Refinements in the use of the transverse abdominal island flap for postmastectomy reconstruction

Destination Design msTRAM: For Greater Reconstructive Certainty

Performing delayed reconstruction to a unilateral breast while simultaneously performing a balancing procedure on the contralateral side can be the most difficult situation to achieve symmetry. We present here a novel approach to free TRAM-based breast reconstruction using reverse planning and subunit principles with simultaneous balancing reduction mastopexy and immediate nipple reconstruction.

Leaving the perfusion zones? Individualized flap design in 100 free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps for autologous breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiography

BACKGROUND

There is still no consensus regarding the ideal zoning in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction using free DIEP or ms-TRAM flaps. In particular, the perfusion pattern of the flap according to the number of perforators used and their location remains controversial. In this study, the perfusion of free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps is assessed intraoperatively and analyzed with regard to different perfusion patterns.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 free flaps for breast reconstruction was performed. Following complete flap harvest, we used indocyanine green angiography for perfusion analysis. By applying two different contour levels, DIEP flaps with lateral or medial perforators and ms-TRAM flaps were assessed for their respective perfusion patterns.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in the size of the perfusion area between the different flap types when applying the contour level of 20% (p >0.05). For the contour level of 30%, however, statistically significant differences were found between DIEP flaps with medially or laterally located perforators (p = 0.038). Laterally or medially located perforators in DIEP flaps showed no significant differences in their ability to cross the midline (contour level 20%, p = 0.068; contour level 30%, p = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

Considering the variability of the perfusion of the abdominal wall and the high sensitivity of indocyanine green angiography for their detection, the abdominal zonings play a minor role. By using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography, a precise and patient-specific free flap surgery for autologous breast reconstruction is possible independent of perforator location.

Immediate breast reconstruction with a 'modified fleur-de-lis' abdominal-free flap in a patient with previous abdominal surgery

DIEP flap has become the gold standard method for patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction; however, previous surgery or scars in the abdominal area have been considered a relative contraindication for the use of abdominal tissue. Longitudinal midline abdominal scars may be specially problematic because of the poor midline crossover of blood and the high risk of necrosis of the distal flap. Patients with small breast may be easily reconstructed with hemi-DIEP flap; however, patients with large breast need more tissue available. Our aim is to report a modification of a 'fleur-de-lis pattern' for a breast reconstruction in a patient with previous abdominal surgery and large breast. The post-operative course was uneventful, flap did not show blood supply compromise, volume and symmetry are preserved after 6 months post-operative and donor site morbidity has not been observed. This modification may be very useful to avoid complications related to poor blood supply associated with scar tissues. Careful pre-operative planning and the transfer of only well-vascularised tissue are essential for a successful reconstruction.

Effects of açaí and cilostazol on skin microcirculation and viability of TRAM flaps in hamsters

BACKGROUND

Tissue necrosis caused by insufficient perfusion is a major complication in flap transfer. This study evaluated whether treatment with cilostazol or hydroalcoholic extract of seeds of Euterpe oleracea Mart. (açaí) protects the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap against ischemic damage in hamsters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four hamsters were divided into three oral treatment groups: placebo, açaí, or cilostazol. Caudally based, unipedicled TRAM flaps were raised, sutured back, classified into four vascular zones (I-IV), and evaluated for tissue viability, capillary blood flow (CBF), perfused vessel density (PVD), and microvascular flow index (MFI) by orthogonal polarization spectral imaging at three time points: immediately postoperatively (IPO), 24 h postoperatively (24hPO), and 7 d postoperatively (7POD).

RESULTS

Comparing to placebo, açaí increased PVD at IPO and açaí and cilostazol increased CBF and PVD at 24hPO in zone I; cilostazol increased CBF, PVD, and MFI at IPO, and CBF at 24hPO in zone II; açaí and cilostazol increased CBF at all time points and PVD and MFI at IPO and 24hPO in zone III; cilostazol increased CBF at IPO and 7POD, açaí increased CBF at 7POD, and both increased PVD and MFI at all time points in zone IV; and açaí and cilostazol increased the percentage of viable area in zones III and IV.

CONCLUSIONS

Açaí and cilostazol treatments had a protective effect against ischemic damage to TRAM flaps in hamsters, improving microvascular blood flow and increasing the survival of flap zones contralateral to the vascular pedicle (zones III and IV).

