer to brain: MD Anderson Cancer Center experience

Outcomes of treatments for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) remain suboptimal, especially for systemic therapy. To evaluate the effectiveness of systemic and local therapy (surgery [S], stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] and whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT]) in BCBM patients, we analyzed the data of 873 BCBM patients from 1999 to 2012. The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression in the brain (TTP-b) after diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) were 9.1 and 7.1 months, respectively. WBRT prolonged OS in patients with multiple BM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.88; P = .004). SRS alone, and surgery or SRS followed by WBRT (S/SRS + WBRT), were equivalent in OS and TTP-b (median OS, 14.9 vs 17.2 months; median TTP-b, 8.2 vs 8.6 months). Continued chemotherapy prolonged OS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30-0.41; P < .001) and TTP-b (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.70; P < .001), however, with no advantage of capecitabine over other chemotherapy agents used (median OS, 11.8 vs 12.4 months; median TTP-b, 7.2 vs 7.4 months). Patients receiving trastuzumab at diagnosis of BM, continuation of anti-HER2 therapy increased OS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83; P = .005) and TTP-b (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74; P = .003); no additional benefit was seen with switching over between trastuzumab and lapatinib (median OS, 18.4 vs 22.7 months; median TTP-b: 7.4 vs 8.7 months). In conclusion, SRS or S/SRS + WBRT were equivalent for patients' OS and local control. Continuation systemic chemotherapy including anti-HER2 therapy improved OS and TTP-b with no demonstrable advantage of capecitabine and lapatinib over other agents of physicians' choice was observed.

Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer: Analysis of the Role of HER2 Status and Treatment in the Outcome of 94 Patients

Aims and background

We investigated the impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and prognostic factors in the outcome of patients with breast cancer that developed brain metastases.

Methods

The data from 94 patients who received multidisciplinary therapy from 2001 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assigned according to their HER2 status, and overall survival and time to brain metastases recurrence/progression were evaluated. The prognostic value of age, presence of extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis class, hormone therapy, systemic therapy and trastuzumab was assessed.

Results

The median overall survival and time to brain disease progression were 7.1 and 6.5 months, respectively. HER2 positivity (P = 0.006), treatment with trastuzumab (P = 0.025), chemotherapy (P = 0.011) and recursive partitioning analysis class I-II (P <0.001) were associated with prolonged survival on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only recursive partitioning analysis class I-II (P <0.001) and triple-negative disease (P = 0.04) remained significant for overall survival, whereas time to brain metastases progression was only associated with recursive partitioning analysis class I-II (P = 0.001). The time from the diagnosis of primary disease to brain metastasis was slightly shorter in the HER2+ patients than in HER2– patients (36 vs 39 months). Intensified local treatment of brain metastasis incorporating whole-brain radiotherapy and/or radiosurgery and neurosurgery did not affect survival. Patients with triple-negative disease presented a significantly lower survival than the rest of the cohort (4 vs 8 months; P = 0.012).

Conclusions

Recursive partitioning analysis class I-II was found to be the strongest independent predictive factor. Treatment with trastuzumab in HER2+ patients appeared to improve overall survival, probably due to the better control of systemic metastatic disease, but did not maintain significance in multivariate analysis. The dismal prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer highlights the need to develop novel therapies to improve the poor survival.

Lapatinib with whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases from breast and non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)

Small molecules, mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are currently used in various malignancies. Lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinases, has demonstrated effectiveness in brain metastases from HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. It also appears to sensitize EGFR-expressing cell lines to radiation. To evaluate the efficacy of lapatinib in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer, as assessed by volumetric analysis by MRI. 81 patients were treated with WBRT (30 Gy in ten fractions) in combination with lapatinib 1250 mg once daily, followed by lapatinib 1500 mg once daily for a total 6 weeks. 21 patients had primary breast cancer and 60 patients NSCLC. Pre- and post-treatment MRI scans in a compact disk for central volumetric assessment were available for 43 patients. 27 patients (62.8%) achieved partial response, 15 patients (34.9%) had stable disease and only one patient (2.3%) had disease progression. Response was not associated to EGFR protein expression. All 81 patients were assessed for safety. The large majority of the adverse events were mild. Eight deaths occurred, four of which were considered related to the study drugs but there were also other contributing factors. Nine cases of serious infections were observed in eight patients, but they were also receiving dexamethasone. Lapatinib in combination with WBRT in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer and NSCLC is a feasible approach that can be further studied in larger clinical trials.

