1
|
Ramdhani K, Lam MGEH, Braat AJAT, Smits MLJ, El-Haddad G. Hepatic Radioembolization: A Multistep Theragnostic Procedure. PET Clin 2024; 19:431-446. [PMID: 38816137 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
This article provides a thorough overview of the practice and multistep approach of hepatic radioembolization. The current literature on hepatic radioembolization in primary or metastatic liver tumors as well as future perspectives are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ramdhani
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L J Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Inchingolo R, Cortese F, Pisani AR, Acquafredda F, Calbi R, Memeo R, Anagnostopoulos F, Spiliopoulos S. Selective internal radiation therapy segmentectomy: A new minimally invasive curative option for primary liver malignancies? World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:2379-2386. [PMID: 38764771 PMCID: PMC11099395 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i18.2379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization or selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has emerged as a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of tumors. This percutaneous technique involves the local, intra-arterial delivery of radioactive microspheres directly into the tumor. Historically employed as a palliative measure for liver malignancies, SIRT has gained traction over the past decade as a potential curative option, mirroring the increasing role of radiation segmentectomy. The latest update of the BCLC hepatocellular carcinoma guidelines recognizes SIRT as an effective treatment modality comparable to other local ablative methods, particularly well-suited for patients where surgical resection or ablation is not feasible. Radiation segmentectomy is a more selective approach, aiming to deliver high-dose radiation to one to three specific hepatic segments, while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Future research efforts in radiation segmentectomy should prioritize optimizing radiation dosimetry and refining the technique for super-selective administration of radiospheres within the designated hepatic segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Inchingolo
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Bari 70021, Italy
| | - Francesco Cortese
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Bari 70021, Italy
| | - Antonio Rosario Pisani
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari 70121, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Acquafredda
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Bari 70021, Italy
| | - Roberto Calbi
- Department of Radiology, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Bari 70021, Italy
| | - Fotis Anagnostopoulos
- The Second Radiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Chaidari Athens 12461, Greece
| | - Stavros Spiliopoulos
- The Second Radiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Chaidari Athens 12461, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown N. Reimbursement of interventional oncology in Australia: How it works and how it does not. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:915-925. [PMID: 38105584 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
The practice of interventional oncology (IO) embodies all the qualities that one would expect to find in a modern, value-based healthcare system. A dynamic, cutting-edge specialty like IO uses highly-targeted, minimally-invasive, image-guided techniques to deliver cost-effective, personalised medicine for cancer patients. Unfortunately, the technical and clinical sophistication of IO is not matched by the reimbursement models and funding arrangements in Australia to fully support this critical component of patient care. Differences between state and federal funding lead to inequity of access to 'standard of care' interventions for patients across public and private hospitals. IO procedures are poorly represented in the Medicare Benefits Schedule and often inadequately funded to cover the true costs of providing care. Complex private health fund reimbursements and inconsistent rebates for prostheses and essential equipment result in inconsistent access to important services and widely variable out-of-pocket costs for patients. IO techniques must be supported by fair, consistent and equitable funding arrangements at all levels to allow for integrated contemporary patient care; only then will the full clinical and economic benefits of IO be realised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Brown
- The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The Prince Charles' Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mertens A, Essing T, Minko P, Möllenhoff K, Mattes-György K, Giesel FL, Antoch G, Luedde T, Roderburg C, Loosen SH. Selective internal radiotherapy in Germany: a review of indications and hospital mortality from 2012 to 2019. J Clin Transl Res 2023; 9:123-132. [PMID: 37179793 PMCID: PMC10171316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) is a minimal invasive tumor therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), biliary tract cancer (BTC), and liver metastasis of extrahepatic tumors. Comprehensive data on past and current trends of SIRT as well as outcome parameters such as in-hospital mortality and adverse events in Germany are missing. Methods We evaluated current clinical developments and outcomes of SIRT in Germany based on standardized hospital discharge data, provided by the German Federal Statistical Office from 2012 to 2019. Results A total of 11,014 SIRT procedures were included in the analysis. The most common indication was hepatic metastases (54.3%; HCC: 39.7%; BTC: 6%) with a trend in favor of HCC and BTC over time. Most SIRTs were performed with yttrium-90 (99.6%) but the proportion of holmium-166 SIRTs increased in recent years. There were significant differences in the mean length of hospital stay between 90Y (3.67 ± 2 days) and 166Ho (2.9 ± 1.3 days) based SIRTs. Overall in-hospital mortality was 0.14%. The mean number of SIRTs/hospital was 22.9 (SD ± 30.4). The 20 highest case volume centers performed 25.6% of all SIRTs. Conclusion Our study gives a detailed insight into indications, patient-related factors, and the incidence of adverse events as well as the overall in-hospital mortality in a large SIRT collective in Germany. SIRT is a safe procedure with low overall in-hospital mortality and a well-definable spectrum of adverse events. We report differences in the regional distribution of performed SIRTs and changes in the indications and used radioisotopes over the years. Relevance for Patients SIRT is a safe procedure with very low overall mortality and a well-definable spectrum of adverse events, particularly gastrointestinal. Complications are usually treatable or self-limiting. Acute liver failure is a potentially fatal but exceptionally rare complication. 166Ho has promising beneficial bio-physical characteristics and 166Ho-based SIRT should be further evaluated against 90Y-based SIRT as the current standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Mertens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
- Corresponding author: Alexander Mertens Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. Tel: +49 211 81 16630 Fax: +49 211 81 04489
| | - Tobias Essing
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
- Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, 90419 Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Peter Minko
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Kathrin Möllenhoff
- Mathematical Institute, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Katalin Mattes-György
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Frederik L. Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Tom Luedde
