Comparison of tracheal aspirates and protected brush catheter specimens for identifying pathogenic bacteria in mechanically ventilated patients

Care of children with home mechanical ventilation in the healthcare continuum

Introduction:The care of children with invasive home mechanical ventilation (HMV) is challenging and insufficiently described in the literature. Objectives:Our objective regarding this unique and growing population is to describe our institution's pediatric chronic HMV program and discuss our current understanding of best care practices. Methods: In addition to characterizing the clinical landscape of our program, we describe demographics for our roughly 223 current HMV patients with comparisons to available national data.  We discuss evidence and expert opinion regarding various elements of care including initiation of HMV, caregiver education, equipment concerns, inpatient care, and longitudinal care.Results: Data was collected but not statistically analyzed for our roughly 223 current patients and historical cohort. Descriptive data included demographic information, patient medical characteristics and complexity, and reasons for rehospitalizations.Conclusions:While we have provided institutional expertise regarding the care of this complex population, the evidence base remains insufficient and there are many areas which need future research to develop standardized care practice guidelines for children with HMV.

Clinical practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important causes of morbidity and mortality, with mortality rates approaching 62%. HAP and VAP are the second most common cause of nosocomial infection overall, but are the most common cause documented in the intensive care unit setting. In addition, HAP and VAP produce the highest mortality associated with nosocomial infection. As a result, evidence-based guidelines were prepared detailing the epidemiology, microbial etiology, risk factors and clinical manifestations of HAP and VAP. Furthermore, an approach based on the available data, expert opinion and current practice for the provision of care within the Canadian health care system was used to determine risk stratification schemas to enable appropriate diagnosis, antimicrobial management and nonantimicrobial management of HAP and VAP. Finally, prevention and risk-reduction strategies to reduce the risk of acquiring these infections were collated. Future initiatives to enhance more rapid diagnosis and to effect better treatment for resistant pathogens are necessary to reduce morbidity and improve survival.

Quantitative cultures for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a critique

The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia has been clouded by uncertainty, because a reference standard has never been established. The use of invasive procedures to obtain respiratory tract samples for culture, with quantitation of the bacteria isolated, has been the approach most commonly advocated. Quantitation of bacteria from lower respiratory tract specimens can be used to distinguish colonization from infection. We review the invasive procedures (bronchoalveolar lavage, protected specimen brushing, nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, and blinded bronchial sampling), the methods of quantitation used, the types of catheters used, the sample collection methods, and the criteria used as cutoffs for the quantitative cultures. Quantitation of lower respiratory tract samples is inherently unstable from a mathematical perspective, given the variability in the volume of fluid instilled and reaspirated and the magnitude and complexity of the area being sampled. We also briefly review the use of quantitation for bacterial infections other than pneumonia, including urinary tract infection and catheter-related bacteremia. The variability in both the methods and reference criteria in the studies reviewed show that the quantitation approach is neither standardized nor evidence based.

Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: focus on nonbronchoscopic techniques (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen brush, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspirates

The ideal diagnostic approach for ventilator-associated pneumonia currently is based on invasive procedures to obtain respiratory tract cultures. Given the lack of consensus and relatively poor acceptance of full bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and protected specimen brush (PSB), less invasive procedures have been developed. We review the nonbronchoscopic procedures (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspiration. We provide a critique of the methods used, the types of catheters inserted, and the sample collection methods. Most studies were flawed in that antibiotic use before initiation of the procedure was not controlled. The variability of both the methods and the criteria for the gold standard in the numerous investigations show that these procedures are neither standardized nor proven to be accurate and often did not improve management. Pending future studies, use of endotracheal aspirates without the use of quantitation seems to be a reasonable approach for clinicians who are not committed to an invasive procedure.