Challenges in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases

Brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, yet little is known about the optimal treatment of brain disease in this group of patients. Although these patients are at lower risk for brain metastases relative to those with HER2-positive and triple-negative disease, they comprise the majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Surgery and radiation continue to have a role in the treatment of brain metastases, but there is a dearth of effective systemic therapies due to the poor penetrability of many systemic drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Additionally, patients with brain metastases have long been excluded from clinical trials, and few studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of systemic therapies specifically for the treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer brain metastases. New approaches are on the horizon, such as nanoparticle-based cytotoxic drugs that have the potential to cross the BBB and provide clinically meaningful benefits to patients with this life-threatening consequence of HR-positive breast cancer.

Systemic therapy of brain metastases: non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma

Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in many cancers, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and melanoma. The development of BM is associated with poor prognosis and has an adverse impact on survival and quality of life. Commonly used therapies for BM such as surgery or radiotherapy are associated with only modest benefits. However, recent advances in systemic therapy of many cancers have generated considerable interest in exploration of those therapies for treatment of intracranial metastases.This review discusses the epidemiology of BM from the aforementioned primary tumors and the challenges of using systemic therapies for metastatic disease located within the central nervous system. Cumulative data from several retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that molecularly targeted systemic therapies may be an effective option for the treatment of BM from NSCLC, breast cancer, and melanoma, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with other therapies. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the efficacy and safety profiles of these targeted agents for the treatment of BM.

Systemic therapy of brain metastases

Brain metastases are a common complication of cancer and continue to be associated with a poor prognosis. Management of brain metastases typically requires a multidisciplinary approach which may include whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, and systemic therapy. Historically, the use of systemic therapy in brain metastases has been challenging because of the resistance to conventional chemotherapies secondary to the blood-brain barrier and an often heavily pre-treated patient population, and the paucity of well-conducted randomized trials in these heterogeneous patient populations. Newer agents, including immunotherapy and targeted therapies, are playing increasingly important roles in the up-front management of brain metastases. In this overview, we review recent advances in systemic therapies for brain metastases and the evidence supporting their use in this patient population.

Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer and Response to Treatment with Eribulin: A Case Series

Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC), causing considerable morbidity and mortality. Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor approved for treating certain patients with metastatic BC, previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. In the 301 phase 3 study in 1102 women with advanced BC, eribulin and capecitabine treatments did not differ for co-primary endpoints (overall survival [OS]: 15.9 vs 14.5 months, P = 0.056; progression-free survival [PFS]: 4.1 vs 4.2 months, P = 0.30). Here, we report outcomes for six patients (eribulin, n = 3; capecitabine, n = 3) who had received treatment for brain metastases from BC (BCBM) at baseline. All eribulin-treated patients experienced brain lesion shrinkage at some point during treatment, compared with one capecitabine-treated patient. Fewer patients in study 301 developed new BCBM with eribulin (13/544, 2.4%) compared with capecitabine (25/546, 4.6%). Eribulin does not cross the healthy blood-brain barrier (BBB), but could have the potential to do so after cranial radiation therapy. Capecitabine may cross the BBB and has demonstrated activity in BCBM. Data from these patients and previous cases suggest that further investigation of eribulin for BCBM may be warranted.

Chemotherapy and biological treatment options in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis: an update

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cause of CNS metastasis. Ten to 20% of all, and 38% of human epidermal growth factor-2(+), metastatic BC patients experience brain metastasis (BM). Prolonged survival with better control of systemic disease and limited penetration of drugs to CNS increased the probability of CNS metastasis as a sanctuary site of relapse. Treatment of CNS disease has become an important component of overall disease control and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Current standard therapy for BM is whole-brain radiotherapy, surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy for selected cases, corticosteroids and systemic chemotherapy. Little progress has been made in chemotherapy for the treatment of BM in patients with BC. Nevertheless, new treatment choices have emerged. In this review, we aimed to update current and future treatment options in systemic treatment for BM of BC.