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christoph Roderburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Sven H. Loosen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Puleo L, Agate L, Bargellini I, Boni G, Piaggi P, Traino C, Depalo T, Lorenzoni G, Bianchi F, Volterrani D, Brogioni S, Bottici V, Brunetto MR, Coco B, Molinaro E, Elisei R. Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization for liver metastases from medullary thyroid cancer. Eur Thyroid J 2022; 11:e220130. [PMID: 36126186 PMCID: PMC9641787 DOI: 10.1530/etj-22-0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Liver metastases occur in 45% of patients with advanced metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has been proposed to treat liver metastases (LM), especially in neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the biochemical (calcitonin and carcino-embryonic antigen) and objective response of liver metastases from MTC to TARE. Methods TARE is an internal radiotherapy in which microspheres loaded with β-emitting yttrium-90 (90Y) are delivered into the hepatic arteries that supply blood to LM. Eight patients with progressive multiple LM underwent TARE and were followed prospectively. They were clinically, biochemically and radiologically evaluated at 1, 4, 12 and 18 months after TARE. Results Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to severe liver injury and death due to extrahepatic disease progression, respectively. One month after TARE, a statistically significant (P = 0.02) reduction of calcitonin was observed in all patients and remained clinically relevant during follow-up; reduction of CEA, although not significant, was found in all patients. Significant reduction of liver tumor mass was observed 1, 4 and 12 months after TARE (P = 0.007, P = 0.004, P = 0.002, respectively). After 1 month, three of six patients showed partial response (PR) and three of six stable disease (SD) according to RECIST 1.1, while five of six patients had a PR and one of six a SD according to mRECIST. The clinical response remained relevant 18 months after TARE. Excluding one patient, all others showed only a slight and transient increase in liver enzymes. Conclusions TARE is effective in LM treatment of MTC. The absence of severe complications and the good tolerability make TARE a valid therapeutic strategy when liver LM are multiple and progressive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Puleo
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
| | - Laura Agate
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
| | | | | | - Paolo Piaggi
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra Brogioni
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
| | - Valeria Bottici
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
| | | | - Barbara Coco
- Hepatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Elisei
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hosseini Shabanan S, Nezami N, Abdelsalam ME, Sheth RA, Odisio BC, Mahvash A, Habibollahi P. Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90 for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review on Post-Treatment Dosimetry and Concomitant Chemotherapy. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3825-3848. [PMID: 35735415 PMCID: PMC9222092 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (90Y)-loaded microspheres is increasingly used for the treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Dosimetry verifications post-treatment are required for a valid assessment of any dose-response relationship. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine how often clinics conducted post-treatment dosimetry verification to measure the actual radiation doses delivered to the tumor and to the normal liver in patients who underwent SIRT for ICC, and also to explore the corresponding dose-response relationship. We also investigated other factors that potentially affect treatment outcomes, including the type of microspheres used and concomitant chemotherapy. Out of the final 47 studies that entered our study, only four papers included post-treatment dosimetry studies after SIRT to quantitatively assess the radiation doses delivered. No study showed that one microsphere type provided a benefit over another, one study demonstrated better imaging-based response rates associated with the use of glass-based TheraSpheres, and two studies found similar toxicity profiles for different types of microspheres. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were the most common chemotherapeutic drugs for concomitant administration with SIRT. Future studies of SIRT for ICC should include dosimetry to optimize treatment planning and post-treatment radiation dosage measurements in order to reliably predict patient responses and liver toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
- Experimental Therapeutics Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Mohamed E. Abdelsalam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.E.A.); (R.A.S.); (B.C.O.); (A.M.)
| | - Rahul Anil Sheth
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.E.A.); (R.A.S.); (B.C.O.); (A.M.)
| | - Bruno C. Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.E.A.); (R.A.S.); (B.C.O.); (A.M.)
| | - Armeen Mahvash
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.E.A.); (R.A.S.); (B.C.O.); (A.M.)
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.E.A.); (R.A.S.); (B.C.O.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ytrrium-90 transarterial radioembolization in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:796-808. [PMID: 35013882 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02745-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) is a promising alternative strategy to treat liver tumors and liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC), as it selectively delivers radioactive isotopes to the tumor via the hepatic artery, sparring surrounding liver tissue. The landscape of TARE indications is constantly evolving. This strategy is considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver-confined disease and preserved liver function in whom neither TACE nor systemic therapy is possible. In patients with liver metastases from CRC, TARE is advised when other chemotherapeutic options have failed. Recent phase III trials have not succeeded to prove benefit in overall survival; however, it has helped to better understand the patients that may benefit from TARE based on subgroup analysis. New strategies and treatment combinations are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical applications of TARE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Guiu B, Garin E, Allimant C, Edeline J, Salem R. TARE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the Right to the Left of BCLC. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1599-1607. [PMID: 35149884 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03072-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system is the most commonly used staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Western countries. BCLC aims to categorize patients into five stages with different prognoses and to allocate treatment according to these stages based on the best possible contemporary evidence. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has recently entered at the left of the BCLC algorithm (i.e., BCLC 0-A), mainly because of negative phase III trials in BCLC C stage. TARE has shown a steady increase in nationwide studies over the past 20 years and has even been adopted in some tertiary centers as the primary HCC treatment across all BCLC stages. We aimed to review the history of TARE in HCC, starting from advanced HCC and gradually expanding to earlier stages at the left of the BCLC system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France.