Optimizing the pedicled rectus abdominis flap: revised designs and vascular classification for safer procedures

BACKGROUND

The rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap is one of the most commonly used flaps in reconstructive surgery, and many designs have been published. The transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM), and oblique designs (ORAM) are the most common. The most frequent complication with these flaps is partial flap necrosis. We describe a new vascular zoning method and a revised classification of abdominal wall perfusion that is applicable when harvesting pedicled TRAM flaps to make them more secure.

METHODS

From February 2009 to February 2013, we performed 70 pedicled RAM flaps in 68 patients for breast reconstruction (79%) as well as pelvic and inguinal reconstruction after bowel and gynecologic tumor resection. Clinical data about cutaneous vascularization of the flaps along with before and after photos were prospectively collected and analyzed, and results were evaluated retrospectively. We collected observations on partial flap necrosis, reviewed the literature, and made design modifications to exclude doubtful vascular territories.

RESULTS

Of the total number of flaps, 59 were TRAMs, 7 were VRAMs, and 1 was an ORAM flap. Three combined horizontal and vertical flaps, or what we call TV RAM flaps, were performed. No flap-related complications were observed with VRAM, TV RAM, or ORAM flaps. Three instances of partial necrosis (in the same vascular territory) occurred with TRAM flaps; as a result, we changed our approach to these flaps and examined alternatives to the classical vascular zoning.

CONCLUSION

We discussed abdominal skin perfusion in accordance with the literature and based on our experience with harvesting pedicled RAM flaps. We proposed safer skin paddles made possible by adopting a revised vascular classification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Salvage of intraoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator flap venous congestion with augmentation of venous outflow: flap morbidity and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps has gained considerable popularity due to reduced donor-site morbidity. Previous studies have identified the superficial venous system as the dominant outflow to DIEP flaps. DIEP flap venous congestion occurs if superficial venous outflow via the deep venous system is insufficient for effective flap drainage. Although augmentation of venous outflow through a second venous anastomosis may relieve venous congestion, effects on flap morbidity remain ill defined.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1616 patients who underwent 2618 DIEP flap breast reconstructions between March 2005 and January 2012 was performed. Patients with intraoperative venous congestion underwent a second venous anastomosis. Preoperative demographic data and methods used to relieve venous congestion were recorded. Incidence of flap morbidity was calculated and compared with a group of 418 controls having 639 DIEP flap breast reconstructions with no venous congestion.

RESULTS

Venous augmentation was required to relieve venous congestion in 87 (3.3%) DIEP flaps on 81 patients. The superficial inferior epigastric vein or accompanying deep inferior epigastric venae comitantes was used to augment venous outflow. Preoperative comorbidities were similar between both groups. Patients requiring a second venous anastomosis had a longer operative time and length of hospital stay. Overall, flap morbidity, delayed wound healing, fat necrosis, and flap loss were similar to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial and venous anatomies play unique roles in flap reliability. DIEP flap venous congestion must be treated expeditiously with venous augmentation to relieve venous congestion and mitigate flap morbidity.

Preferred use of the ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction: an illustrated approach

BACKGROUND

Recent experience with the ipsilateral TRAM flap has shown that it has the advantage of a longer functional pedicle length, which allows tension-free inset of well-vascularized tissue into the breast pocket. This leads to better positioning and shaping of the reconstructed breast with minimal disruption of the inframammary fold. The purpose of this article was to provide an illustrated approach to the ipsilateral TRAM flap and to clarify the technique when applied in the context of immediate breast reconstruction following cancer extirpation.

METHODS

A prospective evaluation of 89 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer was performed. All patients underwent ipsilateral TRAM reconstruction. The innate insetting advantage of the ipsilateral TRAM flap is illustrated in the article. The key steps of the technique were as follows: (1) The ipsilateral corner of the flap was used as the axillary tail, leaving the more bulky part to form the main body of the breast; (2) To avoid undesirable twists, a right TRAM was rotated clockwise so that its apex points superiorly; (3) This flap was subsequently tunneled into the breast pocket while preserving the inframammary fold. The opposite maneuvers were done for the left side; (4) If the flap was congested, venous augmentation was performed where the tributary of the axillary vein or the thoracodorsal vein was anastomosed with the inferior epigastric vein from the flap with an interposed vein graft (17% of cases).