EXPERT OPINION

Cornerstone local treatment options for BM of BC are radiotherapy and surgery in selected cases. Efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics is limited. Among targeted therapies, lapatinib has activity in systemic treatment of BM particularly when used in combination with capecitabine. Novel agents are currently investigated.

Brain metastases in breast cancer

Brain metastases are less common than bone or visceral metastases in patients with breast cancer. The overall prognosis of breast cancer patients with brain metastases remains poor, and these metastases are less responsive to systemic therapies. Brain metastasis is associated with a reduced quality of life due to progressive neurologic impairments. Recently, a trend of increased incidence of brain metastases in breast cancer has been noted. Reasons for this increased incidence include the more frequent use of sensitive detection methods such as contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and increased awareness of brain metastasis among patients and clinicians. Adjuvant and systemic therapy with drugs that have a low blood-brain barrier penetrance can lead to an increased risk of brain metastases in breast cancer patients. Molecular subtype is a predictive factor for overall survival after developing brain metastases. Patients who do not have a poor prognosis based on previously identified prognostic factors should be treated with radiation therapy to control symptoms. Whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic irradiation and surgery are tools for the local treatment of brain metastases. Novel molecular target therapy, including HER2-targeted therapy, has demonstrated an antitumor effect on brain metastases. In this review, we provide a practical algorithm for the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases. This review provides an overview of the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors and current and potential future management strategies of breast cancer brain metastases.

Current approaches to the treatment of metastatic brain tumours

Metastatic tumours involving the brain overshadow primary brain neoplasms in frequency and are an important complication in the overall management of many cancers. Importantly, advances are being made in understanding the molecular biology underlying the initial development and eventual proliferation of brain metastases. Surgery and radiation remain the cornerstones of the therapy for symptomatic lesions; however, image-based guidance is improving surgical technique to maximize the preservation of normal tissue, while more sophisticated approaches to radiation therapy are being used to minimize the long-standing concerns over the toxicity of whole-brain radiation protocols used in the past. Furthermore, the burgeoning knowledge of tumour biology has facilitated the entry of systemically administered therapies into the clinic. Responses to these targeted interventions have ranged from substantial toxicity with no control of disease to periods of useful tumour control with no decrement in performance status of the treated individual. This experience enables recognition of the limits of targeted therapy, but has also informed methods to optimize this approach. This Review focuses on the clinically relevant molecular biology of brain metastases, and summarizes the current applications of these data to imaging, surgery, radiation therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Brain metastases of breast cancer

Brain metastases of breast cancer remain a difficult problem for clinical management. Their incidence appears to be increasing, which is likely due to longer survival times for advanced breast cancer patients as well as additional and improved tools for detection. Molecular features of tumors associated with this syndrome are not yet understood. In general, survival may be improving for brain metastases due to better local control in the CNS, as well as improvements in systemic disease management. Selected patients with brain metastases are able to undergo surgical resection, which has been associated with extended disease control in some patients. However, whole-brain radiation has been the mainstay for treatment for most patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery is playing an increasing role in the primary treatment of brain metastases, as well as for salvage after whole-brain radiation. Recent series have reported median survivals of 13 months or longer with stereotactic radiosurgery. Further improvements in radiation-based approaches may come from ongoing studies of radiosensitizing agents. The ability of systemic treatments to impact brain metastases has been debated, and specific treatment regimens have yet to be defined. New approaches include chemotherapy combinations, biologic therapies and novel drug-delivery strategies.

Chemosensitization of IκBα-overexpressing glioblastoma towards anti-cancer agents

Mode of action of 5-FU and curcumin nanoconjugates in U87-IκBα cells.

Response of meningeal carcinomatosis from breast cancer to capecitabine monotherapy: a case report

A 62-year-old woman with breast cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by breast-conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy. During adjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitor, she developed multiple bone metastases. Thereafter, she received tamoxifen and zoledronate therapy. In May 2011, she developed a tongue deviation and was diagnosed as having meningeal carcinomatosis. The tongue deviation disappeared 3 weeks after taking capecitabine (2,400 mg/day). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed regression of meningeal carcinomatosis. Levels of tumor markers CEA and CA15-3 changed from 96.0 IU/ml and 3.5 ng/ml to 47.0 IU/ml and 1.5 ng/ml, respectively. Progression-free survival with capecitabine monotherapy was 5 months.