| | - Etienne Garin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Carole Allimant
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Julien Edeline
- Department of Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gulec SA, McGoron AJ. Radiomicrosphere Dosimetry: Principles and Current State of the Art. Semin Nucl Med 2022; 52:215-228. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Webster LA, Villalobos A, Majdalany BS, Bercu ZL, Gandhi RT, Kokabi N. Standard Radiation Dosimetry Models: What Interventional Radiologists Need to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:405-411. [PMID: 34629706 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Thoughtful and accurate dosimetry is critical to obtain the safest and most efficacious yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers. Three dosimetry models are currently used in clinical practice, namely, body surface area model, medical internal radiation dose model, and the partition model. The objective of this review is to briefly outline the history behind Y90 dosimetry and the difference between the aforementioned models. When applying these three models to a single case, the differences between them are further demonstrated. Each dosimetry model in clinical practice has its own benefits and limitations. Therefore, it is incumbent upon practicing interventional radiologists to be aware of these differences to optimize treatment outcomes for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linzi Arndt Webster
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexander Villalobos
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bill S Majdalany
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zachary L Bercu
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ripal T Gandhi
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Murali N, Mouli SK, Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Extrahepatic Applications of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:479-481. [PMID: 34629717 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
While initially described and now accepted as treatment for primary and secondary malignancies in the liver, radioembolization therapy has expanded to include treatment for other disease pathologies and other organ systems. Advantages and limitations for these treatments exist and must be compared against more traditional treatments for these processes. This article provides an overview of the current applications for radioembolization outside of the liver, for both malignant and nonmalignant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikitha Murali
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Samdeep K Mouli
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ahsun Riaz
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sivananthan G, Tabori NE. Principles of Radioembolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:393-396. [PMID: 34629704 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Radioembolization has become a mainstay therapy in the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancers. This article will specifically discuss a brief history of yttrium treatment as well as an overview of the physical properties of the currently available devices. A discussion of the mechanism of action will be followed by a discussion on patient selection for this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gajan Sivananthan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Georgetown Medical School, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nora E Tabori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Georgetown Medical School, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sivananthan G, Tabori NE. Principles of Radioembolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021. [PMID: 34629704 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20200511-00237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Radioembolization has become a mainstay therapy in the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancers. This article will specifically discuss a brief history of yttrium treatment as well as an overview of the physical properties of the currently available devices. A discussion of the mechanism of action will be followed by a discussion on patient selection for this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gajan Sivananthan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Georgetown Medical School, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nora E Tabori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Georgetown Medical School, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Treatment response assessment following transarterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3596-3614. [PMID: 33909092 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03095-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres is an established therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Post-procedural imaging is important for the assessment of both treatment response and procedural complications. A variety of challenging treatment-specific imaging phenomena complicate imaging assessment, such as changes in tumoral size, tumoral and peritumoral enhancement, and extrahepatic complications. A review of the procedural steps, emerging variations, and timelines for post-treatment tumoral and extra-tumoral imaging changes are presented, which may aid the reporting radiologist in the interpretation of post-procedural imaging. Furthermore, a description of post-procedural complications and their significance is provided.
Collapse
|
15
|
Clinical outcome of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (Y-90 SIRT) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Experience from a tertiary care center. LIVER RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livres.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
16
|
Preston E, Shaida N. Selective internal radiation therapy in the management of primary and metastatic disease in the liver. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2021; 82:1-11. [PMID: 33646031 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy is a type of brachytherapy used to provide targeted radiotherapy, most commonly to treat primary or metastatic disease within the liver. This review outlines current clinical practice, dosimetric considerations, the pre-treatment workup and safety considerations before treatment. It also examines the clinical evidence for its use in patients with both primary and metastatic disease within the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Preston
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Nadeem Shaida
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aramburu J, Antón R, Rivas A, Ramos JC, Sangro B, Bilbao JI. Liver Radioembolization: An Analysis of Parameters that Influence the Catheter-Based Particle-Delivery via CFD. Curr Med Chem 2020; 27:1600-1615. [DOI: 10.2174/0929867325666180622145647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Radioembolization (RE) is a valuable treatment for liver cancer. It consists of administering
radioactive microspheres by an intra-arterially placed catheter with the aim of
lodging these microspheres, which are driven by the bloodstream, in the tumoral bed. Even
though it is a safe treatment, some radiation-induced complications may arise. In trying to
detect or solve the possible incidences that cause nontarget irradiation, simulating the particle-
hemodynamics in hepatic arteries during RE by computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
tools has become a valuable approach. This paper reviews the parameters that influence the
outcome of RE and that have been studied via numerical simulations. In this numerical approach,
the outcome of RE is regarded as successful if particles reach the artery branches that
feed tumor-bearing liver segments. Up to 10 parameters have been reviewed. The variation
of each parameter actually alters the hemodynamic pattern in the vicinities of the catheter tip
and locally alters the incorporation of the particles into the bloodstream. Therefore, in general,
the local influences of these parameters should result in global differences in terms of
particle distribution in the hepatic artery branches. However, it has been observed that under
some (qualitatively described) appropriate conditions where particles align with blood
streamlines, the local influence resulting from a variation of a given parameter vanishes and
no global differences are observed. Furthermore, the increasing number of CFD studies on
RE suggests that numerical simulations have become an invaluable research tool in the study
of RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Aramburu
- Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingenieros, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Raúl Antón
- Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingenieros, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Alejandro Rivas
- Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingenieros, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Juan C. Ramos
- Universidad de Navarra, TECNUN Escuela de Ingenieros, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I. Bilbao
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Birgin E, Rasbach E, Seyfried S, Rathmann N, Diehl SJ, Schoenberg SO, Reissfelder C, Rahbari NN. Contralateral Liver Hypertrophy and Oncological Outcome Following Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12020294. [PMID: 32012709 PMCID: PMC7072354 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization with 90Y-microspheres has been reported to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy with simultaneous ipsilateral control of tumor growth. The aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the evidence of contralateral liver hypertrophy and oncological outcome following unilateral treatment with radioembolization. A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries for studies published between 2008 and 2020 was performed. A total of 16 studies, comprising 602 patients, were included. The median kinetic growth rate per week of the contralateral liver lobe was 0.7% and declined slightly over time. The local tumor control was 84%. Surgical resection after radioembolization was carried out in 109 out of 362 patients (30%). Although the available data suggest that radioembolization prior to major hepatectomy is safe with a promising oncological outcome, the definitive role of radioembolization requires assessment within controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Erik Rasbach
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Nils Rathmann
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Steffen J. Diehl
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Stefan O. Schoenberg
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-621-383-3591
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
The current review documents the major hallmarks in the history and development of radioembolization, the origins of which date back to the late 1940s. Radioembolization was initially abandoned because of the increased incidence of adverse effects and lack of commercial interest; however, it regained avid interest in clinical trials and has achieved established clinical utility in the last 15 years. This review focuses on the main stations of the evolution of radioembolization, namely, initial animal and human experimental studies, production of Y-microspheres, development of current therapeutic agents (resin and glass spheres and labeled Lipiodol), prediction and prevention of inadvertent, extrahepatic shunt side effects, initial prospective studies, and large randomized trials till final approval from the relevant official bodies. The historical knowledge of the initial concepts of the method and the limitations encountered may pave the way toward further evolution and possible new applications.
