Skin burn associated with pulse oximetry during perioperative photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy can be safely performed with Talaporfin sodium as a day treatment for central-type early-stage lung cancer

BACKGROUNDS/AIM

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Talaporfin sodium (Talaporfin) is an effective and safe treatment for central-type early-stage lung cancer (CELC) that is associated with less skin photosensitivity. However, PDT is mostly performed in hospital for the purpose of light shading management in Japan. It is expected that it will be possible to perform PDT with Talaporfin (Talaporfin-PDT) as a day treatment with ≥14 days of shading management at home. This study aimed to confirm the safety of Talaporfin-PDT as day treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the occurrence of adverse events among consecutive patients who received PDT for CELC in a day treatment setting in the Respiratory Endoscopy Division of our institution between January 2010 and February 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (16 treatments) received day treatment of Talaporfin-PDT. Among the 12 patients, one patient (one treatment) was followed at another hospital. No severe adverse events after treatment were observed among the remaining 11 patients (15 treatments). Mild photosensitivity on a photosensitivity test was observed in 3 (3 treatments) of the 11 patients (15 treatments) but no major photosensitivity was observed. This photosensitivity was a temporary reaction.

CONCLUSION

Talaporfin-PDT for CELC was safely performed as a day treatment.

Skin Burn Associated With Photochemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) phototherapy (PT) has become a standard treatment for several severe skin diseases. Photosensitization is done by oral psoralen intake. In minor cases, PUVA can lead to skin changes like erythema and hyperpigmentation. However, it can also lead to severe burn injuries when exposed to extensive UV light. This makes the treatment in a burn center inevitable.

METHODS

We report the clinical observation of a 38-year-old man presenting with an extensive burn injury caused by sun tanning after PUVA PT.

CONCLUSIONS

There are just few cases of extensive burns induced by PUVA PT. Prevention becomes manifest in patient information, correct calculation of dosage, evaluation of photosensitivity, and close observation. In cases of severe burn injuries, patients should be referred to a burn center for optimal conservative treatment. Surgical intervention is usually not necessary.

Safe use of pulse oximetry during verteporphin therapy

IMPLICATIONS

Pulse oximetry may produce skin damage after the administration of photosensitizing chemotherapeutic drugs. Surgery must often be performed in near darkness during photodynamic therapy. Limiting the duration of pulse oximetry and rotating sites allowed successful use of pulse oximetry in a long anesthetic during which verteporphin was administered.

Clinical study of adjuvant photodynamic therapy to reduce restenosis following femoral angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) reduces neointimal hyperplasia and negative remodelling following balloon injury in small and large animal models. This clinical study investigated the role of adjuvant PDT following femoral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

METHODS

Eight PTAs in seven patients (two women) with a median age of 70 (range 59-86) years were performed with adjuvant PDT. All patients had previously undergone conventional angioplasty at the same site which resulted in symptomatic restenosis or occlusion between 2 and 6 months. Each was sensitized with oral 5-aminolaevulinic acid 60 mg/kg, 5-7 h before the procedure. Following a second femoral angioplasty, up to 50 J/cm2 red light (635 nm) was delivered to the angioplasty site via a laser fibre within the angioplasty balloon. Patients were kept in subdued light overnight and discharged the following day. Outcome was assessed by duplex imaging at 24 h, 1, 3 and 6 months and by intravenous digital subtraction angiography at 6 months. A peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) of more than 2.0 at the angioplasty site was taken to represent restenosis.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the procedure well without adverse complications or death. All were rendered asymptomatic which was sustained throughout the study interval. All vessels remained patent and no lesion attained the duplex definition of restenosis. Median (interquartile range) PSVR across stenotic segments was 4.7 (3.7-5.7) before angioplasty, 1.1 (0.9-1.3) at 24 h and 1.4 (1.0-1.8) at 6 months after intervention (P = 0.04 compared with preoperative value).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that endovascular PDT is safe and may reduce restenosis follow- ing angioplasty. The data justify a randomized controlled trial.

Current concepts in gastrointestinal photodynamic therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review current concepts of photodynamic therapy (PDT) applied to the treatment of tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

PDT initially involves the uptake or production of a photosensitive compound by tumor cells. Subsequent activation of the photoreactive compound by a specific wavelength of light results in cell death, either directly or as a result of vascular compromise and/or apoptosis.

METHODS

The authors selectively review current concepts relating to photosensitization, photoactivation, time of PDT application, tissue selectivity, sites of photodynamic action, PDT effects on normal tissue, limitations of PDT, toxicity of photosensitizers, application of principles of PDT to tumor detection, and current applications of PDT to tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.

RESULTS

PDT is clearly effective for small cancers, but it is not yet clear in which cases such treatment is more effective than other currently acceptable approaches. The major side effect of PDT is cutaneous photosensitization. The major limitation of PDT is depth of tumor kill. As data from current and future clinical trials become available, a clearer perspective of where PDT fits in the treatment of cancers will be gained. Many issues regarding pharmacokinetic data of photosensitizers, newer technology involved in light sources, optimal treatment regimens that take advantage of the pharmacophysiology of photoablation, and light dosimetry still require solution. One can foresee application of differing sensitizers and light sources depending on the specific clinical situation. As technologic advances occur, interstitial PDT may have significant application.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT has a potentially important role either as a primary or adjuvant mode of treatment of tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.