The possibility of lapatinib treatment for breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases. Case study and literature review

In patients with breast cancer with overexpression of the HER2 receptor, during treatment with trastuzumab, in 30% of cases brain metastases are observed. The use of lapatinib with capecitabine (L + C) seems to be an efficacious method of curing patients in whom the spread of cancer in this location has occurred. In a patient aged 52 treated by the L + C scheme a stabilization of changes in the brain was noted, lingering for 17 months. The tolerance of the treatment was good. Grade 2 hand-foot syndrome on the NCI 2,0 scale, nausea, a first degree increase in transaminase levels and first degree diarrhea were observed. No hematological or cardiac complications were observed. In the third phase test comparing capecitabine with capecitabine and lapatinib in patients with advanced breast cancer, adding lapatinib to capecitabine significantly prolonged the time until progression and contributed to lessening of the amount of progression of the condition into the central nervous system. Recently published studies showed 6% remission of metastases to the central nervous system in patients with advanced breast cancer with brain metastases treated with lapatinib and 20-21% in patients receiving lapatinib with capecitabine. Future studies evaluating the effectiveness of lapatinib in patients with spread into the central nervous system should include the evaluation of lapatinib in association with cytostatics able to break through the blood-brain barrier. Lapatinib should also be tested in association with brain radiation, considering the results of preclinical studies indicating that it may work as a radiation sensitizer.

Breast cancer subtypes and response to systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the role of systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in immunohistochemically defined biological subsets of breast cancer patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

The group of 420 consecutive breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated at the same institution between the years of 2003 to 2009 was analyzed. Patients were divided into 4 immunohistochemically biological subsets, based on the levels of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptors, and labeled as luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and triple-negative. Survival from brain metastases with and without systemic treatment after WBRT was calculated in 4 subsets.

RESULTS

In the entire group, the median survival from brain metastases in patients without and with systemic treatment after WBRT was 3 and 10 months, respectively (P < .0001). In the triple-negative subset, the median survival from brain metastases with and without systemic treatment was 4 and 3 months (P = .16), and in the luminal A subset, it was 12 and 3 months, respectively (P = .003). In the luminal B subset, the median survival without further treatment, after chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, and after chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy with targeted therapy was 2 months, 9 months, and 15 months, respectively (P < .0001). In the HER2 subset, the median survival was 4 months, 6 months, and 13 months, respectively (P < .0001). No significant response to systemic treatment was noted in the triple-negative breast cancer population.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy, ordered after WBRT, appears to improve survival in patients with the luminal A, luminal B, and HER2 breast cancer subtypes. Targeted therapy was found to have an additional positive impact on survival. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the role of systemic treatment after WBRT appears to be less clear, and therefore this issue requires further investigation.

Systemic treatment in breast-cancer patients with brain metastasis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Breast cancer is the second most common cause of CNS metastasis, following lung cancer. With better control of systemic disease, the CNS is emerging as a sanctuary site of relapse in patients with otherwise controlled cancer.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Standard therapy for brain metastasis is currently whole-brain radiotherapy. Other treatment modalities include surgery and radiosurgery in selected cases, corticosteroids, and systemic chemotherapy. Little progress has been made in chemotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases, partly because tumors develop brain metastases at a stage when they become totally chemoresistant. Nevertheless, new treatment choices have emerged considering cytotoxic and biological agents for the treatment of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer.

WHAT THE READERS WILL GAIN

In this review, we aimed to review current and future treatment options in the systemic treatment of brain metastases of breast cancer.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Corticosteroids, anti-epileptic drugs, and radiotherapy remain the cornerstones of management. The efficacy of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapeutics is limited. Novel biologic agents, lapatinib being the most promising, are currently investigated in the treatment of brain metastases of breast cancer with promising results.