Collapse
|
20
|
Rincón JO, Regi AR, Leyte MG, Martín LC, Pascual RP, Farto JCA. Hepatic supraselective radioembolization, today and new horizons. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2412-2413. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04492-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
21
|
Ludwig AD, Labadie KP, Seo YD, Hamlin DK, Nguyen HM, Mahadev VM, Yeung RS, Wilbur DS, Park JO. Yttrium-90-Labeled Anti-Glypican 3 Radioimmunotherapy Halts Tumor Growth in an Orthotopic Xenograft Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:4564707. [PMID: 31636665 PMCID: PMC6766125 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4564707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most lethal malignancy globally and is increasing in incidence in the United States. Unfortunately, there are few effective systemic treatment options, particularly for disseminated disease. Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a proteoglycan cell surface receptor overexpressed in most HCCs and provides a unique target for molecular therapies. We have previously demonstrated that PET imaging using a 89Zr-conjugated monoclonal anti-GPC3 antibody (αGPC3) can bind to minute tumors and allow imaging with high sensitivity and specificity in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model of HCC and that serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are highly correlated with tumor size in this model. In the present study, we conjugated 90Y, a high-energy beta-particle-emitting radionuclide, to our αGPC3 antibody to develop a novel antibody-directed radiotherapeutic approach for HCC. Luciferase-expressing HepG2 human hepatoblastoma cells were orthotopically implanted in the livers of athymic nude mice, and tumor establishment was verified at 6 weeks after implantation by bioluminescent imaging and serum AFP concentration. Tumor burden by bioluminescence and serum AFP concentration was highly correlated in our model. Yttrium-90 was conjugated to αGPC3 using the chelating agent 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and injected via the tail vein into the experimental mice at a dose of 200 μCi/mouse or 300 μCi/mouse. Control mice received DOTA-αGPC3 without radionuclide. At 30 days after a single dose of the radioimmunotherapy agent, mean serum AFP levels in control animals increased dramatically, while animals treated with 200 μCi only experienced a minor increase, indicating cessation of tumor growth, and animals treated with 300 μCi experienced a reduction in serum AFP concentration, indicating tumor shrinkage. Mean tumor-bearing liver weight in control animals was also significantly greater than that in animals that received either dose of 90Y-αGPC3. These results were achieved without significant toxicity as measured by body condition scoring and body weight. The results of this preclinical pilot demonstrate that GPC3 can be used as a target for radioimmunotherapy in an orthotopic mouse model of HCC and may be a target of clinical significance, particularly for disseminated HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D. Ludwig
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kevin P. Labadie
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Y. David Seo
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Donald K. Hamlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Holly M. Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Raymond S. Yeung
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - D. S. Wilbur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - James O. Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freeman LM, Blaufox MD. Letter from the Editors. Semin Nucl Med 2019; 49:167. [PMID: 30954180 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
23
|
Saini A, Wallace A, Alzubaidi S, Knuttinen MG, Naidu S, Sheth R, Albadawi H, Oklu R. History and Evolution of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8010055. [PMID: 30621040 PMCID: PMC6352151 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer and affects millions worldwide. Due to the lack of effective systemic therapies for HCC, researchers have been investigating the use of locoregional tumor control with Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization since the 1960s. Following the development of glass and resin Y90 microspheres in the early 1990s, Y90 radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with HCC across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. By demonstrating durable local control, good long term outcomes, and equivalent if not superior tumor responses and tolerability when compared to alternative therapies including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib, Y90 radioembolization is being increasingly used in HCC treatment. More recently, investigations into variations in Y90 radioembolization technique including radiation segmentectomy and radiation lobectomy have further expanded its clinical utility. Here, we discuss the history and evolution of Y90 use in HCC. We outline key clinical trials that have established the safety and efficacy of Y90 radioembolization, and also summarize trials comparing its efficacy to existing HCC treatments. We conclude by reviewing the techniques of radiation segmentectomy and lobectomy, and by discussing dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Saini
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Alex Wallace
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Sadeer Alzubaidi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - M Grace Knuttinen
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Sailendra Naidu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Rahul Sheth
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
| | - Hassan Albadawi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Rahmi Oklu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Interventional Radiologic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Where We Began to Where We Are Going. MOLECULAR AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21540-8_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
25
|
Voutsinas N, Lekperic S, Barazani S, Titano JJ, Heiba SI, Kim E. Treatment of Primary Liver Tumors and Liver Metastases, Part 1: Nuclear Medicine Techniques. J Nucl Med 2018; 59:1649-1654. [PMID: 30072501 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
90Y radioembolization is an increasingly used treatment for both primary and metastatic malignancy in the liver. Understanding the biophysical properties, dosing concerns, and imaging appearance of this treatment is important for interventional radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians to provide important therapy. 90Y radioembolization is efficacious and safe, although the possibility of complications does exist. This article provides a comprehensive in-depth discussion about the indications for 90Y radioembolization, reviews the role of preprocedural angiography and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin scans, illustrates different dosing techniques, compares and contrasts resin and glass microspheres, and describes potential complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Voutsinas
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Safet Lekperic
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Sharon Barazani
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Joseph J Titano
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Sherif I Heiba
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kis B, El-Haddad G, Sheth RA, Parikh NS, Ganguli S, Shyn PB, Choi J, Brown KT. Liver-Directed Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Control 2018; 24:1073274817729244. [PMID: 28975829 PMCID: PMC5937250 DOI: 10.1177/1073274817729244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) are primary liver cancers where all or most of the tumor burden is usually confined to the liver. Therefore, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease with minimal systemic side effects. The English medical literature and clinical trials were reviewed to provide a synopsis on the available liver-directed percutaneous therapies for HCC and IHC. Locoregional liver-directed therapies provide survival benefit for patients with HCC and IHC compared to best medical treatment and have lower comorbid risks compared to surgical resection. These treatment options should be considered, especially in patients with unresectable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bela Kis
