The synergistic interaction between midazolam and clonidine in spinally-mediated analgesia in two different pain models of rats

Fadolmidine - Favourable adverse effects profile for spinal analgesia suggested by in vitro and in vivo models

Fadolmidine is an α₂-adrenoceptor full agonist developed for spinal analgesia with a local mode of action. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety of fadolmidine on known α₂-adrenoceptor-related effects: kidney function, urodynamics and cardiovascular variables. Furthermore, the binding affinity of fadolmidine for the 5-HT₃ receptor prompted functional studies on 5-HT₃. According to the binding affinity data, fadolmidine demonstrated partial agonism on the 5-HT₃ receptor in transfected cells and in guinea pig ileum preparation. However, intravenous (IV) fadolmidine did not produce any 5-HT₃-related hemodynamic effects in anaesthetised rats. In urodynamic studies, intrathecal (IT) fadolmidine interrupted volume-evoked voiding cycles and induced overflow incontinence at high concentrations in anaesthetised rats; however, at the analgesic dose range, the effects were mild. The effects of fadolmidine on kidney function were studied in conscious rats after IV and IT dosing. While IT fadolmidine increased dose-dependent urine output, sodium ion concentration, IV doses increased only sodium ion concentration The effects of IT fadolmidine on heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and sedation were evaluated in the home cage and in the open field using a telemetry system. In resting conditions, fadolmidine decreased HR dose-dependently and increased initial MAP, whereas in actively moving rats, there were no effects at analgesic doses. The results suggest that at anticipated analgesic clinical doses, IT fadolmidine provides analgesia without significant adverse effects on sedation, MAP or HR and with only modest effects on kidney function and urodynamics.

The analgesic interaction of tramadol and morphine in rats: An isobolographic study

In order to assess possible synergistic antinociceptive interactions, the analgesic effects of intra-peritoneal tramadol and morphine administered either separately or in combination were determined using tail-flick latency test following exposure to radiant heat in rats. Groups of eight male Sprague-Dawley rats received either tramadol (3.90, 7.00, 12.50, and 22.20 mg kg^-1) and morphine (1.26, 2.25, 4.00 and 7.10 mg kg^-1) or a combination of tramadol and morphine (4 different combinations). The baseline latency was obtained before drug injection for each rat, then at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 min after injection. The effective dose (ED)₅₀ for either tramadol or morphine individually was 11.70 mgkg^-1 and 2.26 mg kg^-1, respectively. Based on isobolographic analysis, the ED₅₀ values obtained by drug combination were significantly less than the calculated additive values; which indicates that the co-administration of tramadol and morphine produces synergistic antinociception in the radiant heat tail-flick assay. Combination of morphine and tramadol administered intra-peritoneally can be used for the control of acute pain in rats.

Psychopharmacology of chronic pain

Chronic pain is a frequent condition that affects an estimated 20% of people worldwide, accounting for 15%-20% of doctors' appointments (Treede et al., 2015). It lacks the acute warning function of physiologic nociception, and instead involves the activation of multiple neurophysiologic mechanisms in the somatosensory system, a complex neuronal network under the control of powerful autoregulatory loops and able to undergo rapid neuroplastic alteration (Verdu et al., 2008). There is a growing body of research suggesting that some such pathways are shared by major psychologic disorders such as depression and anxiety, opening new avenues in co-treatment strategies. In particular, besides anticonvulsants, which are today used as analgesics, other psychopharmaceuticals, such as the tricyclic antidepressants, are displaying efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic and nociceptive chronic pain. The state of the art regarding the mechanisms of nociception and the pharmacology of both the neurotransmitters involved and the wide range of psychoactive compounds that may be useful in the treatment of chronic pain are discussed.

The antinociceptive effects and pharmacological properties of JM-1232(-): a novel isoindoline derivative

BACKGROUND

An isoindoline derivative, JM-1232(-) was developed as a sedative and analgesic drug. We performed the present study to investigate its antinociceptive effects on three different nociceptions in mice.

METHODS

Mail ddY mice were administered intraperitoneal (i.p.) JM-1232(-) 1,3 or 10 mg/kg (n = 8 for each dose in each test). Saline was used as a control. The hotplate or tail pressure test was performed for 120 min after i.p. drug injection. Acetic acid 0.6% solution in 10 mL/kg was i.p. administered 15 min after i.p. drug injection in the acetic acid test. The number of abdominal constriction episodes was counted for 10 min, starting 5 min after i.p. administration of the acid. When the analgesic effect was observed, naloxone or flumazenil was subcutaneously administered before administration of the maximum effective dose of JM-1232(-). Using the wheel running test, the number of wheel revolutions was recorded every 5 min for 120 min.