Rationally designed pharmacogenomic treatment using concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy for glioblastoma; gene expression profiles associated with outcome

PURPOSE

Previous preclinical studies suggested that concurrent capecitabine and radiation could be an effective new treatment modality for glioblastoma (GBM). In the current study, we investigate toxicity and response to this regimen and explore associations between gene expression and patient outcome.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eighteen newly diagnosed GBM patients received concurrent capecitabine at 625 mg/m2 BID (25% escalation) and irradiation (60 Gy total) for 6 weeks followed by 4 weeks of capecitabine only. Maintenance capecitabine was administered for 14 days every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Expression analysis of 94 genes involved in capecitabine metabolism and radiation response was done on tissues obtained before therapy. The relationship of gene expression with time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) was investigated using univariate Cox proportional hazards regression, semi-supervised principle component analysis, and class prediction modeling.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine was 625 mg/m2 BID. Median patient TTP and OS were 247 and 367 days, respectively. Cox regression identified 24 genes significantly (P<0.025) associated with patient outcome. Semi-supervised principle component analysis identified two patient populations significantly different in both TTP (P=0.005) and OS (P=0.015). Class prediction modeling determined that eight genes (RAD54B, MTOR, DCTD, APEX2, TK1, RRM2, SLC29A1, and ERCC6) could collectively classify patients into outcome subgroups with 100% accuracy and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine and concurrent radiation for newly diagnosed GBM seems to be well tolerated and comparable to temozolomide and radiation. A gene expression profile predictive of patient outcome that may be useful in patient stratification for therapy was also elucidated.

Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT)

BACKGROUND

Patients with breast cancer brain metastasis are a heterogeneous group in relation to tumor biology and outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The group of 222 breast cancer patients with brain metastasis was divided into three biological subgroups. The propensity of biological subtypes for metastases to the brain and survivals depending on biological subtype, recursive partitioning analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RPA RTOG) prognostic class and the use of systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy were assessed.

RESULTS

The rate of patients with triple-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and luminal breast cancer with brain metastases was 28%, 53% and 19%, respectively. Median survival from brain metastases in triple-negative, HER2-positive and luminal subtype was 3.7, 9 and 15 months, respectively. Median survival from brain metastases in RPA RTOG prognostic class I, II and III was 15, 11 and 3 months, respectively. In the luminal and in the triple-negative subtype, systemic therapy prolonged survival from 3 to 14 months and from 3 to 4 months, respectively. In HER2-positive subtype, median survival without further treatment, after chemotherapy and after chemotherapy with targeted therapy were 3, 8 and 11 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancers have special predilection for metastases to the brain. Survival from brain metastases depended on performance status and the use of systemic treatment.

The role of intra-cerebrospinal fluid treatment and prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors

Metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS), including neoplastic meningitis (NM), is a devastating complication of systemic cancer. With the improved survival of cancer patients, the incidence of CNS metastasis is rising, especially among those with breast or lung carcinoma. New therapies that effectively treat these primary tumors outside of the CNS have underscored the significance of CNS metastases; they have become a significant clinical issue and a therapeutic challenge. This review discusses clinical situations in which treatment or chemoprophylaxis of CNS metastases and NM from breast or lung cancer may play an important role. Potential clinical trials to assess these assumptions also will be proposed.

Contemporary issues and the potential uses of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Since its first regulatory approval more than 10 years ago, oncologists have gained wide experience in using the oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with other agents and the body of evidence supporting these approaches continues to grow. Alongside this increasing experience has been the appearance of new challenges in patient management. We now recognise several different biological subtypes of breast cancer, such as HER2-positive disease. The standard of care in these tumours comprises anti-HER2 therapy, and phase III data show that capecitabine can be effectively combined with such agents. Another increasingly prominent and currently unresolved issue resulting from more effective treatment of metastatic disease is the management of patients with brain metastases. The introduction of new, well-tolerated, oral chemotherapies also provides the opportunity for longer duration of therapy. These new clinical scenarios are discussed in the current review.

Dramatic Regression of Multiple Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer with Capecitabine: Another Arrow at the Bow?

Several chemotherapic agents, which are active against breast cancer, penetrate poorly into the central nervous system. Despite its limited brain penetration, 5-fluorouracil has been a component of effective regimens for brain metastases. Capecitabine is a recently developed oral prodrug that is converted into 5-fluorouracil by sequential enzymatic steps. Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is the final enzyme responsible for Capecitabine activation. Studies have demonstrated that high intratumoral levels of TP and low levels of its catabolite dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenase are correlated with the capecitabine response. The penetration of Capecitabine across the brain-blood barrier remains unknown; we report the case of and discuss a breast cancer patient who had an interesting response of brain metastases with Capecitabine in monochemotherapy before brain irradiation.