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rahul A Sheth
- 2 Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nainesh S Parikh
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- 3 Center for Image Guided Cancer Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul B Shyn
- 4 Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Junsung Choi
- 1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Karen T Brown
- 5 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
The treatment of malignancies has undergone dramatic changes in the past few decades. Advances in drug delivery techniques and nanotechnology have allowed for new formulations of old drugs, so as to improve the pharmacokinetics, to enhance accumulation in solid tumors, and to reduce the significant toxic effects of these important therapeutic agents. Here, we review the published clinical data in cancer therapy of several major drug delivery systems, including targeted radionuclide therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, liposomes, polymer-drug conjugates, polymer implants, micelles, and nanoparticles. The clinical outcomes of these delivery systems from various phases of clinical trials are summarized. The success and limitations of the drug delivery strategies are discussed based on the clinical observations. In addition, the challenges in applying drug delivery for efficacious cancer therapy, including physical barriers, tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and metastasis, are discussed along with future perspectives of drug delivery in cancer therapy. In doing so, we intend to underscore that efficient delivery of cancer therapeutics to solid malignancies remains a major challenge in cancer therapy, and requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates knowledge from the diverse fields of chemistry, biology, engineering, and medicine. The overall objective of this review is to improve our understanding of the clinical fate of commonly investigated drug delivery strategies, and to identify the limitations that must be addressed in future drug delivery strategies, toward the pursuit of curative therapies for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng-Rong Lu
- Case Center for Biomolecular Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering , Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland , Ohio 44106 , United States
| | - Peter Qiao
- Case Center for Biomolecular Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering , Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland , Ohio 44106 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cao C, Yan TD, Morris DL, Bester L. Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Microspheres for Pancreatic Cancer Liver Metastases: Results from a Pilot Study. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/548.6515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Cao
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tristan D Yan
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lourens Bester
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Justinger C, Gruden J, Kouladouros K, Stravodimos C, Reimer P, Tannapfel A, Binnenhei M, Bentz M, Tatsch K, Rüdiger T, Schön MR. Histopathological changes resulting from selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:1084-1091. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Justinger
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | - Juliana Gruden
- Institute of Pathology; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | | | - Christos Stravodimos
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | - Peter Reimer
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Bentz
- Department of Oncology; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | - Klaus Tatsch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | - Thomas Rüdiger
- Institute of Pathology; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| | - Michael R. Schön
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery; Klinikum Karlsruhe; Karlsruhe Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Liver metastases are the most common cause of death in colorectal cancer patients. Nowadays, complete resection is considered to be the only curative treatment but only approximately 25% of patients are suitable candidates for surgery; therefore, many different interventional oncology techniques have been developed in recent years for the treatment of secondary liver metastases. The aim of interventional oncological procedures is either to provide a potentially curative treatment option for locally limited metastases with local ablative techniques, to enable nonresectable tumors to become accessible to surgical or local ablative techniques using transarterial procedures or to achieve improved survival in a palliative setting. These interventional therapies include transarterial approaches, such as chemoembolization and radioembolization as well as a multitude of different ablative techniques, such as radiofrequency and microwave ablation as well as irreversible electroporation (IRE). This article describes the indications for the various procedures and the clinical results of each of these techniques are reviewed based on the currently available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R-T Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Radiologische Diagnostik, Klinikum Carl-Gustav-Carus der TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Luna Pais H, Alho I, Vendrell I, Mansinho A, Costa L. Radionuclides in oncology clinical practice – review of the literature. Dalton Trans 2017; 46:14475-14487. [DOI: 10.1039/c7dt01929g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Radionuclide therapy is a promising type of targeted therapy for cancer and its use is becoming more common in several types of malignant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Luna Pais
- Medical Oncology Department
- Hospital de Santa Maria
- 1649-035 Lisbon
- Portugal
| | - Irina Alho
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular
- Faculdade de Medicina
- Universidade de Lisboa
- 1649-035 Lisbon
- Portugal
| | - Inês Vendrell
- Medical Oncology Department
- Hospital de Santa Maria
- 1649-035 Lisbon
- Portugal
| | - André Mansinho
- Medical Oncology Department
- Hospital de Santa Maria
- 1649-035 Lisbon
- Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Medical Oncology Department
- Hospital de Santa Maria
- 1649-035 Lisbon
- Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Impact of Yttrium-90 Microsphere Density, Flow Dynamics, and Administration Technique on Spatial Distribution: Analysis Using an In Vitro Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 28:260-268.e2. [PMID: 27641675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate material density, flow, and viscosity effects on microsphere distribution within an in vitro model designed to simulate hepatic arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS A vascular flow model was used to compare distribution of glass and resin surrogates in a clinically derived flow range (60-120 mL/min). Blood-mimicking fluid (BMF) composed of glycerol and water (20%-50% vol/vol) was used to simulate a range of blood viscosities. Microsphere distribution was quantified gravimetrically, and injectate solution was dyed to enable quantification by UV spectrophotometry. Microsphere injection rate (5-30 mL/min) and the influence of contrast agent dilution of injection solution (0%-60% vol/vol) were also investigated. RESULTS No significant differences in behavior were observed between the glass and resin surrogate materials under any tested flow conditions (P = .182; n = 144 injections). Microspheres tend to align more consistently with the saline injection solution (r2 = 0.5712; n = 144) compared with total BMF flow distribution (r2 = 0.0104; n = 144). The most predictable injectate distribution (ie, greatest alignment with BMF flow, < 5% variation) was demonstrated with > 10-mL/min injection rates of pure saline solution, although < 20% variation with glass microsphere distribution was observed with injection solution containing as much as 30% contrast medium when injected at > 20 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS Glass and resin yttrium-90 surrogates demonstrated similar distribution in a range of clinically relevant flow conditions, suggesting that microsphere density does not have a significant influence on microsphere distribution. Injection parameters that enhanced the mixing of the spheres with the BMF resulted in the most predictable distribution.
Collapse
|
33
|
Dai WC, Cheung TT. Strategic overview on the best treatment option for intrahepaitc hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:1063-72. [PMID: 27548586 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1226136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The long-term survival after hepatectomy for HCC remains unsatisfactory because of the high incidence of recurrence. The cumulative 5-year recurrence rate ranged from 60-100% in previous studies and majority of them remains intrahepatic recurrence. The therapeutic modalities commonly used for primary tumors, including surgical resection, liver transplantation, TACE, local ablative therapy and radiotherapy have been used to treat recurrent tumors in the liver remnant and the outcomes with the heterogeneous therapeutic options are reviewed. It is important to note that the level of evidence for most therapeutic options is limited to cohort investigations with few RCTs and most were limited due to enrollment of various tumor stages and did not compare treatment modalities for specific tumor stages. AREAS COVERED A literature search for recurrent HCC was performed using Medline and PubMed up to May 2016. Expert commentary: The long term survival results after re-resection for recurrent HCC were favourable and aggressive management of postoperative intrahepatic recurrence remains the most important strategy in prolonging the survival of patients after resection of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing Chiu Dai
- a Department of Surgery , The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- a Department of Surgery , The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Lee EW, Alanis L, Cho SK, Saab S. Yttrium-90 Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Glass Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current and Updated Literature Review. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17:472-88. [PMID: 27390539 PMCID: PMC4936170 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver cancer and it represents the majority of cancer-related deaths in the world. More than 70% of patients present at an advanced stage, beyond potentially curative options. Ytrrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (Y90-SIRT) with glass microspheres is rapidly gaining acceptance as a potential therapy for intermediate and advanced stage primary hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases. The technique involves delivery of Y90 infused glass microspheres via the hepatic arterial blood flow to the appropriate tumor. The liver tumor receives a highly concentrated radiation dose while sparing the healthy liver parenchyma due to its preferential blood supply from portal venous blood. There are two commercially available devices: TheraSphere® and SIR-Spheres®. Although, Y90-SIRT with glass microspheres improves median survival in patients with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and has the potential to downstage hepatocellular carcinoma so that the selected candidates meet the transplantable criteria, it has not gained widespread acceptance due to the lack of large randomized controlled trials. Currently, there are various clinical trials investigating the use of Y90-SIRT with glass microspheres for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and the outcomes of these trials may result in the incorporation of Y90-SIRT with glass microspheres into the treatment guidelines as a standard therapy option for patients with intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Wolfgang Lee
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Lourdes Alanis
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Sung-Ki Cho
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Sammy Saab
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Pfleger Liver Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mahnken AH. Current status of transarterial radioembolization. World J Radiol 2016; 8:449-459. [PMID: 27247711 PMCID: PMC4882402 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Unresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies present a major problem in the treatment of solid tumors. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an increasingly used technique for treating various types of malignant liver tumors. This approach is appealing, as the mechanism of action is independent from other loco-regional treatments and potentially complementary to systemic therapies. There are two commercially available products in use for TARE: 90Y-resin and 90Y-glass microspheres. Currently available data indicates TARE so be safe and effective in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic liver disease. In HCC the results compare well with chemoembolization, while the role of TARE in combination with kinase inhibitors has yet to be established. Current data on TARE in metastatic liver disease is promising, but there is a strong need for prospective randomized trials comparing TARE and modern chemotherapeutic regimen to support the growing role of TARE in metastatic liver disease.
Collapse
|
37
|
Kalantzis G, Leventouri T, Apte A, Shang C. A computational tool for patient specific dosimetry and radiobiological modeling of selective internal radiation therapy with (90)Y microspheres. Appl Radiat Isot 2015; 105:123-129. [PMID: 26296058 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Revised: 05/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
In recent years we have witnessed tremendous progress in selective internal radiation therapy. In clinical practice, quite often, radionuclide therapy is planned using simple models based on standard activity values or activity administered per unit body weight or surface area in spite of the admission that radiation-dose methods provide more accurate dosimetric results. To address that issue, the authors developed a Matlab-based computational software, named Patient Specific Yttrium-90 Dosimetry Toolkit (PSYDT). PSYDT was designed for patient specific voxel-based dosimetric calculations and radiobiological modeling of selective internal radiation therapy with (90)Y microspheres. The developed toolkit is composed of three dimensional dose calculations for both bremsstrahlung and beta emissions. Subsequently, radiobiological modeling is performed on a per-voxel basis and cumulative dose volume histograms (DVHs) are generated. In this report we describe the functionality and visualization features of PSYDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Kalantzis
- Florida Atlantic University, Department of Physics, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States
| | - Theodora Leventouri
- Florida Atlantic University, Department of Physics, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States
| | - Aditiya Apte
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, NY 10065, United States
| | - Charles Shang
- Florida Atlantic University, Department of Physics, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States; Lynn Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boca Raton, FL 33486, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeeva P Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
| | - Patrick D Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Duran R, Chapiro J, Schernthaner RE, Geschwind JFH. Systematic review of catheter-based intra-arterial therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: state of the art and future directions. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20140564. [PMID: 25978585 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Intra-arterial therapies (IATs) play a pivotal role in the management of patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies. The unique advantages of these treatments are their ability to selectively deliver a high dose of anticancer treatment while preserving healthy liver tissue. The proven efficacy of these catheter-based locoregional therapies in a highly systemic chemoresistant cancer such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), along with the minimally invasive nature of these treatments, quickly yielded wide acceptance in the medical community and revolutionized the field of Interventional Oncology. In this article, we describe the clinical rationale and background of catheter-based IATs. We provide an overview of clinical achievements of these treatments alone and in combination with sorafenib in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Duran
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - J Chapiro
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - R E Schernthaner
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - J-F H Geschwind
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Unresectable liver cancer presents a major problem in the treatment of solid tumors. Transarterial radioembolization is a modern approach toward primary and secondary liver malignancies. The mechanism of action is independent from other therapies that are based on ischemia or chemotoxicity. (90)Y-resin and (90)Y-glass microspheres are commercially available for transarterial radioembolization. Available data on the use of (90)Y-glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic disease indicate that this treatment is safe and effective. In hepatocellular carcinoma the results compare well with chemoembolization and might be considered more often. Current data in metastatic disease are promising, but there is a strong need for prospective randomized trials to identify the role of transarterial radioembolization with (90)Y-glass microspheres in metastatic liver disease.
Collapse
|
41
|
Kennedy AS, Ball D, Cohen SJ, Cohn M, Coldwell DM, Drooz A, Ehrenwald E, Kanani S, Rose SC, Nutting CW, Moeslein FM, Savin MA, Schirm S, Putnam SG, Sharma NK, Wang EA. Multicenter evaluation of the safety and efficacy of radioembolization in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases selected as candidates for (90)Y resin microspheres. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:134-42. [PMID: 25830033 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) was an investigator-initiated case-control study to assess the experience of 11 US centers who treated liver-dominant metastases from colorectal cancer (mCRC) using radioembolization [selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)] with yttrium-90-((90)Y)-labeled resin microspheres. METHODS Data from 606 consecutive patients who received radioembolization between July 2002 and December 2011 were collected by an independent research organization. Adverse events (AEs) and survival were compared across lines of treatment using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier estimates, respectively. RESULTS Patients received a median of 2 (range, 0-6) lines of prior chemotherapy; 35.1% had limited extrahepatic metastases. Median tumor-to-liver ratio and -activity administered at first procedure were 15% and 1.17 GBq, respectively. Hospital stay was <24 hours in 97.8% cases. Common grade ≥3 AEs over 184 days follow-up were: abdominal pain (6.1%), fatigue (5.5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5.4%), ascites (3.6%) and gastrointestinal ulceration (1.7%). There was no statistical difference in AEs across treatment lines (P>0.05). Median survivals [95% confidence interval (CI)] following radioembolization as a 2(nd)-line, 3(rd)-line, or 4(th)-plus line were 13.0 (range, 10.5-14.6), 9.0 (range, 7.8-11.0), and 8.1 (range, 6.4-9.3) months, respectively; and significantly prolonged in patients with ECOG 0 vs. ≥1 (P=0.009). Statistically significant independent variables for survival at radioembolization were: disease stage [extrahepatic metastases, extent of liver involvement (tumor-to-treated-liver ratio)], liver function (uncontrolled ascites, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase), leukocytes, and prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Radioembolization appears to have a favorable risk/benefit profile, even among mCRC patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Kennedy
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David Ball
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Steven J Cohen
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael Cohn
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Douglas M Coldwell
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Alain Drooz
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Eduardo Ehrenwald
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Samir Kanani
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Steven C Rose
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Charles W Nutting
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Fred M Moeslein
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael A Savin
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Sabine Schirm
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Samuel G Putnam
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Navesh K Sharma
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Eric A Wang
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA ; 10 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 11 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 12 Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Willatt J, Hannawa KK, Ruma JA, Frankel TL, Owen D, Barman PM. Image-guided therapies in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A multidisciplinary perspective. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:235-244. [PMID: 25729478 PMCID: PMC4342605 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i2.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2014] [Revised: 10/26/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to improvements in screening, detection, and treatments. Interventional techniques include thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization whilst stereotactic body radiation therapy also uses imaging to target the radiation. Both survival rates and cure rates have improved markedly since the introduction of these techniques. This review article describes the image guided techniques used for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Srinivas SM, Natarajan N, Kuroiwa J, Gallagher S, Nasr E, Shah SN, DiFilippo FP, Obuchowski N, Bazerbashi B, Yu N, McLennan G. Determination of Radiation Absorbed Dose to Primary Liver Tumors and Normal Liver Tissue Using Post-Radioembolization (90)Y PET. Front Oncol 2014; 4:255. [PMID: 25353006 PMCID: PMC4195277 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 ((90) Y) microspheres is becoming a more widely used transcatheter treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Using post-treatment (90) Y positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) scans, the distribution of microspheres within the liver can be determined and quantitatively assessed. We studied the radiation dose of (90) Y delivered to liver and treated tumors. METHODS This retrospective study of 56 patients with HCC, including analysis of 98 liver tumors, measured and correlated the dose of radiation delivered to liver tumors and normal liver tissue using glass microspheres (TheraSpheres(®)) to the frequency of complications with modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). (90) Y PET/CT and triphasic liver CT scans were used to contour treated tumor and normal liver regions and determine their respective activity concentrations. An absorbed dose factor was used to convert the measured activity concentration (Bq/mL) to an absorbed dose (Gy). RESULTS The 98 studied tumors received a mean dose of 169 Gy (mode 90-120 Gy; range 0-570 Gy). Tumor response by mRECIST criteria was performed for 48 tumors that had follow-up scans. There were 21 responders (mean dose 215 Gy) and 27 non-responders (mean dose 167 Gy). The association between mean tumor absorbed dose and response suggests a trend but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.099). Normal liver tissue received a mean dose of 67 Gy (mode 60-70 Gy; range 10-120 Gy). There was a statistically significant association between absorbed dose to normal liver and the presence of two or more severe complications (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION Our cohort of patients showed a possible dose-response trend for the tumors. Collateral dose to normal liver is non-trivial and can have clinical implications. These methods help us understand whether patient adverse events, treatment success, or treatment failure can be attributed to the dose that the tumor or normal liver received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam M Srinivas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Navin Natarajan
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Joshua Kuroiwa
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine , Athens, OH , USA
| | - Sean Gallagher
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine , Athens, OH , USA
| | - Elie Nasr
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Shetal N Shah
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Frank P DiFilippo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Nancy Obuchowski
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Bana Bazerbashi
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Naichang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| | - Gordon McLennan
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Raval M, Bande D, Pillai AK, Blaszkowsky LS, Ganguli S, Beg MS, Kalva SP. Yttrium-90 radioembolization of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2014; 4:120. [PMID: 25120951 PMCID: PMC4110696 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) result in substantial morbidity and mortality. The primary treatment is systemic chemotherapy, and in selected patients, surgical resection; however, for patients who are not surgical candidates and/or fail systemic chemotherapy, liver-directed therapies are increasingly being utilized. Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microsphere therapy, also known as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) or radioembolization, has proven to be effective in terms of extending time to progression of disease and also providing survival benefit. This review focuses on the use of Y-90 microsphere therapy in the treatment of liver metastases from CRC, including a comprehensive review of published clinical trials and prospective studies conducted thus far. We review the methodology, outcomes, and side effects of Y-90 microsphere therapy for metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir Raval
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Essentia Health , Fargo, ND , USA
| | - Dinesh Bande
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Sanford Health , Fargo, ND , USA ; Roger Maris Cancer Center , Fargo, ND , USA ; Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Dakota , Fargo, ND , USA
| | - Anil K Pillai
- Harold Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA ; Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center , Boston, MA , USA ; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA , USA ; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Suvranu Ganguli
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center , Boston, MA , USA ; Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA , USA ; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Muhammad S Beg
- Harold Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA ; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| | - Sanjeeva P Kalva
- Harold Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA ; Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rostambeigi N, Dekarske AS, Austin EE, Golzarian J, Cressman EN. Cost effectiveness of radioembolization compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25:1075-84. [PMID: 24861664 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2013] [Revised: 04/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess cost effectiveness of radioembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS The cost of radioembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization was determined based on Medicare reimbursements. Three patient subgroups were defined based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification system (A, B, or C). Efficacy and safety outcomes after each procedure were obtained from the literature. A Monte Carlo case-based simulation was designed for 60 months in 250 patients in each subgroup. Survival was calculated based on average survival from the literature and the Monte Carlo model. The primary outcome was the cost effectiveness of radioembolization over transarterial chemoembolization by considering calculated survival. RESULTS The costs approached $17,000 for transarterial chemoembolization versus $31,000 or $48,000 for unilobar or bilobar radioembolization, respectively. Based on the simulation, median estimated survival was greater with transarterial chemoembolization than radioembolization in BCLC-A and BCLC-B subgroups (40 months vs 30 months and 23 months vs 16 months, respectively, P = .001). However, in the BCLC-C subgroup, survival was greater with radioembolization than transarterial chemoembolization (13 months vs 17 months, P = .001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of radioembolization over transarterial chemoembolization in the BCLC-C subgroup was $360 per month. The results were dependent on bilobar versus unilobar radioembolization and the total number of radioembolization procedures. CONCLUSIONS The model suggests radioembolization costs may be justified for patients with BCLC-C disease, whereas radioembolization may not be cost effective in patients with BCLC-A disease; however, many patients with BCLC-C disease have extensive disease precluding locoregional therapies. Secondary considerations may determine treatment choice in more borderline patients (BCLC-B disease) because there is no persistent survival benefit with radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nassir Rostambeigi
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
| | - Adrienne S Dekarske
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Erin E Austin
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Erik N Cressman
- Department of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Salem R, Mazzaferro V, Sangro B. Yttrium 90 radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: biological lessons, current challenges, and clinical perspectives. Hepatology 2013; 58:2188-97. [PMID: 23512791 PMCID: PMC3732811 DOI: 10.1002/hep.26382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 03/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology and Division of Interventional Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Gastro-Intestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, National Cancer Institute, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, and Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Uliel L, Royal HD, Darcy MD, Zuckerman DA, Sharma A, Saad NE. From the Angio Suite to the γ-Camera: Vascular Mapping and 99mTc-MAA Hepatic Perfusion Imaging Before Liver Radioembolization—A Comprehensive Pictorial Review. J Nucl Med 2012; 53:1736-47. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.105361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
49
|
Samuelson SD, Louie JD, Sze DY. N-butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Embolization of Arterial Networks to Facilitate Hepatic Arterial Skeletonization before Radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 36:690-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0490-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2012] [Accepted: 08/27/2012] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
50
|
Kan RWM, Tsang SHY, Poon RTP, Cheung TT. Update on yttrium-90-based radio-embolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82:505-9. [PMID: 22747591 DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06121.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheter-based intra-arterial therapies provided effective tumour control for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma without distant metastasis. There was a renewed interest in the advancement of yttrium-90 radio-embolization. METHOD An extensive search on the MEDLINE databases identified seven case series and two comparative studies regarding yttrium-90 radio-embolization. RESULTS Case series on yttrium-90 radio-embolization indicated a tumour response rate that ranged from 20% to 70%, and median survival that ranged from 7.7 to 26.6 months. Two comparative studies did not demonstrate significant difference in terms of tumour response rate and survival. One of these comparative studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in treatment-related neutropaenia. CONCLUSION The current use of yttrium-90 radio-embolization was mainly based on small case series. Yttrium-90 radio-embolization seemed equivalent to conventional chemo-embolization in terms of tumour response rate and survival benefit. Emerging evidence suggested that yttrium-90 radio-embolization may have a more favourable side effects profile, in particular in reducing the chance of neutropaenia. Cost and logistics arrangement were two important considerations in generalizing the application of yttrium-90 radio-embolization.
Collapse
|