Surgical Principles Underlying the Use of Grafts in the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Influence of cyclic AMP on facial nerve regeneration in rats

Promoting facial nerve regeneration is a significant challenge.

Aim

To evaluate the possible neurotrophic influence of cyclic AMP on facial nerve regeneration of Wistar rats.

Method

The right facial nerve of thirty-two animals were completely transected and immediately sutured, followed by exposure or not to topical cyclic AMP. Behavioral and histometric analyses were done at 14 and 28 days.

Results

Statistical differences (p<0.05) were found in the behavioral and histometric analyses on the 14th day, suggesting an early regenerative response of the facial nerve to cAMP exposure.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a possible neurotrophic effect of cAMP on facial nerve regeneration in rats.

Modelo experimental comportamental e histológico da regeneração do nervo facial em ratos

O estabelecimento de modelos experimentais é o passo inicial para estudos de regeneração neural. OBJETIVO: Estabelecer modelo experimental de regeneração do nervo facial. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Ratos Wistar com secção completa e sutura do tronco do nervo facial extratemporal, com análise comportamental e histológica até 9 semanas. FORMA DE ESTUDO: Estudo prospectivo experimental. RESULTADOS: Progressiva recuperação clínica e histológica dos animais. CONCLUSÃO: Estabelecemos um método aceitável para o estudo de regeneração do nervo facial em ratos.

Experimental interfascicular nerve grafting

Twenty-nine adult rhesus monkeys underwent complete laceration of both tibial nerves at mid-thigh level and repair by different methods to study the relative efficacy of autogenous interfascicular nerve grafts. Sixteen animals in Group I had an interfascicular graft repair using short sural nerve autografts on one limb and fascicular repair without grafts on the other limb. Thirteen animals in Group II, after having a 1-cm segment of tibial nerve resected, had an interfascicular graft repair without tension in one limb and an epineurial repair under moderate tension in the other limb. Evoked nerve and muscle action potentials and muscle strenght in response to repetitive and tetanic stimulation were recorded as baseline values prelaceration and then on re-exploration at 4, 6, 9, or 12 months. All nerves were examined by light and electron microscopy. Electrophysiological data, particularly muscle strength response, showed non-graft repairs to be superior at 4 and 6 months of regeneration. However, by 9 and 12 months the graft repairs had caught up and were equal to the non-graft repairs. Histologically, it was observed that many axons missed the graft segments and were present in extrafascicular connective tissues. Nonetheless, enough axons regenerated to the distal nerve to explain the success of these relatively short grafts. From the results of these experiments, it is concluded that use of autogenous interfascicular grafts offers no advantage over end-to-end non-graft repair. When and end-to-end repair cannot be achieved, use of short interfascicular nerve grafts is feasible and will work.