Divergence of intracranial and central venous pressures in lightly anesthetized, tracheally intubated dogs that move in response to a noxious stimulus

Modulation of Cerebral Function by Muscle Afferent Activity, with Reference to Intravenous Succinylcholine

Cerebral Function and Muscle Afferent Activity Following Intravenous Succinylcholine in Dogs Anesthetized with Halothane: The Effects of Pretreatment with a Defasciculating Dose of Pancuronium. By WL Lanier, PA Iaizzo, and JH Milde. Anesthesiology 1989; 71:87-95. Reprinted with permission. By the mid-1980s, it was widely assumed that if the depolarizing muscle relaxant, succinylcholine, given IV, produced increases in intracranial pressure, it did so because fasciculations produced increases in intrathoracic and central venous pressures that were transferred to the brain; however, there was no direct evidence that this was true. In contrast, we explored the possibility that the succinylcholine effect on the brain was explained by the afferentation theory of cerebral arousal, which predicts that agents or maneuvers that stimulate muscle stretch receptors will tend to stimulate the brain. Our research in tracheally intubated, lightly anesthetized dogs discovered that IV succinylcholine (which does not cross the blood-brain barrier) produced a doubling of cerebral blood flow that lasted for 30 min and corresponded to activation of the electroencephalogram and increases in intracranial pressure. Later, in our Classic Paper, we were able to assess simultaneously cerebral physiology and afferent nerve traffic emanating from muscle stretch receptors (primarily muscle spindles). We affirmed that the cerebral arousal response to succinylcholine was indeed driven by muscle afferent traffic and was independent of fasciculations or increases in intrathoracic or central venous pressures. Later research in complementary models demonstrated that endogenous movement (e.g., coughing, hiccups) produced a cerebral response very similar to IV succinylcholine, apparently as a result of the same muscle afferent mechanisms, independent of intrathoracic and central venous pressures. Thus, the importance of afferentation theory as a driver of the cerebral state of arousal and cerebral physiology during anesthesia was affirmed.

Neuroanesthesiology Update

We provide a synopsis of innovative research, recurring themes, and novel experimental findings pertinent to the care of neurosurgical patients and critically ill patients with neurological diseases. We cover the following broad topics: general neurosurgery, spine surgery, stroke, traumatic brain injury, monitoring, and anesthetic neurotoxicity.

Neuroanesthesiology update

We review topics pertinent to the perioperative care of patients with neurological disorders. Our review addresses topics not only in the anesthesiology literature, but also in basic neurosciences, critical care medicine, neurology, neurosurgery, radiology, and internal medicine literature. We include literature published or available online up through December 8, 2013. As our review is not able to include all manuscripts, we focus on recurring themes and unique and pivotal investigations. We address the broad topics of general neuroanesthesia, stroke, traumatic brain injury, anesthetic neurotoxicity, neuroprotection, pharmacology, physiology, and nervous system monitoring.

Muscle relaxants in neurosurgical anaesthesia: a critical appraisal

The use of muscle relaxants, considered until recently as common practice in current neurosurgical anaesthesia protocols, becomes increasingly more questionable today. The reasons rely on the evolution of neurosurgery including the advent of new surgical techniques, the evolution of anaesthesia having the benefit of new drugs and devices, and the rationale for using muscle relaxants balanced against their potential side-effects and possible pharmacodynamic alterations in neurosurgical patients.