[Difficulties on diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia]

Ventilator associated pneumonia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. It is important a correct diagnosis in way to guide the antibiotic therapy in the most appropriate way. However, its diagnosis is difficult, because clinical and radiologic features are not specific and approaches to standard diagnosis, that allow its confirmation, are very invasive or not very frequent. Protected techniques and quantitative cultures have been trying to outline the problem of the contamination of the samples obtained by routine methods and to allow the distinction between colonization and infection. The author makes a revision on the different methods of diagnosis of this clinical entity.

Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: agreement between quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspiration and plugged telescoping catheter

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic agreement between quantitative cultures of samples obtained with endotracheal aspiration (ETA) and plugged telescoping catheter (PTC).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Medical ICU.

PATIENTS

Hundred thirty-eight episodes of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia studied in 100 consecutive patients.

INTERVENTIONS

For each suspected episode of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ETA and PTC were performed consecutively. The agreement between microbiological results obtained from the two techniques was evaluated (kappa statistic test). Pneumonia was diagnosed on a positive culture result of telescoping catheter with the threshold set at 10(3) cfu/ml or more. The cut-off points evaluated for ETA ranged from 10(2 )to 10(6) cfu/ml.

RESULTS

Micro-organisms retrieved by aspiration and telescoping catheter were similar and bacterial counts obtained by the two procedures were well correlated ( r = 0.71 p < 0.001). There was good agreement between positive and negative ETA and PTC specimens (kappa: 0.78) with a diagnostic threshold for ETA of 10(4) cfu/ml. The sensitivity and specificity of ETA for the diagnosis of PTC-confirmed pneumonia were 92% and 85%, respectively. Kappa decreased to 0.48 when the diagnostic threshold was increased to 10(6) cfu/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative cultures of ETA and PTC tallied for both micro-organisms and counts. The simpler ETA appears adequate for determining the presence of pathogenic organisms in significant concentration in the lower respiratory tract.

A rational approach to the evaluation and treatment of the infected patient in the intensive care unit

Critically ill patients are at increased risk of acquiring nosocomial infections. A thorough clinical evaluation and the selection of appropriate diagnostic techniques are important elements in the evaluation of these patients. Nonetheless, this selection process can be difficult because of the wide spectrum of disease that is seen in the ICU and the lack of standardized studies that have evaluated the different diagnostic methods that are available. Many different antimicrobials are available for the treatment of ICU-acquired infections. Most antimicrobial regimens have not been evaluated in large-scale, prospective, randomized trials. Until this information is available, the clinician must make an effort to be familiar with the different clinical and epidemiologic variables that can be used to stratify patients at the moment of selecting antimicrobial therapy. The information provided in this article, used in association with good clinical judgment, will help the critical care physician provide optimal initial management of the infected patient in the ICU.

A Prospective Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy of Blind Protective Bronchial Brushings Compared to Bronchoscope-Assisted Lavage, Bronchoscope-Directed Brushings, and Blind Endotracheal Aspirates in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to compare techniques for the diagnosis of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia in the trauma patient. Per the literature, bronchoscope protected brushings and bronchoalveolar lavage were set as the standards for comparison because of their high specificity and sensitivity. We hypothesized that blind protected brushings were equivalent to bronchoscope-directed techniques and that endotracheal aspirates (ETA) were not.

METHODS

With informed consent, 90 trauma patients with two or more of the following were accepted into the study: 48 hours or more on the ventilator, new or increasing infiltrate on chest radiograph, excess or purulent secretions, suspected aspiration, temperature of 38.5 degrees C or above, white blood cell count greater than or equal to 12,000/mm3, and respiratory distress. Four samplings were performed on each patient using bronchoscope-assisted and nonbronchoscopic techniques. Each patient had cultures obtained by and significances quantified as follows: ETA, moderate/many/abundant; bronchoscope-directed protected brushings (BDPB), 103 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL; blind protected brushing via endotracheal tube (BPB), 103 CFU/mL; and bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), 104 CFU/mL. Quantitative cultures were obtained and compared for the following pathogens: gram-positive cocci, gram-positive rods, gram-negative cocci, gram-negative rods, anaerobic bacteria, and yeast. An assessment of agreement for cultured pathogens between the sampling modalities was completed using kappa (kappa) analysis, and significance was set at p < or = 0.05.