RESULTS

In the hotplate, tail pressure and acetic acid tests, i.p. JM-1232(-) produced significant antinociceptive effects with a 50% effective dose of 2.96 mg/kg (CI: 2.65-3.30 mg/kg), 3.06 mg/kg (CI: 2.69-3.47 mg/kg) and 2.27 mg/kg (CI: 1.46-3.53 mg/kg), respectively. In all tests, JM-1232(-)-induced antinociception was antagonized by flumazenil (5 mg/kg) but not by naloxone (10 mg/kg). In the running wheel test, there was no dose-dependent effect of JM-1232(-) on locomotor activity.

CONCLUSION

Systemically administered JM-1232(-) had antinociceptive effects on acute thermal, mechanical-induced pain, and visceral pain in mice. These effects might be mediated by benzodiazepine-gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors but not by opioid receptors.

The synergistic interaction between rilmenidine and paracetamol in the writhing test in mice

The aim of the study was to ascertain antinociceptive effects of rilmenidine, a second-generation imidazoline-alpha-2-adrenoreceptor agonist, and to see whether rilmenidine was able to increase the analgesic effects of paracetamol in the writhing test in mice. An acetic acid (0.7%) solution was injected into the peritoneal cavity and the number of writhes was counted. The influence on locomotor performance was tested using the rotarod test. Rilmenidine, paracetamol, and rilmenidine-paracetamol fixed-ratio combinations produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects. ED(50) values were estimated for the individual drugs and an isobologram was constructed. The derived theoretical additive ED(50) value for the rilmenidine-paracetamol combination was 109.23 +/- 35.05 mg/kg. This value was significantly greater than the observed ED(50) value which was 56.35 +/- 20.86 mg/kg, indicating a synergistic interaction. Rilmenidine did not impair motor coordination, as measured by the rotarod test, at antinociceptive and higher doses.

The antinociceptive effects of midazolam on three different types of nociception in mice

Antinociceptive effects of systemically administered midazolam remain controversial. The present study was performed to investigate its antinociceptive effects on different types of nociception in mice. Four different doses of midazolam (1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.). Saline was used as a control. The hot plate test, tail pressure test, acetic acid writhing test, the running wheel test, and the balance beam test were performed following the drug administration. In the hot plate test and tail pressure test, i.p. midazolam produced significant antinociceptive effects with the 50% effective dose (ED(50)) of 3.46 mg/kg [confidence interval (CI), 1.99 - 6.01 mg/kg] and 3.52 mg/kg (CI, 2.77 - 4.47 mg/kg), respectively. In the acetic acid writhing test, i.p. midazolam also produced significant antinociceptive effects. In the running wheel test, no mice stopped running after saline or midazolam at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, but all mice stopped running 30 and 45 min after i.p. administration of midazolam at 30 mg/kg. In the balance beam test, 30 min after i.p. administration of saline or midazolam at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, all mice were able to stay on the beam for 90 s, none of them could with midazolam at 30 mg/kg. In conclusion, systemically administered midazolam had antinociceptive effects on acute thermal, acute mechanical, and acute inflammatory-induced nociception in mice. The antinociceptive potency of midazolam was the same for both acute thermal-induced nociception and mechanical-induced nociception.

High doses of processed Aconiti tuber inhibit the acute but potentiate the chronic antinociception of morphine

AIM OF THE STUDY

In this study, we investigated the effects of processed Aconiti tuber (PAT), an oriental herbal medicine, at analgesic doses on acute morphine antinociception in morphine-naïve mice and morphine tolerance in morphine-tolerant mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In acute experiments, mice received subcutaneous (s.c.) morphine (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg) and oral distilled water or PAT (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 g/kg). The mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) and thermal nociceptive latency (TNL) were measured with the tail pressure test and tail flick test, respectively, before, and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after s.c. morphine injection. In chronic experiments, mice received s.c. morphine (10 mg/kg) and oral distilled water or PAT (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 g/kg) once daily for 11 days. MNT was measured before, and at 60 min after, and TNL was measured before, and at 30 min after, daily morphine injections on days 1-11.

RESULTS

PAT at analgesic doses inhibited the acute antinociceptive effect of morphine dose-dependently in morphine-naïve mice. In contrast, PAT at analgesic doses potentiated the chronic antinociceptive effect of morphine dose-dependently by inhibiting the development of morphine tolerance dose-dependently. These effects of PAT on acute and chronic morphine antinociception were mediated through activation of kappa-opioid receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicated that chronic co-administration of PAT at analgesic doses with morphine could provide better-maintained morphine analgesia in a long-term morphine treatment after initial inhibition of acute morphine antinociception for a brief period of time.

