Zdichavsky M, Jones JW, Ustuner ET, Ren X, Edelstein J, Maldonado C, Breidenbach W, Gruber SA, Ray M, Barker JH. Scoring of skin rejection in a swine composite tissue allograft model.
J Surg Res 1999;
85:1-8. [PMID:
10383831 DOI:
10.1006/jsre.1999.5673]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
For the first time, we define and correlate visual and histologic grading systems of composite tissue allograft (CTA) skin rejection in a large-animal model and determine the utility of these grading systems for early diagnosis and monitoring of rejection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixteen pairs of outbred swine underwent transplant of a forelimb osteomyocutaneous free flap. Group I (n = 6) did not receive immunosuppressive therapy. Group II (n = 10) received oral cyclosporin A, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The flap was visually inspected and protocol skin biopsies were taken at frequent intervals over a 90-day period. Visual Grades 0 (no rejection) to 4 (severe rejection) were assigned based on skin color, bleeding from biopsy site, and blister formation. Histologic Grades 0 to 4 were assigned based on the degree of vasculitis, folliculitis, dermal inflammation, and epidermal degeneration present.
RESULTS
All Group I animals progressively rejected their graft by Day 7. Group II grafts survived from 19 and 90 days; 93% of 115 biopsy specimens were read to be within +/-1 histologic score of their assigned flap visual grade. Visual assessment carried an 8% false positive and 39% false negative rate with regard to biopsy-proven rejection. However, 81% of missed rejection specimens were histologic Grade 1. Biopsy, when visually indicated, would detect all rejection episodes when histologically Grade 1 or 2 and still potentially reversible.
CONCLUSIONS
Visual scoring of CTA skin serves as a useful tool for initially detecting rejection, but repeated histologic evaluation is necessary for monitoring the subsequent course of the graft.
Collapse