RESULTS

With patients used as their own controls, Gram's stain and pathogens cultured from the various sampling techniques were compared for agreement by kappa analysis. BDPB and BAL were set as the "gold standards" for comparison against each other and against the BPB and ETA. Kappa analysis was used to measure the strength of agreement for these findings; individual values from the comparisons of Gram's stain were then averaged for descriptive purposes of the data. Most kappa values were associated with a statistically significant value of p < 0.05. The greatest strength of agreement was found to be moderate comparing Gram's stain results of BPB and BDPB (kappa = 0.467), ETA and BAL (kappa = 0.535), and BPB and BAL (kappa = 0.547). Fair kappa values were shown in comparing Gram's stain results of ETA and BDPB (kappa = 0.382) and BAL and BDPB (kappa = 0.390).

CONCLUSION

A quantitative analysis of bacteriologic cultures obtained by four standard sampling techniques has demonstrated with statistical significance that no difference exists between modality of sampling in reliability or in obtaining clinically significant pathogens. In reviewing the literature, this study is the first assessment of agreement for cultured pathogens between the four different sampling modalities and the largest to assess the efficacy of the blind protected brush technique.

Quantitative culture of endotracheal aspirates in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with treatment failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation of bacteriology between quantitative cultures of protected specimen brush (PSB), BAL, and quantitative endotracheal aspirate (QEA) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients with treatment failure.

DESIGN

Prospective observational clinical study.

SETTING

A 15-bed medical ICU of tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight patients receiving mechanical ventilation with clinical suspected VAP who had been treated with antibiotics for at least 72 h without improvement.

INTERVENTION

QEA, PSB, and BAL were performed with patients receiving antibiotics. The diagnostic thresholds for QEA, PSB, and BAL were 10(5), 10(3), and 10(4) cfu/mL, respectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Microbial culture findings were positive in 24 BAL samples (50%), in 23 PSB samples (48%), and in 28 QEA samples (58%). The correlations between of QEA vs PSB and QEA vs BAL were significant (rho = 0.567 and rho = 0.620, p < 0.01, respectively). The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Acinetobacter baumannii (27%), Staphylococcus aureus (24%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (15%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%). Using the predetermined criteria, bacterial pneumonia was diagnosed in 28 of 48 suspected VAP episodes based on PSB and/or BAL results. The diagnostic efficiency of QEA at threshold of 10(5) cfu/mL had a sensitivity of 92.8% and a specificity of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

QEA correlated with PSB and BAL in patients with suspected VAP who responded poorly to the existent antibiotic treatment. QEA missed only two cases of bacterial pneumonia diagnosed by invasive PSB and/or BAL with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. More importantly, QEA is noninvasive and easily repeatable. Early use of QEA is helpful to clinical physicians in decision making with regard to antibiotics use.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continues to complicate the course of 8 to 28% of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). In contrast to infections of more frequently involved organs (e.g., urinary tract and skin), for which mortality is low, ranging from 1 to 4%, the mortality rate for VAP ranges from 24 to 50% and can reach 76% in some specific settings or when lung infection is caused by high-risk pathogens. The predominant organisms responsible for infection are Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae, but etiologic agents widely differ according to the population of patients in an intensive care unit, duration of hospital stay, and prior antimicrobial therapy. Because appropriate antimicrobial treatment of patients with VAP significantly improves outcome, more rapid identification of infected patients and accurate selection of antimicrobial agents represent important clinical goals. Our personal bias is that using bronchoscopic techniques to obtain protected brush and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from the affected area in the lung permits physicians to devise a therapeutic strategy that is superior to one based only on clinical evaluation. When fiberoptic bronchoscopy is not available to physicians treating patients clinically suspected of having VAP, we recommend using either a simplified nonbronchoscopic diagnostic procedure or following a strategy in which decisions regarding antibiotic therapy are based on a clinical score constructed from seven variables. Selection of the initial antimicrobial therapy should be based on predominant flora responsible for VAP at each institution, clinical setting, information provided by direct examination of pulmonary secretions, and intrinsic antibacterial activities of antimicrobial agents and their pharmacokinetic characteristics. Further trials will be needed to clarify the optimal duration of treatment and the circumstances in which monotherapy can be safely used.