Multicenter phase II study of lapatinib in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Brain metastases develop in one third of patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Effective therapy for patients with central nervous system (CNS) progression after cranial radiation is extremely limited and represents a major clinical challenge. Lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor/HER2 inhibitor, was associated with regressions of CNS lesions in a small phase 2 trial. The current study was done to further evaluate the CNS activity of lapatinib. The study was later amended to allow patients who progressed on lapatinib the option of receiving lapatinib plus capecitabine.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients had HER2+ breast cancer, progressive brain metastases, prior trastuzumab, and cranial radiotherapy. The primary end point was CNS objective response, defined as >or=50% volumetric reduction of CNS lesion(s) in the absence of increasing steroid use, progressive neurologic signs and symptoms, or progressive extra-CNS disease.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and forty-two patients entered the study. CNS objective responses to lapatinib were observed in 6% of patients. In an exploratory analysis, 21% of patients experienced a >or=20% volumetric reduction in their CNS lesions. An association was observed between volumetric reduction and improvement in progression-free survival and neurologic signs and symptoms. Of the 50 evaluable patients who entered the lapatinib plus capecitabine extension, 20% experienced a CNS objective response and 40% experienced a >or=20% volumetric reduction in their CNS lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the modest CNS antitumor activity of lapatinib. Additional responses were observed with the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine. Further studies of lapatinib-based regimens for CNS metastases from HER2+ breast cancer are warranted.

Concurrent capecitabine and whole-brain radiotherapy for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients

Preclinical data have demonstrated that ionizing radiation acts synergistically with capecitabine. This report retrospectively assessed the use of capecitabine concurrently with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. From January 2003 to March 2005, five breast cancer patients with brain metastases were referred for WBRT with concurrent capecitabine. Median age was 44 years (range: 38-53). The median dose of capecitabine was 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days (day1-14). Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days, concurrently with WBRT (30 Gy, 3 Gy per fraction, 5 days per week). Median survival after starting WBRT plus capecitabine was 6.5 months (range 1-34 months). One patient achieved a complete response. Two patients achieved partial response, including one with local control lasting until most recent follow-up. One patient had stable disease. The remaining patient was not assessable for response because of early death. Most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (n = 2) and headache (n = 2), always grade 1. Other toxicities were grade 3 hand/foot syndrome (n = 1), moderate anemia requiring transfusion and dose reduction of capecitabine (n = 1), and grade 1 mucositis (n = 1). Although promising, these preliminary data warrant further assessment of capecitabine-based chemoradiation in brain metastases from breast cancer and need to be further validated in the setting of a clinical trial.

Dramatic response with capecitabine after cranial radiation to the brain parenchymal and leptomeningeal metastases from lung cancer

It is known that the prognosis of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer with brain metastasis are very poor with a median survival of only a few months. Although some chemotherapeutic agents penetrate the blood brain barrier generally chemotherapy results are bad but efficiency may be better after radiotherapy. For this reason brain metastatic disease requires some efforts to improve the response rate. Here we reported a case with lung cancer metastatic to the brain and we discussed the good response to capecitabine after cranial radiotherapy (C).

Treatment strategies in CNS metastases

BACKGROUND

CNS metastases constitute the most common brain malignancy in adults and, therefore, represent a challenging issue in cancer treatment.

PURPOSE

To review the role and indication of the various treatment options in the context of important prognostic factors that may guide the selection of patients who could benefit from each treatment modality.

METHODS

Therapeutic approaches in treating CNS metastases include surgery, radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy, and are reviewed through a critical evaluation of published recent literature; however, in the majority of most common malignancies spreading to the CNS, treatment remains largely palliative and rarely curative, as is the case for other metastastic sites.

CONCLUSIONS

It is anticipated that a multidisciplinary approach with rapid integration of new treatment strategies is required for the treatment of patients developing CNS metastases, ultimately aiming to prolong survival, preserve neurologic function and improve quality of life.

