Fetal death from abruptio placentae associated with incorrect use of a seatbelt

The Impact of Seat Belt Use in Pregnancy on Injuries and Outcomes After Motor Vehicle Collisions

BACKGROUND

Seat belt use during motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) has been shown to alter adults' intra-abdominal injury patterns, although the effect of seat belt use in pregnant women is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of seat belt use in pregnancy on injuries and outcomes after MVCs.

METHODS

Patients injured by MVCs were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2014). The exclusion criteria were transfer from an outside hospital, male or unspecified sex, missing restraint data, and nonchildbearing age. Demographics, clinical/injury data, pregnancy status, seat belt use, and outcomes were collected. Study groups were dichotomized by pregnancy status with subgroup analysis by seat belt use. Univariate/multivariate analyses compared outcomes and determined predictors of seat belt use.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 162,964 women were included, of which 680 (<1%) were pregnant. Intra-abdominal injuries during pregnancy did not vary according to seat belt use (P > 0.05). Unrestrained pregnant women were more injured (Injury Severity Score: 13 versus 7, P < 0.001), more likely to need emergent operation (14% versus 10%, P < 0.001), and had a longer hospital stay (6 versus 4 d, P = 0.012) than restrained counterparts. On multivariate analysis among pregnant women, seat belt use was associated with age ≥25 y (odds ratio: 2.033, P = 0.001). The lack of restraint use was associated with the position in the passenger seat (odds ratio: 0.521, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Seat belt use in pregnancy does not alter abdominal injury patterns but is associated with lower injury severity, reduced need for emergent surgery, and shortened hospital stay. Public health interventions emphasizing the importance of seat belts could be focused on younger patients and vehicle passengers to reach the high-risk pregnant subset.

Effect of an educational leaflet on the frequency of seat belt use and the rate of motor vehicle accidents during pregnancy in Japan in 2018: a prospective, non-randomised control trial with a questionnaire survey

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an educational leaflet had any effect on seat belt use, seat preference and motor vehicle accidents rate during pregnancy in Japan.

DESIGN

Prospective, non-randomised control trial with a questionnaire survey.

SETTING

Eight obstetric hospitals in Sapporo, Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

2216 pregnant women, of whom 1105 received the leaflet (intervention group) and 1111 did not (control group).

INTERVENTIONS

Distribution of an educational leaflet on seat belt use to women in the intervention group.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The effect of an educational leaflet on seat belt use, each pregnant woman's seat preference and the women's rates of motor vehicle accidents rate during their pregnancies. To evaluate the effects, the intervention group's responses to the questionnaires were compared with those of the control group.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects who always used seat belts during pregnancy was significantly higher in the intervention group (91.3%) than in the control group (86.7%; p=0.0005). Among all subjects, the percentage of women who preferred the driver's seat was lower during pregnancy (27.0%) than before pregnancy (38.7%), and the percentage of women who preferred the rear seat was higher during pregnancy (28.8%) than before pregnancy (21.0%). These two rates did not differ between two groups. Seventy-one women (3.2%) reported experiencing a motor vehicle accident during pregnancy. The motor vehicle accident rate for the intervention group (3.3%) was similar to that for the control group (3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

An educational seat belt leaflet was effective in raising the rate of consistent seat belt use during pregnancy, but it did not decrease the rate of motor vehicle accidents. The wearing of seat belts should be promoted more extensively among pregnant women to decrease rates of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle accidents.

Seat belt-related injuries: A surgical perspective

Introduction:

Legislation making seatbelt use mandatory is considered to have reduced fatal and serious injuries by 25%, with UK government estimates predicting more than 50,000 lives saved since its introduction. However, whilst the widespread use of seatbelts has reduced the incidence of major traumatic injury and death from road-traffic collisions (RTCs), their use has also heralded a range of different injuries. The first ever seatbelt related injury was described in 1956, and since then clear patterns of seatbelt-related injuries have been recognised.

Methodology and Findings:

This review of the published literature demonstrates that the combination of airbags and three-point seatbelts renders no part of the body free from injury. Serious injuries can, and do, occur even when passengers are properly restrained and attending clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for overt or covert intra-abdominal injuries when patients involved in RTCs attend the Emergency Department. Bruising to the trunk and abdomen in a seatbelt distribution is an obvious sign that suggests an increased risk of abdominal and thoracic injury, but bruising may not be apparent and its absence should not be falsely reassuring. A high index of suspicion should be retained for other subtler signs of injury. Children and pregnant women represent high-risk groups who are particularly vulnerable to injuries.

Conclusion:

In this review we highlight the common patterns of seatbelt-related injuries. A greater awareness of the type of injuries caused by seatbelt use will help clinicians to identify and treat overt and covert injuries earlier, and help reduce the rates of morbidity and mortality following RTCs.

Prenatal counseling on seat belt use and crash-related medical care

Describe the prevalence of and characteristics associated with being hurt in a car accident during pregnancy; the resulting medical care needed; and the association between counseling and the medical care needed after a car accident. Secondary data analysis of PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System) data, a population based survey of women with a recent live birth. Two percent of women were hurt in a car accident during their pregnancy. Only 57% of them had received counseling on seat belt use. Most women (87%) who were hurt in an accident needed medical care. Being counseled on seat belt use was not associated with the level of care needed. Most pregnant women who are hurt in a car accident require medical care or bed rest. Public health action and research is needed to reduce the burden of motor-vehicle related injuries among pregnant women.

The ability of computed tomography to diagnose placental abruption in the trauma patient

BACKGROUND

Fetal demise following trauma remains a devastating complication largely owing to placental injury and abruption. Our objective was to determine if abdominopelvic computed tomographic (CT) imaging can assess for placental abruption (PA) when obtained to exclude associated maternal injuries.