International Conference for the Development of Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important health problem that still generates great controversy. A consensus conference attended by 12 researchers from Europe and Latin America was held to discuss strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of VAP. Commonly asked questions concerning VAP management were selected for discussion by the participating researchers. Possible answers to the questions were presented to the researchers, who then recorded their preferences anonymously. This was followed by open discussion when the results were known. In general, peers thought that early microbiological examinations are warranted and contribute to improving the use of antibiotherapy. Nevertheless, no consensus was reached regarding choices of antimicrobial agents or the optimal duration of therapy. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the preferred choice for empiric therapy, followed by a cephalosporin with antipseudomonal activity and a carbapenem. All the peers agreed that the pathogens causing VAP and multiresistance patterns in their ICUs were substantially different from those reported in studies in the United States. Pathogens and multiresistance patterns also varied from researcher to researcher inside the group. Consensus was reached on the importance of local epidemiology surveillance programs and on the need for customized empiric antimicrobial choices to respond to local patterns of pathogens and susceptibilities.

Microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a serious infectious condition in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, currently related to a high mortality rate. Therefore, this complication of mechanical ventilation requires a prompt diagnosis and adequate antibiotic treatment. The detection of the causative organism is imperative for guiding an appropriate therapy as there is strong evidence of the adverse effect of inadequate empirical treatment on outcome. The major difficulty of the microbial investigation is to obtain the sample from the lower respiratory tract, mainly because of the potential contamination with upper airways flora, which may result in a misinterpretation of the cultures. Microbial investigation in VAP is based on the culture of samples obtained from lower respiratory tract by noninvasive or invasive methods. The most common techniques of sampling are the endotracheal aspirate (ETA), which is considered a noninvasive method, the protected specimen brush (PSB) and the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), both being invasive methods of investigation. The latter were designed as an attempt to avoid the colonizing flora of the upper airways. The best of these diagnostic approaches is still controversial. In terms of outcome, there is strong evidence that the impact of both invasive and noninvasive methods seems to be similar. In terms of cost, however, the endotracheal aspirate is less expensive compared to BAL or PSB. On the other hand, invasive methods could be particularly beneficial in patients who are not responding to the initial empirical antibiotic treatment. The rationale for the quantitative culture of the respiratory samples is to differentiate between infection and colonization of lower airways, because the bacterial colonization is a frequent event in mechanically ventilated patients. The thresholds currently employed for the diagnosis of the pneumonia are the following: ETA samples, > or = 10(5)-10(6) colony forming units (cfu).mL(-1); PSB samples, > or =10(3) cfu.mL(-1); and BAL samples, > or =10(4) cfu.mL(-1). Intending to provide a practical approach to the issue, the present manuscript reviews the available noninvasive (blood culture, endotracheal aspirate) and invasive (protected specimen brush, bronchoalveolar lavage, blinded methods and lung biopsy) techniques used for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Are quantitative cultures useful in the diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia?

Noninvasive and invasive tests have been developed and studied for their utility in diagnosing and guiding the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, a condition with an inherently high mortality. Early empiric antibiotic treatment has been shown to reduce mortality, so delaying this treatment until test results are available is not justifiable. Furthermore, tailoring therapy based on results of either noninvasive or invasive tests has not been clearly shown to affect morbidity and mortality. This may be related to quantitative limitations of these tests or possibly to a high false-negative rate in patients who receive early antibiotic treatment and may therefore have suppressed bacterial counts. Results of these tests, however, do influence treatment. It is therefore hoped that they may ultimately provide a rational basis for making therapeutic decisions. In the future, outcomes research should be a part of large-scale clinical trials, and noninvasive and invasive tests should be incorporated into the design in an attempt to provide a better understanding of the value of such tests.