Clonidine--a potent analgesic adjuvant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine is one of the most widely investigated substances in anaesthesia and pain therapy. Recently, numerous experimental and clinical studies have allowed a better understanding of its underlying mechanisms of action and interactions with other analgesic drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several experimental studies have shown that clonidine may improve the analgesic effect of anti-inflammatory agents and also have significant peripheral antinociceptive effects. Volunteer and clinical studies have demonstrated analgesic effects of clonidine after systemic administration, whereas local administration of plain clonidine (e.g. intra-articular, intravenous regional) showed only limited clinical efficacy. The major clinical place of clonidine may thus be as an adjuvant to other analgesics, as shown in a number of studies in which clonidine has been investigated in combination with local anaesthetics, opioids and ketamine. An increasing number of studies have now investigated clonidine in paediatric patients and have demonstrated that the effects are generally similar to those in adults. Furthermore, it seems that in paediatric patients the side-effects of clonidine are predictable and of limited clinical importance.

SUMMARY

During the past decade clonidine has been investigated as an adjuvant for general and regional anaesthesia and in the postoperative period. There is no doubt that clonidine improves analgesia after systemic, spinal or peripheral opioids, and prolongs the analgesic action of most local anaesthetics. The side-effects of usual doses of clonidine are predictable. Given the clinical experience of an increasing number of hospitals, clonidine should no longer be considered an experimental drug, but a useful addendum to the pharmacological armamentarium.

Effects of a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, sarpogrelate on thermal or inflammatory pain

The effects of intrathecally and systemically administered 5-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT)(2A) receptor antagonist, sarpogrelate on acute thermal or formalin induced pain were examined. Male Sprague-Dawley rats with lumbar intrathecal catheters were tested with their tail withdrawal response to thermal stimulation (tail flick test) or their paw flinching and shaking response by subcutaneous formalin injection into the hind paw (formalin test) after intrathecal or intraperitoneal administration of sarpogrelate. 5-HT(2A) receptor agonist was used to antagonize the effects of sarpogrelate. In the tail flick test, only intraperitoneal administration induced analgesia. In the formalin test, both intrathecal and intraperitoneal administration were analgesic. The analgesic effects were inhibited by pretreatment with 5-HT(2A) receptor agonist. Motor disturbance and behavioral side effects were not observed. In conclusion, sarpogrelate might be analgesic on inflammatory induced acute and facilitated pain by intrathecal or systemic administration. However, only systemic administration could be effective on thermal induced acute pain.

The combination of epidural clonidine and S(+)-ketamine did not enhance analgesic efficacy beyond that for each individual drug in adult orthopedic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefit of epidural clonidine and S(+)-ketamine combination through the epidural route in adult orthopedic surgery.

DESIGN

Randomized double-blinded study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Scheduled to undergo knee surgery, 56 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 adult patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups to receive the combined epidural-intrathecal technique. A 10-mL epidural injection of either study drug or normal saline was first administered to all patients. Intrathecal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg of bupivacaine. The control group (CG) received epidural saline. The 0.1-mg/kg S(+)-ketamine epidural group received 0.1 mg/kg epidural S(+)-ketamine. The 0.5-microg/kg clonidine epidural group received 0.5 microg/kg epidural clonidine. The S(+)-ketamine/clonidine group received 0.1 mg/kg epidural S(+)-ketamine plus 0.5 microg/kg epidural clonidine.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pain and adverse effects were evaluated by visual analog scale. Rescue analgesics were available to patients. The groups were demographically similar. Sensory level to pinprick, surgical and anesthetic time, and visual analog scale scores for pain at first rescue medication were similar among the groups. The time to first rescue analgesic (minute) was lowest in CG (P < .005). The CG required more rescue analgesics in 24 hours than any of the other groups (P < .0005). Patients who received either epidural clonidine, S(+)-ketamine, or both displayed similar analgesia. The frequency of adverse effects was similar among groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of epidural clonidine or S(+)-ketamine did not result in a greater analgesic effect in the model of acute postoperative pain studied, although the interaction of epidural clonidine and S(+)-ketamine is not attributable to sharing of a common second messenger system.

The evolving role of spinal agents in acute pain

Local anesthetics and opioids were among the earliest pharmacologic agents used for intrathecal injection. Side-effect profiles have limited the use of additional agents and, after a century of clinical use, local anesthetics and opioids remain the most widely used intrathecal or epidural medications.