RESULTS

All flaps survived and flap-related complications included partial necrosis of tissue across the midline (2.2%), palpable fat necrosis (22%), and hematoma requiring drainage (2.2%). All flaps were raised concurrent with the resection, and the combined operative time ranged from 3.5 to 6 h, with a mean hospital stay of 7 days.

CONCLUSION

The ipsilateral TRAM flap was a reliable flap with low complication rates and short surgery time. It was our preferred choice for pedicled breast reconstruction in all cases, except for the ptotic breast or if abdominal scarring excludes its use.

The perforator angiosome: a new concept in the design of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The previously described "perfusion zones" of the abdominal wall vasculature are based on filling of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and all its branches simultaneously. With the advent of the DIEA perforator flap, only a single or several perforators are included in supply to the flap. As such, a new model for abdominal wall perfusion has become necessary. The concept of a "perforator angiosome" is thus explored.

METHODS

A clinical and cadaveric study of 155 abdominal walls was undertaken. This comprised the use of 10 whole, unembalmed cadaveric abdominal walls for angiographic studies, and 145 abdominal wall computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) in patients undergoing preoperative imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature. The evaluation of the subcutaneous branching pattern and zone of perfusion of individual DIEA perforators was explored, particularly exploring differences between medial and lateral row perforators.

RESULTS

Fundamental differences exist between medial row and lateral row perforators, with medial row perforators larger (1.3 mm vs. 1 mm) and more likely to ramify in the subcutaneous fat toward the contralateral hemiabdomen (98% of cases vs. 2% of cases). A model for the perfusion of the abdominal wall based on a single perforator is presented.

CONCLUSION

The "perforator angiosome" is dependent on perforator location, and can mapped individually with the use of preoperative imaging.

Comparison of Fat Necrosis Between Zone II and Zone III in Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flaps

Fat necrosis in transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is considered to be mainly affected by blood supply. This prospective study compares the incidence of fat necrosis between zones II and III in 400 consecutive patients who had undergone unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Fifty-eight patients (14.5%) suffered from fat necrosis, and 7 had 2 separate nodules. Fifty-four occurred in zone II, 10 in zone III, and 1 in zone I. The incidence of fat necrosis in zone II was significantly higher than in zone III (P < 0.001). The weight of the mastectomy specimen and the relative amount of zone II tissue included in the flap had positive correlation with the incidence of fat necrosis. This result implies relatively poor perfusion of zone II compared with zone III.

The pedicled TRAM flap in breast reconstruction

The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap remains a viable option in breast reconstruction. This article documents the history of the TRAM flap and puts in context the vascular anatomy through a discussion of the vascular zones. Options for flap delay are discussed and an algorithm is presented for patient selection. Finally, the issue of unipedicle versus bipedicle flap harvest is discussed and complications are examined.

Breast Reconstruction with Free Flaps from the Abdominal Donor Site—TRAM, DIEAP, and SIEA Flaps

Multiple types of free flap can be elevated from the lower abdominal region for use in breast reconstruction. These include the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, and the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. This sequence of flaps represents an evolution in the protection of the donor site. However, the decision as to which flap may be most appropriate for an individual patient is complex. This article serves to review pertinent surgical anatomy, preoperative planning, intraoperative decision making in flap elevation, and reported outcomes.

Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: a clinical study

BACKGROUND

The Hartrampf perfusion zones of the lower abdominal flap are generally accepted. They were empirically based on the clinical impression of the perfusion in the first 16 unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps and have been uncritically adopted for the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous and the free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Scientific data proving the validity of these perfusion zones do not exist. The objective of this study was to evaluate and quantitatively assess the perfusion zones of the DIEP flap.

METHODS

In a clinical, prospective study of 15 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction, tissue perfusion was intraoperatively assessed using the method of laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green.

RESULTS

Perfusion of zones I, II, and III was seen 25, 41, and 32 seconds, respectively, after injection, and the perfusion index constituted 76, 25, and 47 percent (median) of normal tissue. Perfusion of zone IV was completely absent in five patients (33 percent); in the remaining patients, it was dramatically decreased (5 percent) and occurred with a delay of 67 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the results of this study, the Hartrampf concept of a centrally perfused skin ellipse with declining perfusion of its peripheral ends is wrong and should be revised. Instead, one should think of the lower abdominal flap as two halves separated by the midline. The ipsilateral half has an axial pattern of perfusion; the contralateral half shows a random-pattern, individually variable blood supply. Therefore, the classic Hartrampf zones should be rearranged, switching zones II and III.