Central nervous system metastases in HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: a treatment challenge

With improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic options and a corresponding improvement in survival, central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is becoming a more frequent diagnosis in breast cancer patients. It can be assumed that up to 30% of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients may experience CNS metastasis during the course of their disease. Moreover, it has been reported that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-overexpressing MBC are at a higher risk for CNS involvement. Whereas locoregional treatment modalities such as surgery, radiosurgery, and whole-brain radiotherapy still must be considered as the treatment of first choice, the armamentarium of systemic treatment modalities has been expanded by the introduction of small molecules such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Rather than analyzing the risk factors for the development of CNS metastasis and reviewing the standard diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with CNS involvement, this review focuses specifically on systemic treatment modalities in patients suffering from CNS metastasis from HER-2-overexpressing MBC.

Chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: have new chemotherapic agents changed the clinical outcome?

Brain metastasis occurs in 15-40% of cancer patients and is present in approximately 10-16% of patients with metastatic breast disease. However, little is known about prognostic factors enabling the early identification of breast cancer patients at risk of CNS metastases. Therapy for brain metastases should be based on several parameters, such as the assessment of prognostic variables, the extent of neurological and systemic disease, and its chemo-sensitivity to previously administered chemotherapy treatments. In view of the known close correlation between metastatic and primary tumor chemosensitivity, the type of chemotherapy chosen should depend more on the tumor histology than on the cerebral distribution of the single drug. More recent drugs with a high impact on the clinical outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients, such as taxanes or trastuzumab, play only a limited role in the treatment of brain metastases.

Successful treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer using the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine: a case report

We report a case of metastatic breast cancer with leptomeninges and multiple bone metastases that showed an excellent response to the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine; therapeutic effect was evaluated by MRI at follow-up. A 44-year-old woman underwent modified radical mastectomy in February 1997. In April 2003, a tumor at the right basis cerebri and multiple bone metastases were noted, and in October 2003, she underwent enucleation of the tumor. Histopathologically, the tumor was consistent with a basal skull metastasis from breast cancer. In March 2004, the patient began to experience pain, weakness, and paresthesia of both legs. She was diagnosed, with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from breast cancer using MRI. In December 2005, the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine administered as sixth-line treatment was very effective for LM. Although it is generally very difficult to diagnose LM and assess the therapeutic effect with MRI, in this case, it was possible. To our knowledge, there has been no report in the literature describing the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine for LM from breast cancer. Although the mechanism underlying the efficacy of this combination is still unknown, the treatment would be worth trying because of its few side effects in extensively treated patients with LM from breast cancer. To confirm the antitumor efficacy of trastuzumab and capecitabine, however, further investigations are required.

Multidisciplinary management of brain metastases

Metastatic brain tumors are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. The incidence of brain metastases appears to be rising as a result of superior imaging modalities, earlier detection, and more effective treatment of systemic disease. Therapeutic approaches to brain metastases include surgery, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and chemotherapy. Treatment decisions must take into account clinical prognostic factors in order to maximize survival and neurologic function whilst avoiding unnecessary treatments. The goal of this article is to review important prognostic factors that may guide treatment selection, discuss the roles of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with brain metastases, and present new directions in brain metastasis therapy under active investigation. In the future, patients will benefit from a multidisciplinary approach focused on the integration of surgical, radiation, and chemotherapeutic options with the goal of prolonging survival, preserving neurologic and neurocognitive function, and maximizing quality of life.

Capecitabine therapy of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer carry a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is often ineffective due to the impermeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and inherent chemoresistance of CNS metastases. There are limited data supporting the use of capecitabine in this setting. Medical records of seven patients with brain metastases from breast cancer who received capecitabine treatment at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1994-2006 were reviewed. Treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively in those patients. Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to the development of CNS metastasis was 48 (18-165) months. Four patients had brain metastases alone, two patients had both leptomeningeal and brain metastases and one patient had leptomeningeal metastasis alone. Five out of seven patients had failed other treatment modalities before capecitabine. Three patients showed complete response (CR) and three patients had stable disease (SD) after capecitabine. The patient with leptomeningeal disease improved clinically, but refused repeat cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies. Median overall and progression-free survival from initiation of capecitabine was 13 and 8 months, respectively, for all patients. Capecitabine may achieve a CR and provide long-term control in patients with both leptomeningeal and parenchymal CNS metastases from breast cancer.

