The advanced practice nurse in gastroenterology. Identifying and comparing care interactions of nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists

Impact of nurse practitioner navigation on access to care for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive complaint that can negatively affect patients' quality of life and have serious complications if inadequately treated.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Facilitating prompt and efficient access to digestive care is imperative especially given the current burden of gastrointestinal diseases such as GERD.

METHODS

A clinical team conducted a quality improvement study in which a nurse practitioner (NP) navigator performed a preconsultation chart review for patients with refractory GERD referred to an Esophagus Center between August and December 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Based on preconsultation chart review, the NP navigator arranged for diagnostic testing and follow-up. Days from consultation to testing completion and establishment of plan were tracked and compared with historic controls. The NP navigator documented time spent for chart review and care coordination.

RESULTS

The median number of days from consultation to testing completion for patients who underwent NP navigation and required diagnostic testing (n = 26) was 33.5 as compared with 64.5 for historic controls who required testing but received usual care (n = 28) (p = .005). The median number of days from consultation to establishment of a management plan was 52 for patients who underwent NP navigation as compared with 97 for historic controls who did not (p = .005). The mean amount of time spent by the NP navigator for chart review and care coordination was 17.5 min (n = 30).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of NP navigators into gastroenterology practices offers a potential solution for timelier patient care delivery.

The Emerging Role of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in Liver Transplantation

The evolving role of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in the United States continues to progress. NP and PA responsibilities have expanded from primary care practices to medical and surgical specialties. They provide acute care in hospitals and intensive care units, and they serve as educators, lobbyists, and researchers. Questions have arisen from NP/PA leaders, physician leaders, and administrators on how to best implement a successful NP/PA model within their practice. This article reviews some common themes in the literature by looking at the current state of NP/PA practice, outlines some practice models established therein, and provides recommendations for implementing a successful NP/PA model in a liver transplant practice.

Nurse in patients' health status assessment: Data from a pilot study assessing agreement among nurse and gastroenterologist in computing IBD-clinical scores

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are chronic, systemic Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs) that need a multidisciplinary approach involving not only different medical specialists but also qualified nurses.

AIM

We evaluated the concordance between IBD-nurse and physician in computing Clinical Activity Scores in IBD-patients treated with biologics.

METHODS

We enrolled all consecutive IBD-patients treated with biologics in two referral centers for IBD-care. For each patient, a gastroenterologist and a nurse blindly filled-out a form to assess the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) in CD or the partial MAYO score in UC. All data were recorded to assess the beyond chance agreement (concordance) using the k statistic.

RESULTS

87 patients were enrolled. The agreement in all patients by k value was substantial (66%), ranging from moderate to substantial (95% CI from 51% to 80%). The main reason of disagreement was about the scoring of remission versus mild activity, and that of mild versus moderate activity, both in CD and UC. For the HBI, the best agreement was for well-being on the previous day (k 62%) and the least one for abdominal mass (k 35%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows an acceptable strength of agreement among nurse and gastroenterologist in evaluating the disease activity of IBD-patients through the calculation of clinical scores.

Reporting relationships of clinical nurse specialists in acute care

Reporting relationships between clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) and administrators (ADMs) can facilitate or constrain CNS practice and affect patient outcomes. Limited information is available comparing reporting relationships and perspectives of CNSs and ADMs.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to describe CNS and ADM reporting relationships and compare their perspectives about the activities and outcomes of CNS practice in acute care settings.

DESIGN

The present study uses a descriptive survey.

SETTING

Four healthcare organizations in the midwestern United States.

SAMPLE

Clinical nurse specialist participants (n = 30) were master's degree prepared and employed in an acute care setting. Administrator participants (n = 7) were responsible for supervision and evaluation of CNSs in their organization.

METHODS

Questionnaires were developed from literature and content review by experts. The CNS and ADM questionnaires contained separate sections for CNS and organization information with parallel construction of questions about CNS activities and outcomes.

FINDINGS

There was variability across organizations related to reporting relationships and structure of CNS work. No significant differences were found when comparing CNS and ADM perspectives of work activity proportions and the importance of 10 activities and 7 outcomes. The most important CNS activities included developing clinical protocols and guidelines, quality improvement, and coordination of care. The most important outcomes included evidence-based nursing care and skilled and competent nursing staff.

CONCLUSION

Comparing perspectives of work activity time, priority activities, and outcomes provides a basis for collaboration between CNSs and ADMs in reporting relationships.

IMPLICATIONS

Clinical nurse specialists should develop positive interactions and shared understanding with ADMs to improve effectiveness and enhance patient outcomes.

The clinical nurse specialist in chronic diseases

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE

The number of individuals with chronic illness is growing at an astonishing rate because of the rapid aging of the population and the increased longevity of persons with chronic conditions. Nurses in clinical nurse specialist (CNS) roles are well positioned and ideally suited to meet the needs of a growing population with chronic diseases; yet, to date, there has been no critical review of the CNS in chronic diseases.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

This article provides a critical review of the literature in order to better define and understand the CNS related to patients living with chronic illnesses (cardiovascular and oncology).

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT/INNOVATION

Using the guidelines of DiCenso et al (2005) for evaluating health services interventions, the literature was appraised in order to identify the characteristics of CNS roles, and the strengths and limitations of research about the effectiveness of CNS in chronic disease management.

IMPLICATIONS

Clinical nurse specialists with master's-level preparation provided high-quality and cost-effective care to patients with chronic diseases. The CNSs had a positive impact on patient, family, and healthcare team outcomes. Further evaluation of the CNS role in the research domain of practice is recommended.

Characteristics and role functions of advanced practice nurses in a tertiary pediatric setting

ISSUES AND PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics and role functions of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) in a tertiary pediatric setting.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This descriptive survey design used a convenience sample (N = 39) of APNs at The Children's Hospital in Denver. A 56-item survey asked participants to define their role by rating how often they performed various primary and specialty care functions.

RESULTS

Findings validated the notion that APNs combine expert knowledge and practice skills into a holistic framework to provide sick children and their families with a full range of comprehensive services across a variety of settings. APNs work collaboratively with physicians and other professionals and are an excellent resource for students.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Describing and characterizing how APNs contribute to and enhance the delivery of care help to clarify and authenticate the scope of practice of the pediatric acute care APN.

Capturing Reimbursement for Advanced Practice Nurse Services in Acute and Critical Care

Advanced practice nurses (APNs) have been affected positively and negatively by recent changes in the way hospitals are financed. Among these changes are the shift from cost-based reimbursement to a prospective payment system and increased opportunities for billing APN services under the physician payment system. Positive effects include the need for hospitals to decrease the length of stay of hospitalized patients, leading to jobs for APNs who make the hospital course and discharge more efficient. Negative effects include budget shortfalls that lead to layoffs. This article explains the current financial landscape, including phenomena that are impeding the billing of APN services, and recommends adjustments so that the APN role will be on firm financial footing.