Analyzing the Vascular Architecture of the Free TRAM Flap Using Intraoperative Ex Vivo Angiography

BACKGROUND

Using ex vivo intraoperative angiography to analyze 14 flaps from 12 breast reconstruction patients, the authors investigated the vascular architecture of free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps nourished by the deep inferior epigastric artery.

METHODS

Contrast medium was injected through the deep inferior epigastric artery and flaps were radiographed to observe their vascular patterns.

RESULTS

TRAM flaps showed one or two segmental arteries stained on their ipsilateral side (zones 1 and 3) and serving as the flap's axial artery. These segmental arteries directly connect to the large perforators (axial perforators) and emerge not only from the paraumbilical perforators but also from the caudal branches of the deep inferior epigastric artery. Arterial density is always lower in the contralateral area (zones 2 and 4) than in the ipsilateral area (zones 1 and 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the cephalic half of zone 2 and all of zone 4 remain unstained, these areas are prone to skin or fat necrosis, especially in high-risk patients. Ex vivo angiography, by providing specific information about the individual flap and by reflecting its flow physiology, enables one to observe and to chart the vascular architecture of free TRAM flaps nourished by the deep inferior epigastric artery.

The "perfusion map" of the unipedicled TRAM flap to reduce postoperative partial necrosis

The unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is a well-known technique for breast reconstruction. However, it is clinically difficult to evaluate the blood perfusion of the flap in the operating room. A new technique of blood supply evaluation, employing indocyanine green dye (ICG) fluorescence videoangiography has been performed in 10 cases of unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. In our series, the ICG measurement was demonstrated to be a safe, quick, and accurate technique of flap perfusion analysis. We confirmed the presence of individual pattern ("perfusion map") of the flap perfusion, zone II sometimes not being as well perfused as zone III. In this paper, we present our descriptive findings, and the ICG analysis seems to have a predictive value of unipedicled TRAM flap viability.

Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient

Obesity can be a contraindication for TRAM flap breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the authors' experience with free TRAM and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient to examine the complication rates associated with each reconstructive method and to determine whether TRAM flap reconstruction can safely be used in these high-risk patients. The records of 221 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors for morbidity were noted, as well as the incidence of TRAM flap success, operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Patients were categorized as obese if their body mass index was greater than 25.8 kg/m2. Data were tabulated using contingency tables and analyzed using chi-squared statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for flap complications. Of the 221 patients studied, 114 patients were found to be obese (body mass index >25.8 kg/m2). Of these 114 patients, 78 were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 36 were reconstructed with pedicled flaps. In these obese patients, the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2 in the free TRAM and 30 kg/m2 in the pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age or preoperative risk factors. Length of hospital stay and operative time did not differ significantly between the two reconstructive methods. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months in both groups. Complications occurred in 26 percent of free TRAM flap reconstructions and 33 percent of pedicled reconstructions. There was no significant difference between reconstructive methods with regard to overall complication rates. Increasing body mass index was found to have a significant effect on free TRAM flap complications (p = 0.008) but not on pedicled TRAM flap complications. There were no partial or total flap losses in obese free TRAM flap patients; however, there was one case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss in the obese pedicled TRAM flap group. The incidence of flap loss was significantly higher when pedicled TRAM flaps were used for reconstruction in obese patients (p = 0.04). Obese patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps were more likely to experience a complication if they also smoked (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in operating time or length of stay when pedicled and free TRAM flap reconstructions in obese patients were compared. There were more cases of flap necrosis in the pedicled TRAM flap group. Free TRAM flaps may provide some benefit in reducing partial flap loss in obese patients, but overall complication rates were not significantly different between reconstructive methods. Of 114 patients, there was only one case of total reconstructive failure. From these findings, it seems that the free or pedicled TRAM flap can be used successfully for breast reconstruction in the majority of patients with obesity. Surgeons should use the technique with which they are most familiar to obtain consistent results.