The use of intrathecal midazolam in humans: a case study of process

Early preclinical work demonstrated the potential role of spinal benzodiazepine pharmacology in regulating spinal nociceptive transmission. We review this preclinical activity and the evolving implementation of intrathecal midazolam in humans for pain management. Important elements in this development for use in humans are issues pertinent to safety and the preclinical reports that have increased our understanding of intrathecal midazolam toxicity. We seek to emphasize the time course of these studies and how they merged to provide enabling data that drove the clinical implementation. In the case of midazolam, we point to the potential issues that arose when preclinical safety data were unreasonably ignored and how consideration of preclinical safety data can serve to facilitate drug development by demonstrating reasonable safety profiles that document the minimal degree of potential risk to the patient. Issues that are of continuing relevance to the use of intrathecal midazolam, including issues of formulation and kinetics, are considered.

IMPLICATIONS

The intrathecal use of midazolam has evolved over 20 years though a combination of preclinical and clinical investigations. We review the time course of this development to define critical elements that should be pursued in reducing the risk associated with the clinical use of a novel spinal drug.

Safety of Continuous Intrathecal Midazolam Infusion in the Sheep Model

We investigated the safety of midazolam administered by continuous intrathecal infusion in relevant animal models. Preservative-free midazolam was delivered to sheep and pigs by using implanted infusion systems (SynchroMed pumps plus silicone catheters). Sheep received midazolam 5 mg/d (n = 4) or 15 mg/d (n = 7) or saline (n = 2) for 43 days at 125 micro L/h. One sheep received 10 mg/d. Infusion concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 2.5 mg/mL (5 mg/d) and from 2.5 to 5.0 mg/mL (15 mg/d). Pigs were evaluated for toxicity only and received 15 mg/d (n = 2) or saline (n = 1) for 43 days at 125 micro L/h. Behavior, neurologic function, and vital signs were documented. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid chemistry and cytology were evaluated, and histology was performed on spinal cord tissue. Behavior and neurologic function remained normal in all subjects. Gross and microscopic evaluation of spinal tissue revealed mild inflammation surrounding the catheter tract in both the midazolam-treated and the saline-treated groups. This inflammation was likely attributable to the mechanical presence of the catheter. These data demonstrate that continuous intrathecal infusion of preservative-free midazolam at doses up to 15 mg/d were well tolerated.

IMPLICATIONS

We investigated the toxicity of preservative-free intrathecal midazolam delivered continuously via implanted infusion systems in sheep and pigs. Doses of 5-15 mg/d were well tolerated. The lack of neurotoxicity observed suggests that intrathecal midazolam may be an alternative for the treatment of intractable pain that is unresponsive to opioids.

Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003: an update on the management of pain by intraspinal drug delivery-- report of an expert panel

Intraspinal drug infusion using fully implantable pump and catheter systems is a safe and effective therapy for selected patients with chronic pain. The options for this approach are increasing, as drugs that are commercially available for systemic administration are adapted to this use and other drugs that are in development specifically for intraspinal administration become available. In 2000 a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference was organized to evaluate the existing literature and develop guidelines for drug selection. The major outcome of this effort, an algorithm for drug selection, was based on the best available evidence at the time. Rapid changes have occurred in the science and practice of intraspinal infusion and a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003 was organized to pursue the following goals: 1) to review the literature on intraspinal drug infusion since 1999, 2) to revise the 2000 drug-selection algorithm, 3) to develop guidelines for optimizing drug dosage and concentration, 4) to create a process for documenting minimum evidence supporting the use of a drug for intraspinal infusion, and 5) to clarify issues pertaining to compounding of drugs. Based on the best available evidence and expert opinion, consensus recommendations were developed in all these areas. The panel's conclusions may provide a foundation for clinical practice and a rational basis for new research.

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of midazolam after epidural administration in dogs

The epidural administration of midazolam has analgesic effects that might be mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors in the spinal cord. In this study, we examined both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of midazolam after epidural administration to investigate the possibility of midazolam entering CSF directly from the epidural space. Five male mongrel dogs had catheters inserted in a femoral artery, the epidural space at L3-4, and the intrathecal space at the atlanto-occipital region under general anesthesia. Midazolam 1 mg/kg was epidurally administered, and arterial blood and CSF samples were collected until 240 min after the midazolam administration to measure midazolam concentration. Serum midazolam concentration increased and reached a peak at 30 min after the administration (224.8 +/- 30.5 ng/mL) and then decreased to 25.8 +/- 6.0 ng/mL at 240 min. Midazolam concentration in the CSF was less than the detection limit at 5 min, reached a peak at 30 min after the administration (7.2 +/- 4.7 ng/mL), and decreased to 3.6 +/- 3.3 ng/mL at 240 min. In conclusion, epidurally administered midazolam enters CSF, but CSF concentrations are only 3% of those in the systemic circulation.

IMPLICATIONS

Midazolam, which has spinally mediated analgesic potency, was epidurally administered in dogs, and serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations were measured. Epidurally administered midazolam enters the cerebrospinal fluid, but concentrations are only 3% of those in the systemic circulation.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.