Pulmonary Infections in Ventilated Patients: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options

The diagnosis of pulmonary infections in the ventilated patient has threatened the foundations of medicine. Although the lifesaving techniques of endotracheal intubation (developed for the treatment of diphtheria) and artificial ventilation (developed for the management of poliomyelitis) contribute greatly to medical care, they have resulted in the production of the "progress"-related infection of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Modern ventilator therapy is a substantial technologic advance from earlier days and, as technology inherently does, has removed some of the human element, the main foundation of Oslerian medical practice. The time-honored clinical diagnosis based on physical examination by an experienced physician has been seriously compromised in the approach to VAP.

Protected specimen brush or bronchoalveolar lavage to diagnose bacterial nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated adults: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a meta-analysis by using summary receiver operating characteristic curves to compare the diagnostic value for bacterial nosocomial pneumonia of the following: a) quantitative culture (colony-forming units per milliliter or CFU/mL) of respiratory secretions collected with a bronchoscopic protected specimen brush (PSB); b) quantitative culture of a bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); and c) the percentage of infected cells (IC) in BAL.

DATA SOURCES

All studies published in the English or the French language, through January 1, 1995, on the evaluation of PSB or BAL for the diagnosis of pneumonia were considered for analysis. The relevant literature was identified through computer and reference searching and by experts in the field.

STUDY SELECTION

A study was included if at least two of three independent readers regarded its purpose as the evaluation of CFU-PSB, CFU-BAL, or IC-BAL for the diagnosis in human beings of bacterial nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated adults and if the study was prospective and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three readers reviewed all published articles and decided whether to include each study; consensus was defined as agreement by at least two readers. The authors of each original article included in the meta-analysis were asked to complete a questionnaire in which they were asked to check and to correct the data extracted by one of the independent readers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the efficacy of three diagnostic tests. Eighteen studies on CFU-PSB (795 patients) were included, as well as 11 studies on CFU-BAL (435 patients) and 11 on IC-BAL (766 patients). The accuracy of these tests was not different. However, it seems that administration of previous antibiotics markedly decreased accuracy of CFU-PSB (p = .0002) but not the accuracy of CFU-BAL and that of IC-BAL.

CONCLUSION

Both PSB and BAL are reliable to diagnose bacterial nosocomial pneumonia. Because CFU-BAL and IC-BAL seemed more resistant to the effects of antibiotics, we recommend BAL rather than PSB if the patient is already receiving antibiotics.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Mechanically ventilated patients are at a substantially higher risk for developing nosocomial pneumonia. Overall, there is a relatively constant 1&!TN!150;3% risk per day of developing pneumonia while receiving mechanical ventilation. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical criteria alone for diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP) is low. Several techniques have been developed to sample and quantitate the lower respiratory tract to improve the diagnostic yield. Gram-negative bacillary pneumonias account for the majority of the VAP. Strategies for prevention of VAP such as use of sucralfate for stress ulcer prophylaxis and selective decontamination of the digestive tract have been the focus of many clinical studies. Cost-effective preventive measures are needed to combat the increasing antimicrobial resistance, growing population of immunocompromised patients and increasing number of mechanically ventilated patients.