Physiological studies using laser Doppler flowmetry to compare blood flow to the zones of the free TRAM flap

Physiological studies of in vivo blood flow within the various types of lower transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps have been limited. Therefore, to supplement our knowledge, intraoperative measurements of flow to the cutaneous paddle as derived from laser Doppler flowmetry were recorded in 13 free TRAM flaps in 10 patients (3 bilateral). The relative contributions from both the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and the superior epigastric artery (SEA) to each zone were assessed jointly and then independently. Mean flow via the DIEA contribution alone was equal to or greater than twice that of the SEA in all zones, although this was not significant (p = 0.079). Flow from either the DIEA or the SEA diminished the farther the zone was from the source pedicle. Contralateral skin territories had significantly decreased flow when compared with all ipsilateral territories (p = 0.005), so that a relative ischemia exists even in free TRAM flaps, which could be the source of unexpected partial flap loss and/or fat necrosis in these zones. These findings were consistent with anatomic descriptions of the lower TRAM flap that imply that the DIEA is the dominant source vessel to the skin of this region.

"Apron" flap and re-creation of the inframammary fold following TRAM flap breast reconstruction

To the best of our knowledge, the recreation of an inframammary fold after TRAM flap breast reconstruction has not yet been described. This article offers a technique for the creation of an inframammary fold as a secondary procedure. The technique has been performed thus far in two patients with good aesthetic outcomes and no postoperative complications. It may also be suitable for adding bulk to the TRAM flap, especially in bilateral breast reconstruction, and for other minor chest deformities.

Flap perfusion mapping: TRAM flap after abdominal suction-assisted lipectomy

This technique or its modification (using other dyes) may play a beneficial role in other clinical scenarios where the reconstructive plastic surgeon preoperatively needs to know the integrity of vessels that are too small to image using standard angiographic techniques. In addition, flap perfusion mapping can demonstrate the pattern of skin that is physiologically perfused by the intact vessels. Knowledge of the perfusion characteristics of the tissues to be transferred before surgery may, at the least, alter the design of the tissues to be transferred and, in the extreme case, could affect the nature of the operative choice altogether.

Umbilical transposition in TRAM flap: a simple horizontal translocation

A simple method of umbilical repositioning by incising the anterior rectus sheath and rectus abdominis muscle is reported for cases of unilateral abdominal wall plication during the TRAM flap operation. This method keeps the umbilicus stable and nonstenotic, and it avoids hypertrophic scars, which result from other techniques such as direct suturing of the stalk to the skin. Although this method might weaken contralateral muscle activity, the patients we operated on maintained their ability to perform sit-ups, and no periumbilical weakening was noticed.

Immediate breast reconstruction with deepidermalized transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap after skin-sparing mastectomy

Use of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is widely accepted and indications have been well-defined over the past years. More recently, the moratorium prohibiting pre-filled silicone gel implants both in esthetic surgery and in reconstruction breast surgery, has incited more and more patients to refuse prostheses, even saline filled implants. Total mastectomy with skin-sparing technique, beyond the limitations dictated by oncology factors which must be taken into account because of the risk of local recurrence, raises the question of immediate breast reconstruction since implants, when possible, may give unsatisfactory results either more or less short-term. The deepidermalized TRAM flap is an interesting alternative for selected patients, especially those with an adapted abdominal morphology, allowing stable and natural autologous breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy

The goal of breast reconstruction is to reconstruct breasts which meet the patient's expectations both psychologically and aesthetically, while adhering to the principles of sound oncological management. Breast reconstruction is usually started around 3 to 9 mos after mastectomy. The simplest method of reconstruction uses tissue available after mastectomy and a silicone implant. The recent advances with tissue expansion of the skin of the mastectomy site can permit reconstruction without the use of a flap. The latissimus dorsi flap from the back is a useful source of muscle and skin and the transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap provides tissue from the lower abdomen enabling breast reconstruction without the use of a silicone implant. Fat and skin from the buttocks may be used in a microsurgical transfer technique. Prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction are still controversial, but are options for the woman who is worried about the development of breast cancer. The reconstruction of the nipple and areola is only done after reconstructed breast symmetry is ascertained.

Anatomical basis of rectus abdominis myo-cutaneous flaps

The recent development of myo-cutaneous flaps and their use in plastic and reconstructive surgery prompted the authors to have a particular interest in musculo-cutaneous flaps of the rectus abdominis. From their personal studies and from a review of the literature, they consider the anatomical bases for these flaps and the different methods proposed for their construction. Finally they indicate their vast area of application which is essentially related to the wide range over which they can act.

Postmastectomy reconstruction

Postmastectomy reconstruction is an integral part of the rehabilitation of a patient with breast cancer. Four questions are to be answered: Who is a candidate? When should this be performed? What are the goals of a breast reconstruction? How should these be obtained?