Brain metastases: the HER2 paradigm

Between 100,000 and 170,000 patients with cancer develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases each year in the U.S., of which approximately 20% carry a primary diagnosis of breast cancer. As a consequence of improvements in systemic therapy, which have allowed patients to live longer with advanced cancer, CNS metastases are emerging as an important sanctuary site, and the incidence may be increasing in patients with particular tumor subtypes. Unless there are improvements in the treatment of CNS disease, a growing proportion of patients may be at risk of experiencing both morbidity and mortality as a result of uncontrolled CNS progression, often at a time when their extra-CNS disease is apparently under control. This article reviews changes in the epidemiology and natural history of women with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer over the last decade and presents the therapeutic challenges and opportunities that have arisen in this setting. First, the apparent increase in CNS disease among women with HER2-positive breast cancer, relative to historical controls, is discussed, followed by consideration of potential causes of this observation. Next, the implications of CNS disease, in terms of prognosis and the potential development of preventive strategies are considered. Finally, new developments in systemic approaches to the treatment of CNS disease, including cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy, are explored.

Chemotherapy and cerebral metastases: misperception or reality?

Cerebral metastases remain a common complication among patients with cancer. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the principal therapeutic interventions. In contrast, the benefit of chemotherapy has long been viewed with skepticism. Nonetheless, as survival in cancer patients improves and the incidence of cerebral metastases increases, so does the demand for effective therapies. It is now recognized that the blood-brain barrier within metastases is permeable and thus allows entry of otherwise excluded drugs. Limited data have suggested that cerebral metastases have modest sensitivity to chemotherapy. Furthermore, novel agents and delivery strategies have been developed to facilitate central nervous system penetration. Nonetheless, data are limited by methodological flaws, including heterogeneous inclusion criteria, small sample sizes, lack of randomization, and inconsistencies in defined end points and response assessment criteria. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to address the effect of chemotherapy. Acceptable control arms must be established to measure the effect of chemotherapies. Standardized response criteria and disease-specific studies are essential.

Chemotherapy and the treatment of brain metastases

Brain metastases have traditionally been treated with a surgical or radiotherapeutic approach. Chemotherapy is used occasionally as salvage therapy. The blood-brain barrier excludes most chemotherapeutic agents, rendering many systemic options ineffective within the CNS. Intrathecal chemotherapies do not penetrate into brain tissue or bulky parenchymal tumors, so are ineffective in treatment of brain metastases. However, some patients with brain metastases benefit from chemotherapy, and temozolomide or targeted therapies like gefitinib have demonstrated activity. A better understanding of the biological behavior of brain metastases may lead to development of effective treatments for this common complication of systemic cancer. The review discusses the biology of brain metastases and provides an update on current chemotherapeutic strategies.

Systemic high-dose intravenous methotrexate for central nervous system metastases

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with recurrent central nervous system (CNS) metastases are limited. Rapid infusion of high-dose intravenous methotrexate (HD IV MTX) penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and has reported activity in leptomeningeal metastases.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for all patients treated with HD IV MTX (3.5 g/m2) for CNS parenchymal or leptomeningeal metastases. Radiographic response rate, survival, and toxicity were determined.

RESULTS

Thirty-one women and one man with a median age of 52 years (range 33-76) were treated with a total of 141 cycles (median 4, range 1-13). Twenty-nine patients had breast cancer, and one each had cancer of unknown primary (CUP), squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An objective radiographic response and stable disease were each observed in nine patients (28%), and 13 (44%) patients progressed. Prior treatment with low-dose MTX for systemic disease did not affect response (P = 0.8). The median overall survival (n = 32) was 19.9 weeks (range 2.9-135.4+) with one patient alive at 135.4 weeks. Myelosuppression and elevated serum hepatic transaminases were the most common acute toxicities (21% and 9% of HD IV MTX cycles, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

HD IV MTX is effective in the treatment of CNS metastases with disease control (response or stable) as a best response in 56% of assessable patients. Further study is warranted.