A reappraisal of the role of Gram's stains of tracheal aspirates in guiding antibiotic selection in the surgical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Tracheal aspirate Gram's stains are used to guide antibiotic selection in empiric pneumonia treatment in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). We questioned whether Gram's stains predict the organism cultured.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

RESULTS

Gram's stains correlated with the cultured organism in 284 of 543 (52%) SICU cultures and in 226 of 403 (56%) trauma intensive care unit (TICU) cultures. Gram-negative rod (GNR) stains yielded GNR organisms in 182 of 205 (89%) SICU cultures and in 160 of 176 (91%) TICU cultures. Gram-positive coccus (GPC) stains yielded GPC organisms in 75 of 228 (33%) SICU cultures and in 52 of 149 (35%) TICU cultures. Noncorrelates in the GPC group were predominantly GNRs (185 of 250 (74%)).

CONCLUSION

When the clinical decision has been made that empiric antibiotic coverage is necessary, GNR coverage should be instituted regardless of Gram's stain result. The decision to institute GPC coverage needs to be supported by clinical data other than the Gram's stain.

Nosocomial pneumonia. Diagnosis and prevention

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important complication in patients with respiratory failure who undergo endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. VAP cannot be accurately diagnosed by clinical or radiographic criteria or culture of endotracheal aspirates; however, it can be accurately diagnosed by histopathologic examination of lung tissue, rapid cavitation of a pulmonary infiltrate, culture of empyema fluid, percutaneous lung needle aspiration, simultaneous recovery of the same microorganism from cultures of respiratory secretions, and blood and quantitative culture of lower respiratory tract secretions obtained by bronchoscopy. VAP can be prevented by proper decontamination and use of ventilatory support equipment, practice of proper nursing techniques during care of the mechanically ventilated patient, and use of face mask ventilation in selected patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia--impact on survival. A decision analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of antibiotic treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) on survival.

DESIGN

Decision analysis.

PATIENTS

A hypothetical cohort of immunocompetent patients receiving mechanical ventilation who have suspected bacterial pneumonia. The analysis was performed separately for the following diagnostic techniques: clinical criteria, bronchoscopic protected specimen brush (PSB), and nonbronchoscopic protected BAL (pBAL). Additional factors accounted for in the analysis included the presence or absence of prior antibiotic use, mortality of antibiotic-treated and untreated pneumonia, mortality attributable to VAP, development of antibiotic resistance, and mortality due to adverse drug reactions.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The overall survival of patients who receive antibiotic therapy was compared to survival if antibiotic therapy had been withheld. Antibiotic treatment of clinically diagnosed VAP was associated with lower overall survival than withholding treatment. Antibiotic treatment of VAP diagnosed by invasive (PSB) or semi-invasive (pBAL) techniques was associated with better survival than withholding treatment, although withholding antibiotic therapy was favored as the mortality rate of antibiotic-treated VAP approached 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive or semi-invasive diagnostic techniques should be used to diagnose VAP, guide therapy, and thereby potentially improve survival. A prospective, randomized trial assessing outcome according to diagnostic technique is needed.

The role of bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has become an invaluable diagnostic tool with important clinical implications in both opportunistic infections and the pulmonary pathology of immunologic disease. Until recently, the use of BAL was limited primarily to two areas: the study of interstitial lung diseases and the diagnosis of lung infections by opportunistic microorganisms in severely immunocompromised patients with lung infiltrates. Over the past decade, the use of BAL has been expanded to include the conventional diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in non-immunocompromised patients. In the past, different clinical studies proposed using BAL to quantify cultures in the sample obtained as a means of increasing the tool's effectiveness. Recent developments have led to a number of newer applications of BAL, such as bronchoscopic BAL, non-bronchoscopic BAL and protected BAL. The most important use of BAL in the non-immunocompromised patient is the diagnosis of pneumonia in the mechanically ventilated patient.

Pneumonia in mechanically ventilated children

The quantitative aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of bronchial aspirates, obtained using protective brush catheters, from 10 children with ventilator-associated pneumonia, is presented. Aerobic or faculative organisms only were isolated in 1 child, anaerobic bacteria only in 3, and aerobic mixed with anaerobic bacteria in 6. There were 10 aerobic or faculative and 17 anaerobic isolates. The predominant aerobes were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2 isolates) and Klebsiella sp. (2). The predominant anaerobes were pigmented Prevotella and Porphyromonas species (5), Peptostreptococcus sp. (4), Fusobacterium sp. and B. fragilis group (2). A total of 10 beta-lactamase-producing aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were isolated in 8 patients. All patients except 1 responded to antimicrobial therapy directed against the recovered isolates. These data highlight the polymicrobial aerobic-anaerobic flora isolated from pulmonary specimens of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Bronchoscopic diagnosis of pneumonia

Lower respiratory tract infections are characterized by significant morbidity and mortality but also by a relative inability to establish a specific etiologic agent on clinical grounds alone. With the recognized shortcomings of expectorated or aspirated secretions toward establishing an etiologic diagnosis, clinicians have increasingly used bronchoscopy to obtain diagnostic samples. A variety of specimen types may be obtained, including bronchial washes or brushes, protected specimen brushings, bronchoalveolar lavage, and transbronchial biopsies. Bronchoscopy has been applied in three primary clinical settings, including the immunocompromised host, especially human immunodeficiency virus-infected and organ transplant patients; ventilator-associated pneumonia; and severe, nonresolving community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia in nonventilated patients. In each clinical setting, and for each specimen type, specific laboratory protocols are required to provide maximal information. These protocols should provide for the use of a variety of rapid microscopic and quantitative culture techniques and the use of a variety of specific stains and selective culture to detect unusual organism groups.

New approaches in the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia

We have presented a review of the present literature on new modalities to diagnose nosocomial pneumonia. Procedures are now available that, when correctly used, can establish a diagnosis of pneumonia with a high degree of reliability. In our institution, reliance on bronchoscopic modalities has simplified management of patients with suspected VAP, by eliminating confusion and rationalizing antibiotic treatment. Invasive procedures, however, should be performed only if the results of cultures are consistently applied to treatment. As this field rapidly evolves, we hope that this review will provide the reader with a foundation to understand new developments.

Diagnostic efficiency of endotracheal aspirates with quantitative bacterial cultures in intubated patients with suspected pneumonia. Comparison with the protected specimen brush

The objectives of the study were to determine the agreement between the protected specimen brush technique (PSB) with quantitative cultures and endotracheal aspirates (EA) with quantitative cultures when using increasing interpretative cutoff points and to investigate the respective operating characteristics for the diagnosis of pneumonia of PSB and EA when using quantitative cultures. Consecutive sampling of respiratory secretions using these two techniques was conducted in the respiratory intensive care units in 52 mechanically ventilated patients with clinical and radiologic suspicion of pneumonia. Quantitative bacterial cultures of PSB and EA samples were obtained. The 10(6) cfu/ml cutoff point was the most accurate diagnostic threshold for the EA technique. When using this threshold, there was a high level of agreement (84.6%) between PSB and EA results. Among the few discrepancies, the EA result was always indicative of pneumonia, whereas the PSB result was nonindicative, thus permitting us to classify correctly five patients in whom pneumonia would have been erroneously excluded on the basis of the sole result of PSB. Conversely, there was no case where the PSB result was indicative of pneumonia when the EA result (at the 10(6) cfu/ml level) was not. The operating characteristics of the PSB technique for the diagnosis of pneumonia were in accordance with previously published studies. The operating characteristics of the EA technique (when taking the 10(6) cfu/ml of respiratory secretions as the interpretative cutoff point) compared favorably with those of the PSB technique. Diagnostic accuracy rates were similar. The specificity of EA was somewhat lower (83 versus 96%), but the sensitivity was higher (82 versus 64%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of four methods for assessing airway bacteriology in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients

A prospective evaluation of lower airway bacteriology from intubated, mechanically ventilated patients was performed by comparing the qualitative and quantitative recovery of bacteria using four different techniques. Twelve intubated, mechanically ventilated patients who satisfied accepted clinical criteria for the suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia were studied. Airway secretions were obtained from each patient by: (1) blind endotracheal aspiration (ET); (2) Accu-cath pulmonary culture catheter (Accu); (3) bronchoscopic protected specimen brush (BPSB); and (4) bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). ET specimens were cultured semi-quantitatively (1+ to 4+) aerobically, and all other specimens were cultured quantitatively both aerobically and anaerobically. The BPSB recovered 9 organisms in > or = 10(3) colony forming units/ml, a standard number often used to indicate significant growth. Of these 9 organisms, 7 were recovered at > or = 10(3) cfu/ml by Accu, and 6 were recovered at > or = 10(4) cfu/ml by BAL. All 8 aerobic isolates recovered in > or = 10(3) cfu/ml by BPSB also were recovered by ET aspirate. Five of these were recovered in > or = 3+ semi-quantitative growth by ET aspirate. Of 30 organisms recovered in < 3+ semi-quantitative growth by ET aspirate, 28 were recovered in < 10(3) cfu/ml by BPSB, indicating a negative predictive value of 93%. Thus, it appears that these four methods provide reasonably similar qualitative and quantitative recovery of bacteria from the lower airways of intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. In addition, routine Gram's stain and semi-quantitative aerobic culture of endotracheal aspirate may provide useful information in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Evaluation of the protected brush catheter and bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia

We assess the sensitivity and specificity of the protected brush catheter (PBC) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in diagnosing nosocomial pneumonia in nonimmunocompromised critically ill patients. Computerized bibliographic literature searches of MEDLINE were performed, and the reference list of each article selected was reviewed. Of 496 citations, there were 19 articles (describing 18 studies) that proved relevant. Study quality was assessed, and descriptive information concerning study populations, interventions, and clinically relevant outcome measurements was extracted. The sensitivity and specificity of PBC were high (pooled estimates, 89.9 and 94.5%, respectively). Criteria for a positive BAL have varied between studies, and sensitivity ranged from 53.3 to 100%, whereas specificity was 98.6%. Most studies did not report whether antibiotics were withheld on the basis of negative test results. In those that did, the incidence of adverse outcomes consequent on withholding antibiotics was low. BAL and PBC, combined with the use of quantitative cultures, appear to increase accuracy in diagnosing pneumonia. The strength of inference is hampered, however, by the absence of a "gold standard" for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Moreover, the generalizability of these findings is limited by the fact that there are so few methodologically sound studies from so few centers. A randomized trial of PBC is needed.

The diagnostic utility of the antibody-coated bacteria test in intubated patients

PURPOSE

Pilot study to determine if the presence of antibody-coated bacteria (ACB) in sputum specimens obtained from endotracheal tube suctioning would aid in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated patients for a two-month period were recruited for study. The diagnosis of LRTI was based on a clinical suspicion sufficient enough to start or change antibiotic therapy. Specimens were obtained by blind endotracheal tube suctioning. After processing, sputum smears were stained with fluorescein-labelled antibody to the Fc portion of IgG, IgM, and IgA. More than five fluorescein-labelled bacteria per oil immersion field were considered positive smears.

RESULTS

Seventy-one specimens were obtained from 36 patients. Eighteen specimens were positive in 12 patients, all of whom had LRTI. No specimen was positive in patients not diagnosed as having LRTI. The ACB test was positive in 12 of 25 patients with LRTI. Patients with LRTI but negative ACB were more likely to have received prior antibiotic therapy (p less than 0.001). ACB was positive prior to the clinical diagnosis of LRTI in seven of nine patients (av 4.1 days, range 2-6 days) and converted to negative in three specimens obtained seven or more days after starting appropriate antibiotics, while in three specimens it remained positive three-six days post treatment initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACB test appears to be highly specific for the presence of LRTI in intubated patients. Sensitivity of the test may be adversely affected by prior antibiotic therapy. A positive ACB test may predict the subsequent development of LRTI. Further study is warranted.