Effect of return hospital visits on economics of ambulatory surgery

Predictors of unanticipated admission following ambulatory surgery: a retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

The primary objectives of this historical case-control study were to evaluate the incidence of and reasons and risk factors for adult unanticipated admissions in three tertiary care Canadian hospitals following ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

A random sample of 200 patients requiring admission (cases) and 200 patients not requiring admission (controls) was taken from 20,657 ambulatory procedures was identified and compared. The following variables were included: demographics, reason for admission, type of anesthesia, surgical procedure, length of procedure, American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) classification, surgical completion time, pre-anesthesia clinic, medical history, medications (classes), and perioperative complications. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with unanticipated admissions.

RESULTS

The incidence of unanticipated admission following ambulatory surgery was 2.67%. The most common reasons for admission were surgical (40%), anesthetic (20%), and medical (19%). The following factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of unanticipated admission: length of surgery of one to three hours (odds ratio [OR] 16.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.10 to 67.99) and length of surgery more than three hours (OR 4.26; 95% CI 2.40 to 7.55); ASA class III (OR 4.60; 95% CI 1.81 to 11.68); ASA class IV (OR 6.51; 95% CI 1.66 to 25.59); advanced age (> 80 yr) (OR 5.41; 95% CI 1.54 to 19.01); and body mass index (BMI) of 30-35 (OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.31 to 6.04). Current smoking status was found to be associated with a decreased likelihood of unanticipated admission (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.83), as was monitored anesthesia care when compared with general anesthesia (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.68) and plastic (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.50), orthopedic (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.33), and dental/ear-nose-throat surgery (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83) when compared with general surgery. Other comorbid conditions did not impact unanticipated admission.

CONCLUSION

Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery occurs mainly due to surgical, anesthetic, and medical complications. Length of surgery more than one hour, high ASA class, advanced age, and increased BMI were all predictors. No specific comorbid illness was associated with an increased likelihood of unanticipated admission. These findings support continued use of the ASA classification as a marker of patient perioperative risk rather than attributing risk to a specific disease process.

Outcomes in day surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize and examine the updated published results on the outcome measures that can be used to assess the quality of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Major morbidity and mortality following ambulatory surgery is exceedingly low. Cancellations and delays may have a negative impact on the patients, healthcare personnel and the organizations. Minor cardiovascular adverse events are the most common intraoperatively and are associated with preexisting cardiovascular diseases and elderly patients. Respiratory events postoperatively are associated with obesity, smoking and asthma. Also, pain is a common cause for longer postoperative stay, unanticipated admission and readmission. Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurs in 30% of patients and strongly affects patient satisfaction. Furthermore, prolonged stays are mainly caused by surgical factors, or minor symptoms like pain or nausea. Surgical factors are also the main causes of unanticipated hospital admission. The type of surgery and the 24 h postoperative symptoms may affect the degree of return to daily living function. Also, patient satisfaction affects the outcome of healthcare and the use of healthcare services.

SUMMARY

Ambulatory surgery, as currently practiced, provides quality care that is cost-effective. Minor adverse events such as pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting are still common, and improvement could be targeted in these areas.

Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery

PURPOSE

Recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery are important components of the ambulatory surgery experience. This review provides contemporary perspectives on the issues of discharge criteria, fast-tracking, patient escort requirements, and driving after ambulatory anesthesia.

SOURCE

A search was performed in the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, MEDLINE(R), EMBASE(R), CINAHL, and PsycINFO, to review factors delaying discharge following ambulatory surgery. The following subject headings were used: "ambulatory surgery, discharge, recovery, car driving, escort, transport, fast tracking, patient discharge, recovery, transportation of patients, hospital discharge, recovery room, patient transport, hospital discharge, recovery room, anesthetic recovery, patient transport, ambulatory surgical procedures, patient discharge, recovery of function, automobile driving, patient escort service, recovery room". Using the same search engines, the following keywords were used: "fast tracking, recovery, and discharge".

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The current literature supports that discharge scoring systems may be useful to guide discharge following ambulatory surgery. While fast-tracking has become common in some centres, further studies are required to justify more routine implementation of this practice in the management of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Patients at low risk for urinary retention can be discharged home without voiding. Patients should not drive until at least 24 hr postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ensuring rapid postoperative recovery and safe discharge following ambulatory surgery are important components of the ambulatory surgical program. A clearly defined process should be established for each ambulatory surgical unit to ensure the safe and timely discharge of patients after anesthesia, in accordance with current best evidence.

Patient selection in ambulatory surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the evidence regarding decisions made in the perioperative management of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery for the following: the elderly, hyper-reactive airways disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, the ex-premature infant and the child with an upper respiratory infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Major morbidity and mortality following ambulatory surgery is exceedingly low. Minor adverse cardiac events during the intraoperative period are associated with hypertension and the elderly. Minor adverse respiratory events during the intraoperative period are associated with obesity. Respiratory events during the postoperative period are associated with obesity, smoking and asthma. Prolonged stays following ambulatory surgery are predominantly caused by surgical factors or minor symptoms such as pain or nausea. Surgical factors are also the main causes of unplanned admissions. Age greater than 85, significant co-morbidity and multiple admissions to hospital in the 6 months preceding ambulatory surgery, however, are associated with higher readmission rates.

SUMMARY

Evidence indicates that ambulatory anesthesia is currently very safe. Ambulatory surgery, however, is being offered to a population with increasing co-morbidity. As the population undergoing ambulatory surgery changes over time, the evidence regarding patient outcomes will need re-examination.

Outcome after regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting--is it really worth it?

Regional anaesthesia provides a continuum of perioperative care that includes perioperative pain management, decreased opioid requirements and decreased post-operative nausea and vomiting. In addition to these benefits, a wide variety of perioperative outcomes can be enhanced by utilizing regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting. Regional anaesthesia has been shown to improve the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, coagulative, immunological and cognitive functions and to be of benefit in an economic context. These improvements are particularly advantageous in caring for elderly and high-risk patient populations undergoing surgery. In addition, regional anaesthesia can facilitate early recovery with excellent post-operative analgesia and few side-effects, which may decrease overall operative costs. This chapter identifies important perioperative outcomes that may be positively influenced by the use of regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting.