A modified thromboelastographic method for monitoring c7E3 Fab in heparinized patients

Assessing the Methodology for Calculating Platelet Contribution to Clot Strength (Platelet Component) in Thromboelastometry and Thrombelastography

The viscoelastic properties of blood clot have been studied most commonly using thrombelastography (TEG) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM). ROTEM-based bleeding treatment algorithms recommend administering platelets to patients with low EXTEM clot strength (e.g., clot amplitude at 10 minutes [A10] <40 mm) once clot strength of the ROTEM® fibrin-based test (FIBTEM) is corrected. Algorithms based on TEG typically use a low value of maximum amplitude (e.g., <50 mm) as a trigger for administering platelets. However, this parameter reflects the contributions of various blood components to the clot, including platelets and fibrin/fibrinogen. The platelet component of clot strength may provide a more sensitive indication of platelet deficiency than clot amplitude from a whole blood TEG or ROTEM® assay. The platelet component of the formed clot is derived from the results of TEG/ROTEM® tests performed with and without platelet inhibition. In this article, we review the basis for why this calculation should be based on clot elasticity (e.g., the E parameter with TEG and the CE parameter with ROTEM®) as opposed to clot amplitude (e.g., the A parameter with TEG or ROTEM®). This is because clot elasticity, unlike clot amplitude, reflects the force with which the blood clot resists rotation within the device, and the relationship between clot amplitude (variable X) and clot elasticity (variable Y) is nonlinear. A specific increment of X (ΔX) will be associated with different increments of Y (ΔY), depending on the initial value of X. When calculated correctly, using clot elasticity data, the platelet component of the clot can provide a valuable insight into platelet deficiency in emergency bleeding.

A Single Controlled Exposure to Secondhand Smoke May Not Alter Thrombogenesis or Trigger Platelet Activation

INTRODUCTION

Chronic secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure increases cardiovascular events, particularly acute thrombotic events. There are little human data on acute SHS exposure. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single controlled exposure of humans to SHS increased thrombogenesis.

METHODS

After 6-8 hours fast, subjects (n = 50) were exposed to constant dose SHS (particulate level of 500 μg/m(3)) for 120 minutes in a temperature-regulated and ventilated, simulated bar environment. Blood was drawn before and immediately after SHS exposure for thromboelastography (TEG) and flow cytometry. Maximum clot strength (MA) was measured using TEG and platelet leukocyte aggregates (LPA) were measured as an index of platelet activation. Anti-CD 14 antibodies were used as leukocyte markers and anti-CD 41 antibodies as platelet markers for cytometry. Data were analyzed using students' t test for paired samples.

RESULTS

There was no effect of acute exposure to SHS on platelet activation or thrombogenesis. Also, intra group (smokers [n = 19] and nonsmokers [n = 31]) comparisons of LPA and TEG parameters did not show changes with SHS exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are abundant data showing enhanced thrombogenesis and platelet activation following repeated exposure to SHS, our study suggests that a single exposure does not appear to significantly alter thrombin kinetics nor result in platelet activation. The effects of SHS on thrombogenesis might be nonlinear.

Monitoring of platelet function in the setting of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy

The role of the platelet in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes is clearly established. In addition, the beneficial effects of oral and intravenous platelet inhibitor therapies were demonstrated in multiple, large, randomized clinical trials. However, despite these advances, current antiplatelet therapy fails to prevent coronary events in a substantial proportion of patients. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that antiplatelet medications are administered without monitoring of the response to therapy. For example, oral antiplatelet therapy is administered as a standard dose for all patients, while intravenous inhibitors of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor are dosed based on patient body weight. A major limitation of measuring platelet function has been that no practical test exists. The historic gold standard, bleeding time, was a very crude measure of platelet function with limited clinical utility. The current "gold standard," turbidimetric aggregometery, requires a central laboratory and is cumbersome to perform. Fortunately, a number of new tests with rapid turnaround time can be performed at the patient's bedside. This article discusses the details regarding the performance, advantages, disadvantages, and available data related to clinical use of each test in populations with coronary disease and patients treated with antiplatelet therapy.

Thrombelastography

Thrombelastography is a 'near patient' test of coagulation. It is easy to perform and can provide information on a patient's coagulation status within 30 min. Despite more than 25 years of clinical experience, however, several basic questions relating thromboelastograph (TEG) parameters to standard coagulation tests remain unanswered, and the value of the TEG is established only in the setting of orthotopic liver transplantation and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. This review will focus on the principles and practise of the TEG(R), and data supporting the current accepted uses. Potential future uses will also be discussed including evaluation of hypercoagulable states, and investigating the mechanism of coagulopathies due to drugs or disease that standard tests have failed to unravel.

Abciximab. An updated review of its use in ischaemic heart disease

Abciximab is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist that has proven to be of significant clinical value in improving patient outcome after percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Primarily, the drug inhibits platelet aggregation, but it may also have anticoagulant activity and other beneficial effects, such as inhibiting migration and promoting apoptosis of smooth muscle cells. Large well designed studies have found administration of abciximab (as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin) during percutaneous coronary revascularisation to significantly reduce the incidence of ischaemic complications occurring in the 30 days after the procedure. Significant benefit, particularly on the incidence of myocardial infarction, was still evident after 6 months in 2 of 4 major trials. Abciximab provides particular benefit in patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction who are undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation. The benefits of the drug are additive to those achieved with coronary stenting. Very preliminary data suggest that abciximab may improve coronary blood flow after myocardial infarction and allow reperfusion to be achieved with reduced thrombolytic doses. Caution is required to minimise the risk of bleeding complications with the use of abciximab in combination with heparin and aspirin. Careful patient selection, use of an appropriate heparin regimen, early vascular sheath removal and meticulous femoral artery access site care are recommended. Thrombocytopenia can occur with abciximab treatment, but severe cases are uncommon (< 2% of patients) and can be treated with platelet transfusions. The high acquisition cost of abciximab may be partly or fully offset by the costs averted by the reduced incidence of ischaemic complications and need for urgent and/or repeat revascularisation in high risk patients who receive the drug. However, if bleeding complications occur, this adds to treatment costs. Cost effectiveness analyses generally support the use of abciximab in high risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Abciximab can be recommended for the prevention of acute ischaemic events in most patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation, but careful patient selection and strict adherence to the recommended treatment protocol are required to reduce the risk of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia. Its use in high risk patients is largely supported by pharmacoeconomic data. Further pharmacoeconomic information is needed to establish the drug as a standard of care for all patient groups. The indications for abciximab are likely to expand as more data on its use in acute coronary syndromes become available.