METHODS

Retrospective review of pregnant trauma patients of 20-week gestation or longer presenting to a trauma center during a 7-year period who underwent CT imaging as part of their initial evaluation. Radiographic images were reviewed by a radiologist for evidence of PA and classified based on percentage of visualized placental enhancement. Blinded to CT results, charts were reviewed by an obstetrician for clinical evidence of PA and classified as strongly positive, possibly positive, or no evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients met inclusion criteria. CT imaging revealed evidence of PA in 61 patients (35%). As the percentage of placental enhancement decreased, patients were more likely to have strong clinical manifestations of PA, reaching statistical significance when enhancement was less than 50%. CT imaging evidence of PA was apparent in all patients who required delivery for nonassuring fetal heart tones.

CONCLUSION

CT imaging evaluation of the placenta can accurately identify PA and therefore can help stratify patients at risk for fetal complications. The likelihood of requiring delivery increased as placental enhancement declined to less than 25%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level III.

The Consequences of High-Risk Behaviors: Trauma During Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Trauma during pregnancy places two lives at risk. Knowledge of risk factors for trauma during pregnancy may improve outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 188 such patients admitted to a Level I trauma center from 1996 to 2004. A comparison was made of injury severity and outcome from a cohort of nonpregnant female trauma patients selected with a similar temporal occurrence and age range.

RESULTS

Motor vehicle collisions comprised 160 cases, 67 using a restraint device. Of 84 patients tested, 45 tested positive for intoxicants, 16 positive for 2 or more intoxicants. A significant trend toward less testing through the study period was observed (p = 0.0002). Injury severity was assessed by Revised Trauma Score (RTS). RTS <11 or admission to operating room or intensive care units (OR/ICU) classified patients as severely injured. The six maternal fatalities had an RTS <11 or OR/ICU disposition. Fetal outcomes included 155 live in utero, 18 live births, and 15 fatalities correlating with injury severity by either criteria (p < 0.0001). Of the fetal fatalities, 7 occurred with RTS = 12, but only 3 fatalities occurred in the 147 cases not admitted to OR/ICU. Gestational age correlated (p < 0.0001) with fetal outcomes. The 18 live births had mean gestational ages of 35 +/- 4 weeks as compared with fetal fatalities at 20 +/- 9 weeks, and fetuses alive in utero at 22 +/- 9 weeks gestation. Coagulation tests prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR) (both p < 0.008), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) (p < 0.0001) correlated with maternal outcome. A matched cohort of nonpregnancy trauma cases during the same time frame indicated that, despite a significantly higher percentage of severely injured patients, fewer fatalities occurred. This might reflect a greater risk for the pregnant trauma patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of trauma in pregnancy cases revealed a high percentage with risk behaviors. There was a significant trend toward less intoxicant testing in recent years. Coagulation tests were the most predictive of outcomes. Lower gestational age correlated with fetal demise.

Profile of mothers at risk: An analysis of injury and pregnancy loss in 1,195 trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the number one cause of maternal death during pregnancy, but incidence of fetal loss exceeds maternal loss by more than 3 to 1. We hypothesized that we could identify women at risk for injury during pregnancy and focus our prevention efforts.

STUDY DESIGN

Women of childbearing age in the American College of Surgeon's National Trauma Data Bank served as the study population. Pregnant patients were compared with nonpregnant patients with respect to age, race, mechanism of injury, injury patterns and severity, risk-taking behaviors, and outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for loss of pregnancy in mothers who survived their trauma.

RESULTS

Pregnant trauma patients (n = 1,195) were younger, less severely injured, and more likely to be African American or Hispanic as compared with the nonpregnant cohort (n = 76,126). Twenty percent of injured pregnant patients tested positive for drugs or alcohol, and approximately one-third of those involved in motor vehicle crashes were not using seatbelts. Independent risk factors for fetal loss after trauma included Injury Severity Score > 15; Adjusted Injury Score > or = 3 in the head, abdomen, thorax, or lower extremities; and Glasgow Coma Score < or = 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Young, African-American, and Hispanic pregnant women are at higher risk for trauma in pregnancy and are most likely to benefit from primary trauma prevention efforts. Those with severe head, abdominal, thoracic, or lower extremity injuries are at high risk for pregnancy loss. Reduction of secondary insults and early recognition of fetal distress may improve outcomes for both the mother and fetus in this high-risk group.

Car seatbelt use during pregnancy in Japan: determinants and policy implications

CONTEXT

Pregnant women are exempted from the current seatbelt legislation in Japan despite the fact that seatbelt use is essential to reduce the risk of fatalities for these women and their fetuses in car crashes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors that might influence seatbelt use during pregnancy.

METHODS

A cross sectional study, with data collected via an anonymous, self administered questionnaire at obstetric clinics in suburban areas of Japan. Altogether 880 pregnant women receiving prenatal care in July 2001 were recruited. The relative effects of factors that might influence seatbelt use during pregnancy were estimated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Almost 70%-80% of pregnant women were consistent seatbelt wearers before pregnancy but seatbelt compliance was reduced by about half at 20 weeks or more gestation. Only 20% had received information on maternal seatbelt use, with one third reporting that seatbelt use is beneficial during pregnancy. Those who perceived that maternal seatbelt use is beneficial tended to maintain use, but daily car users and those who knew that they were exempted from seatbelt legislation were more likely to reduce use.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the legislative exemption for pregnant women, misunderstanding of the benefits, and daily car use contributed to the reduction in seatbelt use after pregnancy.